Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleOncology

Assessing Cerebrospinal Fluid Flow Dynamics in Pediatric Patients with Central Nervous System Tumors Treated with Intraventricular Radioimmunotherapy

Kim Kramer, Maria Donzelli, Emmanuela Nwora and Neeta Pandit-Taskar
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2020, 61 (5) 662-664; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.119.232678
Kim Kramer
1Department of Pediatrics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maria Donzelli
1Department of Pediatrics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Emmanuela Nwora
1Department of Pediatrics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Neeta Pandit-Taskar
2Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The incidence of abnormal cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flow dynamics in children with central nervous system (CNS) tumors before intraventricular therapy has not been described. Methods: We performed a single-institution, retrospective review of patients with primary or metastatic CNS tumors treated between 2003 and 2018 (15 y). Patients underwent 111In-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid injection into the CSF intraventricular space followed by nuclear medicine imaging at 90 min, 4 h, 24 h, and 48 h (if required). CSF flow was classified as normal, delayed, asymmetric, or obstructed. Results: In total, 278 CSF flow studies were performed on 224 patients, 202 of whom (90%) were less than 18 y old. Of these, 116 patients (52%) had metastatic CNS neuroblastoma, 57 (25%) had medulloblastoma, and 51 (23%) had other histologic types of CNS tumors. Of the 278 studies, 237 (85%) were normal, 9 (3%) required neurosurgical intervention, 25 (9%) were delayed, and 7 (3%) were asymmetric. Conclusion: Abnormal CSF flow and the necessity for neurosurgical intervention must be considered when attempting to ensure appropriate intraventricular therapy in the pediatric population.

  • cerebrospinal flow
  • leptomeningeal disease
  • radioimmunotherapy

The success of intraventricular compartmental therapies, bypassing the blood–brain barrier, in part depends on adequate drug distribution throughout the thecal space. Several techniques may be used to assess cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) dynamics in the central nervous system (CNS), including phase-contrast and time-spatial–labeling MRI. Radionuclide shuntography using 99mTc-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA) and serial imaging is another reliable way of evaluating CSF dynamics, although there is a general lack of guidelines on this procedure, as well as a lack of consensus on image interpretations (1). We undertook this study to define the incidence of normal, delayed, asymmetric, and obstructed CSF flow in a large pediatric population with CNS tumors before the administration of intraventricular therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of patients with primary or metastatic CNS tumors treated at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center over a 15-y period (2003–2018). The patients were the subjects of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center institutional review board–approved protocol 16-1466, a study of the reliability of 111In-DTPA studies. Pediatric patients under consideration for trials incorporating radioimmunotherapy were required to have CSF flow studies documenting the absence of obstructive hydrocephalus and adequate CSF flow. All patients had an indwelling intraventricular catheter with either an Ommaya reservoir or a programmable ventriculoperitoneal shunt, with the ventricular location of the catheter confirmed on MRI or CT. The intraventricular catheter was accessed by the pediatric team (oncologist or nurse practitioner) in the presence of a nuclear medicine physician. The same clinician then used a 25-gauge needle under sterile conditions; clear CSF was aspirated, confirming ventricular access. Approximately 7.4–11.1 MBq (0.2–0.3 mCi) of 111In-DTPA were injected into the ventricle, followed by an autologous CSF flush. Imaging was obtained using a Skylight dual-head γ-camera system (Philips Inc.). Whole-body conjugate (anterior, posterior, and bilateral) images of the head were acquired, as well as anterior and posterior images of the spine. The first nondynamic set of images was obtained within 90 min and up to 4 h after injection; this window was chosen to accommodate the pediatric patients, who often required general anesthesia for the scan, or to accommodate the capabilities of the scanner. Patients then underwent follow-up nuclear medicine imaging at 24 h and 48 h (if necessary). The distribution of the 111In-DTPA was assessed on serial imaging and was officially read by a board-certified nuclear medicine physician and reviewed by the pediatric oncology team. CSF flow findings were classified as normal if tracer flowed down the thecal sac in the first scan and showed a distribution over the convexities and systemic clearance on the 24-h scan (Fig. 1A). CSF flow was considered obstructed if no tracer was seen down the thecal sac on any scan (Fig. 1B), asymmetric if one side of the brain had preferential uptake of tracer (Fig. 1C), and delayed if the tracer was slower to distribute over the convexities (Fig. 1D).

FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

(A) Normal 111In-DTPA and nuclear medicine imaging results over 48 h in child with CNS neuroblastoma brain metastases. Patient was treated with surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy and was in radiographic remission at time of this study, with no evidence of neuroblastoma on MRI. (B) Obstructed CSF flow—despite normal MRI results—seen at 24 h after injection in 3-y-old with relapsed medulloblastoma. Patient underwent endoscopic third ventriculostomy with lysis of adhesions, which reestablished adequate CSF flow and enabled treatment with radioimmunotherapy. (C) Asymmetric CSF flow shown by increased activity over right hemisphere on scan 20 h after injection in 8-y-old boy with recent right parietal craniotomy and resection of metastatic lesions in right frontal lobe. MRI was unremarkable for evidence of hydrocephalus or subdural fluid collections. (D) Delayed CSF, with retention in ventricle at 24 h after injection, in 13-y-old boy with multiply recurrent medulloblastoma and known leptomeningeal metastases at time of injection. At 4 h after injection, images showed tracer accumulation predominantly in basilar cisterns and ventricles, with decreased flow down remainder of thecal sac.

RESULTS

In total, 278 CSF flow studies were performed on 224 patients, 202 of whom (90%) were less than 18 y old; 116 (52%) of these patients had a diagnosis of metastatic CNS neuroblastoma, 57 (25%) had medulloblastoma, and 51 (23%) had other histologic types of CNS tumors. There were no complications (i.e., extravasation, infection, or inability to acquire or remove CSF) associated with the administration of 111In-DTPA. In general, Ommaya catheters and ventriculoperitoneal shunts with programmable valves were equally easy to access, although a greater CSF volume for standard assays (i.e., cytology, cell count, and total protein levels) was obtainable from Ommaya catheters. In addition, administration of an Ommaya catheter did not require shunt valve adjustments, making them less cumbersome for both patients and staff. Further, despite full programming of a ventriculoperitoneal shunt at the highest setting (i.e., “off”), residual tracer activity was still visualized in the peritoneum at 24 h (Fig. 2). Of the 278 flow studies, 237 (85%) were normal (Fig. 1A), 41 (15%) were abnormal, 25 (9%) were delayed (Fig. 1B), 9 (3%) were obstructed and required neurosurgical intervention (Fig. 1D), and 7 (3%) were asymmetric (Fig. 1C). Obstruction was evident for those scans that had no distribution down the thecal sac by 4 h, with little or no change seen at 24 or 48 h. Surgical correction to lyse adhesions or shunt revision to correct occlusion was required to establish flow in these instances.

FIGURE 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2.

111In-DTPA injection through programmable VP shunt. (A) Immediate-postinjection image shows CSF accumulation in basilar cisterns and ventricles, with no evidence of obstruction. (B) Four-hour images show minimal excretion from radiotracer-shunt catheter in peritoneum.

For delayed scans, tracer resorption into the systemic circulation took more than 24 h and was evident on scans obtained at later intervals (i.e., 48 h). The 24 h of drainage over the convexities is the rule for cisternograms (when lumbar injection is performed); in contrast, for Ommaya shunt studies, delayed flow was noted by decreased flow over the convexities at 24 h accompanied by decreased resorption into the systemic circulation.

An asymmetric distribution of tracer was evident on scans obtained at 24 h, where one hemisphere had preferential uptake compared with the other. No surgical procedure was performed to address delayed or asymmetric CSF flow.

DISCUSSION

CSF dynamics have clinical, surgical, and therapeutic implications. For many years, contrast myelography was the procedure of choice to assess CSF flow, but contrast myelography was later replaced by radionuclide cisternography, particularly when detecting CSF fistulous tracts (2). Radionuclide imaging has often used 99mTc-DTPA or 111In-DTPA (2,3). More recently applied has been phase-contrast MRI, a noninvasive imaging technique that enables quantitative measurements of CSF flow (4). Although this technique has been validated, a single injection of 111In-DTPA followed by serial images over 1–2 d provides additional therapeutic information by depicting the rate of CSF flow throughout the thecal space, the time to trace over the CNS convexities, and the time to achieve systemic absorption. These studies simulate the dynamics that may be predicted with radioimmunotherapy. Further, the use of 111In-DTPA imaging demonstrates the amount of therapeutic activity that may or may not be asymmetrically distributed, or lost in the peritoneal cavity as with VP shunts, with obvious therapeutic implications.

Several pathologic states are known to disrupt CSF flow dynamics, including the presence of bulk leptomeningeal deposits, postsurgical adhesions, and Chiari malformations (4). Recently, MRI studies have shown that anatomic differences, including lordosis and kyphosis, among healthy subjects affect CSF bulk flow; spinal cord eccentricity in the healthy human spine results in subject-specific patterns of recirculation of bulk CSF flow in certain regions (5).

Several methods to bypass the blood–brain barrier and improve the effectiveness of macromolecule drugs for CNS tumors have been attempted, with intraventricular administration of chemotherapy and radioimmunotherapy being among the most common. More recently, the study of interstitial fluid in the brain tissue and CSF, as well as the glia-lymphatic system and perivascular spaces for waste clearance, have been recognized as important links to the transport of solutes in the CNS (6,7). Data further support the possibility that the perivascular spaces lining the leptomeninges provide an avenue of transport deep into the brain via CSF (8). Asymptomatic patients with no evidence of hydrocephalus on neuroradiographic imaging may have altered CSF flow dynamics that have therapeutic implications for intraventricular therapy.

Our results show that up to 15% of patients with CNS tumors have mechanisms that may affect the distribution of therapies in the CSF space, even in the absence of radiographic findings suggestive of altered CSF dynamics. This finding has therapeutic implications, because for treatments such as radioimmunotherapy, contact with the target antigen is necessary for radionuclide tumor ablation. Among these abnormal studies, there exist patients in whom no therapeutic drug would have been successfully distributed throughout the thecal space in the absence of a neurosurgical procedure to address flow dynamics. An asymmetric distribution of tracer is largely considered to be related to the presence of tumor deposits or to prior therapies resulting in adhesions or vascular insults (i.e., postsurgical or radiation therapy–induced changes), although innate interpatient variability is still possible. These results support baseline isotope tracer studies for any patient in whom intraventricular therapies are being considered, not only for malignancies but for several other neurodegenerative conditions with proposed therapies circumventing the blood–brain barrier (i.e., amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Alzheimer and Parkinson diseases, and lysosomal storage diseases).

CONCLUSION

Abnormal CSF flow studies were noted in 15% of pediatric patients with CNS tumors, including 3% of patients who would require a procedure to improve adequate flow before receiving intraventricular therapy. These results have implications for successful delivery of intraventricular therapies.

DISCLOSURE

Kim Kramer is a consultant to Ymabs Therapeitucs, Inc. This work was supported by NCI Cancer Center support grant P30 CA008748. No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

KEY POINTS

  • QUESTION: What is the incidence of normal, delayed, asymmetric, and obstructed CSF flow in the pediatric population with CNS tumors before intraventricular radioimmunotherapy?

  • PERTINENT FINDINGS: Abnormal CSF flow results were found for 15% of pediatric patients with CNS tumors; 3% of patients would require a procedure to improve adequate flow before receiving intraventricular therapy.

  • IMPLICATIONS FOR PATIENT CARE: Because adequate CSF flow is important to the successful therapeutic use of chemotherapy and radioimmunotherapy, oncologists should consider demonstrating a normal distribution before performing these interventions.

Acknowledgments

We thank Joe Olechnowicz for editorial assistance in submitting the article.

Footnotes

  • Published online Jan. 31, 2020.

  • © 2020 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Tsai SY,
    2. Wang SY,
    3. Shiau YC,
    4. Yang LH,
    5. Wu YW
    . Clinical value of radionuclide shuntography by qualitative methods in hydrocephalic adult patients with suspected ventriculoperitoneal shunt malfunction. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96:e6767.
    OpenUrl
  2. 2.↵
    1. Krasnow AZ,
    2. Collier BD,
    3. Isitman AT,
    4. Hellman RS,
    5. Joestgen TM
    . The use of radionuclide cisternography in the diagnosis of pleural cerebrospinal fluid fistulae. J Nucl Med. 1989;30:120–123.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Rosen PR,
    2. Chaudhuri TK
    . Radioisotope myelography in the detection of pleural-dural communication as a source of recurrent meningitis. Clin Nucl Med. 1983;8:28–30.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Sakhare AR,
    2. Barisano G,
    3. Pa J
    . Assessing test-retest reliability of phase contrast MRI for measuring cerebrospinal fluid and cerebral blood flow dynamics. Magn Reson Med. 2019;82:658–670.
    OpenUrl
  5. 5.↵
    1. Coenen W,
    2. Gutierrez-Montes C,
    3. Sincomb S,
    4. et al
    . Subject-specific studies of CSF bulk flow patterns in the spinal canal: implications for the dispersion of solute particles in intrathecal drug delivery. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2019;40:1242–1249.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Abbott NJ,
    2. Pizzo ME,
    3. Preston JE,
    4. Janigro D,
    5. Thorne RG
    . The role of brain barriers in fluid movement in the CNS: is there a ‘glymphatic’ system? Acta Neuropathol (Berl). 2018;135:387–407.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Pizzo ME,
    2. Wolak DJ,
    3. Kumar NN,
    4. et al
    . Intrathecal antibody distribution in the rat brain: surface diffusion, perivascular transport and osmotic enhancement of delivery. J Physiol (Lond). 2018;596:445–475.
    OpenUrl
  8. 8.↵
    1. Papisov MI,
    2. Belov VV,
    3. Gannon KS
    . Physiology of the intrathecal bolus: the leptomeningeal route for macromolecule and particle delivery to CNS. Mol Pharm. 2013;10:1522–1532.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  • Received for publication June 18, 2019.
  • Accepted for publication September 16, 2019.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 61 (5)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 61, Issue 5
May 1, 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Assessing Cerebrospinal Fluid Flow Dynamics in Pediatric Patients with Central Nervous System Tumors Treated with Intraventricular Radioimmunotherapy
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Assessing Cerebrospinal Fluid Flow Dynamics in Pediatric Patients with Central Nervous System Tumors Treated with Intraventricular Radioimmunotherapy
Kim Kramer, Maria Donzelli, Emmanuela Nwora, Neeta Pandit-Taskar
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2020, 61 (5) 662-664; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.119.232678

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Assessing Cerebrospinal Fluid Flow Dynamics in Pediatric Patients with Central Nervous System Tumors Treated with Intraventricular Radioimmunotherapy
Kim Kramer, Maria Donzelli, Emmanuela Nwora, Neeta Pandit-Taskar
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2020, 61 (5) 662-664; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.119.232678
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Oncology

  • The value of 18-FDG PET/CT as a supplemental screening method to overcome the challenges of dense breast imaging
  • False positive radioactive iodine uptake in Nabothian cyst in a patient with thyroid cancer.
  • Rediscovering the indispensable role of FDG PET in kidney cancer imaging
Show more Oncology

Clinical

  • TauIQ: A Canonical Image Based Algorithm to Quantify Tau PET Scans
  • Dual PET Imaging in Bronchial Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: The NETPET Score as a Prognostic Biomarker
  • Addition of 131I-MIBG to PRRT (90Y-DOTATOC) for Personalized Treatment of Selected Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors
Show more Clinical

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • cerebrospinal flow
  • leptomeningeal disease
  • radioimmunotherapy
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire