Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleFocus on Molecular Imaging

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Prostate Cancer: A Hybrid Approach

Nynke S. van den Berg, Renato A. Valdés-Olmos, Henk G. van der Poel and Fijs W.B. van Leeuwen
Journal of Nuclear Medicine April 2013, 54 (4) 493-496; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.112.113746
Nynke S. van den Berg
1Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Renato A. Valdés-Olmos
1Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
2Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Netherlands Cancer Institute–Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Henk G. van der Poel
3Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute–Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fijs W.B. van Leeuwen
1Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

To provide surgeons with optimal guidance during interventions, it is crucial that the molecular imaging data generated in the diagnostic departments finds its way to the operating room. Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy provides a textbook example in which molecular imaging data acquired in the department of nuclear medicine guides the surgical management of patients. For prostate cancer, in which SLNs are generally located deep in the pelvis, procedures are preferably performed via a (robot-assisted) laparoscopic approach. Unfortunately, in the laparoscopic setting the senses of the surgeon are reduced. This topical review discusses technologic innovations that can help improve surgical guidance during SLN biopsy procedures.

  • interventional molecular imaging
  • image-guided surgery
  • prostate cancer
  • sentinel lymph node
  • multimodal

Metastasis in pelvic lymph nodes (LNs) is considered an important prognostic factor in prostate cancer. Prostate-specific antigen levels, pathologic stage, and Gleason score are predictors for LN involvement; the higher these factors are, the greater is the chance of nodal involvement. Postoperative (histo)pathologic examination of tissue samples obtained during (extended) pelvic lymphadenectomy is considered the gold standard in assessing metastatic spread. With an increasing LN dissection template, the prognosis of both N0 and N1 groups increases (Will Rogers phenomenon). Unfortunately, (extended) pelvic lymphadenectomy also increases the chance of postoperative complications such as lymphoceles, injuries to the obturator nerve or the ureter, and lymphedema of the lower extremity. Such complications can lead to a decrease in the patient’s quality of life.

Sentinel LN (SLN) biopsy focuses on the identification, subsequent minimally invasive excision, and pathologic and histopathologic evaluation of the LNs that drain directly from the primary tumor. Assuming the orderly spread of tumor cells through the lymphatic system, SLN biopsy can be used for LN staging. After staging, therapeutic follow-up can be decided on.

The potential of SLN biopsy for detecting LN metastasis has been validated in several studies. The Augsburg group validated the SLN biopsy procedure in more than 2,000 patients with prostate cancer and reported a high sensitivity and an overall false-negative rate of 5.9% (1). Moreover, SLN biopsy allows the identification of SLNs outside the pelvic lymphadenectomy field (2–4). Recently, Joniau et al. showed that 44% of SLNs were located outside the extended pelvic lymphadenectomy field; in 6% of patients, a positive LN was located exclusively in the presacral or paraaortic region (2).

Ideally, a surgeon is able to identify and excise the preoperatively identified SLNs in a minimally invasive manner, with a high sensitivity and specificity. This topical review discusses technologic improvements that may help improve the different aspects involved in (robot-assisted) laparoscopic SLN biopsy for prostate cancer; SLN biopsy for the prostate is often performed in combination with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Potential improvements can be found in (hybrid) tracers that are radioactive and fluorescent, the injection procedure, preoperative SLN identification and planning of the surgical procedure, translation of the preoperatively acquired imaging data to the operating room (e.g., via navigation), and intraoperative imaging for SLN identification. A schematic overview of these points is given in Figure 1. Similar technologies are also expected to help improve guidance for other SLN indications and in the future may even help enable tumor-specific resections.

FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

Schematic overview of the integrated hybrid SLN biopsy procedure. On presentation of the patient, a hybrid SLN tracer (1) is injected into the prostate (2). Preoperative imaging is performed to identify the SLNs (3). Preoperatively acquired images can be directly translated to operating room—for example, via augmented reality-based navigation (4)—to provide both radio- and fluorescence-based surgical guidance toward SLNs (5). FLU = fluorescence imaging; λem = emission wavelength of the fluorophore; λex = excitation wavelength of the fluorophore; γ = γ-signal coming from the radioisotope; RA = radioactivity-based detection (i.e., γ-imaging/tracing).

(HYBRID) TRACERS

Despite the success of radioguided surgery, to provide optical guidance blue dyes are often injected before the start of the operation. However, for prostate cancer, in which SLNs are generally localized deep within the tissue, blue dye is of little value. An alternative optical detection technology can be found in near-infrared (NIR) fluorescence imaging, which allows for real-time optical detection of lesions less than 10 mm deep (5). The requirement of preoperative SLN mapping data for surgical planning, however, dictates that fluorescence guidance has to be used in combination with the more common radioguided procedures.

Conventional SLN mapping is performed using 20- to 600-nm radiocolloids. Because of their size, these exogenous compounds are recognized by the immune system, leading to accumulation in the SLN (6). We found that premixing of the clinically approved NIR dye indocyanine green and an albumin-based radiocolloid (99mTc-nanocolloid) yields the noncovalent indocyanine green–99mTc-nanocolloid complex. This complex has migratory properties similar to the parental 99mTc-nanocolloid (7). Other hybrid nanoparticles also have the potential to guide SLN biopsy (8). A recent preclinical example of a hybrid SLN tracer can be found in 99mTc-tilmanocept labeled with the NIR dye Cy7 (9). Alternatively, Cerenkov imaging of positron-emitting radionuclides has been proposed as a hybrid imaging technology; Thorek et al. demonstrated that LNs could be detected after a subdermal injection of 18F-FDG in the tail of a mouse (10).

Ideally, for more accurate LN staging, direct identification of nodal metastases would be preferred. Research is now focusing on the introduction of hybrid tracers that specifically target tumor tissue (11,12)—for example, by targeting prostate-specific biomarkers such as prostate-specific membrane antigen or the gastrin-releasing peptide receptor. In this light, a hybrid prostate-specific membrane antigen tracer, labeled with 111In and the NIR dye CW800, was shown to facilitate radioactivity- and fluorescence-based detection of prostate-specific membrane antigen–overexpressing tumors in mice (13).

INJECTION PROCEDURE

Before SLN biopsy, transrectal ultrasound guidance is used to direct the tracer deposition toward the peripheral zone of the prostate (Fig. 2A). Nevertheless, a recent study showed that in only 53% of patients was the tracer actually deposited in this area (14). Interestingly, the same study also suggested that the location of tracer deposition influences the lymphatic drainage pattern. The main question is whether, in order to identify the true tumor-draining SLNs, the tracer should be injected randomly in the peripheral zone of the prostate. It might be better to aim for peri- or intratumoral tracer deposition as is common in, for example, breast cancer and melanoma.

FIGURE 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2.

Preoperative SLN mapping. After tracer injection in the peripheral zone of prostate (A), planar lymphoscintigraphic images are acquired to identify the SLNs (B). SPECT/CT imaging allows identification of the anatomic location of the SLNs and, in some cases, identification of SLNs outside extended pelvic lymphadenectomy field; here, a paravesical SLN (white arrow) not clearly detectable on the lymphoscintigraphic image was identified after SPECT/CT imaging (C and D). In this patient, 5 SLNs were detected, with 2 being located outside extended pelvic lymphadenectomy field (white and pink arrows). 3D-VR = 3D volume rendering.

Multiparametric MR imaging (T2-weighted, contrast-enhanced, and diffusion weighted) was shown to be promising in the identification of localized prostate cancer (15). Integrating such MR imaging information with real-time–acquired contrast-enhanced transrectal ultrasound may allow MR imaging–based navigation of injection needles toward the intraprostatic tumor foci.

PREOPERATIVE SLN IDENTIFICATION AND PLANNING OF THE SURGICAL PROCEDURE

After tracer injection, obtaining sequential anterior (Fig. 2B) and posterior lymphoscintigraphic images is recommended in order to differentiate early draining SLNs from higher-echelon nodes (16). Via the introduction of SPECT/CT imaging, the 3-dimensional (3D) distribution of the radiocolloid can be directly placed in the anatomic context provided by the CT component (Figs. 2C and 2D). Moreover, with SPECT/CT imaging, SLNs not seen on lymphoscintigraphic images, such as those in the presacral region, can be identified (17). As such, preoperative identification of the lymphatic drainage patterns allows surgeons to decide beforehand on the optimal and least invasive surgical approach.

PET/CT, PET/MR imaging, or multiparametric MR imaging may, in the future, also be of value in planning surgical procedures. For example, LN mapping can be performed using radiocolloids suitable for PET imaging, via the direct identification of LN metastasis using targeted PET tracers or using ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide particles or targeted dendrimers suitable for MR imaging.

TRANSLATION OF THE PREOPERATIVELY ACQUIRED IMAGING DATA TO THE OPERATING ROOM

Ideally, preoperatively acquired 2-dimensional (2D) and 3D imaging data can be directly translated into the operating room to help navigate the surgeon to the areas of interest. Improvement is especially desired in localization of SLNs near vital structures. Most straightforward is 2D navigation provided by a portable γ-camera (18). By placing a 125I-seed on a laparoscopic γ-probe and performing dual-isotope γ-imaging, it is possible to surgically navigate a laparoscopic γ-probe toward the SLNs (Fig. 3C) (18).

FIGURE 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 3.

Intraoperative SLN identification. Via patient and tool tracking (yellow square and circle, respectively) (A), preoperatively acquired images can be translated into the operating room via 3D virtual reality navigation (B). A portable γ-camera allows visualization of the radioactive hot spots in 2D whereby a 125I-seed placed on the tip of the laparoscopic γ-probe (white circle) can be used for navigation (C). Hybrid tracers allow SLNs to be acoustically traced using a γ-probe (D) and optically detected via fluorescence imaging (E). RARP = robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

The freehand-SPECT technology, which is based on real-time tracking of both the patient and a γ-probe, enables the generation of intraoperative 3D SPECT data that can be viewed in augmented or virtual reality (i.e., mixed reality) as an improvement over 2D imaging (19). Alternatively, virtual reality images can be generated using segmentation of SPECT scans (Fig. 3B), CT scans (20) or using transrectal ultrasound images (21). For robot-assisted procedures, one can load virtual reality images and/or the preoperatively acquired 3D images into the TilePro function of the da Vinci robot (Intuitive Surgical, Inc.). By attaching a 3D motion controller, it even becomes possible to manually manipulate these images (22).

For mixed reality–based navigation in soft tissue, organ deformation and movement of organs or the cameras can be a serious problem. Hence, one must compensate for such movements by placing internal (20) or external (23) navigation aids (Fig. 3A). A disadvantage of that approach is that it is difficult to correct for motion and organ deformation. The fluorescence signature of a hybrid tracer, in combination with the tracking of a fluorescence endoscope, can potentially be used to compensate for navigation errors of less than 10 mm (23).

INTRAOPERATIVE SLN IDENTIFICATION

Intraoperative SLN identification is traditionally facilitated via acoustic γ-tracing (Fig. 3D). With the introduction of robot-assisted laparoscopic procedures, not only are the senses of the surgeon reduced but also new challenges are faced for intraoperative γ-tracing. For example, the reduction in the movement of the γ-probe reduces the spatial accuracy of this technology even further. This is particularly problematic in areas near the injection site, where the high background signal hinders SLN identification. With regard to a 2-d protocol, the natural decay of the radioactive signal over time can reduce the detection sensitivity, which is already relatively low for the prostate.

Hybrid tracers such as indocyanine green–99mTc-nanocolloid can be used to extend the conventional radioguided surgical procedure with the benefits that NIR fluorescence imaging has to offer (24). With this tracer, γ-tracing can be used to obtain a rough localization of the SLN while the increased spatial resolution provided by the fluorescent signature enables accurate delineation of the SLN (Fig. 3E). An excellent example of the spatial information that fluorescence imaging provides during laparoscopic surgery was demonstrated by Jeschke et al., who showed lymphatic tracts draining from the prostate to the SLN, as well as the SLN itself (25).

PATIENT BENEFIT

We envision that symbiosis between the above-mentioned surgical guidance technologies may, in the future, provide patient benefit. Diagnostic images may help surgeons to select the least invasive surgical approach. Such planning should result in minimization of the exploration time. A one-to-one correlation between pre- and intraoperatively generated images helps validate complete excision of lesions. Finally, more accurate surgical identification of diseased and anatomic structures may result in further reduction of complications associated with nodal dissection.

CONCLUSION

Optimal use of interventional molecular imaging techniques is expected to lead to new surgical treatment paradigms for indications such as the SLN biopsy procedure for prostate cancer. One of the major challenges in the wide implementation of such technologies is their clinical translation. The first proof-of-concept studies, however, can provide a clinical basis for further improvements in this research field.

DISCLOSURE

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. Therefore, and solely to indicate this fact, this article is hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 USC section 1734. This work was supported in part by a Dutch Cancer Society translational research award (PGF 2009-4344), a National Research Council NWO-STW-VIDI grant (STW BGT11272), and an Intuitive Surgical, Inc., clinical research grant. No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Footnotes

  • Published online Mar. 14, 2013.

  • © 2013 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Inc.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Holl G,
    2. Dorn R,
    3. Wengenmair H,
    4. Weckermann D,
    5. Sciuk J
    . Validation of sentinel lymph node dissection in prostate cancer: experience in more than 2,000 patients. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2009;36:1377–1382.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Joniau S,
    2. Van den Bergh L,
    3. Lerut E,
    4. et al
    . Mapping of pelvic lymph node metastases in prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2013;63:450–458.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.
    1. Mattei A,
    2. Fuechsel FG,
    3. Bhatta Dhar N,
    4. et al
    . The template of the primary lymphatic landing sites of the prostate should be revisited: results of a multimodality mapping study. Eur Urol. 2008;53:118–125.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Meinhardt W,
    2. van der Poel HG,
    3. Valdes Olmos RA,
    4. Bex A,
    5. Brouwer OR,
    6. Horenblas S
    . Laparoscopic sentinel lymph node biopsy for prostate cancer: the relevance of locations outside the extended dissection area. Prostate Cancer. 2012;2012:751753.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. van den Berg NS,
    2. van Leeuwen FW,
    3. van der Poel HG
    . Fluorescence guidance in urologic surgery. Curr Opin Urol. 2012;22:109–120.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Uren RF
    . Lymphatic drainage of the skin. Ann Surg Oncol. 2004;11(suppl):179S–185S.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Brouwer OR,
    2. Buckle T,
    3. Vermeeren L,
    4. et al
    . Comparing the hybrid fluorescent-radioactive tracer indocyanine green-99mTc-nanocolloid with 99mTc-nanocolloid for sentinel node identification: a validation study using lymphoscintigraphy and SPECT/CT. J Nucl Med. 2012;53:1034–1040.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Buckle T,
    2. Chin PT,
    3. van Leeuwen FW
    . (Non-targeted) radioactive/fluorescent nanoparticles and their potential in combined pre- and intraoperative imaging during sentinel lymph node resection. Nanotechnology. 2010;21:482001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Emerson DK,
    2. Limmer KK,
    3. Hall DJ,
    4. et al
    . A receptor-targeted fluorescent radiopharmaceutical for multireporter sentinel lymph node imaging. Radiology. 2012;265:186–193.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Thorek DL,
    2. Abou DS,
    3. Beattie BJ,
    4. et al
    . Positron lymphography: multimodal, high-resolution, dynamic mapping and resection of lymph nodes after intradermal injection of 18F-FDG. J Nucl Med. 2012;53:1438–1445.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Kuil J,
    2. Velders AH,
    3. van Leeuwen FW
    . Multimodal tumor-targeting peptides functionalized with both a radio- and a fluorescent label. Bioconjug Chem. 2010;21:1709–1719.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Azhdarinia A,
    2. Ghosh P,
    3. Ghosh S,
    4. Wilganowski N,
    5. Sevick-Muraca EM
    . Dual-labeling strategies for nuclear and fluorescence molecular imaging: a review and analysis. Mol Imaging Biol. 2012;14:261–276.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Banerjee SR,
    2. Pullambhatla M,
    3. Byun Y,
    4. et al
    . Sequential SPECT and optical imaging of experimental models of prostate cancer with a dual modality inhibitor of the prostate-specific membrane antigen. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2011;50:9167–9170.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Buckle T,
    2. Brouwer OR,
    3. Valdes Olmos RA,
    4. van der Poel HG,
    5. van Leeuwen FW
    . Relationship between intraprostatic tracer deposits and sentinel lymph node mapping in prostate cancer patients. J Nucl Med. 2012;53:1026–1033.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Fütterer JJ,
    2. Barentsz JO
    . MR imaging-guided and robotic-assisted prostate biopsy. Curr Opin Urol. 2012;22:316–319.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Mariani G,
    2. Manca G,
    3. Orsini P,
    4. Vidal-Sicart S,
    5. Valdes Olmos R
    1. Valdés Olmos RA,
    2. Vidal-Sicart S
    . SPECT/CT image generation and criteria for sentinel node mapping. In: Mariani G, Manca G, Orsini P, Vidal-Sicart S, Valdes Olmos R, eds. Atlas of Lymphoscintigraphy and Sentinel Node Mapping. Milan, Italy: Springer; 2012:269–283.
  17. 17.↵
    1. Vermeeren L,
    2. Valdes Olmos RA,
    3. Meinhardt W,
    4. et al
    . Value of SPECT/CT for detection and anatomic localization of sentinel lymph nodes before laparoscopic sentinel node lymphadenectomy in prostate carcinoma. J Nucl Med. 2009;50:865–870.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Vermeeren L,
    2. Valdes Olmos RA,
    3. Meinhardt W,
    4. et al
    . Intraoperative radioguidance with a portable gamma camera: a novel technique for laparoscopic sentinel node localisation in urological malignancies. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2009;36:1029–1036.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Navab N,
    2. Blum T,
    3. Wang L,
    4. Okur A,
    5. Wendler T
    . First deployments of augmented reality in operating rooms. Computer. 2012;45:48–55.
    OpenUrl
  20. 20.↵
    1. Simpfendörfer T,
    2. Baumhauer M,
    3. Muller M,
    4. et al
    . Augmented reality visualization during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Endourol. 2011;25:1841–1845.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Ukimura O,
    2. Nakamoto M,
    3. Gill IS
    . Three-dimensional reconstruction of renovascular-tumor anatomy to facilitate zero-ischemia partial nephrectomy. Eur Urol. 2012;61:211–217.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Volonté F,
    2. Pugin F,
    3. Buchs NC,
    4. et al
    . Console-integrated stereoscopic osirix 3D volume-rendered images for da Vinci colorectal robotic surgery. Surg Innov. May 1, 2012 [Epub ahead of print].
  23. 23.↵
    1. Brouwer OR,
    2. Buckle T,
    3. Bunschoten A,
    4. et al
    . Image navigation as a means to expand the boundaries of fluorescence-guided surgery. Phys Med Biol. 2012;57:3123–3136.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. van der Poel HG,
    2. Buckle T,
    3. Brouwer OR,
    4. Valdes Olmos RA,
    5. van Leeuwen FW
    . Intraoperative laparoscopic fluorescence guidance to the sentinel lymph node in prostate cancer patients: clinical proof of concept of an integrated functional imaging approach using a multimodal tracer. Eur Urol. 2011;60:826–833.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Jeschke S,
    2. Lusuardi L,
    3. Myatt A,
    4. Hruby S,
    5. Pirich C,
    6. Janetschek G
    . Visualisation of the lymph node pathway in real time by laparoscopic radioisotope- and fluorescence-guided sentinel lymph node dissection in prostate cancer staging. Urology. 2012;80:1080–1086.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  • Received for publication December 10, 2012.
  • Accepted for publication February 21, 2013.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 54 (4)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 54, Issue 4
April 1, 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Prostate Cancer: A Hybrid Approach
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Prostate Cancer: A Hybrid Approach
Nynke S. van den Berg, Renato A. Valdés-Olmos, Henk G. van der Poel, Fijs W.B. van Leeuwen
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Apr 2013, 54 (4) 493-496; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.112.113746

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Prostate Cancer: A Hybrid Approach
Nynke S. van den Berg, Renato A. Valdés-Olmos, Henk G. van der Poel, Fijs W.B. van Leeuwen
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Apr 2013, 54 (4) 493-496; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.112.113746
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • (HYBRID) TRACERS
    • INJECTION PROCEDURE
    • PREOPERATIVE SLN IDENTIFICATION AND PLANNING OF THE SURGICAL PROCEDURE
    • TRANSLATION OF THE PREOPERATIVELY ACQUIRED IMAGING DATA TO THE OPERATING ROOM
    • INTRAOPERATIVE SLN IDENTIFICATION
    • PATIENT BENEFIT
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Entering the Era of Molecularly Targeted Precision Surgery in Recurrent Prostate Cancer
  • Toward (Hybrid) Navigation of a Fluorescence Camera in an Open Surgery Setting
  • Prostate Cancer Imaging and Therapy: Potential Role of Nanoparticles
  • Noninvasive brain cancer imaging with a bispecific antibody fragment, generated via click chemistry
  • Dual-Modality Image-Guided Surgery of Prostate Cancer with a Radiolabeled Fluorescent Anti-PSMA Monoclonal Antibody
  • Optical Imaging of Renal Cell Carcinoma with Anti-Carbonic Anhydrase IX Monoclonal Antibody Girentuximab
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • From Genome to Phenome: Opportunities and Challenges of Molecular Imaging
  • Imaging the Activity of Efflux Transporters at the Blood–Brain Barrier in Neurologic Diseases: Radiotracer Selection Criteria
  • Molecular Imaging of Pulmonary Fibrosis
Show more Focus on Molecular Imaging

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • interventional molecular imaging
  • image-guided surgery
  • prostate cancer
  • sentinel lymph node
  • multimodal
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire