Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
LetterLetters to the Editor

Reply: Breast Cancer Staging: To Which Women Should 18F-FDG PET/CT Be Offered?

Gary A. Ulaner and Christopher C. Riedl
Journal of Nuclear Medicine August 2015, 56 (8) 1293-1294; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.115.161042
Gary A. Ulaner
*Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center 1275 York Ave., Box 77 New York, NY 10065 E-mail:
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: ulanerg@mskcc.org
Christopher C. Riedl
*Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center 1275 York Ave., Box 77 New York, NY 10065 E-mail:
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: ulanerg@mskcc.org
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

REPLY: We thank Drs. Groheux and Hindié for their comments on our article (1). Their position and ours are quite similar. We both support the growing evidence for using 18F-FDG PET/CT for systemic staging of patients with newly diagnosed stage III or IIB breast cancer (1,2), because the detection of unsuspected distant metastases in these patients would alter treatment from neoadjuvant or surgical to palliative systemic. Although our study specifically examined the yield of 18F-FDG PET/CT for patients less than 40 y old, the study that Drs. Groheux and Hindié cite was unselected for age. It is of course difficult to compare studies that vary in design and are from regions that may potentially encompass different patient populations, but we note that the yield of 18F-FDG PET/CT for detecting distant metastases for each initial stage was higher in the cohort of patients less than 40 y old than in the cohort unselected for age. For example, the rate of upstaging to distant metastatic disease (stage IV) in initially stage IIB patients was 17% for patients less than 40 y old (1) and 10.7% for patients unselected for age (2). Thus, although 18F-FDG PET/CT may be considered for any patient with newly diagnosed stage IIB or III breast cancer, the value of the examination may be higher for younger patients.

We caution that further evaluation is still warranted. There are still several patient and tumor factors that have not been adequately addressed. For example, tumor histology may influence the utility of 18F-FDG PET/CT for systemic staging of patients with breast cancer. Indeed, on 18F-FDG PET both primary (3) and metastatic (4) lesions from invasive lobular carcinoma are less apparent than comparable lesions from invasive ductal carcinoma. Thus, the utility of 18F-FDG PET/CT for systemic staging of patients with newly diagnosed invasive lobular carcinoma may not be as strong as for patients with invasive ductal carcinoma. The histologic subtype of breast cancer may also affect the evaluation of prognosis in initial (5) and metastatic (6,7) breast cancer, as well as the evaluation of treatment response (8).

Although there is growing evidence in support of offering 18F-FDG PET/CT to all patients with newly diagnosed stage IIB or III breast cancer, we must continue to investigate this issue.

Footnotes

  • Published online Jun. 25, 2015.

  • © 2015 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Inc.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Riedl CC,
    2. Slobod E,
    3. Jochelson M,
    4. et al
    . Retrospective analysis of 18F-FDG PET/CT for staging asymptomatic breast cancer patients younger than 40 years. J Nucl Med. 2014;55:1578–1583.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Groheux D,
    2. Hindie E,
    3. Delord M,
    4. et al
    . Prognostic impact of 18FDG-PET-CT findings in clinical stage III and IIB breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012;104:1879–1887.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Avril N,
    2. Rose CA,
    3. Schelling M,
    4. et al
    . Breast imaging with positron emission tomography and fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose: use and limitations. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:3495–3502.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Dashevsky BZ,
    2. Goldman DA,
    3. Parsons M,
    4. et al
    . Appearance of untreated bone metastases from breast cancer on FDG PET/CT: importance of histologic subtype. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. May 14, 2015 [Epub ahead of print].
  5. 5.↵
    1. Cochet A,
    2. Dygai-Cochet I,
    3. Riedinger JM,
    4. et al
    . 18F-FDG PET/CT provides powerful prognostic stratification in the primary staging of large breast cancer when compared with conventional explorations. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014;41:428–437.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Morris PG,
    2. Ulaner GA,
    3. Eaton A,
    4. et al
    . Standardized uptake value by positron emission tomography/computed tomography as a prognostic variable in metastatic breast cancer. Cancer. 2012;118:5454–5462.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Ulaner GA,
    2. Eaton A,
    3. Morris PG,
    4. et al
    . Prognostic value of quantitative fluorodeoxyglucose measurements in newly diagnosed metastatic breast cancer. Cancer Med. 2013;2:725–733.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Schwarz-Dose J,
    2. Untch M,
    3. Tiling R,
    4. et al
    . Monitoring primary systemic therapy of large and locally advanced breast cancer by using sequential positron emission tomography imaging with [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:535–541.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 56 (8)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 56, Issue 8
August 1, 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Reply: Breast Cancer Staging: To Which Women Should 18F-FDG PET/CT Be Offered?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Reply: Breast Cancer Staging: To Which Women Should 18F-FDG PET/CT Be Offered?
Gary A. Ulaner, Christopher C. Riedl
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Aug 2015, 56 (8) 1293-1294; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.115.161042

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Reply: Breast Cancer Staging: To Which Women Should 18F-FDG PET/CT Be Offered?
Gary A. Ulaner, Christopher C. Riedl
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Aug 2015, 56 (8) 1293-1294; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.115.161042
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Business Model Beats Science and Logic: Dosimetry and Paucity of Its Use
  • Determining PSMA-617 Mass and Molar Activity in Pluvicto Doses
  • The Value of Functional PET in Quantifying Neurotransmitter Dynamics
Show more Letters to the Editor

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire