Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleOncology

The Prognostic Value of Quantitative Bone SPECT/CT Before 223Ra Treatment in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

Helmut Dittmann, Sabine Kaltenbach, Matthias Weissinger, Francesco Fiz, Peter Martus, Maren Pritzkow, Juergen Kupferschlaeger and Christian la Fougère
Journal of Nuclear Medicine January 2021, 62 (1) 48-54; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.119.240408
Helmut Dittmann
1Department of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Molecular Imaging, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sabine Kaltenbach
1Department of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Molecular Imaging, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthias Weissinger
1Department of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Molecular Imaging, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Francesco Fiz
1Department of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Molecular Imaging, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter Martus
2Institute for Clinical Epidemiology and Applied Biometry, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maren Pritzkow
1Department of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Molecular Imaging, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Juergen Kupferschlaeger
1Department of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Molecular Imaging, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christian la Fougère
1Department of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Molecular Imaging, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
3iFIT Cluster of Excellence, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Visual Abstract

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Abstract

Radiolabeled bisphosphonates such as 99mTc-3,3-diphosphono-1,2-propanodicarboxylic acid (99mTc-DPD) typically show intense uptake in skeletal metastases from metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Extensive bone involvement is regarded as a risk factor for mCRPC patients treated with 223Ra-dichloride (223Ra). The aim of this study was to quantify 99mTc-DPD uptake by means of SPECT/CT before 223Ra and compare the results with the feasibility of treatment and overall survival (OS). Methods: Sixty consecutive mCRPC patients were prospectively included in this study. SPECT/CT of the central skeleton covering the skull to the mid-femoral level was performed before the first cycle of 223Ra. The bone compartment was defined by means of low-dose CT. Emission data were corrected for scatter, attenuation, and decay supplemented by resolution recovery using dedicated software. The Kaplan–Meier estimator, U test, and Cox regression analysis were used for statistics. Results: Total 99mTc-DPD uptake of the central skeleton varied between 11% and 56% of injected dose (%ID) or between 1.8 and 10.5 %ID/1,000 mL of bone volume (%ID/L). SUVmean ranged from 1.9 to 7.4, whereas the SUVmax range was 18–248. Patients unable to complete 223Ra treatment because of progression and/or cytopenia (n = 23) showed significantly higher uptake (31.9 vs. 25.4 %ID and 6.0 vs. 4.7 %ID/L; P < 0.02). OS after 223Ra (median, 15.2 mo) was reduced to 7.3 mo in cases of skeletal uptake that was 26 %ID or higher, as compared with 30.8 mo if lower than 26 %ID (P = 0.008). Similar results were obtained for %ID/L and SUVmean. SUVmax did not correlate with survival. %ID/L was identified as an independent prognostic factor for OS (hazard ratio, 1.381 per unit), along with number of previous treatment lines. Conclusion: Quantitative SPECT/CT of bone scans performed at baseline is prognostic for survival in mCRPC patients treated with 223Ra.

  • SPECT/CT
  • quantification
  • prostate cancer
  • bone scan
  • 223Ra

Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is a bone-dominant disease, with about 90% of patients affected by osseous involvement (1). Skeletal metastases are a major threat to patient quality of life because they cause pain, pathologic fractures, and neurologic dysfunction. Depletion of the hematopoietic marrow by tumor expansion is recognized as the major cause of cancer-specific death in mCRPC (2). To overcome this problem, various new treatments have been developed, including novel radiopharmaceuticals (3,4).

Bone scintigraphy using 99mTc-labeled bisphosphonates is still considered the standard of choice for imaging of bone metastases in mCRPC (5). With the introduction of SPECT/CT, sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy have been considerably improved as compared with 2-dimensional imaging (6). The extent of bone involvement is usually reported by applying qualitative or semiquantitative measures such as the number of lesions. PET/CT with Na18F is an alternative to bone scintigraphy that comes with superior image resolution and allows for absolute quantification (7). However, Na18F PET/CT suffers from limited availability and thus has not yet been recommended by guidelines (8). Moreover, it lacks reimbursement in most countries.

Osteotropic radiopharmaceuticals also allow for targeted irradiation following a theranostic approach (9). The α-emitter 223Ra-dichloride (223Ra) was shown to improve overall survival (OS) in mCRPC (10) and reduce skeleton-related events at favorable tolerability (11). Conversely, the optimal role of 223Ra in the growing instrumentarium against mCRPC has yet to be defined (12,13).

Earlier work has demonstrated that a high extent of bone involvement as identified by bone scans is a risk factor for patients with mCRPC. In the pivotal 223Ra trial, a large number of skeletal lesions was associated with an elevated risk for cytopenia (14). Although the rate of anemia was comparable between the 223Ra and placebo groups, thrombocytopenia was more frequent in the 223Ra group. High osseous tumor load as measured by Na18F PET/CT was shown to be associated with poor OS after 223Ra (15). More recently, semiautomated estimation of bone metastatic involvement, creating a bone scan index, has been shown to be related to poor survival in patients with great tumor burden (16,17). Since that approach involves only planar images, the projected 2-dimensional anatomy may be subject to summation artifacts (18). As a result, differentiation of metastases from normal bone can be challenging in advanced tumor spread, and a bone scan index might not be obtainable for all patients (17). Delineation of metastatic tumor load would be especially difficult in the case of a superscan finding (19).

Recent development has allowed for quantification of SPECT/CT data similar to PET/CT (20,21). Here, we report on quantitative bone SPECT/CT to analyze bisphosphonate uptake of the central skeleton. This approach is based on the notion that the higher the overall bone uptake is, the higher is the osteoblastic tumor load. We hypothesize that the resulting measure of bone metabolism may be prognostic in patients treated with 223Ra. A prospective clinical study was conceived, aiming to evaluate whether the results of quantitative bone scan imaging correlate with completion of the subsequent 223Ra treatment course and survival.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patient Population

This prospective, observational study included mCRPC patients with symptomatic osseous metastases referred to our institution for 223Ra treatment. A bone scan including quantitative SPECT/CT was planned for all individuals lacking a recent pretest (≤2 mo before the planned treatment). CT or MRI scans of the thorax, abdomen, and pelvis were obtained to evaluate visceral and lymph node involvement. Patients with lymph node metastases up to a maximum diameter of 3 cm were accepted, whereas patients with visceral metastasis were excluded. This study was conceived as part of an extensive clinical protocol on SPECT/CT quantification registered in the German Registry for Clinical Studies (DRKS00013571) (22). The study was approved by the institutional review board (decision 747/2014BO1), and all subjects gave written informed consent.

223Ra Treatment

223Ra treatment was scheduled as a series of 6 cycles at 4-wk intervals, with dose adapted to body weight (55 kBq/kg). In cases of cytopenia, subsequent cycles could be postponed up to week 8 from the previous dose to allow for recovery. 223Ra treatment was considered completed in patients who received 5–6 cycles. Serum prostate-specific antigen level and blood cell counts were collected at baseline, and blood cell counts were recorded approximately every 2 wk during treatment. Cytopenia was classified according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 4.03 (23). Since osseous progression and treatment-related hematotoxicity may lead to reduced blood cell numbers, distinction between these causes can be challenging or even impossible in individual cases. In practice, decreased blood cell levels are often caused by a combination of both. In this study, we report as cytopenia any reduction in blood cell elements corresponding to CTCAE grade 2 or higher, irrespective of its possible cause.

Bone Imaging

Imaging was performed within 30 d before the first cycle of 223Ra. Patients received, on average, 632 ± 56 MBq of 99mTc-3,3-diphosphono-1,2-propanodicarboxylic acid (99mTc-DPD) (CIS Bio International) intravenously. A dual-detector SPECT/CT camera (Discovery NM/CT 670 Pro; GE Healthcare) was used throughout. Approximately 3 h from 99mTc-DPD injection, planar images of the whole body were acquired in anterior and posterior views (table feed, 15 cm/min of acquisition; 1,028 × 256 matrix) followed by SPECT/CT. For the SPECT acquisition, the camera heads were in H-mode. There were 3 fields of view covering the skull to the mid-femoral level, with the arms adducted laterally to the body. The matrix was 128 × 128 matrix. Thirty steps were used, with a 15-s acquisition per step. Images were reconstructed using iterative ordered-subset expectation maximization (4 iterations and 10 subsets) without pre- or postfiltering. Then, a non–contrast-enhanced CT scan (dose–length product, 358–462 mGy-cm; 120 kV; slice thickness, 2.5 mm) was obtained for attenuation correction and anatomic mapping. Finally, the reconstructed SPECT data were coregistered with the CT images on a dedicated workstation (Xeleris 4; GE Healthcare). The images were read by 2 experienced nuclear medicine specialists. On planar whole-body images, focal areas of increased uptake suggestive of osseous metastasis were recorded and classified as fewer than 6 lesions, 6–20, more than 20, or superscan (diffuse, intense skeletal uptake without renal and background radioactivity).

Quantification

To quantify 99mTc-DPD uptake, tomographic SPECT data were corrected for attenuation, scatter, and resolution recovery using a dedicated software algorithm (Evolution; GE Healthcare). SPECT/CT of a cylindric phantom (21 cm in diameter and 20 cm in height) filled with 99mTc and water at a known activity concentration was used to calculate system sensitivity. This procedure was repeated after each system calibration (uniformity, energy, linearity) every 6 mo. In addition, planar sensitivity using a point source was measured weekly to define a reference value (tolerance ± 5%).

Volumes of interest were defined by means of a proprietary semiautomatic segmentation application (Q.metrix; GE Healthcare). At first, the skeletal bone compartment was delineated using CT-measured density (lower threshold, +200 Hounsfield units). Areas outside the skeletal compartment, such as vessel calcifications, were meticulously reviewed and manually excluded. The resulting volume of interest thus represented the entire central skeleton compartment from the skull to the mid-femoral level. Then, the following measures of tracer uptake in the bone volumes of interest were extracted: percentage injected dose (%ID), %ID per 1,000-mL bone volume (%ID/L), SUVmean, and the SUVmax in any of a patient’s tumor lesions.

Statistics

Differences in parameters between patient groups (complete vs. incomplete 223Ra treatment) were compared using the Mann–Whitney U test. The Kaplan–Meier estimator and log rank test were used to assess patients’ survival fraction categorized for quantitative SPECT/CT variables. Receiver-operating-characteristic analysis was executed to analyze the performance of SPECT/CT to prognosticate early death and incomplete treatment. Simple and multiple Cox regression proportional-hazards analysis and logistic regression were performed to analyze the influence of variables on OS and treatment completion. Stepwise-forward variable selection was applied with inclusion and exclusion probabilities of 0.05 and 0.10, respectively. All analyses were performed using SPSS software (version 25; IBM). An α-level of 0.05 (2-sided) was considered significant. No correction for multiple testing was performed.

RESULTS

223Ra Treatment and Follow-up

From March 2015 until June 2018, 65 consecutive patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria for this study and subsequently received at least one cycle of 223Ra. Sixty of these individuals could be included. Four patients were excluded because they lacked or had incomplete SPECT/CT data, and one patient was excluded because SPECT/CT could be performed only after the first 223Ra cycle. The clinical characteristics of the patients are shown in Table 1. The mean follow-up after 223Ra treatment was 13.6 mo (range, 1–42 mo). Thirty-five patients died during the study period. Median OS since the first 223Ra therapy cycle was 15.2 mo. Moderately decreased blood cell counts corresponding to CTCAE grade 2 were present in 7 patients before 223Ra (Table 1), whereas most patients had no relevant myelosuppression. New-onset cytopenia of CTCAE grades 2–4 was observed in 21 of 53 patients (38.6%; 95% CI, 26.5%–54.0%) during 223Ra. Severe myelosuppression, grades 3–4, developed in 10 patients (n = 9 newly evolved [6 anemias, 0 thrombocytopenia, 2 neutropenias, 1 leukopenia]; n = 1 aggravation of preexisting bicytopenia in erythrocytes and platelets [17%; 95% CI, 8.1–29.9]). The scheduled 223Ra course could be completed in 36 of 60 individuals, with 279 cycles applied in total (6 cycles, n = 36; 4 cycles, n = 6; 3 cycles, n = 7; 2 cycles, n = 7; 1 cycle, n = 4). Reasons for early termination (prevalence, 40%; 95% CI, 27.6%–53.5%) were tumor progression (n = 15), cytopenia of grade 3 or 4 (n = 5), or a combination of both (n = 3). In one patient without evidence of myelosuppression or progression, 223Ra was terminated after 4 cycles following a novel reported contraindication against the combination of 223Ra with abiraterone and prednisolone. This case was excluded from analyses stratified for completed versus incomplete 223Ra treatment. In total, 13 patients continued abiraterone or enzalutamide under 223Ra before the contraindication for combination treatment was reported in November 2017. No patient received 223Ra combined with novel antiandrogens during the remaining study period. Two patients developed pathologic fractures during 223Ra treatment (1 on 223Ra monotherapy, 1 on 223Ra plus abiraterone), both of which were assigned to additional external-beam irradiation before 223Ra was resumed.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

Baseline Characteristics of Patients

Quantitative 99mTc-DPD Uptake as Prognosticator of Survival

Planar whole-body scans revealed increased uptake in osseous metastases in all cases. Most scans visualized multiple bone lesions with increased tracer uptake, classified as either more than 20 lesions or superscan in about two thirds of patients (Table 1). Quantification showed a mean total 99mTc-DPD uptake of 27.8 %ID in the central skeleton, or 5.2 %ID/L (Table 2), with considerable variance between individuals. The mean 99mTc-DPD uptake was calculated to have an SUVmean of 4.1. Tumoral SUVmax showed particularly high variability in our patient cohort. Typical clinical examples are shown in Figures 1 and 2.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2

Quantitative SPECT/CT Results for Bone Scans Before 223Ra Treatment

FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

Bone compartment as defined by CT and quantitative data for 99mTc-DPD uptake in a mCRPC patient with osseous metastases. The image shows a screenshot of the output generated using the semiautomatic segmentation application. Images show central coronal, sagittal, and transaxial CT slices (upper row) and SPECT slices (lower row) with superposed bone compartment VOI (green). cnt = counts; NM = nuclear medicine; MIP = maximum-intensity projection; SUVbw = SUV normalized to patient body weight.

FIGURE 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2.

Typical case studies in 2 patients with disseminated bone metastasis. Quantitative SPECT/CT revealed low to moderate parameters of 99mTc-DPD uptake except for pronounced SUVmax in patient A, whereas all measures were markedly high in patient B. Both patients subsequently received 6 cycles of 223Ra. OS in patient A (85 y old) was 13 mo, whereas patient B (72 y old) survived for only 7 mo after start of 223Ra.

Kaplan–Meier analyses with thresholds set to median revealed a significantly shortened OS of 7.3 mo in patients with at least 26 %ID or more than 4.5 %ID/L (Fig. 3). The cohort of individuals with lower total uptake had a favorable survival of 30.8 and 19.6 mo, instead. A similar trend was also seen for SUVmean, with a threshold of 3.9 (7.3 vs. 17.8 mo). In contrast, SUVmax was not associated with survival. The 1-y OS rate after the start of 223Ra was 55% (n = 29/53, 7 censored). Receiver-operating-characteristic analysis of SPECT/CT variables demonstrated that high %ID and %ID/L were moderately accurate for prognosticating death during the first year (Fig. 4). SUVmean showed only a trend for connection with first-year mortality, whereas SUVmax was not linked with early death.

FIGURE 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 3.

Kaplan–Meier analysis of OS since start of 223Ra treatment, stratified for quantitative SPECT/CT measures of 99mTc-DPD uptake. Cum = cumulative.

FIGURE 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 4.

Receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) analyses showing sensitivity and specificity of quantitative SPECT/CT variables in prognosticating death within first year after 223Ra. CI = confidence interval.

Quantitative SPECT/CT variables and clinical characteristics (age, prostate-specific antigen level, tumor load categories, prior chemotherapy, number of previous treatment lines for mCRPC) were included as candidates in a Cox regression model for prediction of OS. Because prostate-specific antigen level was not distributed normally, decadic logarithm prostate-specific antigen was used instead. At univariate regression analyses, %ID, %ID/L, extent of bone disease, number of previous treatment cycles for mCRPC, and history of chemotherapy were significantly associated with OS. Multiple Cox regression identified %ID/L and the number of previous therapy lines for mCRPC as independent predictors of survival (Table 3).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 3

Cox Proportional Hazards Regression Analysis on Association of Multiple Variables and OS after 223Ra Treatment

Early Termination Versus Completed 223Ra Treatment

Median OS was only 5.8 mo in patients unable to complete the full 223Ra treatment because of progression and/or cytopenia (n = 23), whereas patients who received the complete course had a median survival of 30.8 mo (P < 0.001). Patients with early terminated treatment showed a significantly higher total 99mTc-DPD uptake (mean, 31.9 %ID vs. 25.4 [P = 0.017]; %ID/L, 6.0 vs. 4.7 [P = 0.014]), whereas SUVmean or SUVmax did not statistically differ between groups. Receiver-operating-characteristic analysis demonstrated an association of %ID and %ID/L with incomplete 223Ra, though considerable overlap limited discrimination from patients able to receive full treatment (Fig. 5). Univariate regression analysis demonstrated %ID/L and the number of previous treatment lines as predictors of incomplete 223Ra therapy (Table 4). Multiple logistic regression identified %ID/L as the sole independent predictor of incomplete 223Ra treatment.

FIGURE 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 5.

Receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) analyses showing sensitivity and specificity of quantitative SPECT/CT variables in prognosticating failure to complete subsequent 223Ra therapy. CI = confidence interval.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 4

Logistic Regression Analysis for Incomplete 223Ra Therapy Depending on Multiple Variables

DISCUSSION

Quantitative measures of bone metastatic disease are desirable for risk stratification in patients considered for 223Ra treatment. The current prospective study on quantitative bone scan SPECT/CT demonstrated shortened OS for mCRPC patients with high bisphosphonate uptake before 223Ra. All measures of average bone uptake in the central skeleton (%ID, %ID/L, and SUVmean) were associated with survival. In particular, %ID at a threshold of 26 or higher showed the strongest separation of prognostic groups (7.3 mo vs. >30 mo survival). Multiple regression identified %ID/L as an independent prognostic variable of OS along with the number of previous treatment lines. Furthermore, high uptake was associated with inability to complete the planned 223Ra sequence, due to progression or cytopenia. In fact, %ID/L was the only independent prognosticator of completion failure at multivariate analysis. The observed relations should not lead to denial of 223Ra treatment, as patients unable to complete the course may still benefit from 223Ra. Although overlap between prognostic groups may limit the use of quantitation for individual decision making, risk stratification could be helpful for clinical studies on mCRPC treatment. In contrast, SUVmax of the most intensive lesion seems to be independent of cumulative tumor load. According to Na18F PET/CT (15) and the current results, SUVmax did not correlate with survival. Thus, maximum uptake does not seem to be of value for defining a reference lesion that might prognosticate outcome.

Our results correspond to the findings of retrospective studies demonstrating poor survival in patients with an extensive metastatic burden expressed as a bone scan index (17) or high tumor volume estimated by quantitative Na18F PET/CT (15). Recently, a similar approach has been suggested using quantification by SPECT/CT of bone scans (24). It has also been shown that bisphosphonate uptake as measured by quantitative SPECT/CT closely correlates with that of Na18F (25). The methodology in the previous studies differed from our approach in that cutoffs, based on either SUV or count rates, were hitherto used to separate metastatic from normal bone so as to define the osseous tumor load. Overlap between uptake of normal and metastatic bone (26) is a potential limitation of cutoffs that may lead to false-positive results. This limitation might be circumvented using a relatively high cutoff, possibly at the price of underestimating tumor volume. In addition, cutoffs will have to be individually established for the scanner used for imaging (27). By omitting any cutoff, our approach does not call for individual adaptation and should be independent of scanner features. Obviously, the presented method does not provide a measure of tumor volume.

Median OS in our cohort was in keeping with the results of the pivotal phase III trial (15.2 vs. 14.9 mo) (10). Compared with the latter, the proportion of patients with extensive bone disease (i.e., more than 20 tumor lesions or a superscan) was considerably higher in the current study (65 vs. 41%). The equal outcome in our study may be due to the availability of treatment options introduced since the previous trial—treatments that may be used after 223Ra—particularly abiraterone and enzalutamide. In comparison, OS was shorter in the retrospective studies of PET/CT (15) and bone imaging (17). Most probably, this shorter OS might be explained by more advanced tumor burden.

Because mathematic tumor models suggest that 223Ra targets only a fraction of bone tumor areas (28), there is a need to improve our understanding of 223Ra distribution. Imaging with 223Ra for the purpose of dosimetry is limited by the low number of photons (29). It has been shown that uptake of bisphosphonates correlates to that of 223Ra (30). Though quantitative SPECT/CT cannot be used to clarify the unknown microdistribution, it is obvious that further studies should address individual dosimetry in patients with advanced disease.

Recently, the indication for 223Ra was restricted by the European Medicines Agency, because in a prospective study the combination of 223Ra with abiraterone and prednisone or prednisolone was associated with an increased risk for fractures (31). Since no quantitative analysis of bone scans was performed in this study, one can only speculate about the potential influence of bisphosphonate uptake.

Our study had some limitations. It included a relatively small cohort of patients; thus, it has to be considered hypothesis-generating, and a larger study is desirable to confirm the results. However, we could include all patients in the observational period and thus should not expect bias in the selection of our sample. Because of the small absolute number of grade 3–4 cytopenia, our study was not powered to explore the relationship between quantitative imaging parameters and clinically relevant myelosuppression. In the current study, alkaline phosphatase, a potential risk factor for survival in mCRPC patients (32), was not systematically recorded at baseline; thus, it could not be included in the multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

This study indicated that bisphosphonate uptake of the central skeleton as quantified by SPECT/CT before 223Ra is prognostic of outcome. Our results should encourage further studies on possible prognostic markers including tumor-volume–based quantitation to identify the best approach for risk stratification in mCRPC.

DISCLOSURE

This study was in part funded by a grant from GE Healthcare to Christian la Fougère. Helmut Dittmann and Christian la Fougère received honoraria from Bayer Pharmaceuticals for advisory boards and training lectures on the use of 223Ra. No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

KEY POINTS

  • QUESTION: Is baseline bone scan quantification by SPECT/CT associated with survival in patients starting 223Ra treatment?

  • PERTINENT FINDINGS: In a prospective clinical cohort study of 60 mCRPC patients assigned for 223Ra treatment, a high total skeletal bisphosphonate uptake at baseline was associated with significantly shortened survival. Conversely, survival of patients with low uptake was superior to that observed in earlier studies.

  • IMPLICATIONS FOR PATIENT CARE: Quantitative bone scan SPECT/CT may be useful for risk stratification in mCRPC.

Footnotes

  • Published online May 22, 2020.

  • © 2021 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Bubendorf L,
    2. Schopfer A,
    3. Wagner U,
    4. et al
    . Metastatic patterns of prostate cancer: an autopsy study of 1,589 patients. Hum Pathol. 2000;31:578–583.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Riihimäki M,
    2. Thomsen H,
    3. Brandt A,
    4. Sundquist J,
    5. Hemminki K
    . What do prostate cancer patients die of? Oncologist. 2011;16:175–181.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Chandrasekar T,
    2. Yang JC,
    3. Gao AC,
    4. Evans CP
    . Mechanisms of resistance in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Transl Androl Urol. 2015;4:365–380.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  4. 4.↵
    1. Cornford P,
    2. Bellmunt J,
    3. Bolla M,
    4. et al
    . EAU-ESTRO-SIOG guidelines on prostate cancer. Part II: treatment of relapsing, metastatic, and castration-resistant prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2017;71:630–642.
    OpenUrl
  5. 5.↵
    1. Scher HI,
    2. Morris MJ,
    3. Stadler WM,
    4. et al
    . Trial design and objectives for castration-resistant prostate cancer: updated recommendations from the prostate cancer clinical trials working group 3. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:1402–1418.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Helyar V,
    2. Mohan HK,
    3. Barwick T,
    4. et al
    . The added value of multislice SPECT/CT in patients with equivocal bony metastasis from carcinoma of the prostate. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010;37:706–713.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Bastawrous S,
    2. Bhargava P,
    3. Behnia F,
    4. Djang DS,
    5. Haseley DR
    . Newer PET application with an old tracer: role of 18F-NaF skeletal PET/CT in oncologic practice. Radiographics. 2014;34:1295–1316.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Mohler JL,
    2. Armstrong AJ,
    3. Bahnson RR,
    4. et al
    . Prostate cancer, version 1.2016. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2016;14:19–30.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Goyal J,
    2. Antonarakis ES
    . Bone-targeting radiopharmaceuticals for the treatment of prostate cancer with bone metastases. Cancer Lett. 2012;323:135–146.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Parker C,
    2. Nilsson S,
    3. Heinrich D,
    4. et al
    . Alpha emitter radium-223 and survival in metastatic prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:213–223.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Sartor O,
    2. Coleman R,
    3. Nilsson S,
    4. et al
    . Effect of radium-223 dichloride on symptomatic skeletal events in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer and bone metastases: results from a phase 3, double-blind, randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:738–746.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Jacene H,
    2. Gomella L,
    3. Yu EY,
    4. Rohren EM
    . Hematologic toxicity from radium-223 therapy for bone metastases in castration-resistant prostate cancer: risk factors and practical considerations. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2018;16:e919–e926.
    OpenUrl
  13. 13.↵
    1. Den RB,
    2. George D,
    3. Pieczonka C,
    4. McNamara M
    . Ra-223 treatment for bone metastases in castrate-resistant prostate cancer: practical management issues for patient selection. Am J Clin Oncol. 2019;42:399–406.
    OpenUrl
  14. 14.↵
    1. Vogelzang NJ,
    2. Coleman RE,
    3. Michalski JM,
    4. et al
    . Hematologic safety of radium-223 dichloride: baseline prognostic factors associated with myelosuppression in the ALSYMPCA trial. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2017;15:42–52.e8.
    OpenUrl
  15. 15.↵
    1. Etchebehere EC,
    2. Araujo JC,
    3. Fox PS,
    4. Swanston NM,
    5. Macapinlac HA,
    6. Rohren EM
    . Prognostic factors in patients treated with 223Ra: the role of skeletal tumor burden on baseline 18F-fluoride PET/CT in predicting overall survival. J Nucl Med. 2015;56:1177–1184.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Ulmert D,
    2. Kaboteh R,
    3. Fox JJ,
    4. et al
    . A novel automated platform for quantifying the extent of skeletal tumour involvement in prostate cancer patients using the bone scan index. Eur Urol. 2012;62:78–84.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Fosbøl MØ,
    2. Petersen PM,
    3. Kjaer A,
    4. Mortensen J
    . 223Ra therapy of advanced metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: quantitative assessment of skeletal tumor burden for prognostication of clinical outcome and hematologic toxicity. J Nucl Med. 2018;59:596–602.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Agrawal K,
    2. Marafi F,
    3. Gnanasegaran G,
    4. Van der Wall H,
    5. Fogelman I
    . Pitfalls and limitations of radionuclide planar and hybrid bone imaging. Semin Nucl Med. 2015;45:347–372.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Constable AR,
    2. Cranage RW
    . Recognition of the superscan in prostatic bone scintigraphy. Br J Radiol. 1981;54:122–125.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Bailey DL,
    2. Willowson KP
    . Quantitative SPECT/CT: SPECT joins PET as a quantitative imaging modality. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014;41(suppl 1):S17–S25.
    OpenUrl
  21. 21.↵
    1. Bailey DL,
    2. Willowson KP
    . An evidence-based review of quantitative SPECT imaging and potential clinical applications. J Nucl Med. 2013;54:83–89.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    Home page. DRKS: German Clinical Trials Register website. https://www.drks.de. Updated July 31, 2020. Accessed August 5, 2020.
  23. 23.↵
    CTCAE files. National Cancer Institute Enterprise Vocabulary Services website. https://evs.nci.nih.gov/ftp1/CTCAE/About.html. Accessed August 5, 2020.
  24. 24.↵
    1. Umeda T,
    2. Koizumi M,
    3. Fukai S,
    4. et al
    . Evaluation of bone metastatic burden by bone SPECT/CT in metastatic prostate cancer patients: defining threshold value for total bone uptake and assessment in radium-223 treated patients. Ann Nucl Med. 2018;32:105–113.
    OpenUrl
  25. 25.↵
    1. Arvola S,
    2. Jambor I,
    3. Kuisma A,
    4. et al
    . Comparison of standardized uptake values between 99mTc-HDP SPECT/CT and 18F-NaF PET/CT in bone metastases of breast and prostate cancer. EJNMMI Res. 2019;9:6.
    OpenUrl
  26. 26.↵
    1. Kuji I,
    2. Yamane T,
    3. Seto A,
    4. Yasumizu Y,
    5. Shirotake S,
    6. Oyama M
    . Skeletal standardized uptake values obtained by quantitative SPECT/CT as an osteoblastic biomarker for the discrimination of active bone metastasis in prostate cancer. Eur J Hybrid Imaging. 2017;1:2.
    OpenUrl
  27. 27.↵
    1. Matheoud R,
    2. Goertzen AL,
    3. Vigna L,
    4. Ducharme J,
    5. Sacchetti G,
    6. Brambilla M
    . Five-year experience of quality control for a 3D LSO-based whole-body PET scanner: results and considerations. Phys Med. 2012;28:210–220.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Moreira HMR,
    2. Guerra Liberal FDC,
    3. O’Sullivan JM,
    4. McMahon SJ,
    5. Prise KM
    . Mechanistic modeling of radium-223 treatment of bone metastases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019;103:1221–1230.
    OpenUrl
  29. 29.↵
    1. Hindorf C,
    2. Chittenden S,
    3. Aksnes AK,
    4. Parker C,
    5. Flux GD
    . Quantitative imaging of 223Ra-chloride (Alpharadin) for targeted alpha-emitting radionuclide therapy of bone metastases. Nucl Med Commun. 2012;33:726–732.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Pacilio M,
    2. Ventroni G,
    3. De Vincentis G,
    4. et al
    . Dosimetry of bone metastases in targeted radionuclide therapy with alpha-emitting 223Ra-dichloride. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43:21–33.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Smith M,
    2. Parker C,
    3. Saad F,
    4. et al
    . Addition of radium-223 to abiraterone acetate and prednisone or prednisolone in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer and bone metastases (ERA 223): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20:408–419.
    OpenUrl
  32. 32.↵
    1. Pinart M,
    2. Kunath F,
    3. Lieb V,
    4. Tsaur I,
    5. Wullich B,
    6. Schmidt S
    ; German Prostate Cancer Consortium (DPKK). Prognostic models for predicting overall survival in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a systematic review. World J Urol. 2020;38:613–635.
    OpenUrl
  • Received for publication December 3, 2019.
  • Accepted for publication April 22, 2020.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 62 (1)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 62, Issue 1
January 1, 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Prognostic Value of Quantitative Bone SPECT/CT Before 223Ra Treatment in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
The Prognostic Value of Quantitative Bone SPECT/CT Before 223Ra Treatment in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
Helmut Dittmann, Sabine Kaltenbach, Matthias Weissinger, Francesco Fiz, Peter Martus, Maren Pritzkow, Juergen Kupferschlaeger, Christian la Fougère
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jan 2021, 62 (1) 48-54; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.119.240408

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
The Prognostic Value of Quantitative Bone SPECT/CT Before 223Ra Treatment in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
Helmut Dittmann, Sabine Kaltenbach, Matthias Weissinger, Francesco Fiz, Peter Martus, Maren Pritzkow, Juergen Kupferschlaeger, Christian la Fougère
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jan 2021, 62 (1) 48-54; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.119.240408
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Visual Abstract
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Dual-Time-Point Posttherapy 177Lu-PSMA-617 SPECT/CT Describes the Uptake Kinetics of mCRPC Lesions and Prognosticates Patients Outcome
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Oncology

  • The diagnostic role of 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT in the detection of neuroendocrine tumors
  • Utility of bone scans in patients with RCC
  • Disseminated xanthogranulomatous oophoritis mimicking malignancy on 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography
Show more Oncology

Clinical

  • Detection of Early Progression with 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT in Men with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Receiving Bipolar Androgen Therapy
  • TauIQ: A Canonical Image Based Algorithm to Quantify Tau PET Scans
  • Dual PET Imaging in Bronchial Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: The NETPET Score as a Prognostic Biomarker
Show more Clinical

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • SPECT/CT
  • quantification
  • prostate cancer
  • bone scan
  • 223Ra
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire