Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleInvited Perspectives

Imaging the Biodistribution and Performance of Transplanted Stem Cells with PET

Christopher G. England, Emily B. Ehlerding and Weibo Cai
Journal of Nuclear Medicine September 2016, 57 (9) 1331-1332; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.116.173963
Christopher G. England
1Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, Wisconsin
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Emily B. Ehlerding
1Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, Wisconsin
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Weibo Cai
1Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, Wisconsin
2Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, Wisconsin; and
3Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Several clinical trials have assessed the efficacy of transplanted stem cells for treatment of muscle-related diseases (1), yet clinical translation of these cell-based therapies has been limited by the host immune response, ineffective homing strategies for getting the donor cells to targeted musculature, and the intricate generation of large numbers of transplantable cells. Because highly invasive tissue biopsies are often required to diagnose muscle-related diseases and monitor their treatment, there is a dire need for alternative noninvasive approaches. Recently, PET imaging of biomarkers has shown great potential for tracking disease progression and monitoring therapeutic interventions. More specifically, PET imaging can track injected cells of interest that have been directly labeled with an imaging tag or indirectly labeled with a reporter, allowing for in vivo tracking of their fate. This ability virtually eliminates the need for highly invasive procedures, in addition to providing fast and reliable data.

See page 1467

In this issue of The Journal of Nuclear Medicine, Haralampieva et al. from ETH Zurich report on the noninvasive PET imaging of human muscle precursor cells (hMPCs) in a nude mouse model using a signaling-deficient human dopamine D2 receptor (hD2R) as a reporter for binding of 18F-fallypride (2). There were 3 distinct reasons why the authors chose hD2R, which has been extensively studied as the reporter gene. First, the fact that hD2R is normally expressed only in the striata nigra simplifies tracking of transplanted hD2R-expressing cells in peripheral body regions, whose native tissues do not express hD2R. Second, hD2R may be genetically mutated to eliminate the potential activation of signaling transduction pathways on binding of hD2R ligands. Normally, binding of hD2R by its native ligands results in activation of a G-protein signaling pathway; thus, the activity of this receptor needs to be silenced to ensure that the genetically altered hMPCs display the same phenotypic properties as normal hMPCs (3). Genetic uncoupling of the binding activity from the intracellular signaling of hD2R prevents the activity of hMPCs from being affected by binding of an endogenous ligand or targeted imaging agent. Third, there are several highly efficient PET imaging agents already available for imaging hD2R.

Next, the authors chose a transfection method for inserting this mutated gene into the hMPCs. An adenoviral construct was used to transfect cells with the mutated hD2R gene. After transfection, hD2R-transfected cells showed no signs of toxicity and the proliferation rate of transfected hMPCs remained unchanged. Together, these data verified the simplicity and high efficiency of the adenoviral system for rapid transfection of the hD2R gene into hMPCs.

Afterward, the authors assessed the binding affinity of hD2R hMPCs for 18F-fallypride in vitro. 18F-fallypride is a high-affinity D2/D3 antagonist radioactive tracer used for PET imaging of extrastriatal dopamine receptors in low concentrations (4). Also, the pharmacokinetic properties and efficacy of 18F-fallypride have been extensively investigated, making it an optimal candidate for imaging of transplanted hD2R hMPCs. Because the authors did not provide a rationale for choosing 18F-fallypride in this study, we predict that future studies may compare other commonly used hD2R-based PET tracers, including 124I-epidepride, 76Br-isoremoxipride, and perhaps their 11C-labeled derivatives for tracking the biodistribution of hD2R hMPCs transplanted in vivo (5).

To track the fate of hMPCs in vivo, the authors subcutaneously injected nude mice with transfected hD2R hMPCs before performing PET imaging with 18F-fallypride. High uptake of 18F-fallypride in hD2R hMPCs was seen at 1 wk after transplantation, whereas uptake was significantly lower at 2 wk. The authors attributed this signal decrease to the posttranslational modification of ectopically expressed hD2R or the internalization and degradation of hD2R during myofibril differentiation. Low PET signal in the cerebellum further confirmed the high specificity of 18F-fallypride for hD2R hMPCs. In addition, PET studies were performed using haloperidol as an hD2R-blocking agent: hD2R-expressing cells and tissues showed decreased PET signal after the injection of haloperidol. Next, the authors investigated the oxygenation status of transplanted hD2R hMPCs by PET imaging with 18F-fluoromisonidazole. Uptake of 18F-fluoromisonidazole was projected to be highest soon after cell transplantation, as low oxygen levels are found during the initial stages of cell-to-myofibril formation. 18F-fluoromisonidazole is the most widely investigated PET tracer for preclinical and clinical imaging of hypoxia. As expected, uptake of 18F-fluoromisonidazole was relatively high at 1 wk after transplantation, and this high uptake was further corroborated by increased protein levels of the endothelial cell marker vWf (Von Willebrand factor) and elevated vascular endothelial growth factor–A gene expression at later time points. Together, increased vascular endothelial growth factor–A and endothelial cell markers, in combination with high oxygen consumption, indicate actively growing tissues. The authors concluded that 18F-fluoromisonidazole allowed for sensitive monitoring of hypoxia-related biologic processes in bioengineered constructs.

Although this study provided a methodology for tracking hMPCs in vivo, this technology can be further implemented to track the fate of other transplanted cells. For example, Schönitzer et al. reported a similar approach for noninvasively tracking human mesenchymal stem cells using a different mutated form of hD2R (6). Only 25% of the cells showed successful transfection of hD2R in the hMPCs; other transfection strategies may provide better transfection rates. In addition, reporter genes can complicate PET quantification and in vivo kinetic modeling of imaging tracers. Effective tracer uptake is dependent on the availability of targeted cells, the injected tracer dose, the regional blood flow and vascularity of the tissue, and the pharmacokinetics of tracer uptake (7). It was previously described that reporter genes encoding for intracellular enzymes or transporters show superiority over membrane receptors such as hD2R because they allow the tracer to accumulate inside the cell, whereas binding to surface receptors may be weak and reversible (8). In addition to the dopamine model described in this study, the sodium iodide symporter transfection model is an alternative that has been commonly used for PET and SPECT imaging (9).

The clinical applicability of stem cell–based therapies is slowly becoming a potential reality. The use of cell-based therapies for the treatment of muscle-related diseases is promising, yet many uncertainties remain. First, transfected stem cells have been widely explored in basic preclinical research, yet these transfection models have been limited to cell imaging and not therapeutic intervention. For this reason, clinical use of reporter gene systems for patient treatment remains unlikely at this time. Currently, 18F-FDG is the only PET tracer used in a clinical setting for stem cell tracking (10). Also, reporter gene models may be limited by changes in the expression of the transfected gene and encoded receptor. Additionally, the effects of the host immune system on the efficacy of cell-based therapies remain unclear. In the future, dual treatment strategies using both gene- and cell-based therapies may show additive or synergistic therapeutic effects in comparison to monotherapy-based approaches. As new cell-based therapeutic strategies are investigated, the noninvasive high-specificity tracking of transplanted cells using PET or other imaging modalities may eliminate the necessity for highly invasive procedures. As researchers continue to investigate novel cell-based therapies, molecular imaging must continue to evolve to fill the need for noninvasive imaging approaches. This field holds great promise, and we expect that cell-based therapies will become a vital part of personalized medicine for the treatment of a broad range of diseases.

DISCLOSURE

This work was supported, in part, by the University of Wisconsin–Madison, the National Institutes of Health (NIBIB/NCI 1R01CA169365, P30CA014520, T32CA009206, and T32GM008505), and the American Cancer Society (125246-RSG-13-099-01-CCE). No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Footnotes

  • Published online May 19, 2016.

  • © 2016 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Inc.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Skuk D
    . Myoblast transplantation for inherited myopathies: a clinical approach. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2004;4:1871–1885.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Haralampieva D,
    2. Betzel T,
    3. Dinulovic I,
    4. et al
    . Noninvasive PET imaging and tracking of engineered human muscle precursor cells for skeletal muscle tissue engineering. J Nucl Med. 2016;57:1467–1473.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Boyd KN,
    2. Mailman RB
    . Dopamine receptor signaling and current and future antipsychotic drugs. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2012;212:53–86.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Vandehey NT,
    2. Moirano JM,
    3. Converse AK,
    4. et al
    . High-affinity dopamine D2/D3 PET radioligands 18F-fallypride and 11C-FLB457: a comparison of kinetics in extrastriatal regions using a multiple-injection protocol. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2010;30:994–1007.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. de Paulis T
    . The discovery of epidepride and its analogs as high-affinity radioligands for imaging extrastriatal dopamine D2 receptors in human brain. Curr Pharm Des. 2003;9:673–696.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Schönitzer V,
    2. Haasters F,
    3. Kasbauer S,
    4. et al
    . In vivo mesenchymal stem cell tracking with PET using the dopamine type 2 receptor and 18F-fallypride. J Nucl Med. 2014;55:1342–1347.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Terrovitis JV,
    2. Smith RR,
    3. Marban E
    . Assessment and optimization of cell engraftment after transplantation into the heart. Circ Res. 2010;106:479–494.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Chen IY,
    2. Wu JC,
    3. Min JJ,
    4. et al
    . Micro-positron emission tomography imaging of cardiac gene expression in rats using bicistronic adenoviral vector-mediated gene delivery. Circulation. 2004;109:1415–1420.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Chung J-K
    . Sodium iodide symporter: its role in nuclear medicine. J Nucl Med. 2002;43:1188–1200.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Kooreman NG,
    2. Ransohoff JD,
    3. Wu JC
    . Tracking gene and cell fate for therapeutic gain. Nat Mater. 2014;13:106–109.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  • Received for publication March 9, 2016.
  • Accepted for publication April 11, 2016.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 57 (9)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 57, Issue 9
September 1, 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Imaging the Biodistribution and Performance of Transplanted Stem Cells with PET
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Imaging the Biodistribution and Performance of Transplanted Stem Cells with PET
Christopher G. England, Emily B. Ehlerding, Weibo Cai
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Sep 2016, 57 (9) 1331-1332; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.116.173963

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Imaging the Biodistribution and Performance of Transplanted Stem Cells with PET
Christopher G. England, Emily B. Ehlerding, Weibo Cai
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Sep 2016, 57 (9) 1331-1332; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.116.173963
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Noninvasive PET Imaging and Tracking of Engineered Human Muscle Precursor Cells for Skeletal Muscle Tissue Engineering
  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Radiomics in PET/CT: More Than Meets the Eye?
  • Metabolic Tumor Volume: We Still Need a Platinum-Standard Metric
  • Citius, Altius, Fortius: An Olympian Dream for Theranostics
Show more Invited Perspectives

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire