Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleSupplement

Introduction and Overview

Johannes Czernin and David Mankoff
Journal of Nuclear Medicine February 2016, 57 (Supplement 1) 1S-2S; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.115.157818
Johannes Czernin
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David Mankoff
2Division of Nuclear Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

As the supplement editors, it is our pleasure to introduce to you a special supplemental issue of The Journal of Nuclear Medicine on the application of molecular imaging to breast cancer. This issue is part of an ongoing series of JNM supplements focused on diseases for which molecular imaging has a high impact on the approach to clinical care and on translational research. Advances in our understanding of the biologic basis of breast cancer have led to increasingly tailored approaches to breast cancer diagnosis and treatment—a precision medicine approach guided by sophisticated diagnostics and targeted therapeutics. The ability to assess an individual patient’s risk of breast cancer, including genetic predisposition, guides the approach to breast cancer screening and diagnosis. Molecular imaging brings a new dimension to the important tasks of breast cancer diagnosis and staging, and there is considerable potential for novel imaging approaches to molecularly targeted detection. Molecular imaging also provides a unique tool that can guide individualized cancer therapy by assessing therapeutic targets, measuring early response to treatment, and identifying residual viable cancer after therapy. In this supplemental issue, we review the important applications of molecular imaging to breast cancer diagnosis and treatment, highlighting current clinical uses and new approaches under study.

We have divided the issue into an initial overview followed by 3 sections: current clinical applications, emerging applications in diagnosis or as a therapeutic biomarker, and translational research on new approaches and applications. We begin with an overview by Elizabeth McDonald and colleagues (1) of current approaches to breast cancer diagnosis and treatment, highlighting areas in which molecular imaging can play an important role. Next, David Groheux and colleagues (2) review the current use of 18F-FDG PET/CT for breast cancer staging, emphasizing those clinical scenarios in which the modality is most helpful. Gary Cook and colleagues (3) then review the use of 18F-FDG PET/CT and other types of molecular imaging in the important tasks of detecting and evaluating metastases of breast cancer to bone, the most common site of distant disease spread. Norbert Avril (4) finishes the section on current clinical applications by reviewing the use of 18F-FDG PET/CT for measuring breast cancer treatment response in both the neoadjuvant and metastatic settings.

In the section on emerging clinical applications, David Hsu and colleagues (5) and Wendie Berg (6) review the use of molecular imaging for breast cancer detection, focusing on novel instrumentation and current and future clinical uses, respectively. Gary Ulaner and colleagues (7) close the section by providing an overview of the use of 18F-FDG PET/CT and other methods currently under study as imaging biomarkers to help guide individualized treatment of breast cancer patients.

The final and largest section of the issue covers the exciting topics of translational research on new molecular imaging approaches to breast cancer and early testing of their application to breast cancer patients. Charles Manning and colleagues (8) review the preclinical molecular imaging research to elucidate the biology of breast cancer in vivo and to guide clinical applications. Elizabeth McDonald and colleagues (9) describe approaches to the development of new molecular imaging probes—and novel combinations of probes—using examples focused on measurement of breast cancer proliferation/quiescence and DNA damage repair, two rapidly emerging areas of biologic and therapeutic interest. We then include a series of 3 articles focusing on molecular imaging as related to 3 key sets of drug targets and biomarkers. Amy Fowler and colleagues (10) review molecular imaging of steroid receptors in breast cancer, focusing on methods of predicting and measuring the response of the breast to endocrine therapy. Geraldine Gebhart and colleagues (11) discuss methods of imaging expression of HER2 and response to HER2-targeted therapy, highlighting the results of recent clinical trials. Laura Kenny (12) covers imaging methods of measuring proliferation, DNA damage, cell death, and angiogenesis—processes important to breast cancer pathogenesis and progression and key biomarkers of therapeutic response. Finally, Suzanne van Es and colleagues (13) discuss what is required to move a novel molecular imaging method for breast cancer from preclinical testing into early clinical trials and eventually into clinical application.

We conclude the issue with an editorial summary of the field by Richard Wahl (14), an early pioneer in PET imaging of breast cancer, with some thoughts about the current state of the field and how molecular imaging can best serve the needs of breast cancer patients and the physicians who treat them.

In closing, we would like to thank the many authors of this supplemental issue for their efforts and excellent contributions, as well as our reviewers and editorial staff for ensuring a high-quality and comprehensive review of the subject area. We hope that JNM readers will find the issue interesting and helpful and will appreciate the considerable progress in this area along with the tremendous potential for molecular imaging to benefit breast cancer patients.

  • © 2016 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Inc.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. McDonald ES,
    2. Clark AS,
    3. Tchou J,
    4. Zhang P,
    5. Freedman GM
    . Clinical diagnosis and management of breast cancer. J Nucl Med. 2016;57(suppl 1):9S–16S.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Groheux D,
    2. Cochet A,
    3. Humbert O,
    4. Alberini J-L,
    5. Hindié E,
    6. Mankoff D
    . 18F-FDG PET/CT for staging and restaging of breast cancer. J Nucl Med. 2016;57(suppl 1):17S–26S.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Cook GJR,
    2. Azad GK,
    3. Goh V
    . Imaging bone metastases in breast cancer: staging and response assessment. J Nucl Med. 2016;57(suppl 1):27S–33S.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Avril S,
    2. Muzic RF,
    3. Plecha D,
    4. Traughber B,
    5. Vinayak S,
    6. Avril N
    . 18F-FDG PET/CT for monitoring of treatment response in breast cancer. J Nucl Med. 2016;57(suppl 1):34S–39S.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Hsu DFC,
    2. Freese DL,
    3. Levin CS
    . Breast-dedicated radionuclide imaging systems. J Nucl Med. 2016;57(suppl 1):40S–45S.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Berg WA
    . Nuclear breast imaging: clinical results and future directions. J Nucl Med. 2016;57(suppl 1):46S–52S.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Ulaner GA,
    2. Riedl CC,
    3. Dickler MN,
    4. Jhaveri K,
    5. Pandit-Taskar N,
    6. Weber W
    . Molecular imaging of biomarkers in breast cancer. J Nucl Med. 2016;57(suppl 1):53S–59S.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Manning HC,
    2. Buck JR,
    3. Cook RS
    . Mouse models of breast cancer: platforms for discovering precision imaging diagnostics and future cancer medicine. J Nucl Med. 2016;57(suppl 1):60S–68S.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. McDonald ES,
    2. Mankoff DA,
    3. Mach RH
    . Novel strategies for breast cancer imaging: new imaging agents to guide treatment. J Nucl Med. 2016;57(suppl 1):69S–74S.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Fowler AM,
    2. Clark AS,
    3. Katzenellenbogen JA,
    4. Linden HM,
    5. Dehdashti F
    . Imaging diagnostic and therapeutic targets: steroid receptors in breast cancer. J Nucl Med. 2016;57(suppl 1):75S–80S.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Gebhart G,
    2. Flamen P,
    3. De Vries EGE,
    4. Jhaveri K,
    5. Wimana Z
    . Imaging diagnostic and therapeutic targets: human epidermal growth factor receptor 2. J Nucl Med. 2016;57(suppl 1):81S–88S.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Kenny LM
    . The use of novel PET tracers to image breast cancer biologic processes such as proliferation, DNA damage and repair, and angiogenesis. J Nucl Med. 2016;57(suppl 1):89S–95S.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. van Es SC,
    2. Venema CM,
    3. Glaudemans AWJM,
    4. et al
    . Translation of new molecular imaging approaches to the clinic: bridging the gap to implementation. J Nucl Med. 2016;57(suppl 1):96S–104S.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Wahl RL
    . Quo vadis: PET and single-photon molecular breast imaging. J Nucl Med. 2016;57(suppl 1):3S–8S.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  • Received for publication November 2, 2015.
  • Accepted for publication November 3, 2015.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 57 (Supplement 1)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 57, Issue Supplement 1
February 1, 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Introduction and Overview
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Introduction and Overview
Johannes Czernin, David Mankoff
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Feb 2016, 57 (Supplement 1) 1S-2S; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.115.157818

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Introduction and Overview
Johannes Czernin, David Mankoff
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Feb 2016, 57 (Supplement 1) 1S-2S; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.115.157818
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • REFERENCES
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Advantages and Challenges of Total-Body PET/CT at a Tertiary Cancer Center: Insights from Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center
  • Pathway to Approval of Innovative Radiopharmaceuticals in China
  • Recent Advances in Radiotracers Targeting Novel Cancer-Specific Biomarkers in China: A Brief Overview
Show more Supplement

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire