Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
LetterLetters to the Editor

Different Radionuclides in DOTA-EB-TATE Effect Different Uptake in Somatostatin Receptor–Positive HEK293 Cells

Jörg Kotzerke, Roswitha Runge, Anja Braune and Gerd Wunderlich
Journal of Nuclear Medicine March 2019, 60 (3) 436; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.118.220707
Jörg Kotzerke
*Universitätsklinikum Dresden Fetscherstrasse 74 01307 Dresden, Germany E-mail:
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: joerg.kotzerke@mailbox.tu-dresden.de
Roswitha Runge
*Universitätsklinikum Dresden Fetscherstrasse 74 01307 Dresden, Germany E-mail:
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: joerg.kotzerke@mailbox.tu-dresden.de
Anja Braune
*Universitätsklinikum Dresden Fetscherstrasse 74 01307 Dresden, Germany E-mail:
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: joerg.kotzerke@mailbox.tu-dresden.de
Gerd Wunderlich
*Universitätsklinikum Dresden Fetscherstrasse 74 01307 Dresden, Germany E-mail:
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: joerg.kotzerke@mailbox.tu-dresden.de
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

TO THE EDITOR: Tian et al. developed a trifunctional ligand with an albumin-binding component (Evans blue), which features a longer-circulation half-life as compared with an unmodified DOTA conjugate. It has been shown in a preclinical model that the prolonged circulation improved the accumulation of this tracer in somatostatin receptor (SSTR)–positive tumors (1). In this study, bioimaging was performed by 86Y-DOTA-EB-TATE and PET as a substitute for 90Y-DOTA-EB-TATE for therapy. Dosimetric calculations revealed an increase of the tumor dose by a factor of 4 compared with the biodistribution without an albumin-binding functionality.

Similarly, Bandara et al. showed in a preclinical study that, in comparison to 177Lu-DOTATATE, 177Lu-DOTA-EB-TATE resulted in an increased tumor uptake over time, no unexpected accumulation, and efficient tumor control, despite similar activities (2).

Chen et al. applied 177Lu-DOTA-EB-TATE in humans and derived an increase in the tumor dose by a factor of 8 whereas kidney and bone marrow dose increased by a factor 3.2 and 18, respectively (3).

We investigated the labeling and the in vitro binding characteristics of 68Ga-, 64Cu-, 177Lu-, and 90Y-DOTA-EB-TATE in SSTR-positive HEK293-sstr2 cells (4) in comparison to unmodified DOTA-TATE conjugates. The cells were plated in 6-well plates 24 h before addition of the radiolabeled DOTA-EB-TATE and DOTA-TATE conjugates (200 kBq). Experiments were performed in 1 mL of standard cell culture medium at 37°C for 60 and 120 min. At each time point, the cells were washed with phosphate-buffered saline and lysed with 0.3 M NaOH. The uptake was determined in triplicate for each radionuclide and each time point and was expressed as a percentage of the total activity associated with 1 million cells. The labeling procedure was similar for all preparations, and the yields were more than 95%. We found for DOTA-EB-TATE that after 1 h the cellular uptake was 9.1% ± 0.69%, 2.0% ± 0.12%, 4.9% ± 0.26%, and 4.6% ± 0.21% and increased at 2 h to 15.6% ± 0.51%, 4.3% ± 0.18%, 9.0% ± 0.71%, and 8.1% ± 0.12%, respectively. In comparison, the bifunctional probes without the albumin-binding unit revealed a 1-h uptake of 23.7% ± 1.47%, 4.3% ± 0.18%, 8.7% ± 0.90%, and 7.2% ± 1.09%, which increased at 2 h to 27.3% ± 1.66%, 5.5% ± 0.36%, 12.6% ± 1.71%, and 10.2% ± 0.18%, respectively.

These data demonstrate that the modified radiotracer featured a lower initial uptake compared with the unmodified one, regardless which isotope was used. However, the incremental gain of the uptake within the second hour was comparable between both radiotracers. This demonstrates that the radioisotope strongly influences the uptake of the SSTR ligand. The highest diagnostic performance is expected from the radiopharmaceutical with the highest uptake, namely 68Ga-DOTATATE.

As a consequence of the different uptake, only different isotopes of the same element (such as 86Y/90Y or 64Cu/67Cu) can be used for assessment of biokinetic data, whereas theranostic “pairs” of isotopes (such as 111In/177Lu) are not appropriate. No solely diagnostic isotope of lutetium is known. Therefore, the use of a low amount of radioactivity for qualitative and quantitative (e.g., dosimetry) imaging is an elegant approach that allows a subsequent therapeutic application (3).

DISCLOSURE

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Xiaoyuan Chen, Bethesda, Maryland, for providing us DOTA-EB-TATE. The HEK293-sstr2 cells were a kind gift from Stephan Schulz, Jena, Germany.

Footnotes

  • Published online Nov. 15, 2018.

  • © 2019 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Tian R,
    2. Jacobson O,
    3. Niu G,
    4. et al
    . Evans blue attachment enhances somatostatin receptor subtype-2 imaging and radiotherapy. Theranostics. 2018;8:735–745.
    OpenUrl
  2. 2.↵
    1. Bandara N,
    2. Jacobson O,
    3. Mpoy C,
    4. Chen X,
    5. Rogers BE
    . Novel structural modification based on Evans blue dye to improve pharmacokinetics of a somastostatin-receptor-based theranostic agent. Bioconjug Chem. 2018;29:2448–2454.
    OpenUrl
  3. 3.↵
    1. Zhang J,
    2. Wang H,
    3. Jacobson Weiss O,
    4. et al
    . Safety, pharmacokinetics and dosimetry of a long-acting radiolabeled somatostatin analogue 177Lu-DOTA-EB-TATE in patients with advanced metastatic neuroendocrine tumors. J Nucl Med. 2018;59:1699–1705.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Lehmann A,
    2. Kliewer A,
    3. Schutz D,
    4. Nagel F,
    5. Stumm R,
    6. Schulz S
    . Carboxyl-terminal multi-site phosphorylation regulates internalization and desensitization of the human sst2 somatostatin receptor. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2014;387:44–51.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 60 (3)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 60, Issue 3
March 1, 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Different Radionuclides in DOTA-EB-TATE Effect Different Uptake in Somatostatin Receptor–Positive HEK293 Cells
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Different Radionuclides in DOTA-EB-TATE Effect Different Uptake in Somatostatin Receptor–Positive HEK293 Cells
Jörg Kotzerke, Roswitha Runge, Anja Braune, Gerd Wunderlich
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Mar 2019, 60 (3) 436; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.118.220707

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Different Radionuclides in DOTA-EB-TATE Effect Different Uptake in Somatostatin Receptor–Positive HEK293 Cells
Jörg Kotzerke, Roswitha Runge, Anja Braune, Gerd Wunderlich
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Mar 2019, 60 (3) 436; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.118.220707
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Business Model Beats Science and Logic: Dosimetry and Paucity of Its Use
  • Determining PSMA-617 Mass and Molar Activity in Pluvicto Doses
  • The Value of Functional PET in Quantifying Neurotransmitter Dynamics
Show more Letters to the Editor

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire