Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleBrief Communications

Encapsulation of α-Particle–Emitting 225Ac3+ Ions Within Carbon Nanotubes

Michael L. Matson, Carlos H. Villa, Jeyarama S. Ananta, Justin J. Law, David A. Scheinberg and Lon J. Wilson
Journal of Nuclear Medicine June 2015, 56 (6) 897-900; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.115.158311
Michael L. Matson
1Department of Chemistry, and the Smalley Institute for Nanoscale Science and Technology, Rice University, Houston, Texas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carlos H. Villa
2Molecular Pharmacology and Chemistry Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jeyarama S. Ananta
1Department of Chemistry, and the Smalley Institute for Nanoscale Science and Technology, Rice University, Houston, Texas
3Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford University, Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Justin J. Law
1Department of Chemistry, and the Smalley Institute for Nanoscale Science and Technology, Rice University, Houston, Texas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David A. Scheinberg
2Molecular Pharmacology and Chemistry Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lon J. Wilson
1Department of Chemistry, and the Smalley Institute for Nanoscale Science and Technology, Rice University, Houston, Texas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

225Ac3+ is a generator of α-particle–emitting radionuclides with 4 net α-particle decays that can be used therapeutically. Targeting 225Ac3+ by use of ligands conjugated to traditional bifunctional chelates limits the amount of 225Ac3+ that can be delivered. Ultrashort, single-walled carbon nanotubes (US-tubes), previously demonstrated as sequestering agents of trivalent lanthanide ions and small molecules, also successfully incorporate 225Ac3+. Methods: Aqueous loading of both 225Ac3+ ions and Gd3+ ions via bath sonication was used to construct 225Ac@gadonanotubes (225Ac@GNTs). The 225Ac@GNTs were subsequently challenged with heat, time, and human serum. Results: US-tubes internally loaded with both 225Ac3+ ions and Gd3+ ions show 2 distinct populations of 225Ac3+ ions: one rapidly lost in human serum and one that remains bound to the US-tubes despite additional challenge with heat, time, and serum. The presence of the latter population depended on cosequestration of Gd3+ and 225Ac3+ ions. Conclusion: US-tubes successfully sequester 225Ac3+ ions in the presence of Gd3+ ions and retain them after a human serum challenge, rendering 225Ac@GNTs candidates for radioimmunotherapy for delivery of 225Ac3+ ions at higher concentrations than is currently possible for traditional ligand carriers.

  • 225Ac
  • carbon nanotube
  • alpha therapy
  • nanotechnology

Single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWNTs, Fig. 1A) are cylinder-shaped, “rolled-up” graphene sheets that possess a graphitic carbon exterior allowing for covalent functionalization with disease-targeting agents (1–5). Moreover, when SWNTs are properly prepared (6), they possess small defects along their sidewalls that allow for the encapsulation of small molecules and ions within their hollow interior (7–9). These features render SWNT-based materials potentially useful as delivery platforms for targeted α-particle–emitting radionuclides, for radioimmunotherapy of cancer (10–12). Here, we examine the ability of modified SWNTs (under 100 nm in length, known as ultrashort tubes [US-tubes], Fig. 1C) to encapsulate the potent α-particle (4He2+) generator 225Ac3+.

FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

Synthetic scheme for production of US-tubes.

α-particle emitters, such as 213Bi, 211At, and 225Ac, possess a far greater linear energy transfer (5,000–8,000 keV) and shorter range (50–80 μm, or a few cell diameters) than the β-particle (e−) emitters currently used for radioimmunotherapy, such as the Food and Drug Administration–approved 90Y and 131I (8,11,13,14). These properties of α-particle emitters make them preferred for the specific killing of small-volume cancers such as single cells or micrometastatic lesions. Moreover, Monte Carlo simulations suggest that a solitary α particle can have a cytotoxic effect equivalent to that of over a thousand β particles (15). 225Ac3+ is particularly potent because of the yield of 4 α particles in the decay pathway to 209Bi. Traditional radiometal-labeling requires the use of bifunctional chelates, such as DOTA or diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid, to bind the free metal radionuclides to the targeting ligand. Recently, chelates have been used to attach 225Ac3+ to ammonium functionalized carbon nanotubes for therapy of model human lymphoma (16). Although these macrocyclic chelates have provided several clinical successes, typically less than 1 chelated α-emitting atom is attached for every 100–1,000 targeting ligands, suggesting an ongoing need to identify alternative chelating agents. The use of selective targeting agents, such as monoclonal antibodies, for the delivery of therapeutics to specific sites in vivo may decrease radioimmunotherapy toxicity (13). There is an inherent preference for intracellular uptake and retention of radiometals over radiohalides (17), and US-tubes are also inherently bioinert, intracellular agents (18,19). Another potential radioimmunotherapy agent, 211At, has been previously reported to be encapsulated within US-tubes by oxidation to form the mixed halide 211AtCl2 (8). However, 211At possesses a short half-life (7.21 h) compared with 225Ac3+ (10 d), making the 225Ac3+ approach more practical. The successful targeting of a 225Ac3+/US-tube construct could lead to rapid uptake of 225Ac3+ within targeted diseased cells. In this article, we report a new synthetic approach to the internalization and stable retention of 225Ac3+ ions within US-tubes (accomplished through the addition of Gd3+ ions) as displayed in Figure 2.

FIGURE 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2.

Representation of 225Ac@GNT construct. Green represents Gd3+ ions, yellow with radioactive symbol represents 225Ac3+ ion, and orange and yellow cluster represents emitted α particle.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

225Ac3+

A dried 225AcNO3 residue obtained from the Department of Energy (Oak Ridge National Laboratory) was dissolved in 0.1 mL of 0.2 M HCl (Optima grade; Fisher Scientific). 225Ac activity was measured using a drop well dose calibrator (CRC-17 radioisotope calibrator; E.R. Squibb and Sons, Inc.) set at 775, with displayed activity value multiplied by 5.

US-Tube Synthesis

US-tubes were prepared following a previously established synthetic method (Fig. 1) (6). Briefly, 1.0 g of full-length SWNTs produced in an electric arc discharge with nickel–yttrium catalyst (AP grade; CarboLex, Inc.) (Fig. 1A) was exposed to a fluorinating gas mixture (5.2% helium–diluted F2) at 125°C for 12 h. The resulting fluorinated SWNTs were pyrolyzed at 1,000°C for 2 h under argon gas, rendering ultrashort nanotubes (US-tubes), 20–80 nm in length, with sidewall defects that facilitate the aqueous internal loading of ions (Fig. 1B) (7–9). The US-tubes were then purified of nickel–yttrium catalyst impurities via bath sonication in concentrated HCl and chemically reduced in an amended Birch reduction with potassium in anhydrous tetrahydrofuran (3). The reduction yields individualized US-tubes as opposed to small bundles of US-tubes (Fig. 1C).

225Ac3+ Labeling

US-tubes were dispersed via bath sonication to a concentration of 5 g/L in metal-free water obtained from a Purelab Plus system (United States Filter Corp.). Three separate aqueous loading techniques were examined: the first was addition of 225Ac3+ ions alone, the second was addition of a mixture of Gd3+ ions and 225Ac3+ ions, and the third was sequential addition of Gd3+ ions followed by 225Ac3+ ions. For 225Ac3+ ions alone, 3.0 μL of 225AcCl3 (7.0 MBq) were diluted in 200 μL of metal-free water and mixed with 50 μL of US-tube suspension. For the mixture, 3 μL of 225AcCl3 (7.0 MBq) were diluted in 150 μL of metal-free water, mixed with 50 μL of 19 mM GdCl3 (Aldrich Chemical) and 50 μL of the US-tube suspension. Finally, for the sequential addition, 150 μL of metal-free water were mixed with 50 μL of 19 mM GdCl3 and 50 μL of the US-tube suspension (the previously established method for creation of the gadonanotubes); after 24 h, 7.0 MBq of 225AcCl3 were added to the GdCl3/US-tube solution. Activity was determined using a Cobra γ counter (Packard Instrument Co., Inc.) with a 340- to 540-keV window.

Previous work detailing the loading of Gd3+ into US-tubes produced the desired product by 1 h of bath sonication followed by overnight equilibration (9). To help ensure that 225Ac could be encapsulated, samples were bath-sonicated for 2 h and allowed to equilibrate overnight. The next day, all samples were washed with 250 μL of metal-free water and filtered using a Handee Micro-Spin Column (Thermo Scientific Pierce) with a paper membrane (pore size, ∼10 μm) until no activity was detected in the filtrate via drop well dose calibrator. After filtration, all samples were resuspended in 200 μL of distilled water by pipette aspiration and the activity measured. All loading procedures were performed in triplicate.

Human Serum Challenge Experiments

To simulate in vivo conditions, challenge experiments were conducted monitoring the effect of heat, time, or human serum on 225Ac@US-tube suspensions. For each serum challenge, 20 μL of the resulting 225Ac@US-tube (12.5 μg) suspension from the above 3 loading techniques were added to 180 μL of normal human AB serum (Sigma Chemical Co.). The mixture was then stirred and incubated at 37°C for 2 h. After incubation, the mixture was filtered using a centrifugal device (100g, 5 min.), and the serum filtrate was counted in scintillation fluid using a β counter (samples were allowed to reach equilibrium overnight). Standards of 225Ac@gadonanotubes (225Ac@GNTs) (prepared by the second technique above) were counted as a reference. For rechallenging the samples, 200 μL of serum were again added to the filter device, and the mixture was resuspended and reincubated at 37°C for 2 h. The filtration process was repeated. As a control, 225AcCl3 alone in serum was spun in the filter device. Samples also were challenged for longer times (4 and 12 h) and at both room temperature and 37°C to compare the effects of temperature and time in serum.

RESULTS

225Ac3+ Labeling

Serial washings via centrifuge filtration were used to determine the extent of 225Ac3+ labeling. For the loading protocol involving only 225Ac3+, over 95% (6.7 MBq) of the initial activity remained with the US-tubes after washing. For both loading techniques involving Gd3+ ions with 225Ac3+ ions (simultaneous and sequential), only 50% (3.5 MBq) of the initial activity remained associated with the US-tubes. This reduction in yield is likely due to the large excess of Gd3+ ions saturating potential binding sites for 225Ac at the US-tube sidewall defects. All 3 loading techniques (225Ac3+ only, 225Ac3+ and Gd3+ simultaneously, and 225Ac3+ and Gd3+ sequentially) showed no radioactivity in the centrifugal filtrate after the third washing of 250 μL, implying that only 750 μL of metal-free water was required to separate the 225Ac3+ ions not bound by the US-tubes in suspension.

Human Serum Challenge Experiments

The 225Ac@US-tubes and 225Ac@GNTs were challenged with human serum (Fig. 3). For the 225Ac@US-tubes labeled with only 225Ac3+ ions, only 40.0% (2.7 MBq) of the loaded 225Ac3+ remained after the initial human AB serum washing. There was little difference in 225Ac3+ retention after serum challenge of the US-tubes loaded via sequential and simultaneous techniques with 225Ac3+ and Gd3+ ions within the US-tubes. The simultaneous loading technique retained 77% (2.7 MBq), and the sequential technique retained 80% (2.8 MBq) (Fig. 3A). Subsequent serum challenges of the 225Ac@US-tubes loaded with Gd3+ ions had no measurable effect on removing 225Ac; however, subsequent challenges of the 225Ac@US-tubes with no Gd3+ ions present continued to further remove 225Ac, until less than 5.0% (0.34 MBq) of the original 225Ac activity remained bound by the US-tubes. Conversely, subsequent challenges of the 225Ac@GNTs (after the initial ∼20% activity loss) through both simultaneous and sequential loading revealed no measurable quantity of 225Ac3+ in the filtrate and approximately 100% retention of the remaining 225Ac3+ ions with the 225Ac@GNTs in the filter (Fig. 3B). Moreover, the additional challenges of time (both 4 and 12 h) and elevated temperature (37°C) of the 225Ac@GNTs using the simultaneous loading technique did not produce additional losses of 225Ac3+ (Fig. 3C). Control experiments (free 225AcCl in serum) showed no significant nonspecific retention of 225Ac3+ on the filter devices. These results indicate that a serum challenge may be used as a stripping procedure to purify the material by removing loosely bound 225Ac3+ ions that are not embedded within Gd3+ ion clusters and encapsulated within the nanotube, as reported previously for US-tubes filled with 64Cu (20).

FIGURE 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 3.

Results of human serum challenge experiments. (A) Time and temperature challenge experiments performed on 3 prepared 225Ac materials: simultaneous Gd3+/225Ac3+ loading, sequential Gd3+/225Ac3+ loading, and 225Ac3+-only loading. (B) Effect of repeated serum challenges on activity of simultaneously loaded 225Ac@GNTs. (C) Effect of various serum challenge conditions on activity of simultaneously loaded 225Ac@GNTs. RT = room temperature.

DISCUSSION

Previous work has shown that 225Ac may be attached to carbon nanotubes by chelation with the macrocyclic chelator DOTA, which may be covalently linked to the external sidewall of the nanotube (16). In the same manner, antibodies may be attached for in vivo targeting of the construct (12,21). In demonstrating that 225Ac may be encapsulated within carbon nanotubes, we have simplified the production of these targeted nanoconstructs by eliminating the need for attachment of the macrocyclic chelator. Retention of the radioisotope within the nanotube reduces exposure to serum proteins and increases the area on the external sidewall that may be used for attaching targeting peptides or antibodies while retaining the therapeutic efficacy. Furthermore, the encapsulation of gadolinium within the carbon nanotubes has previously been shown to enhance MR imaging contrast (22), and a bimodal PET/MR contrast agent has been produced by trapping 64Cu2+ within Gd3+ clusters (20).

The above results are consistent with the hypothesis that the 225Ac3+ ions should behave similarly to the Gd3+ ions within US-tubes because of the similar solution chemistries of trivalent actinide ions and trivalent lanthanide ions (19). One exception was the continual leakage of 225Ac3+ ions from the US-tubes for the 225Ac@US-tubes on repetitive serum challenges, whereas Gd3+ ions show no leakage (23). Therefore, it is unclear whether the internalization of the 225Ac3+ ions directly mimics the Gd3+ ion internalization of the gadonanotubes. Previous high-resolution transmission electron microscopy images revealed that the Gd3+ ions in the gadonanotubes exist in small (1 nm × 2–5 nm) clusters that correspond to roughly 5–10 Gd3+ ions per cluster (9); additionally, the gadonanotubes average 2%–5% Gd3+ by mass as determined by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry. Assuming a mean length of 50 nm and approximately 120 carbon atoms per nanometer, each US-tube therefore contains about 10–20 Gd3+ ions. Although the synthetic method herein uses the minimum concentration of US-tubes that can be reliably manipulated for filtration experiments, practical considerations (i.e., amount of radionuclide readily available) limited the concentration of 225Ac3+ ions such that the conditions provided for one 225Ac3+ ion for roughly every 250 US-tubes. At this low concentration, there are not enough 225Ac3+ ions present to form 225Ac3+ clusters that would directly mimic the stable Gd3+ ion clusters inside the gadonanotubes. However, at this concentration, the 225Ac3+ ions behave similarly to the Gd3+ ions when admixed into the US-tubes with Gd3+ carrier ions, allowing for use of the nonradioactive ions for most of the cluster formation. Interestingly, the methodology of loading (sequential vs. simultaneous) appears to have little or no effect on the final product. This result should prove beneficial to future synthetic routes with regard to the time of production of 225Ac3+/gadonanotube conjugates, and the solution chemistry of the 225Ac3+ ions within the gadonanotubes further supports the idea that production of an ion cluster is critical for their stable embedment within the US-tubes and their resistance to serum challenge.

CONCLUSION

225Ac@GNTs provide a novel alternative to chelation for radiometal ions useful for radioimmunotherapy. In addition to sequestering the therapeutic radioisotope, ultrashort carbon nanotubes may also be used to encapsulate elements for imaging by MR or PET and may be functionalized with antibodies, creating a single construct capable of targeted imaging and therapy.

DISCLOSURE

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. Therefore, and solely to indicate this fact, this article is hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 USC section 1734. The Welch Foundation (grant C-0627) and the NIH (grant R01CA055349) provided partial support of this work. David A. Scheinberg is a consultant to Ensyce Biosciences, Inc. No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Footnotes

  • Published online Apr. 30, 2015.

  • © 2015 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Inc.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Hirsch A
    . Functionalization of single-walled carbon nanotubes. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2002;41:1853–1859.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.
    1. Georgakilas V,
    2. Kordatos K,
    3. Prato M,
    4. Guldi DM,
    5. Holzinger M,
    6. Hirsch A
    . Organic functionalization of carbon nanotubes. J Am Chem Soc. 2002;124:760–761.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Ashcroft JM,
    2. Hartman KB,
    3. Mackeyev Y,
    4. et al
    . Functionalization of individual ultra-short single-walled carbon nanotubes. Nanotechnology. 2006;17:5033.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  4. 4.
    1. Ashcroft JM,
    2. Hartman KB,
    3. Kissell KR,
    4. et al
    . Single-molecule I2@US-tube nanocapsules: a new x-ray contrast-agent design. Adv Mater. 2007;19:573–576.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  5. 5.↵
    1. Mackeyev Y,
    2. Hartman KB,
    3. Ananta JS,
    4. Lee AV,
    5. Wilson LJ
    . Catalytic synthesis of amino acid and peptide derivatized gadonanotubes. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131:8342–8343.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Gu Z,
    2. Peng H,
    3. Hauge RH,
    4. Smalley RE,
    5. Margrave JL
    . Cutting single-wall carbon nanotubes through fluorination. Nano Lett. 2002;2:1009–1013.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  7. 7.↵
    1. Kissell KR,
    2. Hartman KB,
    3. Van der Heide PAW,
    4. Wilson LJ
    . Preparation of I2@SWNTs: synthesis and spectroscopic characterization of I2-loaded SWNTs. J Phys Chem B. 2006;110:17425–17429.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Hartman KB,
    2. Hamlin DK,
    3. Wilbur DS,
    4. Wilson LJ
    . 211AtCl@US-tube nanocapsules: a new concept in radiotherapeutic-agent design. Small. 2007;3:1496–1499.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Sitharaman B,
    2. Kissell KR,
    3. Hartman KB,
    4. et al
    . Superparamagnetic gadonanotubes are high-performance MRI contrast agents. Chem Commun (Camb). 2005;3915–3917.
  10. 10.↵
    1. Kim Y-S,
    2. Brechbiel MW
    . An overview of targeted alpha therapy. Tumour Biol. 2012;33:573–590.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. McDevitt MR,
    2. Ma D,
    3. Lai LT,
    4. et al
    . Tumor therapy with targeted atomic nanogenerators. Science. 2001;294:1537–1540.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Ruggiero A,
    2. Villa CH,
    3. Holland JP,
    4. et al
    . Imaging and treating tumor vasculature with targeted radiolabeled carbon nanotubes. Int J Nanomedicine. 2010;5:783–802.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Goldenberg DM
    . Targeted therapy of cancer with radiolabeled antibodies. J Nucl Med. 2002;43:693–713.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Morgenstern A,
    2. Bruchertseifer F,
    3. Apostolidis C
    . Bismuth-213 and actinium-225: generator performance and evolving therapeutic applications of two generator-derived alpha-emitting radioisotopes. Curr Radiopharm. 2012;5:221–227.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Scheinberg DA
    . Antibody therapies of cancer. In: Chabner B, Longo D, eds. Cancer Chemotherapy and Biotherapy: Principles and Practice. 4th ed. New York, NY: Lippincott; 2010.
  16. 16.↵
    1. Mulvey JJ,
    2. Villa CH,
    3. McDevitt MR,
    4. Escorcia FE,
    5. Casey E,
    6. Scheinberg DA
    . Self-assembly of carbon nanotubes and antibodies on tumours for targeted amplified delivery. Nat Nanotechnol. 2013;8:763–771.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Scheinberg DA,
    2. Strand M
    . Leukemic cell targeting and therapy by monoclonal antibody in a mouse model system. Cancer Res. 1982;42:44–49.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Kolosnjaj-Tabi J,
    2. Hartman KB,
    3. Boudjemaa S,
    4. et al
    . In vivo behavior of large doses of ultrashort and full-length single-walled carbon nanotubes after oral and intraperitoneal administration to Swiss mice. ACS Nano. 2010;4:1481–1492.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Hassan AA,
    2. Chan BT-Y,
    3. Tran LA,
    4. et al
    . Serine-derivatized gadonanotubes as magnetic nanoprobes for intracellular labeling. Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2010;5:34–38.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Cisneros BT,
    2. Law JJ,
    3. Matson ML,
    4. Azhdarinia A,
    5. Sevick-Muraca EM,
    6. Wilson LJ
    . Stable confinement of positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance agents within carbon nanotubes for bimodal imaging. Nanomed (Lond). 2014;9:2499–2509.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  21. 21.↵
    1. McDevitt MR,
    2. Chattopadhyay D,
    3. Kappel BJ,
    4. et al
    . Tumor targeting with antibody-functionalized, radiolabeled carbon nanotubes. J Nucl Med. 2007;48:1180–1189.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    1. Sethi R,
    2. Mackeyev Y,
    3. Wilson LJ
    . The gadonanotubes revisited: a new frontier in MRI contrast agent design. Inorg Chim Acta. 2012;393:165–172.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  23. 23.↵
    1. Choppin G,
    2. Rizkalla E
    . Solution chemistry of actinides and lanthanides. In: Choppin GR, Lander GH, Eyring L, and Gschneidner KA, eds. Handbook on the Physics and Chemistry of Rare Earths. Vol 18. New York, NY: Elsevier; 1994:559–590.
  • Received for publication March 25, 2015.
  • Accepted for publication April 17, 2015.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 56 (6)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 56, Issue 6
June 1, 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Encapsulation of α-Particle–Emitting 225Ac3+ Ions Within Carbon Nanotubes
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Encapsulation of α-Particle–Emitting 225Ac3+ Ions Within Carbon Nanotubes
Michael L. Matson, Carlos H. Villa, Jeyarama S. Ananta, Justin J. Law, David A. Scheinberg, Lon J. Wilson
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jun 2015, 56 (6) 897-900; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.115.158311

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Encapsulation of α-Particle–Emitting 225Ac3+ Ions Within Carbon Nanotubes
Michael L. Matson, Carlos H. Villa, Jeyarama S. Ananta, Justin J. Law, David A. Scheinberg, Lon J. Wilson
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jun 2015, 56 (6) 897-900; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.115.158311
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Intraarterial Administration Boosts 177Lu-HA-DOTATATE Accumulation in Salvage Meningioma Patients
  • Head-to-Head Comparison of 68Ga-NOTA (68Ga-NGUL) and 68Ga-PSMA-11 in Patients with Metastatic Prostate Cancer: A Prospective Study
  • Assessment of P-Glycoprotein Transport Activity at the Human Blood–Retina Barrier with (R)‐11C-Verapamil PET
Show more Brief Communications

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • 225Ac
  • carbon nanotube
  • alpha therapy
  • nanotechnology
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire