Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
LetterLetters to the Editor

Reply: The Importance of an Adequate Surgical Template During Salvage Lymph Node Dissection for Node-Recurrent Prostate Cancer

Wolfgang Peter Fendler and Andrea Farolfi
Journal of Nuclear Medicine July 2021, 62 (7) 1022; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.121.262271
Wolfgang Peter Fendler
*University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany E-mail:
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: wolfgang.fendler@uk-essen.de
Andrea Farolfi
*University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany E-mail:
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: wolfgang.fendler@uk-essen.de
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

REPLY: In line with the comments by Bravi et al. on our article (1), prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET demonstrated low sensitivity but high specificity and negative predictive value for the detection of pelvic nodal metastases, compared with histopathology, in a multicenter prospective phase III imaging study using blinded independent central reads (2). PSMA PET detection inversely correlates with the size of tumor deposits, and thus PET is prone to missing micrometastatic disease (3). Despite underestimation on a single-lesion level (4), PSMA PET positivity raises a red flag for diseased regions (1). Because nodal spread follows lymph drainage anatomy, PSMA PET guidance toward regions at risk seems feasible. The ongoing prospective ProsTone trial (NCT04271579) will assess whether unilateral pelvic lymph node dissection on the PSMA PET–positive side will lead to an improved trade-off between efficacy and toxicity by sparing potentially nondiseased contralateral nodal regions. We agree with Bravi and colleagues that suggesting the adoption of an adequate template will be key to maximizing the benefit for patients undergoing local salvage therapy. In addition, standardized reporting of PSMA PET using a rational anatomic framework together with implementation into clinical trials on local therapy will be key to defining the future role of PSMA PET in treatment guidance (5).

  • © 2021 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Farolfi A,
    2. Ilhan H,
    3. Gafita A,
    4. et al.
    Mapping prostate cancer lesions before and after unsuccessful salvage lymph node dissection using repeat PSMA PET. J Nucl Med. 2020;61:1037–1042.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Hope TA,
    2. Armstrong WR,
    3. Murthy V,
    4. et al.
    Accuracy of 68Ga-PSMA-11 for pelvic nodal metastasis detection prior to radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection: a multicenter prospective phase III imaging study [abstract]. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(15, suppl)5502.
    OpenUrl
  3. 3.↵
    1. Jilg CA,
    2. Drendel V,
    3. Rischke HC,
    4. et al.
    Detection rate of 18F-choline PET/CT and 68Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC PET/CT for prostate cancer lymph node metastases with direct link from PET to histopathology: dependence on the size of tumor deposits in lymph nodes. J Nucl Med. 2019;60:971–977.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Horn T,
    2. Krönke M,
    3. Rauscher I,
    4. et al.
    Single lesion on prostate-specific membrane antigen-ligand positron emission tomography and low prostate-specific antigen are prognostic factors for a favorable biochemical response to prostate-specific membrane antigen-targeted radioguided surgery in recurrent prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2019;76:517–523.
    OpenUrl
  5. 5.↵
    1. Eiber M,
    2. Herrmann K,
    3. Calais J,
    4. et al.
    Prostate Cancer Molecular Imaging Standardized Evaluation (PROMISE): proposed miTNM classification for the interpretation of PSMA-ligand PET/CT. J Nucl Med. 2018;59:469–478.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 62 (7)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 62, Issue 7
July 1, 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Reply: The Importance of an Adequate Surgical Template During Salvage Lymph Node Dissection for Node-Recurrent Prostate Cancer
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Reply: The Importance of an Adequate Surgical Template During Salvage Lymph Node Dissection for Node-Recurrent Prostate Cancer
Wolfgang Peter Fendler, Andrea Farolfi
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jul 2021, 62 (7) 1022; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.121.262271

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Reply: The Importance of an Adequate Surgical Template During Salvage Lymph Node Dissection for Node-Recurrent Prostate Cancer
Wolfgang Peter Fendler, Andrea Farolfi
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jul 2021, 62 (7) 1022; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.121.262271
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • REFERENCES
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Business Model Beats Science and Logic: Dosimetry and Paucity of Its Use
  • Determining PSMA-617 Mass and Molar Activity in Pluvicto Doses
  • The Value of Functional PET in Quantifying Neurotransmitter Dynamics
Show more Letters to the Editor

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire