Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleClinical Investigations

Radiation Dosimetry of 18F-FPEB in Humans

Robert M. Kessler, John Seibyl, Ronald L. Cowan, David Zald, Jacob S. Young, Mohammad Sib Ansari and Michael G. Stabin
Journal of Nuclear Medicine July 2014, 55 (7) 1119-1121; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.113.133843
Robert M. Kessler
1Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John Seibyl
2Institute for Neurodegenerative Disorders, New Haven, Connecticut; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ronald L. Cowan
1Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David Zald
3Psychology, Vanderbilt University School of Arts and Sciences, Nashville, Tennessee
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jacob S. Young
3Psychology, Vanderbilt University School of Arts and Sciences, Nashville, Tennessee
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mohammad Sib Ansari
1Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael G. Stabin
1Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

18F-3-fluoro-5-[(pyridin-3-yl)ethynyl]benzonitrile (18F-FPEB) is a potent and specific radioligand for the metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 5 (mGluR5). Before undertaking clinical research studies with 18F-FPEB, we performed studies of human radiation dosimetry. Methods: Serial whole-body scans were obtained in 9 healthy human subjects (5 men, 4 women) for 190–440 min after the intravenous administration of 18F-FPEB. Radiation doses were estimated using the OLINDA/EXM software. Results: Peak organ doses were to the urinary bladder wall, 0.258 mGy/MBq (0.955 rad/mCi), and gallbladder wall, 0.193 mGy/MBq (0.716 rad/mCi). The effective dose was 0.025 mSv/MBq (0.0922 rem/mCi). The doses to the red marrow and spleen were 0.00797 mGy/MBq (0.0295 rad/mCi) and 0.00709 mGy/MBq (0.0262 rad/mCi), respectively. Reducing the urinary voiding interval to 60 or 90 min lowered the urinary bladder wall dose to 0.0885 mGy/MBq (0.327 rad/mCi) or 0.128 mGy/MBq (0.473 rad/mCi), respectively, and the effective dose to 0.0149 mSv/MBq (0.0551 rem/mCi) or 0.0171 mSv/MBq (0.0634 rem/mCi), respectively. Conclusion: Urinary voiding should be performed during 18F-FPEB studies to minimize radiation exposure to research subjects.

  • 18F-FPEB
  • glutamate
  • mGluR5
  • radiation dosimetry

The metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 5 (mGluR5) is a type I metabotropic glutamatergic receptor, which is an important modulator of both N-methyl-d-aspartate and dopamine receptor signaling; it positively modulates N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor function and has complex interactions with dopamine receptor intracellular signaling (1,2). Altered function of the mGluR5 has been implicated in the pathophysiology of several neurologic and psychiatric disorders including Fragile X syndrome (3), Huntington and Parkinson disease (4,5), psychostimulant drug and alcohol abuse (6–8), depression, and anxiety as well as being involved in learning and memory (9–12). 18F-3-fluoro-5-[(pyridin-3-yl)ethynyl]benzonitrile (18F-FPEB) is a promising radioligand for imaging the mGluR5 in humans. It has a high affinity (0.11–0.15 nM) for the mGluR5 and nearly optimal lipophilicity for imaging, with a logP of 2.8 (13). Initial human imaging studies have shown high contrast between regions rich in mGluR5 levels, such as the anterior cingulated, and regions with low levels, such as the cerebellum and pons, as well as the ability to estimate regional receptor levels using both bolus administration with 2-tissue-compartment modeling and bolus–infusion administration (14,15). Given the importance of the mGluR5 in several disease states and its promise as a PET radioligand for studies of mGluR5, we undertook studies of human radiation dosimetry of 18F-FPEB.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

After approval of this study by the appropriate institutional review boards (IRBs), all subjects provided written informed consent before enrollment. All subjects had to be 18 y or older and have a normal medical history, physical examination, and laboratory testing including a comprehensive metabolic panel, complete blood panel with differential, urine analysis, negative urine drug screens, and a normal electrocardiogram. A history of significant medical condition, psychiatric disorder including any history of drug abuse or eating disorder, pregnancy, and lactation were exclusion criteria. Nine healthy subjects (5 men and 4 women; mean age, 23.7 y; age range, 18–47 y) were studied after intravenous bolus administration of 18F-FPEB (mean dose, 173 MBq [4.67 mCi]; dose range, 160–187 MBq [4.34–5.05 mCi]). Seven of the 9 subjects were studied at Vanderbilt after approval by the Vanderbilt IRB using a Discovery DTSE PET/CT scanner (GE Healthcare) and were scanned for 190 min after administration of 18F-FPEB. Serial whole-body images were obtained from the top of the head to the mid thigh. Two subjects were studied at the Institute for Neurodegenerative Disorders after approval from the New England IRB using an ECAT EXACT HR+ PET scanner (Siemens) and were scanned for 382 and 440 min after 18F-FPEB administration using serial whole-body acquisitions from the top of the head to the mid thigh. For the calculation of radiation dosimetry, regions of interest were drawn around regions representing major organs at all time points with appropriate decay corrections. The resultant region-of-interest data were fit to time–activity curves using the SAAM II software (SAAM Institute, University of Washington) (16). Time–activity curves were integrated and time–activity integrals entered into the OLINDA/EXM (Vanderbilt University) software (17,18); organ dose estimates and effective dose values were obtained using the most appropriate anthropomorphic model for each subject. Urine excretion was modeled using the dynamic bladder model provided in the OLINDA/EXM code.

RESULTS

Organ residence times for 18F-FPEB are shown in Table 1. The calculated radiation dose estimates are shown in Table 2. When urinary voiding at 3.5 h after18F-FPEB administration was used, the highest organ doses were to the urinary bladder wall (0.258 mGy/MBq [0.955 rad/mCi]) and the gallbladder wall (0.193 mGy/MBq [0.716 rad/mCi]). The highest doses to blood-forming organs were to the red marrow (0.00797 mGy/MBq [0.0295 rads/mCi]) and spleen (0.00709 mGy/MBq [0.0262 rad/mCi]). The highest gonadal dose was to the ovaries (0.0185 mGy/MBq [0.0684 rad/mCi]). The effective dose was 0.025 mSv/MBq (0.0922 rem/mCi). Reducing the urinary bladder voiding interval to 60 or 90 min produced significant decreases in the dose to the urinary bladder wall, lowering absorbed doses to 0.0885 mGy/MBq (0.327 rad/mCi) for 1-h voiding and 0.128 mGy/MBq (0.473 rad/mCi) for 1.5-h voiding. Decreases were also seen in the effective dose, with reductions to 0.0149 mSv/MBq (0.0551 rem/mCi) for 1-h voiding and 0.0171 mSv/MBq (0.0634 rem/mCi) for 1.5-h voiding. Smaller decrements were seen in doses to the ovaries and red marrow, but the dose to the gallbladder wall was virtually unchanged.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

Mean Organ Residence Times (±SD) for 18F-FPEB with Urinary Voiding at 3.5 Hours

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2

Radiation Dosimetry for 18F-FPEB with Urinary Voiding Intervals of 3.5, 1.5, and 1.0 Hours

DISCUSSION

The results of the current study indicate that multiple 185-MBq (5-mCi) doses of 18F-FPEB can be administered for studies of cerebral mGluR5 in humans. To minimize the radiation dose received by human subjects, it is recommended that bladder voiding be done at 1 or 1.5 h after bolus administration of 18F-FPEB, which significantly lowers both the urinary bladder wall and the effective doses. Previous studies indicate that 1.5 h of imaging after bolus injection of 18F-FPEB should allow quantitation of mGluR5 levels in all brain regions; for such studies, urinary voiding at the end of the imaging study is recommended (14,15).

In comparing the present study with a recently published study of radiation dosimetry (14), the greatest difference between the previous and the current radiation dosimetry studies is the dose to the urinary bladder wall, which is significantly higher in the current study. In the prior study, the dose to the urinary bladder wall was 0.047 mGy/MBq (0.18 rad/mCi) versus 0.258 mGy/MBq (0.955 rad/mCi) in the current study. The reason for this difference may be the longer duration of scanning in the current study than in the previous study, 190–440 versus 90 min. The greater urinary bladder wall dose also produces a somewhat higher effective dose than reported in the previous study—that is, 0.025 mGy/MBq (0.0922 rad/mCi) without voiding versus 0.017 mGy/MBq (0.062 rad/mCi). Voiding at 90 min reduces the effective dose to virtually the same dose reported in the prior study and decreases the urinary bladder wall dose by more than 50%. With urinary voiding intervals of 1.0 or 1.5 h, the highest organ dose becomes the gallbladder wall, 0.193 mGy/MBq (0.714 rad/mCi), which is remarkably similar to the dose reported by Wong et al. (14), 0.19 mGy/MBq (0.71 rad/mCi).

CONCLUSION

The results of the current study demonstrate that 18F-FPEB can be administered in doses to humans sufficient to allow quantitation of regional mGluR5 levels in brain. To minimize absorbed radiation doses, urinary voiding at 1 to 1.5 h is advocated to achieve the minimum reasonable dose, particularly for the urinary bladder wall and the effective dose.

DISCLOSURE

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. Therefore, and solely to indicate this fact, this article is hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 USC section 1734. This work was supported by a grant from the National Institute of Drug Abuse, 1R21 DA031441. No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Footnotes

  • Published online May 5, 2014.

  • © 2014 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Inc.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Mannaioni G,
    2. Marino MJ,
    3. Valenti O,
    4. Traynelis SF,
    5. Conn PJ
    . Metabotropic glutamate receptors 1 and 5 differentially regulate CA1 pyramidal cell function. J Neurosci. 2001;21:5925–5934.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Svenningsson P,
    2. Nishi A,
    3. Fisone G,
    4. Girault JA,
    5. Nairn AC,
    6. Greengard P
    . DARPP-32: an integrator of neurotransmission. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2004;44:269–296.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Dölen G,
    2. Bear MF
    . Role for metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 (mGluR5) in the pathogenesis of fragile X syndrome. J Physiol. 2008;586:1503–1508.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Anborgh PH,
    2. Godin C,
    3. Pampillo M,
    4. et al
    . Inhibition of metabotropic glutamate receptor signaling by the huntingtin-binding protein optineurin. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:34840–34848.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Dekundy A,
    2. Pietraszek M,
    3. Schaefer D,
    4. Cenci MA,
    5. Danysz W
    . Effects of group I metabotropic glutamate receptors blockade in experimental models of Parkinson's disease. Brain Res Bull. 2006;69:318–326.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Chiamulera C,
    2. Epping-Jordan MP,
    3. Zocchi A,
    4. et al
    . Reinforcing and locomotor stimulant effects of cocaine are absent in mGluR5 null mutant mice. Nat Neurosci. 2001;4:873–874.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.
    1. Osborne MP,
    2. Olive MF
    . A role for mGluR5 receptors in intravenous methamphetamine self-administration. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008;1139:206–211.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Parkitna JR,
    2. Sikora M,
    3. Gołda S,
    4. et al
    . Novelty-seeking behaviors and the escalation of alcohol drinking after abstinence in mice are controlled by metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 on neurons expressing dopamine d1 receptors. Biol Psychiatry. 2013;73:263–270.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Hashimoto K
    . Emerging role of glutamate in the pathophysiology of major depressive disorder. Brain Res Rev. 2009;61:105–123.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.
    1. Palucha A,
    2. Pilc A
    . Metabotropic glutamate receptor ligands as possible anxiolytic and antidepressant drugs. Pharmacol Ther. 2007;115:116–147.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.
    1. Deschwanden A,
    2. Karolewicz B,
    3. Feyissa AM,
    4. et al
    . Reduced metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 density in major depression determined by [11C]ABP688 PET and postmortem study. Am J Psychiatry. 2011;168:727–734.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Homayoun H,
    2. Stefani MR,
    3. Adams BW,
    4. Tamagan GD,
    5. Moghaddam B
    . Functional interaction between NMDA and mGlu5 receptors: effects on working memory, instrumental learning, motor behaviors, and dopamine release. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2004;29:1259–1269.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Patel S,
    2. Hamill TG,
    3. Connolly B,
    4. Jagoda E,
    5. Li W,
    6. Gibson RE
    . Species differences in mGluR5 binding sites in mammalian central nervous system determined using in vitro binding with [18F]F-PEB. Nucl Med Biol. 2007;34:1009–1017.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Wong DF,
    2. Waterhouse R,
    3. Kuwabara H,
    4. et al
    . 18F-FPEB, a PET radiopharmaceutical for quantifying metabotropic glutamate 5 receptors: a first-in-human study of radiochemical safety, biokinetics, and radiation dosimetry. J Nucl Med. 2013;54:388–396.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Sullivan JM,
    2. Lim K,
    3. Labaree D,
    4. et al
    . Kinetic analysis of the metabotropic glutamate subtype 5 tracer [18F]FPEB in bolus and bolus-plus-constant-infusion studies in humans. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2013;33:532–541.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Foster D,
    2. Barrett P
    . Developing and testing integrated multicompartment models to describe a single input multiple-output study using the SAAM II software system. In: Proceedings Sixth International Radiopharmaceutical Dosimetry Symposium. Oak Ridge, TN: Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education; 1999:577–599.
  17. 17.↵
    1. Stabin MG,
    2. Siegel JA
    . Physical models and dose factors for use in internal dose assessment. Health Phys. 2003;85:294–310.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Stabin MG,
    2. Sparks RB,
    3. Crowe E
    . OLINDA/EXM. The second-generation personal computer software for internal dose assessment in nuclear medicine. J Nucl Med. 2005;46:1023–1027.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  • Received for publication October 31, 2013.
  • Accepted for publication February 26, 2014.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 55 (7)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 55, Issue 7
July 1, 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Radiation Dosimetry of 18F-FPEB in Humans
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Radiation Dosimetry of 18F-FPEB in Humans
Robert M. Kessler, John Seibyl, Ronald L. Cowan, David Zald, Jacob S. Young, Mohammad Sib Ansari, Michael G. Stabin
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jul 2014, 55 (7) 1119-1121; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.113.133843

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Radiation Dosimetry of 18F-FPEB in Humans
Robert M. Kessler, John Seibyl, Ronald L. Cowan, David Zald, Jacob S. Young, Mohammad Sib Ansari, Michael G. Stabin
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jul 2014, 55 (7) 1119-1121; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.113.133843
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Feasibility of Ultra-Low-Activity 18F-FDG PET/CT Imaging Using a Long–Axial-Field-of-View PET/CT System
  • Cardiac Presynaptic Sympathetic Nervous Function Evaluated by Cardiac PET in Patients with Chronotropic Incompetence Without Heart Failure
  • Validation and Evaluation of a Vendor-Provided Head Motion Correction Algorithm on the uMI Panorama PET/CT System
Show more Clinical Investigations

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • 18F-FPEB
  • glutamate
  • mGluR5
  • radiation dosimetry
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire