Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research Article1990s

Small-Animal PET: A Technology That Changed Our Field (perspective on “Performance Evaluation of microPET: A High-Resolution Lutetium Oxyorthosilicate PET Scanner for Animal Imaging” J Nucl Med. 1999;40:1164–1175)

Yuan-Chuan Tai
Journal of Nuclear Medicine December 2020, 61 (Supplement 2) 153S-165S; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.120.251280
Yuan-Chuan Tai
Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

As we continue to cope with the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, we can take the opportunity to reflect back and learn from history how unexpected events changed the way we live and work, sometimes in good ways.

On September 11, 2001, many of us were at Rockville, Maryland, attending the HiRes meeting (High Resolution Imaging in Small Animals with PET, MR and Other Modalities: Instrumentation, Applications, and Animal Handling). This conference brought together physicists, biomedical researchers, veterinarians, physicians, and engineers to develop new in vivo imaging tools and methods for biomedical research on small animals. Although the conference was cut short and overshadowed by the tragic event on 9/11, the field of molecular imaging continued to grow and gain recognition for its potential impact on biomedical research (1,2). The driving force behind the growth was several technologic breakthroughs in small-animal imaging, in particular the small-animal PET technology described in the article by Chatziioannou et al. in this anniversary issue of JNM (3).

Initially developed to probe physiologic functions in human and nonhuman primates, PET was not known for its spatial resolution. Several groups attempted to develop high-resolution PET scanners for laboratory animals in the 1990s, with limited success in rodents. Yet, the advances in molecular biology and the availability of transgenic mice called for imaging technologies that could quantify molecular changes in mice noninvasively. The technologic breakthrough came after the group at UCLA adapted a new scintillator: cerium-doped lutetium oxyorthosilicate, leveraging its high light yield to create detectors with high spatial resolution without compromising other performance characteristics (e.g., energy resolution, timing resolution, and scatter fraction). Optical fibers were used to couple scintillation light from lutetium oxyorthosilicate to a position-sensitivity photomultiplier tube to overcome the physical limitations of light sensors at that time. The scanner delivered for the first time an image resolution better than 2 mm in full width at half maximum in all 3 dimensions, a peak system sensitivity of 5.62%, an average energy resolution of 19% in full width at half maximum at 511 keV, and a timing resolution of 2.4 ns in full width at half maximum. Importantly, the system had an excellent linearity and quantitative accuracy between the image value (cps/cm3) and the activity concentration measured by a well counter (MBq/cm3). Representative animal studies demonstrated whole-body PET imaging using FDG and 18F− in rodents, cardiac imaging in a rat, and dynamic imaging of neuroreceptor ligands in a rat. This work marked the beginning of an era during which in vivo quantitative PET imaging of rodents for longitudinal studies become a reality.

After the development of the small-animal PET at UCLA, several seminal works were published demonstrating the potential of molecular imaging for studying biologic processes (2), measuring gene expression in vivo (4), and accelerating drug development (5), among others. The interest in and demand for preclinical PET imaging grew rapidly, leading to the commercialization of small-animal PET technology. The procedures described in the work of Chatziioannou et al. (3) were adapted and became part of the National Electrical Manufacturers Association standard for evaluating the performance of preclinical PET systems. Embraced by many research groups and pharmaceutical companies, in vivo PET imaging became an essential tool to study disease models, to assess novel molecular probes, and to accelerate the screening and validation of targets and drugs using small animals. With additional anatomic or functional images from CT or MRI, preclinical PET/CT and PET/MRI systems are now an integral part of a research pipeline that supports innovation, validation, and translation of novel molecular probes from bench to human for clinical imaging and therapeutic applications.

In 2012, our society changed its name to the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, embracing the development of novel molecular probes for preclinical and clinical imaging and therapeutics as our core mission. Although imaging and therapies at the molecular level have always been the backbone of our discipline since its inception 60 years ago, small-animal PET technology likely played a role in accelerating the transformation and reshaping the landscape of our field over the past 2 decades. A recent technologic breakthrough—the total-body PET system (6)—brings immense excitement as we look forward to the new discoveries and clinical applications that will be enabled in the next decade.

As for what happened to the conference after 9/11—with all the airports shut down in North America, many of us took a road trip and drove across the country together to go home. Even in the worst of times, one can find comfort in friends—except that you will need to wear a mask and practice social distancing this time, please!

DISCLOSURE

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

  • © 2020 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Weissleder R,
    2. Mahmood U
    . Molecular imaging. Radiology. 2001;219:316–333.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Phelps ME
    . Inaugural article: positron emission tomography provides molecular imaging of biological processes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97:9226–9233.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Chatziioannou AF,
    2. Cherry SR,
    3. Shao Y,
    4. et al
    . Performance evaluation of microPET: a high-resolution lutetium oxyorthosilicate PET scanner for animal imaging. J Nucl Med. 1999;40:1164–1175.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Gambhir SS,
    2. Barrio JR,
    3. Phelps ME,
    4. et al
    . Imaging adenoviral-directed reporter gene expression in living animals with positron emission tomography. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96:2333–2338.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Cherry SR
    . Fundamentals of positron emission tomography and applications in preclinical drug development. J Clin Pharmacol. 2001;41:482–491.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Cherry SR,
    2. Jones T,
    3. Karp JS,
    4. Qi J,
    5. Moses WW,
    6. Badawi RD
    . Total-body PET: maximizing sensitivity to create new opportunities for clinical research and patient care. J Nucl Med. 2018;59:3–12.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  • Received for publication June 9, 2020.
  • Accepted for publication July 25, 2020.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 61 (Supplement 2)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 61, Issue Supplement 2
December 1, 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Small-Animal PET: A Technology That Changed Our Field (perspective on “Performance Evaluation of microPET: A High-Resolution Lutetium Oxyorthosilicate PET Scanner for Animal Imaging” J Nucl Med. 1999;40:1164–1175)
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Small-Animal PET: A Technology That Changed Our Field (perspective on “Performance Evaluation of microPET: A High-Resolution Lutetium Oxyorthosilicate PET Scanner for Animal Imaging” J Nucl Med. 1999;40:1164–1175)
Yuan-Chuan Tai
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Dec 2020, 61 (Supplement 2) 153S-165S; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.120.251280

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Small-Animal PET: A Technology That Changed Our Field (perspective on “Performance Evaluation of microPET: A High-Resolution Lutetium Oxyorthosilicate PET Scanner for Animal Imaging” J Nucl Med. 1999;40:1164–1175)
Yuan-Chuan Tai
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Dec 2020, 61 (Supplement 2) 153S-165S; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.120.251280
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • DISCLOSURE
    • REFERENCES
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • A Pioneering Paper That Provided a Tool for Accurate, Observer-Independent Analysis of 18F-FDG Brain Scans in Neurodegenerative Dementias (perspective on “A Diagnostic Approach in Alzheimer’s Disease Using Three-Dimensional Stereotactic Surface Projections of Fluorine-18-FDG PET” J Nucl Med. 1995;36:1238–1248)
  • Promises and Challenges of Metabolic Imaging: Where Does 18F-FDG Stand in the Immunometabolism Era? (perspective on “Intratumoral Distribution of Fluorine-18-Fluorodeoxyglucose In Vivo: High Accumulation in Macrophages and Granulation Tissues Studied by Microautoradiography” J Nucl Med. 1992;33:1972–1980)
Show more 1990s

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire