Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleEndocrinology

PET/MRI in the Diagnosis of Hormone-Producing Pituitary Microadenoma: A Prospective Pilot Study

Hao Wang, Bo Hou, Lin Lu, Ming Feng, Jie Zang, Shaobo Yao, Feng Feng, Renzhi Wang, Fang Li and Zhaohui Zhu
Journal of Nuclear Medicine March 2018, 59 (3) 523-528; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.117.191916
Hao Wang
1Department of Nuclear Medicine and Beijing Key Laboratory of Molecular Targeted Diagnosis and Therapy in Nuclear Medicine, Peking Union Medical College (PUMC) Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and PUMC, Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bo Hou
2Department of Radiology, PUMC Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and PUMC, Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lin Lu
3Department of Endocrinology and Key Laboratory of Endocrinology of National Health and Family Planning Commission, PUMC Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and PUMC, Beijing, China; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ming Feng
4Department of Neurosurgery, PUMC Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and PUMC, Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jie Zang
1Department of Nuclear Medicine and Beijing Key Laboratory of Molecular Targeted Diagnosis and Therapy in Nuclear Medicine, Peking Union Medical College (PUMC) Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and PUMC, Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shaobo Yao
1Department of Nuclear Medicine and Beijing Key Laboratory of Molecular Targeted Diagnosis and Therapy in Nuclear Medicine, Peking Union Medical College (PUMC) Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and PUMC, Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Feng Feng
2Department of Radiology, PUMC Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and PUMC, Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Renzhi Wang
4Department of Neurosurgery, PUMC Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and PUMC, Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fang Li
1Department of Nuclear Medicine and Beijing Key Laboratory of Molecular Targeted Diagnosis and Therapy in Nuclear Medicine, Peking Union Medical College (PUMC) Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and PUMC, Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zhaohui Zhu
1Department of Nuclear Medicine and Beijing Key Laboratory of Molecular Targeted Diagnosis and Therapy in Nuclear Medicine, Peking Union Medical College (PUMC) Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and PUMC, Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

This study was designed to evaluate the ability of PET/MRI, using 18F-FDG and 68Ga-DOTATATE as tracers, to detect hormone-producing pituitary microadenoma when diagnosis is difficult using MRI alone. Methods: We recruited 37 patients with elevated hormone levels, including 19 with undiagnosable primary pituitary adenoma and 18 with suspected recurrent pituitary adenoma. 18F-FDG PET/MRI and 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/MRI were performed within 1 wk of each other in all patients. Within 2 wk afterward, 27 of the 37 patients underwent transsphenoidal adenomectomy, 3 underwent sella region radiotherapy, 1 underwent somatostatin therapy, and 6 had only clinical follow-up. The image characteristics and uptake levels were correlated with the surgical findings and pathologic results. Receiver-operating-characteristic curves were analyzed to determine the optimal cutoff to differentiate adenoma from normal pituitary tissue. The area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve was calculated to compare diagnostic performance. Results: The PET/MR images were of diagnostic quality and without obvious image artifacts. The high contrast of the PET images provided complementary information to the fine anatomic display of the MR images. Increased 18F-FDG uptake was clearly observed in all patients. MRI enhanced using a 0.05 mmol/kg dose of gadopentetate dimeglumine showed suggestive findings in only 47% of the patients with primary adenoma and 39% of those with recurrent adenoma; when a 0.1 mmol/kg dose was used, the respective percentages were 37% and 50%. The 18F-FDG SUVmax of the 16 primary adenomas that underwent transsphenoidal adenomectomy (6.8 ± 3.7) was significantly higher than that of normal pituitary tissue (3.2 ± 1.1, P < 0.01). The adenomas showed moderate 68Ga-DOTATATE uptake (SUVmax, 3.8 ± 2.6), but the 68Ga-DOTATATE uptake was generally lower than that of normal pituitary tissue (SUVmax, 6.2 ± 3.2, P < 0.05). In the 11 suspected recurrent pituitary adenomas that underwent transsphenoidal adenomectomy, the 18F-FDG SUVmax was 6.1 ± 3.5, significantly higher than that of normal pituitary tissue (2.5 ± 1.1, P < 0.01), and the 68Ga-DOTATATE SUVmax was 3.0 ± 1.1, significantly lower than that of normal pituitary tissue (5.5 ± 1.7, P < 0.01). The 18F-FDG/68Ga-DOTATATE SUVmax ratio of the adenomas (2.3 ± 1.5) was significantly higher than that of normal pituitary tissue (0.6 ± 0.3, P < 0.05). When the 18F-FDG SUVmax alone and the 18F-FDG/68Ga-DOTATATE SUVmax ratio were used as criteria to discriminate between adenoma and pituitary tissue, the best analysis came from the ratio, and that from 18F-FDG SUVmax alone was slightly less, with optimal diagnostic cutoffs of 1.04 and 3.88, respectively. Conclusion: PET/MRI provides an ideal tool for the detection of hormone-producing pituitary microadenoma. Dual-tracer 18F-FDG and 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/MRI was useful for distinguishing pituitary microadenoma from normal pituitary tissue.

  • pituitary adenoma
  • 68Ga-DOTATATE
  • 18F-FDG
  • PET/MRI

Pituitary adenoma accounts for about 10%–20% of all primary intracranial tumors (1). These tumors can cause symptoms either through a mass effect or through oversecretion of various hormones. Hypersecretion of hormones from the pituitary gland leads to syndromes such as hyperprolactinemia, Cushing disease, and acromegaly. MRI has been the first choice for detecting pituitary adenoma since the 1990s (2). However, sometimes MRI struggles to detect adenoma, especially when the lesion is small or when the anatomic conditions have been altered by surgery (3–6).

18F-FDG PET has a high sensitivity for the detection of pituitary adenoma (7,8). Somatostatin receptors are expressed by both normal pituitary tissue and pituitary adenoma. Novel 68Ga-labeled somatostatin analogs such as 68Ga-DOTATATE are now finding increasing clinical application (9–14). Previously, we reported that 68Ga-DOTATATE in general had a higher uptake in normal pituitary tissue than in recurrent or residual adenoma. However, there was significant overlap in uptake between these 2 entities, making it difficult to distinguish adenoma from normal pituitary tissue using solely this tracer. The combined analysis of 68Ga-DOTATATE and 18F-FDG PET/CT might therefore be of clinical value in differentiating recurrent or residual pituitary adenoma from normal pituitary tissue (15). Furthermore, combined assessment using PET is advantageous because brain CT scanning is a less sensitive method and cannot accurately detect regions of increased tracer uptake in the pituitary gland.

Integrated PET/MRI has recently become commercially available and offers many advantages in the evaluation of brain disease. However, its utility in the evaluation of pituitary lesions has not been systematically explored. In this prospective pilot study, patients with suspected functional pituitary adenoma (for which diagnosis by MRI alone was difficult) underwent dual-tracer 18F-FDG and 68Ga-DOTATATE brain PET/MRI to evaluate its possible application for the detection of hormone-producing pituitary microadenoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients

This was a prospective pilot study with Institutional Review Board approval and written informed consent from the patients enrolled. The total enrollment was 37 patients (11 men, 26 women; mean age ± SD, 34 ± 15 y). The patients had elevated hormone levels, including adrenocorticotropic hormone (n = 33), growth hormone (n = 3), or thyroid-stimulating hormone (n = 1). All patients were suspected to have a pituitary microadenoma, including 19 patients with possible primary tumors and 18 patients with recurrent tumors. All patients had undergone contrast-enhanced 3-T MRI before recruitment. The MRI protocols included 3 serial sequences: a coronal T2-weighted fast spin echo sequence (repetition time [TR], 3,660 ms; echo time [TE], 97.3 ms; field of view [FOV], 20 × 16 cm; slice thickness, 4 mm; slice spacing, 1 mm; matrix, 320 × 224), a coronal T1-weighted fast spin echo sequence (TR, 417 ms; TE, 8.7 ms; FOV, 20 × 16 cm; slice thickness, 3 mm; slice spacing, 0.6 mm; matrix, 320 × 224), and a sagittal T1-weighted Cube sequence (a GE Healthcare fast spin echo sequence) (TR, 300 ms; TE, 15.1 ms; FOV, 16 × 16 cm; slice thickness, 3 mm; no slice spacing; matrix, 224 × 192). Fat saturation was applied. The MRI protocols also included a dynamic coronal T1-weighted fast spin echo sequence (TR, 250 ms; TE, 12.6 ms; FOV, 20 × 16 cm; slice thickness, 2 mm; slice spacing, 0.5 mm; matrix, 256 × 192; 4 slices to cover the pituitary; 28 s/phase; scanning time, 2 min 54 s). A 0.05 mmol/kg bolus of the contrast agent gadopentetate dimeglumine was administered by a power injector at a rate of 3 mL/s. Afterward, coronal and sagittal T1-weighted imaging were repeated. Among the 37 patients, 16 had undiagnosable MRI findings and 21 had negative MRI results. Both 18F-FDG PET/MRI and 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/MRI were performed within 1 wk of each other in all patients. Within 2 wk afterward, 27 patients underwent transsphenoidal adenomectomy (Table 1), whereas because of surgical difficulty or other reasons, 3 patients underwent sella region radiotherapy, 1 patient underwent somatostatin therapy, and the other 6 patients had clinical follow-up only. The latter 10 patients were excluded from further analysis.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

Patient Characteristics

PET/MRI

Brain PET/MR images were acquired with the patient supine 1 h after intravenous injection of either 370 MBq of 18F-FDG or 120–200 MBq of 68Ga-DOTATATE. These 2 different PET/MRI scans were performed on separate days within 1 wk of each other. The images were acquired using a Signa time-of-flight PET/MRI system (GE Healthcare). Simultaneous PET and 3-T MRI data were acquired. Four MRI sequences were performed. The first was coronal and sagittal T2-weighted fast spin echo imaging (TR, 3,000 ms; TE, 98 ms; FOV, 18 × 18 cm; slice thickness, 3 mm; no slice spacing; frequency encoding, 320) with fat saturation applied to inhibit the hyperintensity of the cranial base, as well as periodically rotated overlapping parallel lines with enhanced reconstruction to ensure excellent image quality. The second sequence was coronal T1-weighted Cube imaging (TR, 365 ms; TE, 15 ms; FOV, 16 × 16 cm; slice thickness, 3 mm; no slice spacing; matrix, 224 × 224) with interplane interpolation applied to achieve a 1.5-mm slice thickness. The third sequence was sagittal T1-weighted Cube imaging (TR, 400 ms; TE, 15 ms; FOV, 16 × 16 cm; slice thickness, 2 mm; no slice spacing; matrix, 224 × 192) with interplane interpolation applied to achieve a 1-mm slice thickness. Fat saturation was applied. The fourth sequence was dynamic coronal T1-weighted fast spin echo imaging (TR, 360 ms; TE, 9 ms; FOV, 17 × 15.3 cm; slice thickness, 2 mm; slice spacing, 0.5 mm; matrix, 224 × 160; 10 slices to cover the whole region; 19 s/phase; scanning time, 3 min 6 s). A 0.1 mmol/kg bolus of the contrast agent gadopentetate dimeglumine was administered by a power injector at a rate of 3 mL/s. Afterward, coronal and sagittal fat-saturation Cube T1-weighted imaging (TR, 400 ms; TE, 15 ms; FOV, 16 × 16 cm; slice thickness, 1.4 mm; no slice spacing; matrix, 224 × 192; scanning time, 5 min and 30 s) was also performed, with a voxel size of 0.3 × 0.3 × 0.7 mm after interpolation. All sequences in this examination covered the whole sellar region, including the right and left cavernous sinuses. For this integrated PET/MRI scan, the attenuation correction was performed with T1-weighted imaging, which may be affected by the gadopentetate; thus, the PET acquisition was performed before and after contrast injection. The duration was about 20 min for each task.

MR images were assessed by 2 experienced neuroradiologists, who were masked to the clinical and PET data. The 18F-FDG and 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/MRI studies were reviewed for regions of increased uptake by 2 board-certified specialists in nuclear medicine, who were masked to the clinical data independently. The pattern of uptake and the SUVmax were documented. The image characteristics and uptake levels were correlated with the surgical findings and pathologic results.

Statistical Analysis

Quantitative results were expressed as the mean ± SD. Differences between 2 independent groups were determined by a Student t test. Receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) curves were analyzed to determine the optimal cutoff for detecting adenoma and normal pituitary tissue. All statistical tests were 2-tailed, and a P value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. SPSS software (version 23.0; IBM) was used for statistical analyses.

RESULTS

Image Quality

The PET/MRI system provided diagnostic image quality without apparent image artifacts. Most lesions demonstrated high 18F-FDG uptake (Fig. 1 and Supplemental Fig. 1; supplemental materials are available at http://jnm.snmjournals.org). Moreover, the different MRI sequences available with high resolution facilitated evaluation of the images provided by the PET/MRI system.

FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

A 31-y-old woman with high adrenocorticotropic hormone level (patient 1 in Table 1). (A–D) MR images showing equivocal lesion at right end of sella region (from left to right: T1-weighted coronal, T2-weighted coronal, and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted coronal and sagittal views). (E–H) 18F-FDG PET/MR images showing definitely avid lesion (arrows) at same region as on MR images (from left to right: coronal PET, coronal PET/MRI, sagittal PET, and sagittal PET/MRI). (I–L) 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/MR images showing lower uptake in lesion than in normal pituitary tissue (arrowhead) (from left to right: coronal PET, coronal PET/MRI, sagittal PET, and sagittal PET/MRI). Follow-up surgery confirmed presence of right-sided 6 × 5 × 5 mm functional pituitary microadenoma, and pathologic stains were adrenocorticotropic hormone–positive, luteinizing hormone–positive, and growth hormone–positive.

Detection of Primary Adenoma

When a 0.05 mmol/kg dose of MRI contrast medium was used, 9 (47%) of the 19 patients with a possible primary adenoma had undiagnosable lesions that were suspected to show low enhancement, and the other 10 patients had negative findings. When a 0.1 mmol/kg dose was used, 7 (37%) of the 19 patients had lesions that definitely showed low enhancement, and the other 12 patients had negative findings. Increased 18F-FDG uptake was present in all 19 patients. The results of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and 18F-FDG PET were comparable and therefore acted to validate each other, thus increasing diagnostic confidence.

The 18F-FDG SUVmax of the 16 primary adenomas that underwent transsphenoidal adenomectomy was 6.8 ± 3.7, significantly higher than that of normal pituitary tissue (3.2 ± 1.1, P < 0.01). In contrast, the 68Ga-DOTATATE SUVmax of these 16 adenomas was 3.8 ± 2.6, significantly lower than that of normal pituitary tissue (6.2 ± 3.2, P < 0.05). In each case, the location of the adenoma on PET/MRI corresponded with its location on surgery (Table 1).

Detection of Recurrent Adenoma

When a 0.05 mmol/kg dose of MRI contrast medium was used, 7 (39%) of the 18 patients with a suspected recurrent adenoma had lesions that were suspected to show low enhancement. When a 0.1 mmol/kg dose was used, 9 (50%) of the 18 patients had lesions that definitely showed low enhancement. However, the dual-tracer PET/MR images clearly differentiated almost all recurrent adenomas (18F-FDG–positive, 68Ga-DOTATATE–positive) from normal pituitary tissue (18F-FDG–negative, 68Ga-DOTATATE–positive).

The 18F-FDG SUVmax of the 11 recurrent adenomas that underwent transsphenoidal adenomectomy was 6.1 ± 3.5, significantly higher than that of normal pituitary tissue (2.5 ± 1.1, P < 0.01). The 68Ga-DOTATATE SUVmax was 3.0 ± 1.1, significantly lower than that of normal pituitary tissue (5.5 ± 1.7, P < 0.01). The diagnoses were confirmed by surgical and pathologic findings (Table 1).

Uptake in Confirmed Adenoma

The 18F-FDG SUVmax of the 27 confirmed adenomas that underwent transsphenoidal adenomectomy was 6.5 ± 3.6, significantly higher than that of normal pituitary tissue (2.9 ± 1.1, P < 0.01). The 68Ga-DOTATATE SUVmax was 3.5 ± 2.1, significantly lower than that of normal pituitary tissue (5.9 ± 2.7, P < 0.01).

Uptake Ratio in Adenoma Versus Normal Tissue

The 18F-FDG/68Ga-DOTATATE SUVmax ratios were 2.3 ± 1.3 in primary adenoma, 2.3 ± 1.7 in recurrent adenoma, and 2.3 ± 1.5 in all confirmed cases of adenoma. All 3 ratios were significantly higher than those in normal pituitary tissue (0.6 ± 0.3 [P < 0.01], 0.5 ± 0.2 [P < 0.05], and 0.6 ± 0.3 [P < 0.01], respectively; Supplemental Fig. 2).

ROC Curve in Differentiation of Adenoma from Normal Tissue

The area under the ROC curve was analyzed for 18F-FDG SUVmax and 18F-FDG/68Ga-DOTATATE SUVmax ratio in adenoma and normal pituitary tissue (Fig. 2). The best result was for the ratio. The optimal diagnostic cutoffs according to ROC analysis were 1.04 for the ratio and 3.88 for 18F-FDG SUVmax alone. With a cutoff of 1.04 for the ratio, the resulting sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for discriminating between adenoma and normal pituitary tissue were 88.9%, 96.3%, and 92.6%, respectively. With a cutoff of 3.88 for 18F-FDG SUVmax alone, the respective percentages were 70.4%, 85.2% and 77.8%.

FIGURE 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2.

Use of 18F-FDG SUVmax (A) and 18F-FDG/68Ga-DOTATATE SUVmax ratio (B) ROC curves for differentiation of pituitary adenoma from normal pituitary tissue. Area under curve and standard error were 0.85 ± 0.05 for 18F-FDG and 0.94 ± 0.03 for 18F-FDG/68Ga-DOTATATE. Optimal diagnostic cutoff by ROC analysis was 3.88 and 1.04, respectively. Diagnostic performance was better with 18F-FDG/68Ga-DOTATATE than with 18F-FDG alone.

DISCUSSION

MRI is the mainstay of assessing pituitary adenoma, which can be identified by criteria such as typical MRI features, a focus of low enhancement, remodeling of the pituitary sella floor, and deformity of the gland contour (16). Although surgical exploration of the pituitary fossa after positive MRI findings has been shown to confirm adenoma in 81%–88% of patients (17,18), many hormone-secreting pituitary microadenomas are undetectable by present MRI technology. Evaluation of the pituitary gland and residual pituitary adenoma using MRI becomes much more difficult after surgery because of anatomic alterations and implant artifacts. The sensitivity of contrast-enhanced MRI of the pituitary can be marginally increased by acquiring a dynamic sequence in the first 1–2 min after contrast injection, but this technique has not been proven to increase the efficacy of MRI in pituitary adenoma (19,20). Our study found a detection sensitivity of 47% and 39% in primary and recurrent pituitary microadenoma, respectively, using a 0.05 mmol/kg dose of gadopentetate dimeglumine, and a detection sensitivity of 37% and 50%, respectively, using a 0.1 mmol/kg dose.

The pituitary gland does not normally accumulate 18F-FDG and therefore is not ordinarily visible at high contrast on 18F-FDG PET scans. In recent years, several reports have indicated that most pituitary adenomas can accumulate 18F-FDG even if they are benign (8,21). There is also evidence that 18F-FDG PET/CT is able to detect pituitary adenoma with a higher sensitivity than contrast-enhanced MRI, especially in patients with a small lesion or with potential recurrence after transsphenoidal adenomectomy (22).

In this study, we showed that microadenomas that were previously undetectable or equivocal on contrast-enhanced MRI could be definitively detected by 18F-FDG PET/MRI. The optimal diagnostic cutoff for 18F-FDG SUVmax according to ROC analysis was 3.88. With the combined use of 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/MRI and 18F-FDG PET/MRI, pituitary adenoma (18F-FDG–positive, 68Ga-DOTATATE–positive) could be well differentiated from normal pituitary tissue (18F-FDG–negative, 68Ga-DOTATATE–positive). In semiquantitative analysis, there were significant differences in 18F-FDG and 68Ga-DOTATATE SUVmax between pituitary adenoma and normal pituitary tissue. The significance was more remarkable when the 18F-FDG/68Ga-DOTATATE SUVmax ratio was applied. We found a ratio cutoff of 1.04 to be optimal for differentiating between pituitary adenoma and normal pituitary tissue. However, there is no defined consensus or published data for the interpretation of the 18F-FDG/68Ga-DOTATATE SUVmax ratio in pituitary adenoma and normal pituitary tissue. Thus, we believe our data can serve as a reference for routine clinical practice.

With the time-of-flight PET/MRI system used in our study, the simultaneous acquisition of PET and MR images allowed for a rapid, 1-stop diagnosis of patients. The high-resolution PET/MR images were flawless and without artifacts, clearly displaying the relationship among pituitary adenoma, normal pituitary tissue, periphery blood vessels, and other structures. The dual-tracer PET/MR images enabled better diagnosis and characterization of the adenoma than single-tracer images, added diagnostic confidence, and helped guide the adenomectomy that followed.

The major limitation of our study was the small number of cases, as the cutoff differentiated best between pituitary adenoma and normal pituitary tissue in this small cohort but is not universally applicable. However, as a pilot study, its result is enough to merit further investigation. A possible confounder in comparisons of SUVmax is the partial-volume effect, in view of the small size of the pituitary adenomas in these patients and the small pituitary remnants in some of them after surgery. When a microadenoma is at the core of the pituitary gland, the value of 68Ga-DOTATATE imaging is limited by the difficulty of demarcating the tumor against the high-uptake background of normal pituitary tissue. In addition, a multitracer approach complicates the diagnostic workup. In clinical application, 18F-FDG PET/MRI is normally enough to make a diagnosis, especially when the adenoma is large. The multitracer approach presented in this study would be used to increase confidence only when diagnosis is complicated by situations such as an MRI-negative or -equivocal hormone-producing pituitary microadenoma or a relapse early after surgery.

CONCLUSION

This preliminary study showed that the combination of the high sensitivity and specificity of PET with the detailed soft-tissue display of MRI provides an ideal tool for detecting hormone-producing pituitary microadenoma. In addition, a dual-tracer approach using 18F-FDG and 68Ga-DOTATATE was helpful for distinguishing pituitary adenoma from normal pituitary tissue, especially in patients with complex structural changes after surgery. This multitracer, multimodality imaging method increased diagnostic confidence and guided surgery in patients with hormone-secreting pituitary microadenoma.

DISCLOSURE

This study was supported by the Peking Union Medical College Scholar project and partly by a CAMS Major Collaborative Innovation Project (2016-I2M-1-011) and Welfare Research Funding for Public Health Professionals (201402001). No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Acknowledgments

We express our sincerest thanks to Prof. Heinrich R. Schelbert for enlightening discussions, review of the language, and encouragement to complete our investigation.

Footnotes

  • ↵* Contributed equally to this work.

  • Published online Aug. 3, 2017.

  • © 2018 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Molitch ME
    . Nonfunctioning pituitary tumors and pituitary incidentalomas. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2008;37:151–171.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Elster AD
    . Modern imaging of the pituitary. Radiology. 1993;187:1–14.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Kremer P,
    2. Forsting M,
    3. Ranaei G,
    4. et al
    . Magnetic resonance imaging after transsphenoidal surgery of clinically non-functional pituitary macroadenomas and its impact on detecting residual adenoma. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2002;144:433–443.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.
    1. Rajaraman V,
    2. Schulder M
    . Postoperative MRI appearance after transsphenoidal pituitary tumor resection. Surg Neurol. 1999;52:592–598.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.
    1. Kremer P,
    2. Forsting M,
    3. Hamer J,
    4. et al
    . MRI of residual tumor tissue after transsphenoidal surgery of hormone-inactive pituitary macroadenomas: a prospective study. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 1996;65:27–30.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Di Maio S,
    2. Biswas A,
    3. Vezina JL,
    4. et al
    . Pre- and postoperative magnetic resonance imaging appearance of the normal residual pituitary gland following macroadenoma resection: clinical implications. Surg Neurol Int. 2012;3:67.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Seok H,
    2. Lee EY,
    3. Choe EY,
    4. et al
    . Analysis of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography findings in patients with pituitary lesions. Korean J Intern Med. 2013;28:81–88.
    OpenUrl
  8. 8.↵
    1. De Souza B,
    2. Brunetti A,
    3. Fulham MJ,
    4. et al
    . Pituitary microadenomas: a PET study. Radiology. 1990;177:39–44.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Schneider C,
    2. Schlaak M,
    3. Bludau M,
    4. et al
    . 68Ga-DOTATATE-PET/CT positive metastatic lymph node in a 69-year-old woman with Merkel cell carcinoma. Clin Nucl Med. 2012;37:1108–1111.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. 10.
    1. Buchmann I,
    2. Henze M,
    3. Engelbrecht S,
    4. et al
    . Comparison of 68Ga-DOTATOC PET and 111In-DTPAOC (OctreoScan) SPECT in patients with neuroendocrine tumours. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2007;34:1617–1626.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.
    1. Gayana S,
    2. Mittal BR,
    3. Bhattacharya A,
    4. et al
    . 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT imaging in carotid body tumor. Clin Nucl Med. 2013;38:e191–e193.
    OpenUrl
  12. 12.
    1. Kabasakal L,
    2. Demirci E,
    3. Ocak M,
    4. et al
    . Comparison of 68Ga-DOTATATE and 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT imaging in the same patient group with neuroendocrine tumours. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012;39:1271–1277.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.
    1. Klinaki I,
    2. Al-Nahhas A,
    3. Soneji N,
    4. et al
    . 68Ga DOTATATE PET/CT uptake in spinal lesions and MRI correlation on a patient with neuroendocrine tumor: potential pitfalls. Clin Nucl Med. 2013;38:e449–e453.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Lapa C,
    2. Lohr M,
    3. Bluemel C,
    4. et al
    . Primary central nervous system lymphoma and meningioma in DOTATATE PET/CT. Clin Nucl Med. 2013;38:994–995.
    OpenUrl
  15. 15.↵
    1. Zhao X,
    2. Xiao JQ,
    3. Xing B,
    4. et al
    . Comparison of 68Ga-DOTATATE to 18F-FDG uptake is useful in the differentiation of residual or recurrent pituitary adenoma from the remaining pituitary tissue after transsphenoidal adenomectomy. Clin Nucl Med. 2014;39:605–608.
    OpenUrl
  16. 16.↵
    1. Sahdev A,
    2. Reznek RH,
    3. Evanson J,
    4. et al
    . Imaging in Cushing’s syndrome. Arq Bras Endocrinol Metabol. 2007;51:1319–1328.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Testa RM,
    2. Albiger N,
    3. Occhi G,
    4. et al
    . The usefulness of combined biochemical tests in the diagnosis of Cushing’s disease with negative pituitary magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Endocrinol. 2007;156:241–248.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Salenave S,
    2. Gatta B,
    3. Pecheur S,
    4. et al
    . Pituitary magnetic resonance imaging findings do not influence surgical outcome in adrenocorticotropin-secreting microadenomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;89:3371–3376.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Bartynski WS,
    2. Lin L
    . Dynamic and conventional spin-echo MR of pituitary microlesions. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1997;18:965–972.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Tabarin A,
    2. Laurent F,
    3. Catargi B,
    4. et al
    . Comparative evaluation of conventional and dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of the pituitary gland for the diagnosis of Cushing’s disease. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1998;49:293–300.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Bergström M,
    2. Muhr C,
    3. Lundberg PO
    . PET as a tool in the clinical evaluation of pituitary adenomas. J Nucl Med. 1991;32:610–615.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    1. Chittiboina P,
    2. Montgomery BK,
    3. Millo C,
    4. et al
    . High-resolution 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for pituitary adenoma detection in Cushing disease. J Neurosurg. 2015;122:791–797.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  • Received for publication February 16, 2017.
  • Accepted for publication July 10, 2017.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 59 (3)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 59, Issue 3
March 1, 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
PET/MRI in the Diagnosis of Hormone-Producing Pituitary Microadenoma: A Prospective Pilot Study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
PET/MRI in the Diagnosis of Hormone-Producing Pituitary Microadenoma: A Prospective Pilot Study
Hao Wang, Bo Hou, Lin Lu, Ming Feng, Jie Zang, Shaobo Yao, Feng Feng, Renzhi Wang, Fang Li, Zhaohui Zhu
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Mar 2018, 59 (3) 523-528; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.117.191916

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
PET/MRI in the Diagnosis of Hormone-Producing Pituitary Microadenoma: A Prospective Pilot Study
Hao Wang, Bo Hou, Lin Lu, Ming Feng, Jie Zang, Shaobo Yao, Feng Feng, Renzhi Wang, Fang Li, Zhaohui Zhu
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Mar 2018, 59 (3) 523-528; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.117.191916
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Using Molecular Imaging to Enhance Decision Making in the Management of Pituitary Adenomas
  • Automatic detection of pituitary microadenoma from magnetic resonance imaging using deep learning algorithms
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Endocrinology

  • Assessment and Comparison of 18F-Fluorocholine PET and 99mTc-Sestamibi Scans in Identifying Parathyroid Adenomas: A Metaanalysis
  • Targeted Optical Imaging of the Glucagonlike Peptide 1 Receptor Using Exendin-4-IRDye 800CW
  • 18F-Fluorocholine PET/CT in Primary Hyperparathyroidism: Superior Diagnostic Performance to Conventional Scintigraphic Imaging for Localization of Hyperfunctioning Parathyroid Glands
Show more Endocrinology

Clinical

  • Detection of Early Progression with 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT in Men with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Receiving Bipolar Androgen Therapy
  • TauIQ: A Canonical Image Based Algorithm to Quantify Tau PET Scans
  • Dual PET Imaging in Bronchial Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: The NETPET Score as a Prognostic Biomarker
Show more Clinical

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • pituitary adenoma
  • 68Ga-DOTATATE
  • 18F-FDG
  • PET/MRI
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire