Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleClinical Investigations

Comparative Analysis of T Cell Imaging with Human Nuclear Reporter Genes

Maxim A. Moroz, Hanwen Zhang, Jason Lee, Ekaterina Moroz, Juan Zurita, Larissa Shenker, Inna Serganova, Ronald Blasberg and Vladimir Ponomarev
Journal of Nuclear Medicine July 2015, 56 (7) 1055-1060; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.115.159855
Maxim A. Moroz
1Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hanwen Zhang
1Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jason Lee
2Crump Institute for Molecular Imaging, University of California, Los Angeles, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ekaterina Moroz
3Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Juan Zurita
1Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Larissa Shenker
1Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Inna Serganova
3Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ronald Blasberg
1Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
3Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; and
4Sloan Kettering Institute Molecular Pharmacology and Chemistry Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vladimir Ponomarev
1Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
4Sloan Kettering Institute Molecular Pharmacology and Chemistry Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Monitoring genetically altered T cells is an important component of adoptive T cell therapy in patients, and the ability to visualize their trafficking/targeting, proliferation/expansion, and retention/death using highly sensitive reporter systems that do not induce an immunologic response would provide useful information. Therefore, we focused on human reporter gene systems that have the potential for translation to clinical studies. The objective of the in vivo imaging studies was to determine the minimum number of T cells that could be visualized with the different nuclear reporter systems. We determined the imaging sensitivity (lower limit of T cell detection) of each reporter using appropriate radiolabeled probes for PET or SPECT imaging. Methods: Human T cells were transduced with retroviral vectors encoding for the human norepinephrine transporter (hNET), human sodium-iodide symporter (hNIS), a human deoxycytidine kinase double mutant (hdCKDM), and herpes simplex virus type 1 thymidine kinase (hsvTK) reporter genes. After viability and growth were assessed, 105 to 3 × 106 reporter T cells were injected subcutaneously on the shoulder area. The corresponding radiolabeled probe was injected intravenously 30 min later, followed by sequential PET or SPECT imaging. Radioactivity at the T cell injection sites and in the thigh (background) was measured. Results: The viability and growth of experimental cells were unaffected by transduction. The hNET/meta-18F-fluorobenzylguanidine (18F-MFBG) reporter system could detect less than 1 × 105 T cells because of its high uptake in the transduced T cells and low background activity. The hNIS/124I-iodide reporter system could detect approximately 1 × 106 T cells; 124I-iodide uptake at the T cell injection site was time-dependent and associated with high background. The hdCKDM/2′-18F-fluoro-5-ethyl-1-β-d-arabinofuranosyluracil (18F-FEAU) and hsvTK/18F-FEAU reporter systems detected approximately 3 × 105 T cells, respectively. 18F-FEAU was a more efficient probe (higher uptake, lower background) than 124I-1-(2-deoxy-2-fluoro-1-d-arabinofuranosyl)-5-iodouracil for both hdCKDM and hsvTK. Conclusion: A comparison of different reporter gene–reporter probe systems for imaging of T cell number was performed, and the hNET/18F-MFBG PET reporter system was found to be the most sensitive and capable of detecting approximately 35–40 × 103 T cells at the site of T cell injection in the animal model.

  • T cells
  • imaging
  • PET
  • reporter genes

Adoptive immunotherapy using genetically engineered T cells is a promising and rapidly evolving field. Further advances in the field of adoptive therapy will require the ability to monitor the trafficking, targeting, and activation/proliferation of the administered cells. The application of novel reporter systems (gene–probe combinations) together with noninvasive imaging modalities, such as PET, has shown the potential for monitoring T cells in vivo (1–4). Herpes simplex virus type 1 thymidine kinase (hsvTK) and mutant hsv1sr39TK reporter genes have been used in most of these seminal studies. Radiolabeled reporter probes, including 1-(2-deoxy-2-fluoro-1-d-arabinofuranosyl)-5-iodouracil (FIAU) (labeled with 131I (5), 123I (5), 124I (6), and 125I (7)), 2′-18F-fluoro-5-ethyl-1-β-d-arabinofuranosyluracil (18F-FEAU) (8), and 9-(4-18F-fluoro-3-[hydroxymethyl]butyl)guanine (18F-FHBG) (9) have been used for imaging hsvTK in these studies, and comparisons of their efficacy have previously been performed (10–12). However, there has been a recent focus on human reporter systems, to avoid the potential risk of generating an immunologic reaction to viral (nonhuman) reporter systems, including hsvTK and hsvsr39TK reporter–transduced T cells.

We and others have tested different human-derived reporter systems for potential cell tracking in patients (12–21). These intrinsically nonimmunogenic reporter systems include the human sodium iodide symporter (hNIS)/124I-iodide (13), the human norepinephrine transporter (hNET)/123I/124I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) (14) and 18F-meta-18F-fluorobenzylguanidine (18F-MFBG) (15), the human somatostatin receptor 2 (SSTR2/68Ga-DOTATOC) (16,17), the human ferritin/2+Fe reporter (18), and the human transferrin receptor (19). More recently described reporter genes include the truncated and mutated human mitochondrial thymidine kinase type 2 (h∆TK2, h∆TK2DM) genes (20,21) and the mutated human deoxycytidine kinase (hdCKDM) gene (22–24). Both human kinases were shown to exclusively phosphorylate pyrimidine-based PET probes, including 124I-FIAU, 18F-FEAU, and 2′-deoxy-2′-18F-fluoro-5-methyl-1-β-l-arabinofuranosyluracil.

The objective of this report was to compare the T cell imaging efficacy of 1 viral and 3 human reporter genes with different imaging probes (different reporter systems). We compared the hNET/18F-MFBG and 123I/124I-MIBG reporter systems with the previously described hNIS, hdCKDM, and hsvTK reporter systems using radiolabeled 124I-iodide, 18F-FEAU, and 124I-FIAU, respectively. We included 18F-MFBG as an alternative to 123I/124I-MIBG, for imaging hNET reporter–transduced T cells, because of the superior tumor-to-background images that can be obtained at earlier times after administration of MFBG compared with MIBG (15,25). Using a murine preclinical model, we determined the minimum number of reporter-transduced T cells that could be imaged with the different reporter systems. Our results demonstrate that the hNET/18F-MFBG reporter system is the most sensitive and allows for repetitive PET imaging of hNET-expressing T cells.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Development of New Retroviral Vectors

Two new retroviral vectors, which carry the constitutively expressed hNET or hNIS separated by IRES (internal ribosomal entry site) with green fluorescent protein (GFP), were developed by recloning of the hNET (14) and hNIS (14) genes into the retroviral SFG backbone. The hsvTK/GFP and hdCKDM/GFP vectors were developed previously (Supplemental Fig. 1; supplemental materials are available at http://jnm.snmjournals.org) (13,26). The hsvTK-IRES-GFP and hdCKDM-IRES-GFP dual reporters were subsequently developed to compare the transduced-to-nontransduced T cell uptake ratio of the fusion and IRES-linked reporter systems for both hsvTK and hdCKDM (Supplemental Fig. 2).

T Cell Isolation, Transduction, Assessment, and Expansion

Buffy coat–containing T cells (60 mL) were obtained from the New York Blood Bank from healthy donors, who gave informed consent. T cells were isolated using Ficoll isolation medium as previously described (27). At 48 h after stimulation with phytohemagglutinin at a concentration of 2 μg/mL, T cells were transduced with a reporter gene–bearing retrovirus in the presence of interleukin-2 (20 U/mL), as described previously (4). During T cell expansion, the medium was supplemented with IL-15 at a concentration of 10 ng/mL every 3 d. T cell viability was measured using trypan blue exclusion. Analysis of GFP expression in all experimental cell populations was performed using a FACSCalibur analyzer (BD Biosciences), and the purity and fluorescence of cells were assessed using Cell Quest Software (Becton Dickinson). All assays were repeated at least 3 times.

Reporter T Cell Studies: In Vitro Uptake of Radiolabeled Probes

The radiolabeled imaging probes were prepared as previously described. 18F-MFBG (∼19 GBq/μmol) (15), 18F-FEAU (∼22 GBq/μmol) (28), carrier-free 124I-MIBG (>12 GBq/μmol), carrier-free 124I-iodide, and carrier-free 124I-FIAU were synthesized at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (28). 123I-MIBG (clinical formulation) was obtained from Nuclear Diagnostics Products.

Triplicate samples containing 1.0 × 106 reporter-transduced or wild-type T cells in a total volume of 1.0 mL were incubated in RMPI medium containing fetal calf serum (10%) with 18.5 kBq/mL (0.5 μCi/mL) of each specific probe. The samples were gently shaken at 37°C for 2 h. After incubation, the cells were isolated by rapid filtration through glass microfiber filters and washed with 3 × 2 mL of ice-cold Tris-buffered saline (pH 7.4). The radioactivity in cells was measured with a γ-Packard γ counter (United Technologies).

Xenotransplantation of T Cells

All animal studies were performed under a Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center protocol approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Athymic rnu/rnu male mice were obtained from the National Cancer Institute; the mice were 3 mo old at the time of the imaging. The mice were anesthetized by inhalation of isoflurane/oxygen and maintained on a heating pad. After completion of the imaging studies, all animals were sacrificed by CO2 inhalation.

T cells were prepared in fresh batches for each cohort of animals and assessed for viability before every set of injections. Every batch of T cells was normalized for transduction efficacy and percentage live cells and diluted in 50 μL of T cell medium. Subcutaneous T cell injections in both shoulders was performed over a 30-s period using a 28.5-gauge needle/syringe (2–3 mm lateral from the scapula).

Eight groups of mice were studied, 1 for each reporter system (8 reporter gene–radiolabeled probe combinations): hNET/18F-MFBG, hdCKDM/18F-FEAU, hsvTK/18F-FEAU (groups 1–3); hNET/124I-MIBG; hNIS/124I-iodide, hdCKDM/124I-FIAU, and hsvTK/124I-FIAU (groups 4–7); and hNET/123I-MIBG (group 8). Four cohorts of animals, injected with different numbers of T cells, were studied for each of the reporter gene–radiolabeled probe combinations, except for hNET/123I-MIBG (group 8) for which 4 cohorts were analyzed. Animals in cohort A of groups 1–7 (n = 8 animals/reporter system) received a subcutaneous injection of reporter-transduced T cells (105 and 106) in opposite shoulders. Animals in cohort B of groups 1–7 (n = 8 animals/reporter system) received a subcutaneous injection of reporter-transduced T cells (3 × 105 and 3 × 106) in opposite shoulders. Mice in group 8 (123I-MIBG/hNET; n = 17) were divided into 3 cohorts: cohort A (105 and 106 T cells), cohort B (3 × 105 and 3 × 106 T cells), and cohort C (107 and 3 × 107 T cells). Thirty minutes after T cell injection, animals received an intravenous injection of the appropriate/corresponding radiolabeled probe.

Nuclear Imaging of Primary T Cells

Animals from the hNET/18F-MFBG, hsvTK/18F-FEAU, and hdCKDM/18F-FEAU groups (1–3) were injected with 7.4 MBq (200 μCi) of radiolabeled probe, respectively, and imaged 2 and 4 h after tracer administration. Animals from the hNET/124I-MIBG, hNIS/124I-iodide, hdCKDM/124I-FIAU, and hsvTK/124I-FIAU groups (4–7) were injected with 14.8 MBq (400 μCi) of radiolabeled probe, respectively, and imaged 4 and 24 h after administration. Animals from the hNET/123I-MIBG group (8) were injected with 29.6 MBq (800 μCi) of 123I-MIBG and imaged 4 and 24 h after administration. PET imaging was performed using a Focus 120 microPET scanner (Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.). A narrow energy window of 420–580 keV and a coincidence timing window of 6 ns were used for 124I-labeled probes, and a wide 350- to 750-keV window was used for 18F-labeled probe. The image data were corrected for nonuniformity of scanner response, dead time count losses, and physical decay to the time of injection. No correction was applied for attenuation, scatter, or partial-volume averaging.

Region-of-interest analysis of the acquired images was performed using ASIPro software (Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.); total radioactivity and the maximum pixel values were recorded for each T cell injection site. Iodide uptake in the thyroid and stomach was not blocked, and radioactivity in these organs reflects radioactive iodide release after the slow catabolism of 124I-MIBG. Because of the rapid uptake and washout/clearance of free 124I-iodide, multiple imaging time points (0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 24 h) were obtained for the hNIS/124I-iodide reporter T cell–bearing animals.

SPECT imaging was performed on each animal receiving 123I-MIBG using a nano-SPECT/CT dedicated small-animal scanner (Bioscan Inc. USA). A photo peak energy window of 143–175 keV and a low-energy, high-resolution collimator were used to acquire the 123I images. Transverse images were reconstructed by filtered backprojection. Quantification was performed using InVivoScope Integrated proprietary Bioscan Analysis Software.

Statistics

The statistical significance of differences between mean values was estimated with Excel (Microsoft) using the independent t test for unequal variances. P values of less than 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.

RESULTS

Characterization of Reporter Gene–Transduced Primary Human T Cells

After transduction, reporter-bearing primary human T cells were characterized for viability and reporter expression. Fluorescence-activated cell sorting profiles demonstrated a high fraction of viable and GFP-positive reporter cells. Each transduction yielded a high percentage of GFP-positive cells: 77.8% for hNET/GFP, 72.4% for hNIS/GFP, 83.4% for human hdCKDM/GFP, and 77.6% for hsvTK/GFP-transduced T cells, respectively, and high mean fluorescence levels corresponding to the respective vector design. All primary T cell groups demonstrated the same rate of proliferation as wild-type cells and high viability (>85%) (Supplemental Fig. 3).

In Vitro Reporter–Transduced Human T Cell Uptake Studies

The initial assessment and comparison of the 4 reporter systems in human T cells was performed in vitro using a radiolabeled probe uptake assay (Fig. 1). The highest uptake levels were obtained with 123I-MIBG and 124I-MIBG in hNET reporter–bearing T cells after 2 h of incubation (6.5 ± 0.4 and 7.6% ± 0.1% of added radioactivity per 106 cells, respectively). Similarly, the hNET-transduced–to–nontransduced T cell ratios were also high. These values were significantly higher than those obtained with 18F-MFBG (1.9% ± 0.2% per 106 cells), which is consistent with prior in vitro uptake studies comparing MIBG and MFBG uptake in hNET-expressing tumor cells (15,25). Comparable values were measured in hNIS (2.2% ± 0.9% per 106 cells), hsvTK (4.1% ± 0.41% per 106 cells), and hdCKDM (1.5% ± 0.25% per 106 cells) reporter–bearing T cells with 124I-iodide, 18F-FEAU, and 124I-FIAU, respectively.

FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

In vitro uptake of radiolabeled probes in human T cells transduced with different reporters. Data are presented as percentage added radioactivity/106 reporter-transduced T cells (A) and as transduced-to-nontransduced T cell uptake ratios (B). Data are presented from 3 independent experiments.

In Vivo Imaging of Reporter-Transduced Human T Cells in Athymic Mice

A comparison of the hNET and hNIS reporter systems is shown in Figures 2 and 3. Prior studies have shown that 18F-MFBG and 124I-MIBG accumulation in hNET-expressing tumor cells is stable between 2 and 4 h after injection (15,25), whereas 124I-iodide accumulation peaks at approximately 1 h and then washes out of hNIS-expressing cells and tumors (13,29,30). Thus, imaging was performed more frequently in the hNIS/124I-iodide experiments. Although the high background of 124I-MIBG at early (4 h) time points prevented the detection of individual signals from T cell injection sites, the long (∼4 d) half-life of 124I-MIBG allowed for late (24 h) imaging. Although the maximum accumulation of 18F-MFBG and 124I-iodide radioactivity by the subcutaneously injected reporter-bearing T cells was similar, the contrast (T cell–to–background radioactivity ratio) was significantly higher for the hNET/18F-MFBG reporter system (∼14/1 at 4 h) than for hNET/124I-MIBG reporter (∼7/1 at 24 h) and hNIS/124I-iodide reporter (∼3/1 at 1–4 h) for the highest T cell–injected number (3 × 106). Because of the lower background, the hNET/18F-MFBG reporter was able to detect less than 105 T cells, compared with approximately 106 T cells for the hNIS/124I-iodide and hNET/124I-MIBG reporter (Table 1). The SPECT studies of hNET/123I-MIBG T cell imaging failed to visualize 3 × 106 cells. Therefore, ultrahigh numbers (107 and 3 × 107) of hNET reporter T cells were injected, followed by 29.6 MBq (800 μCi) of 123I-MIBG and SPECT imaging at 4 and 24 h. The results of this additional study demonstrated a clear signal at the injection site of 3 × 107 hNET reporter T cells but not at the 107 T cell injection site (Supplemental Fig. 4).

FIGURE 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2.

PET imaging of human primary T cells transduced with hNET (A) or hNIS (B) reporters. Different numbers of T cells were injected subcutaneously, followed by systemic administration of corresponding radiopharmaceuticals and PET imaging at respective time points. Number of T cells injected is shown in right upper and lower panels. %ID/g = percentage injected dose per gram.

FIGURE 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 3.

Analysis of PET images of human T cells transduced with hNET (A and B) and hNIS (C and D) reporters, as shown in Figure 2. Data are %ID/g ± SD (A and C) and T cell–to–background ratios ± SD (B and D). Data are from 2 independent experiments. %ID/g = percentage injected dose per gram.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

Sensitivity of T Cell Number–Dependent Reporter Imaging Using PET

The T cell imaging patterns observed with the hdCKDM/GFP and herpes simplex virus hsvTK/GFP fusion reporters with either 18F-FEAU or 124I-FIAU were similar and between those observed with the hNET/18F-MFBG and hNIS/124I-iodide reporter systems (Figs. 4 and 5). Because both reporter systems have been shown previously to result in fairly stable radioactivity accumulation in tumor cells between 1 and 4 h after injection of tracer (11,12,24), we studied only the 4-h time point to allow for optimal clearance of 18F-FEAU and 124I-FIAU background radioactivity. 18F-FEAU yielded significantly higher T cell accumulation values than 124I-FIAU at 4 h for both reporters, and the T cell–to–background ratios with 18F-FEAU were higher than with 124I-FIAU, partly due to the lower background values observed with 18F-FEAU. Both hdCKDM/18F-FEAU and the hsvTK/18F-FEAU reporter systems were able to detect approximately 3 × 105 T cells at 4 h (Fig. 5; Table 1).

FIGURE 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 4.

PET imaging of human primary T cells transduced with hdCKDM (A) or hsvTK (B) reporters. Different numbers of T cells were injected subcutaneously, followed by systemic administration of corresponding radiopharmaceuticals and PET imaging at respective time points. Number of T cells injected is shown in right upper and lower panels. %ID/g = percentage injected dose per gram.

FIGURE 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 5.

Analysis of PET images of human T cells transduced with hdCKDM (A and B) and hsvTK (C and D), as shown in Figure 4. Data are %ID/g ± SD (A and C) and T cell–to–background ratios to ± SD (B and D). Data are from 2 independent experiments. %ID/g = percentage injected dose per gram.

DISCUSSION

The objective of this report was to determine the minimum number of T cells that can be imaged by different reporter systems (reporter gene + radiolabeled probe) using PET in a murine model. Three human genes (hNET, hNIS, and hdCKDM) and an established viral reporter gene (hsvTK), coupled with their corresponding radiolabeled substrates (comprising different reporter systems), were studied. We compared the sensitivity of the reporter systems to image different numbers of hNET-, hNIS-, hdCKDM-, and hsvTK-transduced T cells at subcutaneous injection sites. All PET reporter systems were effective, but there was a greater than 10-fold difference in threshold sensitivity for T cell detection (Table 1). Not surprisingly, the SPECT reporter system (hNET/123I-MIBG) had more than 100-fold-lower sensitivity than the most sensitive PET reporter system (hNET/18F-MFBG). The hNET/18F-MFBG reporter system could detect less than 1 × 105 T cells, and we were able to visualize all 4 sets of T cells (ranging in number between 1 × 105 and 3 × 106) in all experimental animals (n = 8 per group). The equation describing the relationship between T cell number and measured radioactivity above background levels is T cell number at the injection site = 31,515 × e(1.03 × [measured percentage injected radioactivity/g – background]) (R = 0.80). Thus, approximately 35,000–40,000 hNET reporter T cells can be detected using 18F-MFBG and small-animal PET, 4 h after their subcutaneous injection and intravenous administration of the radiotracer.

This study builds on a recent comparison between 18F-MFBG and clinically approved 123/124I-MIBG for imaging of hNET-expressing cells and tumors (15,25). These studies showed that 18F-MFBG can be synthesized in reasonable radiochemical yields under milder conditions and that it is a more hydrophilic benzylguanidine analog than MIBG, has a lower binding to plasma proteins, and is cleared more rapidly from nontarget tissues and from the body. These characteristics result in superior tumor-to-background images at earlier times after administration of MFBG, compared with MIBG. Although the in vitro experimental data (Fig. 1) and the previously published binding data (15) suggest that MIBG would be a more effective probe than MFBG, the higher logD and serum protein binding and slower body clearance of MIBG, compared with that of MFBG, account for the discordance between the in vitro and in vivo uptake results. These results also corroborate previously published studies using the hNET reporter system in a model of intratumorally injected Epstein-Barr virus–specific T cells (30).

hNIS imaging, after administration of 124I-iodide, demonstrated rapid accumulation and rapid clearance of the probe from the sites of T cell injection, which is similar to the results described by us and others (29,31) in stably transduced xenografts. However, the T cell–to–background ratio was fairly stable from 1 to 4 h due to the rapid clearance of iodide from most tissues (background) as well as from the T cell injection site. The advantage of rapid initial accumulation was negated by the high background level of radioactivity and near-parallel clearance from the T cell injection site and surrounding tissues (background).

PET imaging of hsvTK/GFP and hdCKDM/GFP with 18F-FEAU also yielded positive results for T cell numbers between 3 × 105 and 3 × 106. Similar PET T cell imaging threshold values were obtained with hsvTKsr39/18F-FHBG by Su et al. and Yaghoubi et al. (32,33). HsvTK and human dCKDM reporter imaging with 124I-FIAU and PET at 24 h after injection was only able to reliably visualize the highest number of T cells injected (3 × 106). Only 20% of the animals showed a positive T cell signal after injection of 1 × 106 cells, and no visualization of T cells was observed below 1 × 106 T cells by either hsvTK or hdCKDM imaged with 124I-FIAU.

We and others have previously demonstrated that FEAU has more rapid body clearance, lower background, and higher affinity to and accumulation by HsvTK and hdCKDM enzymes than FIAU (12). These preferential pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters resulted in a lower T cell detection threshold with 18F-FEAU than with 124I-FIAU.

The in vivo experiments demonstrated an advantage of short-half-life 18F-based probes that clear nontarget tissue and the body rapidly, including 18F-MFBG and 18F-FEAU for imaging early (i.e., 4 h). In contrast, the more slowly clearing iodine-based substrates, such as 124I-MIBG, 123I-MIBG, and 124I-FIAU, require a longer time to achieve a good target-to-background ratio because the bulky electron-donor iodine is more hydrophobic than the small electron-acceptor fluorine. The hNET/123I-MIBG SPECT study showed the lowest sensitivity, with no visualization of 3 × 106 T cells at both early (2–4 h) and late (8–24 h) time points after subcutaneous injection. An additional hNET/123I-MIBG study, with injection of high numbers of T cells (1 × 107 and 3 × 107), showed reliable detection of T cells only at the highest number injected, demonstrating the limitation of 123I-MIBG SPECT imaging.

CONCLUSION

A comparison of different constitutively expressed radionuclide-based reporter genes (3 human and 1 viral) and their corresponding reporter probes for imaging of T cell number was performed. The hNET/18F-MFBG PET reporter system was the most sensitive, capable of detecting 3–4 × 104 T cells at the site of T cell injection in the animal model. Fast-clearing short-half-life 18F-based probes demonstrate high specificity and allow for repetitive of T cell imaging.

DISCLOSURE

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. Therefore, and solely to indicate this fact, this article is hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 USC section 1734. This work was supported by the NIH P50 CA86438-11, R01 CA163980, and R01 CA161138 grants and Mr. William H. Goodwin and Mrs. Alice Goodwin and the Commonwealth Foundation for Cancer Research and The Experimental Therapeutics Center of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. Technical services were provided by the MSKCC Small-Animal Imaging Core Facility, supported in part by NIH Small-Animal Imaging Research Program (SAIRP), NIH Shared Instrumentation grant no. 1 S10 RR020892-01, NIH Shared Instrumentation grant no. 1 S10 RR028889-01, and NIH Center grant P30 CA08748. No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Jason Lewis and the Radiochemistry Core for their technical assistance and expertise.

Footnotes

  • Published online May 29, 2015.

  • © 2015 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Inc.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Koehne G,
    2. Doubrovin M,
    3. Doubrovina E,
    4. et al
    . Serial in vivo imaging of the targeted migration of human HSV-TK-transduced antigen-specific lymphocytes. Nat Biotechnol. 2003;21:405–413.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.
    1. Su H,
    2. Chang DS,
    3. Gambhir SS,
    4. Braun J
    . Monitoring the antitumor response of naive and memory CD8 T cells in RAG1−/− mice by positron-emission tomography. J Immunol. 2006;176:4459–4467.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.
    1. Dubey P,
    2. Su H,
    3. Adonai N,
    4. et al
    . Quantitative imaging of the T cell antitumor response by positron-emission tomography. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:1232–1237.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Dobrenkov K,
    2. Olszewska M,
    3. Likar Y,
    4. et al
    . Monitoring the efficacy of adoptively transferred prostate cancer-targeted human T lymphocytes with PET and bioluminescence imaging. J Nucl Med. 2008;49:1162–1170.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Choi SR,
    2. Zhuang ZP,
    3. Chacko AM,
    4. et al
    . SPECT imaging of herpes simplex virus type1 thymidine kinase gene expression by 123I-FIAU(1). Acad Radiol. 2005;12:798–805.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Zinn KR,
    2. Chaudhuri TR,
    3. Krasnykh VN,
    4. et al
    . Gamma camera dual imaging with a somatostatin receptor and thymidine kinase after gene transfer with a bicistronic adenovirus in mice. Radiology. 2002;223:417–425.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Zinn K,
    2. Chaudhuri TR,
    3. Krasnykh VN,
    4. et al
    . Molecular imaging of temporal dynamics and thymidine kinase after gene transfer with a bicistronic adenovirus in mice. Radiology. 2004;64:417–425.
    OpenUrl
  8. 8.↵
    1. Serganova I,
    2. Doubrovin M,
    3. Iyer M,
    4. et al
    . Molecular imaging of temporal dynamics and spatial heterogeneity of hypoxia-inducible factor-1 signal transduction activity in tumors in living mice. Cancer Res. 2004;64:6101–6108.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Yaghoubi S,
    2. Barrio JR,
    3. Dahlbom M,
    4. et al
    . Human pharmacokinetic and dosimetry studies of [18F]FHBG: a reporter probe for imaging herpes simplex virus type-1 thymidine kinase reporter gene expression. J Nucl Med. 2001;42:1225–1234.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Min JJ,
    2. Iyer M,
    3. Gambhir SS
    . Comparison of 18F-FHBG and 14C-FIAU for imaging of HSV1-tk reporter gene expression: adenoviral infection vs stable transfection. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2003;30:1547–1560.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Tjuvajev JG,
    2. Doubrovin M,
    3. Akhurst T,
    4. et al
    . Comparison of radiolabeled nucleoside probes (FIAU, FHBG, and FHPG) for PET imaging of HSV1-tk gene expression. J Nucl Med. 2002;43:1072–1083.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Miyagawa T,
    2. Gogiberidze G,
    3. Serganova I,
    4. et al
    . Imaging of HSV-tk Reporter gene expression: comparison between 18F-FEAU, 18F-FFEAU, and other imaging probes. J Nucl Med. 2008;49:637–648.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Che J,
    2. Doubrovin M,
    3. Serganova I,
    4. et al
    . hNIS-IRES-eGFP dual reporter gene imaging. Mol Imaging. 2005;4:128–136.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Moroz MA,
    2. Serganova I,
    3. Zanzonico P,
    4. et al
    . Imaging hNET reporter gene expression with 124I-MIBG. J Nucl Med. 2007;48:827–836.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Zhang H,
    2. Huang R,
    3. Pillarsetty N,
    4. et al
    . Synthesis and evaluation of 18F-labeled benzylguanidine analogs for targeting the human norepinephrine transporter. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014;41:322–332.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Reubi JC,
    2. Kvols L,
    3. Krenning E,
    4. et al
    . Distribution of somatostatin receptors in normal and tumor tissue. Metabolism. 1990;39:78–81.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Zhang H,
    2. Moroz MA,
    3. Serganova I,
    4. et al
    . Imaging expression of the human somatostatin receptor subtype-2 reporter gene with 68Ga-DOTATOC. J Nucl Med. 2011;52:123–131.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Genove G,
    2. DeMarco U,
    3. Xu H,
    4. et al
    . A new transgene reporter for in vivo magnetic resonance imaging. Nat Med. 2005;11:450–454.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Moore A,
    2. Josephson L,
    3. Bhorade RM,
    4. et al
    . Human transferrin receptor gene as a marker gene for MR imaging. Radiology. 2001;221:244–250.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Campbell DO,
    2. Yaghoubi SS,
    3. Su Y,
    4. et al
    . Structure-guided engineering of human thymidine kinase 2 as a positron emission tomography reporter gene for enhanced phosphorylation of non-natural thymidine analog reporter probe. J Biol Chem. 2012;287:446–454.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Ponomarev V,
    2. Doubrovin M,
    3. Shavrin A,
    4. et al
    . A human-derived reporter gene for noninvasive imaging in humans: mitochondrial thymidine kinase type 2. J Nucl Med. 2007;48:819–826.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    1. Schwarzenberg J,
    2. Radu CG,
    3. Benz M,
    4. et al
    . Human biodistribution and radiation dosimetry of novel PET probes targeting the deoxyribonucleoside salvage pathway. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011;38:711–721.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.
    1. Murphy JM,
    2. Armijo AL,
    3. Nomme J,
    4. et al
    . Development of new deoxycytidine kinase inhibitors and noninvasive in vivo evaluation using positron emission tomography. J Med Chem. 2013;56:6696–6708.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Likar Y,
    2. Zurita J,
    3. Dobrenkov K,
    4. et al
    . A new pyrimidine-specific reporter gene: a mutated human deoxycytidine kinase suitable for PET during treatment with acycloguanosine-based cytotoxic drugs. J Nucl Med. 2010;51:1395–1403.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. Zhang H,
    2. Huang R,
    3. Cheung NK,
    4. et al
    . Imaging the norepinephrine transporter in neuroblastoma: a comparison of 18F-MFBG and 123I-MIBG. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20:2182–2191.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    1. Ponomarev V,
    2. Doubrovin M,
    3. Serganova I,
    4. et al
    . Cytoplasmically retargeted HSV1-tk/GFP reporter gene mutants for optimization of noninvasive molecular-genetic imaging. Neoplasia. 2003;5:245–254.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Iwatani Y,
    2. Amino N,
    3. Mori H,
    4. et al
    . Effects of various isolation methods for human peripheral lymphocytes on T cell subsets determined in a fluorescence activated cell sorter (FACS), and demonstration of a sex difference of suppressor/cytotoxic T cells. J Immunol Methods. 1982;54:31–42.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Zhang H,
    2. Cantorias MV,
    3. Pillarsetty N,
    4. et al
    . An improved strategy for the synthesis of [18F]-labeled arabinofuranosyl nucleosides. Nucl Med Biol. 2012;39:1182–1188.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Miyagawa M,
    2. Anton M,
    3. Wagner B,
    4. et al
    . Non-invasive imaging of cardiac transgene expression with PET: comparison of the human sodium/iodide symporter gene and HSV1-tk as the reporter gene. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2005;32:1108–1114.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Doubrovin MM,
    2. Doubrovina ES,
    3. Zanzonico P,
    4. et al
    . In vivo imaging and quantitation of adoptively transferred human antigen-specific T cells transduced to express a human norepinephrine transporter gene. Cancer Res. 2007;67:11959–11969.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. 31.↵
    1. Miyagawa M,
    2. Beyer M,
    3. Wagner B,
    4. et al
    . Cardiac reporter gene imaging using the human sodium/iodide symporter gene. Cardiovasc Res. 2005;65:195–202.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. 32.↵
    1. Yaghoubi SS,
    2. Gambhir SS
    . PET imaging of herpes simplex virus type 1 thymidine kinase (HSV1-tk) or mutant HSV1-sr39tk reporter gene expression in mice and humans using 18F-FHBG. Nat Protoc. 2006;1:3069–3075.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    1. Su H,
    2. Forbes A,
    3. Gambhir SS,
    4. et al
    . Quantitation of cell number by a positron emission tomography reporter gene strategy. Mol Imaging Biol. 2004;6:139–148.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  • Received for publication April 23, 2015.
  • Accepted for publication April 25, 2015.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 56 (7)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 56, Issue 7
July 1, 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparative Analysis of T Cell Imaging with Human Nuclear Reporter Genes
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Comparative Analysis of T Cell Imaging with Human Nuclear Reporter Genes
Maxim A. Moroz, Hanwen Zhang, Jason Lee, Ekaterina Moroz, Juan Zurita, Larissa Shenker, Inna Serganova, Ronald Blasberg, Vladimir Ponomarev
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jul 2015, 56 (7) 1055-1060; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.115.159855

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Comparative Analysis of T Cell Imaging with Human Nuclear Reporter Genes
Maxim A. Moroz, Hanwen Zhang, Jason Lee, Ekaterina Moroz, Juan Zurita, Larissa Shenker, Inna Serganova, Ronald Blasberg, Vladimir Ponomarev
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jul 2015, 56 (7) 1055-1060; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.115.159855
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Imaging cellular immunotherapies and immune cell biomarkers: from preclinical studies to patients
  • Development of a Clinically Relevant Reporter for Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell Expansion, Trafficking, and Toxicity
  • Imaging of T-cell Responses in the Context of Cancer Immunotherapy
  • Molecular Imaging with Reporter Genes: Has Its Promise Been Delivered?
  • 89Zr-oxine labelling and PET imaging shows lung delivery of a cell/gene cancer therapy
  • New Developments in Imaging Cell-Based Therapy
  • Antibody with Infinite Affinity for In Vivo Tracking of Genetically Engineered Lymphocytes
  • Reporter Genes for PET Imaging of CAR T Cells Offers Insight into Adoptive Cell Transfer
  • Norepinephrine Transporter as a Target for Imaging and Therapy
  • Molecular Imaging of Inflammation: Current Status
  • Dynamic imaging for CAR-T-cell therapy
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Feasibility of Ultra-Low-Activity 18F-FDG PET/CT Imaging Using a Long–Axial-Field-of-View PET/CT System
  • Cardiac Presynaptic Sympathetic Nervous Function Evaluated by Cardiac PET in Patients with Chronotropic Incompetence Without Heart Failure
  • Validation and Evaluation of a Vendor-Provided Head Motion Correction Algorithm on the uMI Panorama PET/CT System
Show more Clinical Investigations

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • T cells
  • imaging
  • PET
  • reporter genes
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire