Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleInvited Perspectives

Promising New 18F-Labeled Tracers for PET Myocardial Perfusion Imaging

Richard C. Brunken
Journal of Nuclear Medicine October 2015, 56 (10) 1478-1479; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.115.161661
Richard C. Brunken
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Myocardial perfusion imaging with PET offers several advantages over SPECT for the detection and characterization of coronary artery disease. With PET, individual tissue-density measurements are routinely used to correct the emission images for photon attenuation and scatter by interposed tissue. And because PET scanners have higher spatial resolutions and count sensitivities than SPECT scanners, PET images can discriminate more readily between areas with normal and abnormal perfusion. As a result, PET imaging has a better diagnostic accuracy for coronary artery disease detection, with reported sensitivities approximately 4%–5% higher and specificities 3%–5% higher than for SPECT imaging (1,2). Moreover, left ventricular function can be assessed during vasodilator stress with PET imaging, permitting measurement of ventricular contractile reserve and identification of ischemia-related deterioration in regional function (3,4). It is also feasible to assess rest and hyperemic myocardial perfusion (in milliliters of blood flow/min/gram of tissue) and to derive myocardial perfusion reserve measurements from dynamic PET

See page 1581

perfusion images using commercially available software (5).This assists in the detection of “balanced coronary artery disease” and in the identification of microvascular disease (6). On a practical level, patients are exposed to significantly less radiation with PET imaging than with SPECT imaging (typically less than 5 mSv for a rest and stress PET study (7)). Finally, a rest–vasodilator stress PET myocardial perfusion study can be completed in a quarter of the time required for a SPECT perfusion study with a 99mTc-labeled tracer.

WHY PET IS NOT USED MORE OFTEN FOR CLINICAL IMAGING

Given the advantages of PET, why is it not used more frequently for clinical myocardial perfusion imaging? One reason is cost. PET/CT scanners are more expensive than SPECT or SPECT/CT scanners, both to purchase and to maintain. Currently, clinical PET myocardial perfusion imaging is performed using either 82Rb or 13N-NH3. 82Rb is eluted from a bedside generator, and there are periodic ongoing costs associated with generator replacement when the generator reaches the end of its service life (usually between 2 and 8 wk). Generator life is determined by its manufacturing characteristics, not its number of uses. As a result, costs per 82Rb imaging procedure are reduced by maximizing the number of imaging studies performed during the useful life of the generator. 13N-NH3, the other tracer used for clinical PET perfusion imaging, is cyclotron-produced and has only a 10-min half-life. If this tracer is to be used for clinical perfusion imaging, the cyclotron has to be near the imaging center. In addition, close coordination between personnel at the imaging center and personnel at the cyclotron is required to ensure that the 13N-NH3 is available at the time it is needed for the stress injection.

Aside from the economic considerations, both 82Rb and 13N-NH3 have other limitations. 82Rb is impractical for exercise stress perfusion imaging because of its short 75-s half-life. Gastrointestinal background activity may be high, even in fasting patients. Images obtained with 13N-NH3 typically exhibit prominent background activity in the liver and may also show prominent pulmonary uptake in many cases. Moreover, some patients without coronary artery disease may exhibit relatively low tracer uptake in the inferolateral region of the ventricle on 13N-NH3 images, possibly because of genetic differences in tracer retention (8,9).

ADVANTAGES OF AN 18F-LABELED PERFUSION TRACER

Because of the limitations of 82Rb and 13N-NH3, a perfusion tracer labeled with 18F for PET imaging is attractive clinically. The half-life of 18F is almost 110 min, which is long enough to permit the transport of unit doses of 18F-labeled perfusion tracers from a regional cyclotron to a PET imaging center. Therefore, either exercise or vasodilator stress myocardial perfusion imaging could be performed at centers that are presently performing only 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging for oncology patients. The extra cost of adding myocardial perfusion imaging to the case mix for such a center would likely be modest if unit doses of an 18F-labeled perfusion tracer were available at a reasonable price. If 18F-labeled perfusion tracers were available as unit doses, more PET imaging centers could perform cardiac perfusion studies. These studies could be performed with or without 18F-FDG for the assessment of myocardial viability (e.g., as part of a 2-d imaging protocol), thereby increasing the numbers of patients with access to PET myocardial imaging studies.

Because the positron emitted by 18F is relatively low-energy, travel distances in tissue before annihilation are significantly shorter than with 82Rb and somewhat shorter than with 13N-NH3. The result is myocardial images that are more sharply defined than those obtained with the other perfusion tracers. Moreover, as initial experience with 18F-flurpiridaz suggests, 18F-labeled tracers may offer better target-to-background ratios than the present tracers, yielding higher-quality images (10).

18F-LABELED FLUOROALKYLPHOSPHONIUM SALTS FOR PERFUSION IMAGING

In a preclinical study appearing in this issue of The Journal of Nuclear Medicine, Kim and colleagues assess the suitability of 3 18F-labeled fluoroalkylphosphonium salts for PET myocardial perfusion imaging (11). Similar to 99mTc-sestamibi and 99mTc-tetrofosmin, these moieties depend on high mitochondrial membrane potentials for retention in cardiac myocytes. In the current study, (5-18F-fluoropentyl)triphenylphosphonium cation (18F-FPTP), (6-18F-fluorohexyl)triphenylphosphonium cation (18F-FHTP), and (2-(2-18F-fluoroethoxy)triphenylphosphonium cation (or 18F-FETP) were compared with 13N-NH3 in Sprague–Dawley rat hearts.

In studies on isolated Langendorff perfused hearts, the authors found higher first-pass extraction fractions for all 3 18F-labeled tracers than for 13N-NH3 at flow velocities exceeding 4.0 mL/min. A higher first-pass extraction fraction indicates that net myocardial uptake of the tracer will more closely parallel tissue perfusion at high flow rates. On perfusion images, therefore, slight differences in hyperemic flow rate should be more readily detectable than on 13N-NH3 images, suggesting that PET imaging with the new perfusion tracers will prove more sensitive for detecting moderate coronary stenoses. The authors also performed dynamic PET imaging on normal rats and rats with infarctions using a small-animal PET/CT tomograph. Areas of infarction were well defined on the 18F-labeled perfusion images. Moreover, at 10 min after tracer injection, myocardium-to-liver ratios were 3–5 times higher for the 18F-labeled images than the 13N-NH3 images, and myocardium-to-lung ratios were approximately 2–3 times higher. Target-to-background ratios were therefore considerably better with the newer tracers, resulting in better image quality. These preclinical studies thus indicate that the 18F-labeled phosphonium cations are promising PET myocardial perfusion tracers.

CHALLENGES AHEAD

Several major hurdles must of course be overcome to transfer the findings of a promising preclinical study into daily practice. Safety and biodistribution studies are a prerequisite to use in humans, and a well-designed hierarchy of clinical trials using appropriately constructed imaging protocols is necessary to confirm efficacy and secure Food and Drug Administration approval for clinical use. 18F-flurpiridaz, another tracer of myocardial perfusion, is in stage III clinical trials and may be the first 18F-labeled PET perfusion tracer to be approved by the Food and Drug Administration for clinical practice. Nevertheless, the new 18F-labeled fluoroalkylphosphonium tracers may also one day prove useful for human studies and could provide an additional option for clinical PET perfusion imaging. Ultimately, it is hoped that cardiac care will benefit from access of greater numbers of patients to PET myocardial perfusion imaging.

DISCLOSURE

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Footnotes

  • Published online Jul. 30, 2015.

  • © 2015 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Inc.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Mc Ardle BA,
    2. Dowsley TF,
    3. deKemp RA,
    4. Wells GA,
    5. Beanlands RS
    . Does rubidium-82 PET have superior accuracy to SPECT perfusion imaging for the diagnosis of obstructive coronary artery disease? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60:1828–1837.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Parker MW,
    2. Iskandar A,
    3. Limone B,
    4. et al
    . Diagnostic accuracy of cardiac positron emission tomography versus single photon emission computed tomography for coronary artery disease: a bivariate meta-analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;5:700–707.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Dorbala S,
    2. Vangala D,
    3. Sampson U,
    4. Limaye A,
    5. Kwong R,
    6. Di Carli MF
    . Value of vasodilator left ventricular ejection fraction reserve in evaluating the magnitude of myocardium at risk and the extent of angiographic coronary artery disease: a 82Rb PET/CT study. J Nucl Med. 2007;48:349–358.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Dorbala S,
    2. Hachamovitch R,
    3. Curillova Z,
    4. et al
    . Incremental prognostic value of gated Rb-82 positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging over clinical variables and rest LVEF. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009;2:846–854.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Bateman TM,
    2. Gould KL,
    3. Di Carli MF
    . Proceedings of the Cardiac PET Summit, 12 May 2014, Baltimore, MD. 3. Quantification of myocardial blood flow. J Nucl Cardiol. 2015;22:571–578.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Marinescu MA,
    2. Loffler AI,
    3. Ouellette M,
    4. Smith L,
    5. Kramer CM
    . Coronary microvascular dysfunction, microvascular angina, and treatment strategies. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;8:210–220.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Senthamizhchelvan S,
    2. Bravo PE,
    3. Esaias C,
    4. et al
    . Human biodistribution and radiation dosimetry of 82Rb. J Nucl Med. 2010;51:1592–1599.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. de Jong RM,
    2. Blanksma PK,
    3. Willemsen ATM,
    4. et al
    . Posterolateral defect of the normal human heart investigated with nitrogen-13-ammonia and dynamic PET. J Nucl Med. 1995;36:581–585.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Beanlands RS,
    2. Muzik O,
    3. Hutchins GD,
    4. Wolfe ER Jr.,
    5. Schwaiger M
    . Heterogeneity of regional nitrogen-13 labeled ammonia tracer distribution in the normal human heart: comparison with rubidium-82 and copper-62-labeled PTSM. J Nucl Cardiol. 1994;1:225–235.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Berman DS,
    2. German G,
    3. Slomka PJ
    . Improvement in PET myocardial perfusion image quality and quantification with flurpiridaz F-18. J Nucl Cardiol. 2012;19(suppl):S38–S45.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Kim D-Y,
    2. Kim HS,
    3. Reder S,
    4. et al
    . Comparison of 18F-labeled fluoroalkylphosphonium cations with 13N-NH3 for PET myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Med. 2015;56:1581–1586.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  • Received for publication June 26, 2015.
  • Accepted for publication July 10, 2015.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 56 (10)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 56, Issue 10
October 1, 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Promising New 18F-Labeled Tracers for PET Myocardial Perfusion Imaging
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Promising New 18F-Labeled Tracers for PET Myocardial Perfusion Imaging
Richard C. Brunken
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Oct 2015, 56 (10) 1478-1479; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.115.161661

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Promising New 18F-Labeled Tracers for PET Myocardial Perfusion Imaging
Richard C. Brunken
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Oct 2015, 56 (10) 1478-1479; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.115.161661
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • WHY PET IS NOT USED MORE OFTEN FOR CLINICAL IMAGING
    • ADVANTAGES OF AN 18F-LABELED PERFUSION TRACER
    • 18F-LABELED FLUOROALKYLPHOSPHONIUM SALTS FOR PERFUSION IMAGING
    • CHALLENGES AHEAD
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Comparison of 18F-Labeled Fluoroalkylphosphonium Cations with 13N-NH3 for PET Myocardial Perfusion Imaging
  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Radiomics in PET/CT: More Than Meets the Eye?
  • Metabolic Tumor Volume: We Still Need a Platinum-Standard Metric
  • Citius, Altius, Fortius: An Olympian Dream for Theranostics
Show more Invited Perspectives

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire