Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleClinical Investigations

18F-Fluoromisonidazole PET/CT: A Potential Tool for Predicting Primary Endocrine Therapy Resistance in Breast Cancer

Jingyi Cheng, Li Lei, Junyan Xu, Yifei Sun, Yongping Zhang, Xincun Wang, Lingling Pan, Zhimin Shao, Yingjian Zhang and Guangyu Liu
Journal of Nuclear Medicine March 2013, 54 (3) 333-340; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.112.111963
Jingyi Cheng
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
2Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Li Lei
3Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; and
4Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Junyan Xu
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
2Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yifei Sun
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
2Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yongping Zhang
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
2Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xincun Wang
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
2Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lingling Pan
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
2Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zhimin Shao
3Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; and
4Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yingjian Zhang
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
2Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Guangyu Liu
3Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; and
4Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Although endocrine therapy is an effective method to treat estrogen receptor (ER)–positive breast cancer, approximately 30%–40% of all hormone receptor–positive tumors display de novo resistance. The aim of our current study was to analyze whether 18F-labeled fluoromisonidazole (1-(2-nitro-1-imidazolyl)-2-hydroxy-3-fluoropropane [18F-FMISO]) PET/CT could predict primary resistance to hormonal therapy in ER-positive breast cancer. Methods: Postmenopausal women who had ER-α–positive breast cancer, stages II–IV, and had never received prior endocrine therapy were prospectively enrolled in this study. Patients underwent both 18F-FDG and 18F-FMISO PET/CT scans before and after treatment. The hottest 18F-FDG standardized uptake value (SUV) in the tumor foci, the SUVs at 2 and 4 h, and the TBR2 h and TBR4 h for the target lesions were calculated (TBR2 h = SUV2 hT/SUV2 hB and TBR4 h = SUV4 hT/SUV4 hB [TBR is the tumor-to-background ratio]). Clinical outcomes of primary endocrine therapy with letrozole were evaluated according to the criteria of the World Health Organization after at least 3 mo of treatment. Immunohistochemistry for markers of proliferation (Ki67) and hypoxia-induced factor 1α was performed on a subset of tumors that had undergone biopsy or surgery. Pearson and Spearman analysis was used to determine the correlation between the parameters of 18F-FDG and 18F-FMISO uptake and clinical or immunohistochemistry outcomes with a 0.01 threshold for statistical significance. Results: A total of 45 lesions (13 primary, 32 metastatic) from 20 patients met the inclusion criteria in this study. Baseline 18F-FDG and 18F-FMISO PET/CT scans were obtained for 33 lesions from 16 patients. The correlation between baseline 18F-FDG uptake and clinical outcome was weak and did not reach statistical significance (r = 0.37, P = 0.031). However, there was a significantly positive correlation between baseline 18F-FMISO uptake (SUV2 hT, TBR2 h, SUV4 hT, and TBR4 h) and clinical outcomes after ≥3 mo of primary endocrine therapy with letrozole (r = 0.77, 0.76, 0.71, and 0.78, respectively; P < 0.0001). The application of a TBR4 h cutoff of ≥1.2 allowed the prediction of 88% of the cases of progressive disease (15/17). Despite poor correlation between 18F-FMISO uptake and hypoxia-induced factor 1α expression, a marginal positive correlation between TBR4 h and Ki67 expression was measured (r = 0.51, P = 0.011) in a subset of malignant lesions acquired by biopsy or surgery. Conclusion: 18F-FMISO PET/CT can be used to predict primary endocrine resistance in ER-positive breast cancer.

  • hypoxia
  • breast cancer
  • 18F-FMISO
  • hormonal therapy
  • resistance

Approximately 70% of breast carcinomas are hormone-dependent and overexpress hormone receptors, such as estrogen receptor (ER)-α. As a result, endocrine therapy has emerged as an important tool to treat ER-positive breast cancer. New-generation hormonal therapy (e.g., third-generation aromatase inhibitors) has performed better than traditional antiestrogen therapy (i.e., tamoxifen) in both early-stage and advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women (1). However, approximately 30% of ER-positive breast cancer will unfortunately display primary resistance to hormonal therapy (2), and some may develop acquired resistance to the therapy after initial treatment (1).

Hypoxia is a normal phenomenon in solid tumors that arises, in part, from uncontrolled proliferation and immature blood vessels (3). Previous studies have demonstrated that hypoxia and its biomarker, hypoxia-induced factor (HIF), are strongly associated with tumor propagation, malignant progression, and resistance to anticancer treatments, such as radiotherapy (4–6). Kurebayashi et al. (7) first reported that hypoxia significantly reduced both the growth-promoting effects of estradiol (E2) and the growth-inhibitory effects of an antiestrogen on ER-positive breast cancer cell lines. Cooper et al. (8) observed that regional loss of ER-α expression was consistently present in hypoxic regions of breast cancer tissue. A recent study comparing neoadjuvant letrozole with letrozole plus metronomic cyclophosphamide found that increased levels of HIF-1α (Novus Biologicals) were significantly associated with resistance to treatment (9,10). Taken together, these data indicate that hypoxia might be associated with endocrine resistance in breast cancer.

In 1991, the gold standard—an O2-sensitive electrode—was first used to measure breast tumors, and 40% of the tumors investigated contained hypoxic areas (11). Unfortunately, this method is invasive, indirect, and overall too restricted to become a tool for general clinical practice. With PET/CT, radiolabeled hypoxia-avid compounds can be applied to evaluate oxygenation status in experimental or human tumors. 18F-labeled fluoromisonidazole (1-[2-nitro-1-imidazolyl]-2-hydroxy-3-fluoropropane [18F-FMISO]) is the most widely used nitroimidazole derivative in clinical PET/CT. Because 18F-FMISO has affinity only for hypoxic cells with functional nitroreductase enzymes, 18F-FMISO accumulates in activated cells but not in necrotic cells (12). In vivo animal model studies have shown that intracellular retention of 18F-FMISO depends on oxygen concentration, and the rate of 18F-FMISO binding under hypoxic conditions can be up to 28 times greater than binding under normoxic conditions (13). Many clinical studies have demonstrated an excellent correlation between the 18F-FMISO uptake and oxygenation status of gliomas, non–small cell lung cancer, head and neck cancer, and cervical cancer (14–20).

The major aim of our study was to analyze uptake of 18F-FMISO in ER-positive breast cancers, which are usually treated with endocrine therapy, and to predict primary endocrine resistance according to baseline 18F-FMISO PET/CT scans in breast cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients and Treatment

Postmenopausal women (mean age, 65.1 y; age range, 55–82 y) who had ER-α–positive breast cancer at stages II–IV and had never received prior endocrine therapy were considered eligible for this study. Patients were assigned to primary aromatase inhibitor treatment with letrozole (Femara; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.), at 2.5 mg daily for at least 3 mo. Primary sites within the breast were assessed by ultrasound or MRI, and distant metastases were assessed by CT. Tumor response was evaluated according to the criteria of the World Health Organization (21). This prospective study was approved by the local ethics committee. Written informed consent was obtained from each candidate patient.

PET/CT Scans

PET/CT Protocol

The baseline 18F-FDG/18F-FMISO PET/CT scans were scheduled before initiation of endocrine therapy. The follow-up 18F-FDG/18F-FMISO PET/CT scans were scheduled at least 3 mo later, just after the clinical evaluation for the tumor response to primary endocrine therapy. All PET/CT scans were obtained on a Biograph 16HR PET/CT (Siemens) operating in 3-dimensional, high-resolution mode. All emission images were reconstructed with a gaussian-filter iterative reconstruction method (iterations, 4; subsets, 8; image size, 168; filter, full width at half maximum, 5 mm) after corrections for scatter, singles, and random events, resulting in a spatial resolution of approximately 5 mm. The tomograph is regularly calibrated to convert counts per minute per pixel to megabecquerels per milliliter using large vials containing known activities of 18F imaged separately from the patient and reconstructed using the same filter as the emission images.

18F-FMISO Static PET/CT Scan

18F-FMISO was produced by a cyclotron (RDS Eclips ST; Siemens CTI) and an Explora FDG4 (Siemens) module using 1-(2′-nitro-1′-imidazolyl)-2-O-tetrahydropyranyl-3-O-tosyl-propanediol as a labeling precursor. 18F-FMISO PET/CT scans were acquired 2 or 3 d after the initial 18F-FDG PET/CT scan. All patients were injected intravenously with 370 MBq of 18F-FMISO. At 2 and 4 h after injection, static emission scans were obtained. The data acquisition procedure was as follows: CT was first performed with 120 kV, CARE Dose (Siemens) 4-dimensional mode, 80–250 mA, and a pitch of 3.6. Immediately after CT, a PET emission scan that covered the identical transverse field of view was obtained. The acquisition time was 5 min per table position. PET scans were processed using iterative reconstruction and measured attenuation correction.

18F-FDG PET/CT Whole-Body Scan

18F-FDG was produced automatically by a cyclotron (RDS Eclips ST; Siemens) and an Explora FDG4 module (Siemens) in our center. All patients were required to fast for at least 6 h to ensure glucose blood levels below 10 mmol/L. Before and after injection, patients were kept lying comfortably in a quiet, dimly lit room. Scanning was initiated 1 h after administration of the tracer (7.4 MBq/kg). The data acquisition procedure was as follows: CT was first performed, from the proximal thighs to head, with 120 kV, CARE Dose 4-dimensional mode, 80–250 mA, and a pitch of 3.6. Immediately after CT, a PET emission scan that covered the identical transverse field of view was obtained. The acquisition time was 2–3 min per table position. PET image datasets were reconstructed iteratively by application of the CT data for attenuation correction, and coregistered images were displayed on a workstation.

Image Analysis

Several lesions were evaluated, including primary lesions within the breast, regional lymph node metastases, local recurrences, and lung and pleura metastases. 18F-FDG/18F-FMISO datasets were reconstructed using the attenuation maps provided by the low-dose CT dataset measured immediately before 18F-FDG/18F-FMISO image acquisition at the same scanner. All images were analyzed on a clinical Leonardo workstation with TrueD software. All PET/CT acquisitions from a given 18F-FDG/18F-FMISO sequence were coregistered with automatic methods using the 18F-FDG PET/CT scans as a reference. An elliptic volume of interest (VOI) was drawn manually around areas with abnormal 18F-FDG uptake to calculate SUVpeak (the hottest spot in the tumor foci). Finally, 40% of the maximum SUVpeak threshold was applied to delineate VOI40, which was then pasted onto the 18F-FMISO PET/CT images to measure SUVpeak for 18F-FMISO uptake. When a significant activity could not be visually distinguished by an experienced nuclear medicine physician, the SUVpeak was calculated in the VOI40 drawn on the initial PET/CT scan. This occurred when no 18F-FMISO uptake was visible in a VOI40. When the initial 18F-FDG hypermetabolism disappeared on the PET/CT acquisition, the VOI40 at initial data was copied onto the images at follow-up. The peak values in 18F-FMISO PET/CT images at 2 and 4 h were noted as SUV2 hT and SUV4 hT. Additionally, six 0.5 × 0.5 × 0.5 cm small spheres (background) were located at the triceps brachii muscles, the scapula muscles, and the latissimus dorsi muscles both in the homonymy and in the opposite side. The mean value of 6 background VOI peaks was noted as SUV2 hB, TBR2 h = SUV2 hT/SUV2 hB, and TBR4 h = SUV4 hT/SUV4 hB (TBR is the tumor-to-background ratio).

Tissue Specimens and Immunohistochemistry

Each patient underwent diagnostic core-needle biopsy on the primary site at baseline. A therapeutic surgery (quadrantectomy or mastectomy in association with sentinel node biopsy or axillary node dissection) or a second core-needle biopsy on the primary site was planned in a subset of patients after at least 3 mo of primary letrozole therapy. Both biopsy and surgical samples of primary tumors were routinely embedded in paraffin wax and cut to 3- to 5-μm thickness and dried overnight at 37°C for immunohistochemistry testing. Immunohistochemistry staining for HIF-1α (Novus Biologicals) was performed on 3- to 5-μm serial sections on coated slides. After the slides were dried at 80°C overnight, they were dewaxed in xylene (10 min, 3 times) and rehydrated using graded alcohol. Antigens were retrieved by cooking in Tris (pH 6.0). The mouse monoclonal antibody H1α67 (at a dilution of 1:100 in tris-buffered saline with 10% normal bovine serum) was used to assess the expression of HIF-1α and incubated overnight at 4°C. Next, an hour-long incubation with a Supervision Universal (antimouse–antirabbit) Detection Reagent (Dako) (horseradish peroxidase) was performed. Slides were then stained with 3,3′-diaminobenzidine chromogen solution for 10 min and then counterstained with hematoxylin and mounted with Aquamount. Immunohistochemistry staining for Ki67 was performed on an automated immunohistochemistry stainer at room temperature. Known positive and negative controls (obtained by omission of primary antibodies) were used to ensure quality control of staining.

All immunohistochemistry slides were examined by light microscopy by 2 observers masked to patient outcome. The HIF-1α level was assessed within the entire tumor section with a semiquantitative scale that combined proportional expression (scored as 0, no expression; 1, <10%; 2, 10%–50%; 3, 50%–80%; and 4, >80% of cells showing nuclear staining) and staining intensity(scored as 0, none; 1, weak; 2, intermediate; and 3, strong) to obtain an a total immunohistochemistry score from 0 to 7 (22). Ki-67 was scored as the percentage of positively stained cells among 1,000 malignant cells.

Statistical Analysis

Data were analyzed using SPSS software (version 17.0; SPSS–IBM). We tested the hypothesis that 18F-FDG and 18F-FMISO uptake in breast tumors was correlated with response to primary endocrine therapy. The Pearson correlation coefficient was computed to determine the correlation among the hottest spot in the tumor foci (SUVFDGpeak), SUV2 hT, SUV4 hT, TBR2 h, and TBR4 h. Spearman rank correlation was used to determine the correlation among 3 groups (complete and partial responders [PRs], stable disease, and progressive disease [PD]) and 18F-FDG/18F-FMISO uptake with a 0.01 threshold for statistical significance. The optimal cutoff value was selected according to PD and PR. Other tests were performed to answer the question of whether 18F-FDG or 18F-FMISO uptake correlates with expression of either HIF-1α or Ki67.

RESULTS

Forty-five lesions (13 primary, 32 metastasis) from 20 patients met the inclusion criteria of the study, including 13 primary sites of breast cancer, 20 regional lymph node metastases, 8 local recurrences, and 4 lung and pleura metastases.

18F-FDG/18F-FMISO Uptake in Primary and Metastatic Lesions

Twenty lesions from 11 patients (patients 1–11) underwent both baseline and follow-up 18F-FDG/18F-FMISO PET/CT scans. Thirteen lesions from 5 patients (patients 12–16) underwent baseline scans only, and the remaining 12 lesions from 4 patients (patients 17–20) underwent follow-up scans only. Therefore, 65 PET/CT scans for 45 lesions were eligible for analysis (Table 1). The SUVFDGpeak of these sixty-five 18F-FDG PET/CT scans ranged from 0.90 to 13.49 (mean, 6.40 ± 3.44). For 18F-FMISO PET/CT scans, SUV2 hT ranged from 0.48 to 4.76 (mean, 1.85 ± 0.69); SUV4 hT ranged from 0.48 to 3.52 (mean, 1.80 ± 0.67), TBR2 h ranged from 0.27 to 3.07 (mean, 1.15 ± 0.45), and TBR4 h ranged from 0.21 to 2.29 (mean, 1.22 ± 0.45). There were weaker correlations for SUVFDGpeak versus SUV4 hT (r = 0.46) and SUVFDGpeak versus TBR4 h (r = 0.44). However, strong correlations were found for SUV2 hT versus SUV4 hT, TBR2 h versus TBR4 h, SUV2 hT versus TBR4 h, and SUV4 hT versus TBR4 h (r = 0.77, 0.79, 0.79, and 0.94, respectively; P < 0.0001 for all). SUVFDGpeak, TBR2 h, and TBR4 h were all greater for metastatic lesions than for primary lesions, and the differences were significant (t = 4.51, 3.49, and 3.23, respectively, P < 0.01 for all).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

Patient Characteristics and Imaging Data

Predictive Value of 18F-FDG/18F-FMISO

In the current study, baseline 18F-FMISO PET/CT scans were performed on 33 lesions from 16 patients (Table 1, patients 1–16). After more than 3 mo of treatment with letrozole, 0 lesions were considered complete responders, 11 were PRs, 5 were stable disease, and 17 were PD (Figs. 1 and 2).The correlation between SUVFDGpeak and clinical outcome was weak and did not reach statistical significance (r = 0.37, P = 0.031). However, there was a significantly positive correlation between baseline 18F-FMISO uptake (SUV2 hT, TBR2 h, SUV4 hT, and TBR4 h) and clinical outcome (r = 0.77, 0.76, 0.71, and 0.78, respectively; P < 0.0001). Application of a cutoff of TBR4 h ≥ 1.2 allowed prediction of 88% of PDs (15/17), whereas cutoffs of TBR2 h ≥ 1.2, SUV2 hT ≥ 2.1, and SUV4 hT ≥ 2.1 identified 70% (12/17), 64% (11/17), and 64% (11/17) of PDs, respectively. However, SUVFDGpeak could not predict PD or PRs because a clear cutoff could not be defined (Figs. 3A–3C). After at least 3 mo of follow-up, 20 of 33 lesions underwent an additional 18F-FMISO PET/CT scan. Comparing TBR4 h at baseline and at follow-up indicated that TBR4 h in PRs and stable disease shows a decreasing trend; in contrast, TBR4 h in PD did not follow this same trend (Fig. 3D).

FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

Metastatic right axillary node in patient 8. Metastatic lesion (23 × 17 mm) showed high 18F-FMISO uptake at baseline (red arrow) (TBR4 h = 2.29). After more than 3 mo of treatment with letrozol, metastatic lesion progressed (30 × 20 mm) and still revealed high 18F-FMISO uptake (yellow arrow) (TBR4 h = 2.15). (A) CT image in baseline. (B) CT image in follow-up. (C) PET image in baseline. (D) PET image in follow-up. (E) Maximum-intensity-projection image in baseline. (F) Maximum-intensity-projection image in follow-up.

FIGURE 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2.

Right breast tumor in patient 4. Primary lesion (19 × 18 mm) did not show decreased 18F-FMISO uptake at baseline (green arrow) (TBR4 h = 1.05). After more than 3 mo of treatment with letrozole, primary lesion lessened (11 × 10 mm) and still had no decreased 18F-FMISO uptake (blue arrow) (TBR4 h = 0.84). (A) CT image in baseline. (B) CT image in follow-up. (C) PET image in baseline. (D) PET image in follow-up.

FIGURE 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 3.

Application of cutoff TBR4 h of ≥ 1.2 allowed prediction of 88% (15/17) PDs and all PRs (C) Although using SUV4hT ≥ 2.1 could identify 64% (11/17) of PDs and all PRs (B), SUVFDGpeak could not predict PDs and PRs because clear cutoff could not be defined (A). When TBR4 h in baseline and follow-up were compared, TBR4 h in stable disease and PRs showed downtrend, whereas TBR4 h in PDs did not (D). SD = stable disease.

Relationship Between 18F-FDG/18F-FMISO Uptake and HIF-1α and Ki67

As shown in Table 1, HIF-1α and Ki67 expression were detected by immunohistochemistry in 14 and 22 samples, respectively. No correlation was found between 18F-FDG/18F-FMISO uptake and HIF-1α expression (r = 0.01 and 0.34, respectively; P = 0.81 and 0.62, respectively). Ki67 did not correlate with SUVFDGpeak, SUV2 hT, or TBR2 h (r = 0.23, 0.28, and 0.25, respectively; and P = 0.27, 0.19, and 0.23, respectively). There was a marginal correlation between Ki67 expression and TBR4 h (r = 0.51, P = 0.011).

DISCUSSION

Endocrine therapy is suitable for both primary and recurrent/metastatic hormone receptor (ER)–positive breast cancer. Unfortunately, however, not all women respond to treatment. The preoperative endocrine prognostic index is a comprehensive evaluation score based on multiple parameters, including histopathologic tumor size after 3–4 mo of primary endocrine therapy, nodal status, ER levels, and Ki67 levels. The index can be used as a tool for individualization of primary endocrine therapy (23). Unfortunately, according to the preoperative endocrine prognostic index, approximately 30%–40% of patients with primary resistance to hormonal therapy receive unnecessary treatment. As a result, their conditions may even worsen. It has been reported that Ki67 levels measured after a short term (2 wk) of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy can predict long-term outcome for individual patients (24), and the same may be true for pretreatment HIF-1α levels (9,10). However, it is difficult to obtain biopsies of metastatic lesions in patients with advanced breast cancer. Thus, it is urgent and valuable to find a noninvasive means with the same efficacy as histopathologic marker analysis to predict primary hormonal therapy resistance. Our study revealed that 18F-FMISO PET/CT is a highly effective method that can accurately predict the clinical efficacy of primary endocrine therapy and has a marginal positive correlation with Ki67 levels.

For over a decade, 18F-FMISO has been used as a PET tracer for hypoxia imaging of several solid tumors, including non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), head and neck cancer, soft-tissue sarcomas, and renal cell carcinoma. To our knowledge, no study has examined the role of 18F-FMISO PET/CT in predicting endocrine resistance in breast cancer. Therefore, no previous studies could provide optimal parameters and cutoffs. Here, we found that TBR4 h is an optimal parameter to assess the degree of hypoxia; importantly, this finding agrees with earlier reports (25,26).The tumor VOI was delineated using 18F-FDG image data in 3-dimensional mode with TrueD software to obtain the SUVFDGpeak—the hottest spot in the tumor. The back muscle was chosen as reference in both homonymy and opposite side because the distribution and drainage of tracer in homonymy muscles may be affected after surgery and radiotherapy. As a result, we drew 6 background VOIs to obtain the average background VOI, which was more representative and close to real for analysis. Each tumor may have its own cutoff threshold because blood supply, location, and extent of necrosis vary from tumor to tumor. For example, 1.2 is a cutoff value for head and neck cancer and soft-tissue sarcomas (18,27,28), 1.24 is a cutoff value for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (29), and 1.4 is the cutoff for NSCLC because the unique structure of the lung parenchyma, including its dual blood supply and abundant oxygen-containing air space, may play a role in NSCLC’s being less hypoxic than other tumor types (30,31). In our study, 16 patients with 33 lesions underwent hypoxia detection at baseline, which was then used to predict endocrine therapy outcome. We determined cutoff values according to clinical responses previously reported in the literature (15) to ensure no false-positives were included. In our patients, a TBR4 h ≥ 1.2 can predict 88% of PDs and 100% of PRs. It is better than other parameters (TBR2 h, SUV2 hT, and SUV4 hT) and still correlates well with them.

Under normal conditions, hypoxia can greatly enhance glucose uptake through upregulation of glycolytic enzymes. The results of our study show that SUVFDGpeak does not correlate with either 18F-FMISO uptake or with the efficacy of endocrine therapy, suggesting that the alteration of glucose metabolism in breast cancer cells characterized by a preference of aerobic glycolysis, known as the Warburg effect, appears to be caused by more than hypoxia and has no relationship with endocrine therapy resistance. Thus, the relationship between hypoxia and endocrine therapy resistance needs further examination.

Like SUVFDGpeak, HIF-1α did not correlate with18F-FMISO uptake in our study. This finding is in line with earlier studies (32–35). HIF-1α was mainly expressed in the cytoplasm (90%–100%) and was highly sensitive to oxygen partial pressure. Many procedures such as surgery and sample collection could cause artificial hypoxia, leading to increased HIF-1α expression and a high false-positive rate. It was noted that not only in hypoxia but also under normal oxygen concentrations, HIF-1α can be induced by a variety of stimuli, such as growth factors, cytokines, hormones, and viral proteins. These pathways are often upregulated in tumor cells because of the activation of oncogenes and loss of tumor suppressors, notably phosphatase and tensin homolog deleted on chromosome 10, von Hippel-Lindau protein, and p53 (36,37). Another reason for the discrepancy between HIF-1α expression and 18F-FMISO uptake may be that the fluctuation of tumor oxygenation at pO2 levels of 10 mm Hg or more would not be detected by 18F-FMISO PET/CT scans but could nevertheless lead to the activation of the HIF system (34). Ki67 has been used as a tumor marker to predict response to endocrine therapy. The expression level of Ki67 had been reported to be negatively correlated with clinical outcome (24). In theory, an increase in cellular proliferation should be accompanied by an increase in oxygen supply. When the oxygen supply cannot adequately meet the needs of locally advanced tumors, hypoxia will likely develop. Our study reveals a marginal correlation between Ki67 expression and 18F-FMISO uptake and retention (r = 0.51, P = 0.012, and r = 0.51, P = 0.011, respectively). However, there was no correlation between Ki67 expression and 18F-FDG uptake (r = 0.23, P = 0.27). Similar results were reported for NSCLC, in which only a weak positive correlation between 18F-FMISO uptake and Ki67 was found (30). It is possible that hypoxia in breast tumors does not depend on cellular proliferation and could be an independent predictive factor of clinical outcome.

We find that the state of hypoxia in ER-positive breast tumors at baseline could predict resistance to endocrine therapy. The prognostic value of 18F-FMISO PET/CT performed at baseline will be assessed in future studies with more patients.

CONCLUSION

Monitoring the effects of endocrine therapy is critical to determine whether the current treatment should be continued, stopped, or changed to a more aggressive regimen. An effective method for monitoring the response to endocrine therapy is needed to ensure early identification of nonresponders. Our study used a noninvasive and repeatable method, 18F-FMISO PET/CT, to predict the outcome after endocrine therapy and confirm that TBR4 h ≥ 1.2 is an optimal cutoff that highly suggests resistance to hormonal therapy.

DISCLOSURE

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. Therefore, and solely to indicate this fact, this article is hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 USC section 1734. This research is supported by the Shanghai Committee of Science and Technology, China (grant 12DZ2260100), and by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (30600725), the Shanghai United Developing Technology Project of Municipal Hospitals (SHDC12010116), the Key Clinical Program of the Ministry of Health (2010-2012), and Novartis. The research funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Acknowledgments

We thank all the subjects of this study for their participation. We greatly appreciate Hong-Fen Lu, Xue-Ke Zhou and Xu Cai at Department of Pathology of Shanghai Cancer Center for their excellent work in Immunohisto-chemistry testing.

Footnotes

  • ↵* Contributed equally to this work.

  • Published online Feb. 11, 2013

  • © 2013 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Inc.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Mouridsen H,
    2. Gershanovich M,
    3. Sun Y,
    4. et al
    . Superior efficacy of letrozole versus tamoxifen as first-line therapy for postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer: results of a phase III study of the International Letrozole Breast Cancer Group. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:2596–2606.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Ellis MJ,
    2. Coop A,
    3. Singh B,
    4. et al
    . Letrozole inhibits tumor proliferation more effectively than tamoxifen independent of HER1/2 expression status. Cancer Res. 2003;63:6523–6531.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Bunn HF,
    2. Poyton RO
    . Oxygen sensing and molecular adaptation to hypoxia. Physiol Rev. 1996;76:839–885.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Vaupel P,
    2. Hoeckel M
    . Predictive power of the tumor oxygenation status. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1999;471:533–539.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. 5.
    1. Bos R,
    2. Groep P,
    3. Greijer AE,
    4. et al
    . Levels of hypoxia-inducible factor-1α independently predict prognosis in patients with lymph node negative breast carcinoma. Cancer. 2003;97:1573–1581.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Aebersold DM,
    2. Burri P,
    3. Beer KT,
    4. et al
    . Expression of hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha: a novel predictive and prognostic parameter in the radiotherpy of oropharyngeal cancer. Cancer Res. 2001;61:2911–2916.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Kurebayashi J,
    2. Otsuki T,
    3. Moriya T,
    4. et al
    . Hypoxia reduces hormone responsiveness of human breast cancer cells. Jpn J Cancer Res. 2001;92:1093–1101.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  8. 8.↵
    1. Cooper C,
    2. Liu GY,
    3. Niu YL,
    4. et al
    . Intermittent hypoxia induces proteasome-dependent down-regulation of estrogen receptor alpha in human breast carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10:8720–8727.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Generali D,
    2. Berruti A,
    3. Brizzi MP,
    4. et al
    . Hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha expression predicts a poor response to primary chemoendocrine therapy and disease-free survival in primary human breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12:4562–4568.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Generali D,
    2. Buffa FM,
    3. Berruti A,
    4. et al
    . Phosphorylated ER-alpha, HIF-1α, and MAPK signaling as predictors of primary endocrine treatment response and resistance in patients with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:227–234.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Vaupel P,
    2. Schlenger K,
    3. Knoop C,
    4. et al
    . Oxygenation of human tumors: evaluation of tissue oxygen distribution in breast cancer by computerized O2 tension measurements. Cancer Res. 1991;51:3316–3322.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Lee ST,
    2. Scott AM
    . Hypoxia positron emission tomography imaging with 18f-fluoromisonidazole. Semin Nucl Med. 2007;37:451–461.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Rasey JS,
    2. Nelson NJ,
    3. Chin L,
    4. et al
    . Characteristics of the binding of labeled fluoromisonidazole in cells in vitro. Radiat Res. 1990;122:301–308.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Valk PE,
    2. Mathis CA,
    3. Prados MD,
    4. et al
    . Hypoxia in human gliomas: demonstration by PET with fluorine-18-fluoromisonidazole. J Nucl Med. 1992;33:2133–2137.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Eschmann SM,
    2. Paulsen F,
    3. Reimold M,
    4. et al
    . Prognostic impact of hypoxia imaging with 18F-misonidazole PET in non-small cell lung cancer and head and neck cancer before radiotherapy. J Nucl Med. 2005;46:253–260.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.
    1. Gagel B,
    2. Reinartz P,
    3. Demirel C,
    4. et al
    . [18F]fluoromisonidazole and [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in response evaluation after chemo-/radiotherapy of non-small-cell lung cancer: a feasibility study. BMC Cancer. 2006;6:51.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.
    1. Vaupel P,
    2. Thews O,
    3. Hoeckel M
    . Treatment resistance of solid tumors: role of hypoxia and anemia. Med Oncol. 2001;18:243–259.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Lawrentschuk N,
    2. Poon AM,
    3. Foo SS,
    4. et al
    . Assessing regional hypoxia in human renal tumours using 18F-fluoromisonidazole positron emission tomography. BJU Int. 2005;96:540–546.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.
    1. Gagel B,
    2. Reinartz P,
    3. Dimartino E,
    4. et al
    . pO(2) Polarography versus positron emission tomography ([18F] fluoromisonidazole, [18F]-2-fluoro-2=-deoxyglucose): an appraisal of radiotherapeutically relevant hypoxia. Strahlenther Onkol. 2004;180:616–622.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Zimny M,
    2. Gagel B,
    3. Dimartino E,
    4. et al
    . FDG: a marker of tumour hypoxia? A comparison with [18F]fluoromisonidazole and pO (2)-polarography in metastatic head and neck cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2006;33:1426–1431.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    World Health Organization. World Health Organization, WHO Handbook for Reporting Results of Cancer Treatment. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1978.
  22. 22.↵
    1. Birner P,
    2. Schindl M,
    3. Obermair A,
    4. Breitenecker G,
    5. Oberhuber G
    . Expression of hypoxia-inducible factor 1alpha in epithelial ovarian tumors: its impact on prognosis and on response to chemotherapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2001;7:1661–1668.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    1. Ellis MJ,
    2. Tao Y,
    3. Luo J,
    4. et al
    . Outcome prediction for estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer based on postneoadjuvant endocrine therapy tumor characteristics. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100:1380–1388.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    1. Dowsett M,
    2. Smith IE,
    3. Ebbs SR,
    4. et al
    . Prognostic value of Ki67 expression after short-term presurgical endocrine therapy for primary breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007;99:167–170.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. Nunn A,
    2. Linder K,
    3. Strauss HW,
    4. et al
    . Nitroimidazoles and imaging hypoxia. Eur J Nucl Med. 1995;22:265–280.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Padhani AR,
    2. Krohn KA,
    3. Lewis JS,
    4. et al
    . Imaging oxygenation of human tumours. Eur Radiol. 2007;17:861–872.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Rasey JS,
    2. Koh WJ,
    3. Evans ML,
    4. et al
    . Quantifying regional hypoxia in human tumors with positron emission tomography of [18F]fluoromisonidazole: a pretherapy study of 37 patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1996;36:417–428.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Rajendran JG,
    2. Wilson DC,
    3. Conrad EU,
    4. et al
    . [18F]FMISO and [18F]FDG PET imaging in soft tissue sarcomas: Correlation of hypoxia,metabolism and VEGF expression. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2003;30:695–704.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Yeh SH,
    2. Liu RS,
    3. Wu LC,
    4. et al
    . Fluorine-18 fluoromisonidazole tumour to muscle retention ratio for the detection of hypoxia in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Eur J Nucl Med. 1996;23:1378–1383.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Cherk MH HC,
    2. Serene SF,
    3. Aurora MTP,
    4. et al
    . Lack of correlation of hypoxic cell fraction and angiogenesis with glucose metabolic rate in non–small cell lung cancer assessed by 18F-fluoromisonidazole and 18F-FDG PET. J Nucl Med. 2006;47:1921–1926.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. 31.↵
    1. Le QT,
    2. Chen E,
    3. Salim A,
    4. et al
    . An evaluation of tumor oxygenation and gene expression in patients with early stage non-small cell lung cancers. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12:1507–1514.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. 32.↵
    1. Mayer A,
    2. Hockel M,
    3. Wree A,
    4. et al
    . Microregional expression of glucose transporter-1 and oxygenation status: lack of correlation in locally advanced cervical cancers. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11:2768–2773.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. 33.
    1. Vordermark D,
    2. Brown JM
    . Evaluation of hypoxia-inducible factor-1_(HIF-1_) as an intrinsic marker of tumor hypoxia in U87 MG human glioblastoma: in vitro and xenograft studies. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003;56:1184–1193.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Cárdenas-Navia LI
    . The pervasive presence of fluctuating oxygenation in tumors. Cancer Res. 2008;68:5812–5819.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. 35.↵
    1. Lehmann S,
    2. Stiehl DP,
    3. Honer M,
    4. et al
    . Longitudinal and multimodal in vivo imaging of tumor hypoxia and its downstream molecular events. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:14004–14009.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. 36.↵
    1. Zundel W,
    2. Schindler C,
    3. Haas-Kogan D,
    4. et al
    . Loss of PTEN facilitates HIF-1-mediated gene expression. Genes Dev. 2000;14:391–396.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. 37.↵
    1. Pouyssegur J,
    2. Dayan F,
    3. Mazure NM
    . Hypoxia signalling in cancer and approaches to enforce tumor regression. Nature. 2006;441:437–443.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  • Received for publication July 27, 2012.
  • Accepted for publication September 26, 2012.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 54 (3)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 54, Issue 3
March 1, 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
18F-Fluoromisonidazole PET/CT: A Potential Tool for Predicting Primary Endocrine Therapy Resistance in Breast Cancer
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
18F-Fluoromisonidazole PET/CT: A Potential Tool for Predicting Primary Endocrine Therapy Resistance in Breast Cancer
Jingyi Cheng, Li Lei, Junyan Xu, Yifei Sun, Yongping Zhang, Xincun Wang, Lingling Pan, Zhimin Shao, Yingjian Zhang, Guangyu Liu
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Mar 2013, 54 (3) 333-340; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.112.111963

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
18F-Fluoromisonidazole PET/CT: A Potential Tool for Predicting Primary Endocrine Therapy Resistance in Breast Cancer
Jingyi Cheng, Li Lei, Junyan Xu, Yifei Sun, Yongping Zhang, Xincun Wang, Lingling Pan, Zhimin Shao, Yingjian Zhang, Guangyu Liu
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Mar 2013, 54 (3) 333-340; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.112.111963
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • 2-18F-Fluoroethanol Is a PET Reporter of Solid Tumor Perfusion
  • 18F-fluoromisonidazole PET and Activity of Neoadjuvant Nintedanib in Early HER2-Negative Breast Cancer: A Window-of-Opportunity Randomized Trial
  • The Use of Novel PET Tracers to Image Breast Cancer Biologic Processes Such as Proliferation, DNA Damage and Repair, and Angiogenesis
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Feasibility of Ultra-Low-Activity 18F-FDG PET/CT Imaging Using a Long–Axial-Field-of-View PET/CT System
  • Cardiac Presynaptic Sympathetic Nervous Function Evaluated by Cardiac PET in Patients with Chronotropic Incompetence Without Heart Failure
  • Validation and Evaluation of a Vendor-Provided Head Motion Correction Algorithm on the uMI Panorama PET/CT System
Show more Clinical Investigations

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • hypoxia
  • breast cancer
  • 18F-FMISO
  • hormonal therapy
  • resistance
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire