Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
LetterLetter to the Editor

Reply: Bowel Obstruction as a Complication of Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy

Jonathan R. Strosberg, Taymeyah Al-Toubah and Ghassan El-Haddad
Journal of Nuclear Medicine September 2021, 62 (9) 1321; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.121.262340
Jonathan R. Strosberg
*H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research InstituteTampa, FloridaE-mail:
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: jonathan.strosberg@moffitt.org
Taymeyah Al-Toubah
*H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research InstituteTampa, FloridaE-mail:
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: jonathan.strosberg@moffitt.org
Ghassan El-Haddad
*H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research InstituteTampa, FloridaE-mail:
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: jonathan.strosberg@moffitt.org
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

REPLY: Dr. Wee and colleagues reviewed their database of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumor patients treated with 177Lu-DOTATATE and observed patterns of bowel obstruction very similar to those described in our study (1). These corroborating data significantly strengthen the evidence of a causal link between 177Lu-DOTATATE and risk of intestinal obstruction among patients with mesenteric or peritoneal disease. Fortunately, the increased use of high-sensitivity somatostatin receptor PET imaging (e.g., 68Ga-DOTATATE and 64Cu-DOTATATE PET) improves the ability of clinicians to identify peritoneal carcinomatosis and screen patients who are at risk for bowel obstruction.

What can be done to mitigate this complication? We have adopted a strategy of classifying mesenteric or peritoneal disease patterns as high or intermediate risk for intestinal obstruction. We define high risk as extensive peritoneal implants, omental caking, or mesenteric masses with significant bowel tethering causing symptoms of intermittent partial bowel obstruction. Intermediate risk is defined as scattered peritoneal or mesenteric metastases (greater than 10 but not innumerable), mesenteric mass with minimal bowel tethering, or implants in the rectovesical or rectouterine pouch.

Patients at high risk of obstruction are advised to pursue other second-line options such as everolimus, cytotoxic drugs, or (in select cases) debulking peritoneal or mesenteric surgery. We prophylactically treat intermediate-risk patients with corticosteroids after each cycle of 177Lu-DOTATATE based on the presumption that radiation-induced inflammation contributes to the obstructive process. The regimen we use generally consists of 8 mg of intravenous dexamethasone after completion of amino acid infusion followed the next day by a 3-wk oral dexamethasone taper starting at 4 mg by mouth daily. We acknowledge that evidence for the prophylactic use of corticosteroids remains theoretic, and that other regimens (such as solumedrol dose pack) may be equally effective or ineffective.

We have not observed any episodes of irreversible bowel obstruction occurring after 177Lu-DOTATATE since adopting these mitigation strategies. Hopefully, our real-world experience, combined with that of the Mayo Clinic, will help ensure that clinicians are cognizant of this potential complication and will stimulate further research into prevention strategies.

Footnotes

  • Published online July 8, 2021.

  • © 2021 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

REFERENCE

  1. 1.↵
    1. Strosberg JR,
    2. Al-Toubah T,
    3. Pellè E,
    4. et al
    . Risk of bowel obstruction in patients with mesenteric or peritoneal disease receiving peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. J Nucl Med. 2021;62:69–72.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 62 (9)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 62, Issue 9
September 1, 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Reply: Bowel Obstruction as a Complication of Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Reply: Bowel Obstruction as a Complication of Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy
Jonathan R. Strosberg, Taymeyah Al-Toubah, Ghassan El-Haddad
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Sep 2021, 62 (9) 1321; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.121.262340

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Reply: Bowel Obstruction as a Complication of Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy
Jonathan R. Strosberg, Taymeyah Al-Toubah, Ghassan El-Haddad
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Sep 2021, 62 (9) 1321; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.121.262340
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCE
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Reply to “The Value of Functional PET in Quantifying Neurotransmitter Dynamics”
  • Reply to “The Randomized, Phase 2 LuCAP Study”
  • Maintaining the Evidence for In Vivo Brain Estrogen Receptor Density by Neuroendocrine Aging and Relationships with Cognition and Symptomatology
Show more Letter to the Editor

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire