Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleOncology
Open Access

Evidence of Local Concentration of α-Particles from 211At-Labeled Antibodies in Liver Metastasis Tissue

Satoshi Kodaira, Yukie Morokoshi, Huizi Keiko Li, Teruaki Konishi, Mieko Kurano and Sumitaka Hasegawa
Journal of Nuclear Medicine April 2019, 60 (4) 497-501; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.118.216853
Satoshi Kodaira
1Radiation Measurement Research Team, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yukie Morokoshi
2Radiation and Cancer Biology Team, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Huizi Keiko Li
2Radiation and Cancer Biology Team, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Teruaki Konishi
3Regenerative Therapy Research Team, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mieko Kurano
1Radiation Measurement Research Team, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sumitaka Hasegawa
2Radiation and Cancer Biology Team, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

We investigated the local concentration of α-particles from 211At-labeled trastuzumab antibodies against human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 antigens in liver metastasis tissue of mice. Methods: Mice carrying metastatic cancer in their liver were injected with 211At-agent. After 12 h, the liver was removed and sliced, and 2 tissue samples of liver tissues without lesions and one containing metastatic lesions were mounted on the CR-39 plastic nuclear track detector. Microscope images of the tissues on the CR-39 were acquired. After irradiation for 31 h, the tissues were removed from the CR-39. A microscope image of α-particle tracks on the CR-39 was acquired after chemical etching. The positions of each tissue sample and the emitted α-particle tracks were adjusted to the same coordinates. Results: The positional distribution of α-particle tracks emitted from 211At was consistent within the tissue. The α-particle tracks were mainly allocated in the tumor region of the tissue. The absorbed dose in individual cells segmented by 10-μm intervals was obtained by the spectroscopic analysis of the linear-energy-transfer spectrum. The concentration efficiency—the track density ratio of α-particle tracks in the necrotized tissue, which was the tumor region, to the normal tissue—was found to be 6.0 ± 0.2. In the tumor region, the high–linear-energy-transfer α-particles deposited a large enough dose to cause lethal damage to the cancer cells. Conclusion: The total absorbed dose ranged from 1 to 7 Gy with a peak at around 2 Gy, which would correspond to a 2–3 times higher biologically equivalent dose because of the high relative biological effectiveness of the α-particles emitted from 211At.

  • autoradiography
  • α-particle
  • 211At radionuclide
  • dose distribution
  • microscopy
  • radioimmunotherapy

Radioimmunotherapy is more efficient with α-particle emitters than with conventional β-ray emitters because the former provides a high linear-energy transfer (LET) that can induce enough damage to break double-stranded DNA, as well as having a short range in tissue in order to target cancer cells but not the surrounding normal cells (1). Recently, 223Ra-chloride–emitting α-particles have been approved as a therapeutic agent for bone metastasis because of their specific characteristics, which are similar to those of calcium concentrating into the bone (2–5). Nonclinical and clinical research studies with the radionuclide 211At (half-life, 7.2 h), emitting 5.87-MeV α-particles, are being performed as one promising candidate for radioimmunotherapy (6,7). It is expected that 211At-labeled monoclonal antibodies will selectively concentrate in the target cancer cells and cause lethal damage there by the high-LET α-particle irradiation. Preclinical models with 211At-labeled monoclonal antibodies were investigated for lymphoma and various solid tumors. For example, 211At-labeled MX35 F(ab′)2 was identified as effective for ovarian cancer (8–10), and 211At-labeled trastuzumab antibody was identified as effective against human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2) antigens for peritoneal metastasis of gastric cancer (11).

Notwithstanding the success of 211At in preclinical trials with mice, its physical aspects related to dosimetry should be addressed in order to characterize the treatment effectiveness of 211At-labeled monoclonal antibodies and optimize treatment conditions such as injection amount and concentration. Because of the short range of α-particles and the heterogeneous distribution of 211At-labeled antibodies in tissues, mean absorbed doses calculated by radioactivities from whole organs or tissues may not accurately correlate with the therapeutic outcomes and may predict unfavorable toxicities in normal tissues. In addition, to assess the correlation between biologic responses and dosimetry, it is critically important to evaluate the LET of a single α-particle emitted from 211At and its spatial distribution in tissue.

A new digital autoradiography technique called the α-camera has emerged to evaluate the distribution of α-particles in tissue (12), and a spatial resolution of about 35 μm has been achieved for imaging their distribution in tissue. However, the α-camera has limitations in identifying the local concentration of α-particles at a single-cell level (∼10 μm) and in determining the LET of an individual α-particle, and there is contamination due to photons emitted via electron capture and α-decay as well.

An aluminum oxide crystal–based device that detects a nuclear track by imaging a fluorescent track signal with a confocal microscope has been developed for radiation dosimetry (13–15) and single-cell radiobiology applications (16–18). This technology allows for microscopic dosimetry at a single-cell level. However, the available imaging area is strongly limited by the current low scan speed, which is on the order of several days for 1 cm2. Therefore, this detector is not applicable to autoradiographic studies of animal samples that are on a scale of centimeters. Thus, no reliable methods have yet been established to assess the LET distribution of α-particles heterogeneously distributed in tissue on a microscopic level.

Recently, we reported that the binding efficiency of 211At-labeled antibodies to targeted cells had been verified by a one-to-one correspondence investigation (i.e., the number of α-particle traversals per individual cell) using CR-39 plastic nuclear track detectors (19). The CR-39 is a promising tool for microscopic dosimetry on a single-cell level based on LET spectroscopy with a submicron spatial resolution (20). The high-speed imaging capability of the microscope (21)—currently reaching 30 s/cm2—allows autoradiographic imaging of the spatial dose distribution in tissue at a microscopic resolution (19). Moreover, the CR-39 responds only to heavily charged particles (LET ≥ 3.5 keV/μm) without any contamination by photons (20).

In the present study, we used the CR-39 to image the α-particle distribution from 211At-trastuzumab antibodies targeting HER2 proteins in mouse liver metastases and to investigate the concentration efficiency and the given dose in the targeted tumors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

α-Particle Detection and Dosimetry

The damage trail left in the CR-39 by the incidence of an α-particle is observable under an optical microscope as a conical etch pit after chemical etching (22). The detector response (S) is defined as the etch velocity, which is obtained from the geometric parameters of the etch pit as…Embedded ImageEq. 1

Here, DA and DB are the major and minor axes of the elliptic etch pit aperture, respectively, and B is the removal thickness due to the chemical etching. S is scaled as the linear energy transfer (L), which is calibrated with various heavy ion beams covering the wide LET range between 3.5 and 600 keV/μm in water (20). The fluence (φ) (cm−2) in each LET bin (ΔL) yields the LET spectrum. The detectable incident angle in CR-39 is limited by S because of the critical angular dependency (23). In other words, a particle with incident angle between π/2 and π/2 – θc is observable, where θc is the critical incident angle. The detection efficiency, η (track per particle), is calculated by…Embedded ImageEq. 2The fluence (φ) is obtained by taking the detection efficiency and angular LET dependency (20,24). The absorbed dose (D) is obtained by…Embedded ImageEq. 3where ρ is a specific gravity.

We used CR-39 plates (TechnoTrak; Chiyoda Technol Corp.) with dimensions of 25 × 75 × 0.9 mm. The CR-39 plates were used as microscope slides on which sliced tissues were mounted. The plates were also used as the detector of α-particles emitted from the tissues.

211At-Labeled Monoclonal Antibodies

We produced 211At-labeled monoclonal antibodies as described previously (11). Briefly, trastuzumab is a humanized anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody that was purchased from Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. 211At was produced using the National Institute of Radiological Sciences AVF-930 cyclotron (25). The 211At-labeled trastuzumab (26) was isolated in phosphate-buffered saline with size-exclusion chromatography using a Sephadex 50 spin column (GE Healthcare) at room temperature (centrifuge; 730g, 2 min).

Animal Experiments

All animal experiments were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of the National Institute of Radiological Sciences at the National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology and were undertaken in compliance with the institutional guidelines on animal care and handling.

Biologic Samples

We produced a mouse model of liver metastasis of gastric cancer by injection of 2 × 106 N87/luc cells, which are human gastric cancer NCI-N87 cells stably expressing the luciferase gene (11), into the splenic vein in severe combined immunodeficiency mice (C. B17/lcr-scid/scidJcl (homo); CLEA Japan). We implanted the cells a week before the experiment and confirmed the tumor formation in the liver by in vivo luminescence imaging (Vilber Lourmat). N87/luc cells intrinsically overexpress HER2 (11). 211At-trastuzumab (1 MBq) was injected into the tail vein of the mice.

Experimental

The liver, containing the cancer metastasis, was extracted from the mice 12 h after antibody injection and then sliced at an 8-μm thickness using a freezing microtome (Leica CM 1850; Leica Biosystems). Two sliced tissue samples, one containing the specifically localized tumor and liver tissues without visible metastatic lesions, were mounted on the CR-39 plate. The images of tissues were acquired with a wide-area optical microscope equipped with a ×20, NA0.45 objective lens (FSP-1000; Seiko Time Systems Inc.). The image size was approximately 12 × 12 mm with a pixel size of 0.28 μm/pixel. After 31 h, corresponding to approximately 4 half-life durations of 211At decay, the tissues were removed from the CR-39 plate using a 1% solution of polysorbate 20. The CR-39 plate was then etched in 7 M NaOH at 70°C for 2 h. The microscope images of α-particle tracks formed on the CR-39 plate surface were acquired under the same conditions as mentioned above.

The images recording α-particle tracks were analyzed with PitFit software developed for analyzing etched pits in the -39 (21). The position (x, y) on the CR-39 coordinates and the α-particle track size (DA and DB, the major and minor axes of the elliptic etch pit) were analyzed. The thickness (B) removed by the etching was determined to be 3.3 ± 0.7 μm by measuring the thickness change of the detector with a micrometer (MDC-25 M; Mitsutoyo) before and after etching (27). Then, the detector response (S) for each track was obtained from Equation 1 and the individual LET was determined using the calibration function (20).

The coordinates on the CR-39 plate before and after etching were adjusted and corrected by the affine transformation technique based on the locations of 4 markers scratched with a small diamond pen onto surrounding tissues before the experiments (19). The distribution of α-particle tracks was superposed to the location of the sliced livers. The number of tracks located in the region of interest in the tissue sample, especially 2 kinds of color regions (pink and purple), was counted in binarized images as shown in Supplemental Figure 1 (supplemental materials are available at http://jnm.snmjournals.org). For discriminating the blank region from the tissue, the tissue imaged was simply binarized by setting a threshold level (138/256) in 8-bit gray scale. The pink region was extracted by setting band-pass thresholds of 24-bit color levels (red, 123–177; green, 42–84; blue, 94–139).

RESULTS

Along the tissues reconstructed from the tiled microscope images (Fig. 1A), we could observe the α-particle tracks emitted from 211At distributed in the tissues in the scatterplot of the positions of the individual tracks (Fig. 1B). The superposition of the tissue image and scatter plot of the α-particle tracks is shown in Figure 1C, in which yellow dots correspond to the individual track positions. The intensity map of the α-particle tracks is illustrated in Figure 1D and was visualized by counting the number of tracks in binned positions (Δx, Δy) at 50-μm intervals. The distribution of α-particle tracks was significantly higher in the pink region in the tissue than in the purple region.

FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

(A) Photomicrograph of sliced tissues; left tissue has specifically localized tumors. (B) Scatterplot of detected α-particle tracks on CR-39. (C) Superposition of tissue image and scatterplot of α-particle tracks. (D) Contour map of α-particle track density in binned positions (Δx, Δy) with 50-μm intervals.

LET dosimetry of individual α-particle tracks was performed to assess the absorbed dose in tissues. Figure 2 shows the LET spectrum of observed α-particle tracks with a peak at around 130 keV/μm, as is consistent with previous work using 211At-binding cells (19). The absorbed dose (D) was calculated using Equation 3 in locally segmented cells binned in a square size of 10 × 10 μm, which is comparable to the typical mean cell diameter of 10 μm (28). Thus, the obtained observed local absorbed dose distribution is shown in the yellow histogram of Figure 3. These data were recorded on the CR-39 for 31 h after the slice-and-mount preparation, meaning that the number of emitted α-particles should be corrected by the reduction rate because of the half-life of 211At decay for the 12-h period between antibody injection into the mouse tail vein and the slice-and-mount preparation on CR-39.

FIGURE 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2.

LET spectrum of observed α-particles.

FIGURE 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 3.

Histogram of observed local absorbed dose for t = 12–43 h, estimated dose corrected by half-life of 211At decay for t = 0–12 h, and estimated total dose for t = 0–43 h. Doses are given in cell scale size (10 μm).

DISCUSSION

Concentration Efficiency

The α-particle tracks were significantly concentrated in the pink region of the tissue, in contrast to the purple region. The pink region was stained by eosin and thus would be necrotized. We think that the pink region was specifically occupied by tumors, where 211At-trastuzumab should be concentrated, causing lethal damage by α-particle irradiation. The track densities were 1,060.9 ± 20.7 mm−2 in the pink region and 177.4 ± 6.1 mm−2 in the purple region. The concentration efficiency, the track density ratio of pink to purple regions, was 6.0 ± 0.2. Here, the error (1σ) comes from the statistics of observed α-particle track counts. The previous in vivo experiment (11) proved that the 211At-trastuzumab concentrated in the tumor (i.e., HER2 distribution) correlates to the double-strand break distribution by the γ-H2AX observation, indicating that the 211At-trastuzumab concentration causes the lethal damage to cancer cells. The dose distribution of α-particle tracks correlating to the distribution of necrotized tissue should correlate with the DNA-damaged region in the same experimental system (11). The significant concentration of α-particles in the tumors validates the effectiveness of the used 211At-trastuzumab, supporting the in vivo results (11).

Total Local Absorbed Dose

The assessment of absorbed dose, which is given by the number of α-particles and their LET, is critical to the discussion of lethal damage in cancer cells. The observed distribution of local dose was due to the recorded α-particle tracks on the CR-39 during the time between the slice-and-mount preparation (t1 = 12 h) and removal of tissue from the detector (t2 = 43 h) as shown in the yellow histogram of Figure 3. This means that the α-particle emission after the injection (from t0 = 0 h to t1 = 12 h) while the mice were still living was not considered. Therefore, the initially given dose (D0) from t0 = 0 h to t2 = 12 h was estimated from the observed dose (D) for t1 = 12 h to t2 = 43 h using the half-life decay curve as…Embedded ImageEq. 4where λ is a decay constant, that is, λ = ln(2)/half-life. Thus, estimated dose distributions of the initial dose (D0) for t = 0–12 h and the total dose for t = 0–43 h are shown as the blue and red histograms in Figure 3. In the total dose distribution, the given dose ranged from 1 to 7 Gy with a peak at around 2 Gy. The biologic equivalent dose is 2–3 times higher because the 5 MeV α-particle has a high relative biological effectiveness (29,30). The intensity map of the total dose is displayed in Figure 4, in which the deposited dose is significantly concentrated in the tumor region. A high-dose region is observed along the edge in the right-side tissue of Figure 4, where the tumors are specifically distributed. High-dose regions are also observed where the blood vessels are contained in the tissue. This estimation using Equation 4 is based on the assumption that the 211At-trastuzumab was immediately bound to the cancer cells after the injection at t = 0. We will soon investigate the possibility of varying the dose distribution in the tissues as a function of kinetic time in living mice.

FIGURE 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 4.

Contour map of total local absorbed dose in binned positions (Δx, Δy) with 10-μm intervals.

CONCLUSION

We investigated the concentration of 211At-labeled trastuzumab in liver metastases of mice by measuring α-particle tracks with the CR-39 plastic nuclear track detector. The concentration efficiency, the track density ratio of α-particle tracks in the necrotized tissue, where tumors were present, to the normal tissue, was found to be 6.0 ± 0.2. In the tumor region, the high-LET α-particles deposited a large enough dose to cause lethal damage to the cancer cells. The total absorbed dose ranged from 1 to 7 Gy with a peak at around 2 Gy, which would correspond to a 2–3 times higher biologically equivalent dose because of the high relative biological effectiveness of the α-particles emitted from 211At. The evidence of a significant concentration of α-particles in the tumors validated the effectiveness of 211At-trastuzumab for cancer radioimmunotherapy.

DISCLOSURE

This work was partially supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (A) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS KAKENHI grant 17H05093). No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Footnotes

  • Published online Oct. 5, 2018.

  • © 2019 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

Immediate Open Access: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY) allows users to share and adapt with attribution, excluding materials credited to previous publications. License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Details: http://jnm.snmjournals.org/site/misc/permission.xhtml.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Newman HC,
    2. Prise KM,
    3. Folkard M,
    4. Michael BD
    . DNA double-strand break distributions in x-ray and alpha-particle irradiated V79 cells: evidence for non-random breakage. Int J Radiat Biol. 1997;71:347–363.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Bruland ØS,
    2. Nilsson S,
    3. Fisher DR,
    4. Larsen RH
    . High-linear energy transfer irradiation targeted to skeletal metastases by the alpha emitter 223Ra: adjuvant or alternative to conventional modalities? Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12:6250s–6257s.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.
    1. Nilsson S,
    2. Franzén L,
    3. Parker C,
    4. et al
    . Bone-targeted radium-223 in symptomatic, hormone-refractory prostate cancer: a randomised, multicentre, placebo-controlled phase II study. Lancet Oncol. 2007;8:587–594.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.
    1. Nilsson S,
    2. Larsen RH,
    3. Fosså SD,
    4. et al
    . First clinical experience with alpha-emitting radium-223 in the treatment of skeletal metastases. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11:4451–4459.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Nilsson S,
    2. Strang P,
    3. Aksnes AK,
    4. et al
    . A randomized, dose–response, multicenter phase II study of radium-223 chloride for the palliation of painful bone metastases in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2012;48:678–686.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Vaidyanathan G,
    2. Zalutsky MR
    . Applications of 211At and 223Ra in targeted alpha-particle radiotherapy. Curr Radiopharm. 2011;4:283–294.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Claesson K,
    2. Magnander K,
    3. Kahu H,
    4. Lindegren S,
    5. Hultborn R,
    6. Elmroth K
    . RBE of α-particles from 211At for complex DNA damage and cell survival in relation to cell cycle position. Int J Radiat Biol. 2011;87:372–384.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Green DJ,
    2. Shadman M,
    3. Jones JC,
    4. et al
    . Astatine-211 conjugated to an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody eradicates disseminated B-cell lymphoma in a mouse model. Blood. 2015;125:2111–2119.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.
    1. Robinson MK,
    2. Shaller C,
    3. Garmestani K,
    4. et al
    . Effective treatment of established human breast tumor xenografts in immunodeficient mice with a single dose of the alpha-emitting radioisotope astatine-211 conjugated to anti-HER2/neu diabodies. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14:875–882.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Palm S,
    2. Bäck T,
    3. Claesson I,
    4. et al
    . Therapeutic efficacy of astatine-211-labeled trastuzumab on radioresistant SKOV-3 tumors in nude mice. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;69:572–579.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Li HK,
    2. Morokoshi Y,
    3. Nagatsu K,
    4. Kamada T,
    5. Hasegawa S
    . Locoregional therapy with α-emitting trastuzumab against peritoneal metastasis of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive gastric cancer in mice. Cancer Sci. 2017;108:1648–1656.
    OpenUrl
  12. 12.↵
    1. Bäck T,
    2. Jacobsson L
    . The α-camera: a quantitative digital autoradiography technique using a charge-coupled device for ex vivo high-resolution bioimaging of α-particles. J Nucl Med. 2010;51:1616–1623.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Akselrod GM,
    2. Akselrod MS,
    3. Benton ER,
    4. et al
    . A novel Al2O3 fluorescent nuclear track detector for heavy charged particles and neutrons. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 2006;247:295–306.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  14. 14.
    1. Bartz JA,
    2. Kodaira S,
    3. Kurano M,
    4. et al
    . High resolution charge spectroscopy of heavy ions with FNTD technology. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 2014;335:24–30.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  15. 15.↵
    1. Kouwenberg JJM,
    2. de Pooter JA,
    3. Wolterbeek HT,
    4. Denkov AG,
    5. Bos JJ
    . Alpha radiation dosimetry using fluorescent nuclear track detectors. Radiat Meas. 2018;113:25–32.
    OpenUrl
  16. 16.↵
    1. Niklas M,
    2. Melzig C,
    3. Abdollahi A,
    4. et al
    . Spatial correlation between traversal and cellular response in ion radiotherapy: towards single track spectroscopy. Radiat Meas. 2013;56:285–289.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  17. 17.
    1. Kodaira S,
    2. Konishi T,
    3. Kobayashi A,
    4. et al
    . Co-visualization of DNA damage and ion traversals in live mammalian cells using a fluorescent nuclear track detector. J Radiat Res (Tokyo). 2015;56:360–365.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. McFadden CH,
    2. Hallacy TM,
    3. Flint DB,
    4. et al
    . Time-lapse monitoring of DNA damage colocalized with particle tracks in single living cells. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016;96:221–227.
    OpenUrl
  19. 19.↵
    1. Kodaira S,
    2. Li HK,
    3. Konishi T,
    4. Kitamura H,
    5. Kurano M,
    6. Hasegawa S
    . Validating α-particle emission from 211At-labeled antibodies in single cells for cancer radioimmunotherapy using CR-39 plastic nuclear track detectors. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0178472.
    OpenUrl
  20. 20.↵
    1. Kodaira S,
    2. Morishige K,
    3. Kawashima H,
    4. et al
    . A performance test of a new high-surface-quality and high-sensitivity CR-39 plastic nuclear track detector: TechnoTrak. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 2016;383:129–135.
    OpenUrl
  21. 21.↵
    1. Yasuda N,
    2. Namiki K,
    3. Honma Y,
    4. et al
    . Development of a high speed imaging microscope and new software for nuclear track detector analysis. Radiat Meas. 2005;40:311–315.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  22. 22.↵
    1. Fleischer RL,
    2. Price PB,
    3. Walker RM
    . Nuclear Tracks in Solids. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press; 1975.
  23. 23.↵
    1. Somogyi G,
    2. Szalay SA
    . Track-diameter kinetics in dielectric track detectors. Nucl Instrum Methods. 1973;109:211–232.
    OpenUrl
  24. 24.↵
    1. Tawara H,
    2. Eda K,
    3. Sanami T,
    4. et al
    . Dosimetry for neutrons from 0.25 to 15 MeV by the measurement of linear energy transfer distributions for secondary charged particles in CR-39 plastic. Jpn J Appl Phys. 2008;47:1726–1734.
    OpenUrl
  25. 25.↵
    1. Nagatsu K,
    2. Minegishi K,
    3. Fukada M,
    4. Suzuki H,
    5. Hasegawa S,
    6. Zhang MR
    . Production of 211At by a vertical beam irradiation method. Appl Radiat Isot. 2014;94:363–371.
    OpenUrl
  26. 26.↵
    1. Lindegren S,
    2. Frost S,
    3. Back T,
    4. Haglund E,
    5. Elgqvist J,
    6. Jensen H
    . Direct procedure for the production of 211At-labeled antibodies with an epsilon-lysyl-3-(trimethylstannyl)benzamide immunoconjugate. J Nucl Med. 2008;49:1537–1545.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    1. Kodaira S,
    2. Yasuda N,
    3. Hasebe N,
    4. Doke T,
    5. Ota S,
    6. Ogura K
    . New method of the precise measurement for the thickness and bulk etch rate of the solid-state track detector. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A. 2007;574:163–170.
    OpenUrl
  28. 28.↵
    Report on the Task Group on Reference Man. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: International Commission on Radiological Protection; 1975:141.
  29. 29.↵
    1. Raju MR,
    2. Eisen Y,
    3. Carpenter S,
    4. Inkret WC
    . Radiobiology of α particles. III. Cell inactivation by α-particle traversals of the cell nucleus. Radiat Res. 1991;128:204–209.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Hill M A,
    2. Herdman MT,
    3. Stevens DL,
    4. Jones NJ,
    5. Thacker J,
    6. Goodhead DT
    . Relative sensitivities of repair-deficient mammalian cells for clonogenic survival after α-particle irradiation. Radiat Res. 2004;162:667–676.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  • Received for publication July 2, 2018.
  • Accepted for publication September 5, 2018.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 60 (4)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 60, Issue 4
April 1, 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Evidence of Local Concentration of α-Particles from 211At-Labeled Antibodies in Liver Metastasis Tissue
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Evidence of Local Concentration of α-Particles from 211At-Labeled Antibodies in Liver Metastasis Tissue
Satoshi Kodaira, Yukie Morokoshi, Huizi Keiko Li, Teruaki Konishi, Mieko Kurano, Sumitaka Hasegawa
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Apr 2019, 60 (4) 497-501; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.118.216853

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Evidence of Local Concentration of α-Particles from 211At-Labeled Antibodies in Liver Metastasis Tissue
Satoshi Kodaira, Yukie Morokoshi, Huizi Keiko Li, Teruaki Konishi, Mieko Kurano, Sumitaka Hasegawa
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Apr 2019, 60 (4) 497-501; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.118.216853
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Utility of 211At-Trastuzumab for the Treatment of Metastatic Gastric Cancer in the Liver: Evaluation of a Preclinical {alpha}-Radioimmunotherapy Approach in a Clinically Relevant Mouse Model
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Oncology

  • The Evolving Role of FDG-PET/CT in Assessing Primary Cutaneous Lymphoma
  • Molecular imaging of Renal clear cell carcinoma subtypes as metabolic diseases
  • Role of PET/CT in the management of multiple myeloma
Show more Oncology

Basic

  • Dopamine D1 Receptor Agonist PET Tracer Development: Assessment in Nonhuman Primates
  • Optical Navigation of the Drop-In γ-Probe as a Means to Strengthen the Connection Between Robot-Assisted and Radioguided Surgery
  • Synthesis and Preclinical Evaluation of a 68Ga-Labeled Adnectin, 68Ga-BMS-986192, as a PET Agent for Imaging PD-L1 Expression
Show more Basic

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • autoradiography
  • α-particle
  • 211At radionuclide
  • dose distribution
  • microscopy
  • radioimmunotherapy
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire