Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research Article2010s

Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen: The Target of the Decade, from Biochemical Recurrence to Widespread Adoption (perspective on “Evaluation of hybrid 68Ga-PSMA Ligand PET/CT in 248 Patients with Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy” J Nucl Med. 2015;56:668–674)

Michael S. Hofman
Journal of Nuclear Medicine December 2020, 61 (Supplement 2) 246S-254S; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.120.252213
Michael S. Hofman
Prostate Cancer Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence, Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, and Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

FDG—the molecule of the (last) century. PSMA—the target of this and the next decade.

—Richard P. Baum, fourth Theranostics World Congress (2016), Melbourne, Australia

Every year, a myriad of promising new radiopharmaceuticals is described in The Journal of Nuclear Medicine, but few become a new standard of care that changes clinical management paradigms and improves patient outcomes. Even fewer are rapidly adopted. Against this trend, in an era when choline PET/CT was undergoing extensive clinical evaluation in men with prostate cancer, from seemingly nowhere arrived the small-molecule–targeting prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) 68Ga-PSMA(Glu-NH-CO-NH-Lys-(Ahx)-[68Ga(HBED-CC)]), more concisely known as 68Ga-PSMA-11.

In January 2015, when few urologists had heard of 68Ga-PSMA-11, Matthias Eiber et al. from the group led by Markus Schwaiger submitted a seminal piece of research to The Journal of Nuclear Medicine, evaluating 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in 248 men with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy (1). Already cited over 800 times, it remains one of the earliest and most practice-changing pieces of research in the still-growing evidence base for PSMA PET/CT. It spearheaded researchers around the globe to further evaluate PSMA PET/CT for a variety of other clinical indications and discover next-generation PSMA ligands for both imaging and therapy.

Urologists and nuclear medicine specialists with experience using 111In-capromab pendetide (ProstaScint; EUSA Pharma), an antibody targeting the intracellular domain of PSMA that had relatively poor tumor targeting with SPECT/CT, were initially skeptical of this “new-generation” PSMA-targeting radiotracer. However, images showing extraordinary tumor-to-background contrast in tiny lymph nodes smaller than 5 mm on CT, combined with early data, provided compelling evidence for a game-changing radiopharmaceutical. This occurred on the back of another seminal paper from the German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) demonstrating superior lesion detection and tumor-to-background contrast with 68Ga-PSMA-11 compared with choline PET/CT (2). These data, combined with click chemistry production; the availability of 68Ge/68Ga, already adopted for imaging neuroendocrine tumors; and, intriguingly, lack of intellectual property protection, led to an early tipping point toward widespread clinical adoption in some countries such as Germany and Australia.

A further key element to the success of the research by Eiber was close collaboration between nuclear medicine and urology, as is evident in the methodology and selected population. Despite the retrospective nature of the research, it used a homogeneous series of patients with early biochemical recurrence after prostatectomy, in whom no imaging is usually performed because of the low detection rate of CT or bone scintigraphy. The result is a research paper with high clinical relevance and, accordingly, read widely by specialists in genitourinary oncology. I had the pleasure of visiting the center while on sabbatical in 2016, and it was a delight to witness how closely the two specialties were collaborating to improve outcomes for men with prostate cancer.

Strikingly, 90% of patients in the study showed one or more localized areas of abnormal uptake suggestive of recurrent prostate cancer. The detection efficacy of 68Ga-PSMA-11 was 97% for a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value of 2 ng/mL or more, 93% for a PSA value of 1 to less than 2 ng/mL, 73% for a PSA value of 0.5 to less than 1 ng/mL, and 58% for a PSA value of 0.2 to less than 0.5 ng/mL. Multiple other groups have successfully repeated and replicated the findings of this research, as demonstrated in several metaanalyses, including our own, in nearly 5,000 patients (3) and inclusion in the latest European Association of Urology guidelines.

The results also formed the basis of subsequent research exploring the utility of PSMA PET/CT in other clinical scenarios. This research includes staging with the ProPSMA study, a 300-patient randomized trial conducted at 11 sites around Australia (4). This trial recently demonstrated that PSMA PET/CT represents a suitable replacement for conventional scanning with CT and bone SPECT/CT, with a 27% absolute improvement in accuracy. Another study redefined nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and showed that more than 50% of men with no abnormality on conventional imaging had metastatic disease on PSMA PET/CT and the other 50% had either localized or pelvic nodal disease (5).

As a result of the work of Eiber et al., and other nuclear medicine groups, it seems a fait accompli that PSMA PET/CT will soon be featured in clinical practice guidelines as the new imaging standard of care, replacing CT, bone scanning, and choline PET/CT. Reimbursement in many countries is also likely to begin soon. As the target of the decade, there is still much work to be done in validating PSMA PET/CT for the initial diagnosis in men with suspected prostate cancer, as a response biomarker in men with metastatic prostate cancer, and optimizing the selection of men for PSMA theranostic treatment. Concurrently, we must better define the complementary role of 18F-FDG PET/CT, the molecule of the last century.

DISCLOSURE

Michael Hofman is supported by a Clinical Fellowship Award from the Peter MacCallum Foundation; grants from the Prostate Cancer Foundation, Movember, the Prostate Cancer Foundation of Australia, the Peter MacCallum Foundation, the Australian Government Medical Research Future Fund (MRFF), the Victorian Cancer Agency, and the U.S. Department of Defense; and personal fees or travel support from educational lectures from Ipsen, Sanofi Genzyme, Jannsen and IBA for educational lectures; research support from Endocyte (a Novartis company). No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

  • © 2020 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Eiber M,
    2. Maurer T,
    3. Souvatzoglou M,
    4. et al
    . Evaluation of hybrid 68Ga-PSMA ligand PET/CT in 248 patients with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. J Nucl Med. 2015;56:668–674.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Afshar-Oromieh A,
    2. Zechmann CM,
    3. Malcher A,
    4. et al
    . Comparison of PET imaging with a 68Ga-labelled PSMA ligand and 18F-choline-based PET/CT for the diagnosis of recurrent prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014;41:11–20.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Perera M,
    2. Papa N,
    3. Roberts M,
    4. et al
    . Gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography in advanced prostate cancer: updated diagnostic utility, sensitivity, specificity, and distribution of prostate-specific membrane antigen-avid lesions—a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2020;77:403–417.
    OpenUrl
  4. 4.↵
    1. Hofman MS,
    2. Lawrentschuk N,
    3. Francis RJ,
    4. et al
    . Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET-CT in patients with high-risk prostate cancer before curative-intent surgery or radiotherapy (proPSMA): a prospective, randomised, multicentre study. Lancet. 2020;395:1208–1216.
    OpenUrl
  5. 5.↵
    1. Fendler WP,
    2. Weber M,
    3. Iravani A,
    4. et al
    . Prostate-specific membrane antigen ligand positron-emission tomography in men with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2019;25:7448–7454.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  • Received for publication June 23, 2020.
  • Accepted for publication August 13, 2020.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 61 (Supplement 2)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 61, Issue Supplement 2
December 1, 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen: The Target of the Decade, from Biochemical Recurrence to Widespread Adoption (perspective on “Evaluation of hybrid 68Ga-PSMA Ligand PET/CT in 248 Patients with Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy” J Nucl…
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen: The Target of the Decade, from Biochemical Recurrence to Widespread Adoption (perspective on “Evaluation of hybrid 68Ga-PSMA Ligand PET/CT in 248 Patients with Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy” J Nucl Med. 2015;56:668–674)
Michael S. Hofman
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Dec 2020, 61 (Supplement 2) 246S-254S; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.120.252213

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen: The Target of the Decade, from Biochemical Recurrence to Widespread Adoption (perspective on “Evaluation of hybrid 68Ga-PSMA Ligand PET/CT in 248 Patients with Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy” J Nucl Med. 2015;56:668–674)
Michael S. Hofman
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Dec 2020, 61 (Supplement 2) 246S-254S; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.120.252213
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • DISCLOSURE
    • REFERENCES
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • A Stepping-Stone to Fully Integrated Whole-Body PET/MRI (perspective on “Performance Measurements of the Siemens mMR Integrated Whole-Body PET/MR Scanner” J Nucl Med. 2011;52:1914–1922)
  • From Compassionate Use to Phase 3 Trial: The Impact of Germany’s PSMA-617 Literature (perspective on “German Multicenter Study Investigating 177Lu-PSMA-617 Radioligand Therapy in Advanced Prostate Cancer Patients” J Nucl Med. 2017;58:85–90)
Show more 2010s

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire