Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research Article2000s

18F-FDG PET/CT for Target Volume Contouring in Lung Cancer Radiotherapy (perspective on “Comparison of Different Methods for Delineation of 18F-FDG PET–Positive Tissue for Target Volume Definition in Radiotherapy of Patients with Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer” J Nucl Med. 2005;46:1342–1348)

Martin Stuschke and Christoph Pöttgen
Journal of Nuclear Medicine December 2020, 61 (Supplement 2) 178S-186S; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.120.251660
Martin Stuschke
Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christoph Pöttgen
Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

In 2005, Nestle et al. (1) published their seminal paper comparing different methods to delineate radiotherapy target volume from 18F-FDG PET in non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). They compared 4 different methods for primary delineation of gross-tumor target volume: a visual method, 2 fixed-threshold methods, and 1 adaptive-threshold method. They found that the corresponding gross-tumor target volumes differ considerably and that the more complex adaptive-threshold algorithm should be further evaluated. From these early steps of evaluation, the randomized PET-Plan multicenter trial was developed to compare locoregional progression after definitive radiochemotherapy using 18F-FDG PET–based planning target volumes or conventional planning target volumes in locally advanced NSCLC (2). The PET-based gross tumor target volumes were delineated with a semiautomatic adaptive-threshold algorithm and expanded to clinical target volumes, including the anatomic extent of involved lymph nodes, and to a planning target volume that also considered set-up errors. The conventional target volumes contained the PET-based target volumes but included parts of PET-negative tumor-associated atelectases, as well as elective mediastinal nodal volumes known to be at higher risk from surgical series. Slightly higher total radiation doses were given in the PET-based arm respecting predefined normal-tissue tolerances. Noninferiority of the PET-based planning target volumes could be confirmed in a per-protocol analysis. The PET-Plan trial took more than 10 years from the initial methodologic studies in 2005 until publication in 2020, indicating the prolonged innovation cycles needed to establish new methods with high-level evidence in radiation oncology (2). The PET-Plan and other trials showed that only about 20% of locoregional recurrences were outside the PET-based target volume and that the relapses at the initial PET-positive macroscopic tumor and at distant metastases remain the dominant risks after the radiochemotherapy regimens used. Therefore, the sensitivity of 18F-FDG PET/CT turned out to be good enough for target volume delineation of locally advanced NSCLC given the concurrent risks of in-field locoregional relapse and distant metastases. Subclinical regional disease not detected by PET/CT might not be of critical relevance for these treatment regimes.

In delineating target volumes, it is of special importance that tumor motion be separated from anatomic tumor spread, as motion during radiation therapy can be selectively reduced by gating or tracking or by irradiation during voluntary breath-hold. Important new techniques emerge in clinical routine, such as elastic motion deblurring algorithms for calculation of motion-corrected images with improved lesion contrast. In addition, advanced automatic segmentation algorithms on PET/CT are under evaluation using deep-learning methods.

18F-FDG PET/CT has additional great benefits for radiotherapy planning in stage III NSCLC. The prognosis of patients with locally advanced NSCLC was improved during the first decade of this century, mainly not because of development of more effective treatments but because of stage migration due to the increased sensitivity of 18F-FDG PET/CT for detection of distant metastases (3).

Decreases in SUV in the primary tumor during induction chemotherapy could be validated as an important prognostic factor for survival and progression-free survival after radiochemotherapy in NSCLC (4). Dose escalation strategies on tumor with residual metabolic activity in a midtreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT study are under investigation for patients with locally advanced NSCLC, as in the RTOG1106/ACRIN 6697 trial, but mature data are lacking (5).

In conclusion, the work of Nestle et al. pioneered 18F-FDG PET–based target volume segmentation in radiotherapy of locally advanced NSCLC, allowing omission of elective nodal irradiation. Improving the accuracy of the target volumes in radiotherapy by integrating the latest technical achievements and thorough validation remains a central task in radiotherapy.

DISCLOSURE

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

  • © 2020 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Nestle U,
    2. Kremp S,
    3. Schaefer-Schuler A,
    4. et al
    . Comparison of different methods for delineation of 18F-FDG PET–positive tissue for target volume definition in radiotherapy of patients with non–small cell lung cancer. J Nucl Med. 2005;46:1342–1348.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Nestle U,
    2. Schimek-Jasch T,
    3. Kremp S,
    4. et al
    . Imaging-based target volume reduction in chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (PET-Plan): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21:581–592.
    OpenUrl
  3. 3.↵
    1. Chee KG,
    2. Nguyen DV,
    3. Brown M,
    4. et al
    . Positron emission tomography and improved survival in patients with lung cancer: the Will Rogers phenomenon revisited. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168:1541–1549.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Pöttgen C,
    2. Gauler T,
    3. Bellendorf A,
    4. et al
    . Standardized uptake decrease on [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is a prognostic classifier for long-term outcome after multimodality treatment: secondary analysis of a randomized trial for resectable stage IIIA/B non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:2526–2533.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Kong F-M,
    2. Ten Haken RK,
    3. Schipper M,
    4. et al
    . Effect of midtreatment PET/CT-adapted radiation therapy with concurrent chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase 2 clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2017;3:1358–1365.
    OpenUrl
  • Received for publication June 15, 2020.
  • Accepted for publication August 27, 2020.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 61 (Supplement 2)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 61, Issue Supplement 2
December 1, 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
18F-FDG PET/CT for Target Volume Contouring in Lung Cancer Radiotherapy (perspective on “Comparison of Different Methods for Delineation of 18F-FDG PET–Positive Tissue for Target Volume Definition in Radiotherapy of Patients with Non–Small Cell Lung Canc…
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
18F-FDG PET/CT for Target Volume Contouring in Lung Cancer Radiotherapy (perspective on “Comparison of Different Methods for Delineation of 18F-FDG PET–Positive Tissue for Target Volume Definition in Radiotherapy of Patients with Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer” J Nucl Med. 2005;46:1342–1348)
Martin Stuschke, Christoph Pöttgen
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Dec 2020, 61 (Supplement 2) 178S-186S; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.120.251660

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
18F-FDG PET/CT for Target Volume Contouring in Lung Cancer Radiotherapy (perspective on “Comparison of Different Methods for Delineation of 18F-FDG PET–Positive Tissue for Target Volume Definition in Radiotherapy of Patients with Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer” J Nucl Med. 2005;46:1342–1348)
Martin Stuschke, Christoph Pöttgen
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Dec 2020, 61 (Supplement 2) 178S-186S; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.120.251660
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • DISCLOSURE
    • REFERENCES
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • PERCISTence: Strength or Stubbornness? (perspective on “From RECIST to PERCIST: Evolving Considerations for PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors” J Nucl Med. 2009;50(suppl 1):122S–150S)
  • On the Origin of Hybrid Imaging (perspective on “A Combined PET/CT Scanner for Clinical Oncology” J Nucl Med. 2000;41:1369–1379)
Show more 2000s

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire