Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleInvited Perspectives

Molecular Imaging of Prostate Cancer: Tapping into the Opportunities

Wim J.G. Oyen and Igle J. De Jong
Journal of Nuclear Medicine February 2015, 56 (2) 169-170; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.114.150219
Wim J.G. Oyen
Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Igle J. De Jong
University Medical Center Groningen Groningen, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Prostate cancer is a major health issue, having the highest incidence rate of all cancers and being the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in men in the Western world. Because prostate cancer results in substantial morbidity and mortality, it poses a significant burden to a vast number of patients, their caregivers, and the health care system in general. When prostate cancer becomes castration-resistant after failure of hormonal therapy, adequate and accurate imaging procedures are particularly important to guide invasive diagnostic procedures and subsequent therapy. For localized low-volume disease, more sophisticated salvage therapies have been introduced requiring imaging guidance such as high-precision radiotherapy, high-intensity focused ultrasound, and cryosurgery. Similarly, the recent introduction of several novel therapeutics (abiraterone, enzalutamide, sipuleucel-T, cabazitaxel, 223Ra) for advanced stages of disease when prostate cancer has become castration-resistant requires careful selection of patients for optimal, personalized decision making.

See page 209

CHOLINE PET/CT

In recent years, several radiopharmaceuticals have been introduced for evaluation of prostate cancer patients by molecular imaging with PET/CT. After the introduction of 11C-labeled choline by Hara et al. (1), the subsequent development of 18F-choline made choline-based PET/CT much more accessible (2), boosting the application for more widespread use in prostate cancer patients. It is of particular importance to progress from feasibility studies in small and often selected patient populations to large clinical studies to assess the strengths and weaknesses of these imaging modalities, adequately positioning them in the diagnostic armamentarium.

Two metaanalyses evaluated choline PET and PET/CT in castration-resistant prostate cancer patients with biochemical failure after curative local treatment (3,4). Evangelista et al. evaluated 19 studies on 1,555 patients. They showed a pooled sensitivity and specificity for disease (local recurrence, lymph nodes, and bone) of 85.6% and 92.6%, respectively (3). Umbehr et al. reported similar results from 12 studies on 1,055 patients (4). Both studies noted the importance of prostate-specific antigen (PSA), PSA doubling time, and PSA velocity. In a third metaanalysis of 14 mostly retrospective studies on a total of 1,869 patients, Treglia et al. reported a pooled detection rate of 58% for choline PET/CT in restaging castration-resistant prostate cancer. They emphasized the importance of PSA levels and especially PSA kinetics for the tumor detection rate. A PSA doubling time of less than 6 mo and PSA velocity of more than 1 ng/mL/y or more than 2 ng/mL/y proved to be relevant factors in predicting the positive result of choline PET/CT (5). The role of PSA level at initiation of the choline PET/CT study influenced the detection rates in recurrent prostate cancers after surgery versus radiotherapy because of differences in the definition of recurrent prostate cancer; that is, postsurgery PSA greater than 0.2 ng/mL versus PSA nadir + 2 ng/mL after radiotherapy.

In this issue of The Journal of Nuclear Medicine, Cimitan et al. report the results of 18F-choline PET/CT in a cohort of 1,000 prostate cancer patients with biochemical recurrence after potentially curative surgery or radiotherapy (6). Despite being retrospective and observational, with the inherent methodologic limitations, this study made several clinically relevant observations on this large patient group. In two thirds of the patients, 18F-choline PET/CT detected the source of the PSA rise, approximately evenly distributed between local recurrence, lymph node metastases, and distant metastases. In line with earlier observations (5), a clear relation was confirmed between the detection rate of disease and PSA levels and PSA velocity, up to 79% when PSA was higher than 2 ng/mL. However, even when PSA was below 1 ng/mL or between 1 and 2 ng/mL, detection rates for 18F-choline PET/CT were still considerable (31% and 43%, respectively). In all subgroups, the detection rate was highest in those patients who were initially diagnosed with a Gleason score of 7 or higher, as demonstrated by multivariate analysis. This observation is important because it may modify current clinical practice, as a PSA level higher than 1 or even 2 ng/mL is often used as a cutoff to refer patients for 18F-choline PET/CT. Cimitan et al. provide evidence that 18F-choline PET/CT should also be considered at low PSA levels in the case of a Gleason score above 7 at initial diagnosis (6).

PATIENT SELECTION WITH CHOLINE PET/CT

Recent clinical studies showed that 60 patients with biochemical progression after radical prostatectomy and selected for high-dose salvage radiation therapy with 18F-choline PET/CT had a 3-y biochemical progression-free survival rate of 72.5% (7). Still, as recurrent prostate cancer after radical surgical treatment is diagnosed by a PSA level of more than 0.2 ng/mL, the added clinical value of choline PET/CT imaging in patients with such low PSA levels remains limited. Salvage radiotherapy will start at PSA levels of between 0.2 and 0.3 ng/mL, at which level the detection rates of any type of imaging will be too low for routine use. In 52 prostate cancer patients who underwent salvage lymph node dissection for nodal recurrence detected by 11C-choline PET/CT, Karnes et al. reported a 3-y biochemical recurrence-free, systemic progression-free, and cancer-specific survival of 45.5%, 46.9%, and 92.5%, respectively (8). At present, choline PET/CT raises considerable interest as reflected by more than 20 trials listed at clinicaltrials.gov. Large-scale prospective clinical trials using choline PET/CT are eagerly awaited.

OTHER RADIOPHARMACEUTICALS

Acknowledging that the role of 18F-FDG PET/CT is rather limited in prostate cancer as compared with other cancer types, several other radiopharmaceuticals have been proposed for molecular imaging of castration-resistant prostate cancer. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), a transmembrane glycoprotein overexpressed on prostate cancer cells, proved to be an important target since the introduction of 111In-capromab pendetide (ProstaScint; Cytogen Corp.), a mouse monoclonal antibody that recognizes an intracellular domain of PSMA. Given the well-known disadvantages of antibodies (e.g., long interval between injection and imaging, relatively low lesion-to-background ratios, immunogenicity of the agent) and the advantages of PET over SPECT, the development of PSMA-targeting small molecules labeled with PET radionuclides was a logical and important step. Several PSMA-targeting peptides have been developed and some translated to clinical studies. First studies with 68Ga-labeled HBED-CC (N,N′-bis-[2-hydroxy-5-(carboxyethyl)benzyl]ethylenediamine-N,N′-diacetic acid) PSMA PET/CT indicate its potential as a powerful diagnostic agent showing higher lesion detection rates than 18F-choline PET/CT (9). As compared with PET/CT, PET/MR imaging with 68Ga-PSMA peptides may further improve diagnostic accuracy because of easier and more accurate detection of lesions (10).

Other radiopharmaceuticals are also under development, such as the amino acid analog anti-3-18F-fluorocyclobutane, which exploits the overexpression of the alanine-serine-cysteine transport system in prostate cancer. An early PET/CT clinical study reported an approximately 60% higher lesion detection rate by anti-3-18F-fluorocyclobutane than by 11C-choline (11). Given the pivotal role of the androgen receptor in prostate cancer, 18F-fluorodihydrotestosterone may also become a radiopharmaceutical that can stratify patients for optimal selection of treatment by assessing the presence and modulation of the receptor before and during antiandrogenic treatment.

CONCLUSION

Using clinical, histologic, and laboratory data to optimize the appropriate use of novel radiopharmaceuticals is important to minimize the application in patient groups in which the diagnostic yield is low. It is of equal importance to identify those individuals within low-yield groups who do have additional risk factors that increase the likelihood of positive, management-changing imaging procedures. This is underlined by the study of Cimitan et al. suggesting that high initial Gleason scores identify patients with PSA levels of between 1 and 2 ng/mL in whom a positive 18F-choline PET/CT result is more likely (6). In order to progress to evidence-based inclusion in guidelines, these data support the step from descriptive patient studies toward prospective clinical studies with a significant impact on individualized patient management in clinical practice, addressing the impact on patient management, treatment selection, patient outcome, quality of life, and cost-effectiveness of 18F-choline PET/CT. Performing those trials that anchor our procedures in general clinical practice is at least as important as tapping into the many opportunities provided by the wealth of newly developed radiopharmaceuticals that are currently being translated to early clinical studies in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer.

DISCLOSURE

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Footnotes

  • Published online Dec. 31, 2014.

  • © 2015 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Inc.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Hara T,
    2. Kosaka N,
    3. Kishi H
    . PET imaging of prostate cancer using carbon-11-choline. J Nucl Med. 1998;39:990–995.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Hara T,
    2. Kosaka N,
    3. Kishi H
    . Development of 18F-fluoroethylcholine for cancer imaging with PET: synthesis, biochemistry, and prostate cancer imaging. J Nucl Med. 2002;43:187–199.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Evangelista L,
    2. Zattoni F,
    3. Guttilla A,
    4. et al
    . Choline PET or PET/CT and biochemical relapse of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Nucl Med. 2013;38:305–314.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Umbehr MH,
    2. Müntener M,
    3. Hany T,
    4. Sulser T,
    5. Bachmann LM
    . The role of 11C-choline and 18F-fluorocholine positron emission tomography (PET) and PET/CT in prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2013;64:106–117.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Treglia G,
    2. Ceriani L,
    3. Sadeghi R,
    4. Giovacchini G,
    5. Giovanella L
    . Relationship between prostate-specific antigen kinetics and detection rate of radiolabelled choline PET/CT in restaging prostate cancer patients: a meta-analysis. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2014;52:725–733.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Cimitan M,
    2. Evangelista L,
    3. Hodolič M,
    4. et al
    . Gleason score at diagnosis predicts the rate of detection of 18F-choline PET/CT performed when biochemical evidence indicates recurrence of prostate cancer: experience with 1,000 patients. J Nucl Med. 2015;56:209–215.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. D’Angelillo RM,
    2. Sciuto R,
    3. Ramella S,
    4. et al
    . 18F-choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography-driven high-dose salvage radiation therapy in patients with biochemical progression after radical prostatectomy: feasibility study in 60 patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014;90:296–302.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Karnes RJ,
    2. Murphy CR,
    3. Bergstralh EJ,
    4. et al
    . Salvage lymph node dissection for prostate cancer nodal recurrence detected by 11C-choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography. J Urol. August 20, 2014 [Epub ahead of print].
  9. 9.↵
    1. Afshar-Oromieh A,
    2. Zechmann CM,
    3. Malcher A,
    4. et al
    . Comparison of PET imaging with a 68Ga-labelled PSMA ligand and 18F-choline-based PET/CT for the diagnosis of recurrent prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014;41:11–20.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Afshar-Oromieh A,
    2. Haberkorn U,
    3. Schlemmer HP,
    4. et al
    . Comparison of PET/CT and PET/MRI hybrid systems using a 68Ga-labelled PSMA ligand for the diagnosis of recurrent prostate cancer: initial experience. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014;41:887–897.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Nanni C,
    2. Schiavina R,
    3. Brunocilla E,
    4. et al
    . 18F-FACBC compared with 11C-choline PET/CT in patients with biochemical relapse after radical prostatectomy: a prospective study in 28 patients. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2014;12:106–110.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  • Received for publication December 1, 2014.
  • Accepted for publication December 2, 2014.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 56 (2)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 56, Issue 2
February 1, 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Molecular Imaging of Prostate Cancer: Tapping into the Opportunities
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Molecular Imaging of Prostate Cancer: Tapping into the Opportunities
Wim J.G. Oyen, Igle J. De Jong
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Feb 2015, 56 (2) 169-170; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.114.150219

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Molecular Imaging of Prostate Cancer: Tapping into the Opportunities
Wim J.G. Oyen, Igle J. De Jong
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Feb 2015, 56 (2) 169-170; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.114.150219
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • CHOLINE PET/CT
    • PATIENT SELECTION WITH CHOLINE PET/CT
    • OTHER RADIOPHARMACEUTICALS
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Gleason Score at Diagnosis Predicts the Rate of Detection of 18F-Choline PET/CT Performed When Biochemical Evidence Indicates Recurrence of Prostate Cancer: Experience with 1,000 Patients
  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Radiomics in PET/CT: More Than Meets the Eye?
  • Citius, Altius, Fortius: An Olympian Dream for Theranostics
  • Metabolic Tumor Volume: We Still Need a Platinum-Standard Metric
Show more Invited Perspectives

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire