Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleFocus on Molecular Imaging

Molecular Imaging of Prostate Cancer with PET

Hossein Jadvar
Journal of Nuclear Medicine October 2013, 54 (10) 1685-1688; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.113.126094
Hossein Jadvar
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Molecular imaging is paving the way for precision and personalized medicine. In view of the significant biologic and clinical heterogeneity of prostate cancer, molecular imaging is expected to play an important role in the evaluation of this prevalent disease. The natural history of prostate cancer spans from an indolent localized process to biochemical relapse after radical treatment with curative intent to a lethal castrate-resistant metastatic disease. The ongoing unraveling of the complex tumor biology of prostate cancer uniquely positions molecular imaging with PET to contribute significantly to every clinical phase of prostate cancer evaluation. The purpose of this article was to provide a concise review of the current state of affairs and potential future developments in the diagnostic utility of PET in prostate cancer.

  • correlative imaging
  • molecular imaging
  • oncology
  • PET
  • PET/CT
  • PET/MRI
  • radiopharmaceuticals
  • cancer
  • imaging
  • molecular
  • prostate

Prostate cancer remains a major public health problem in developed countries. The disease is characterized by evolution from a clinically localized hormone-naïve state to an eventually castrate-resistant metastatic state (1). The widespread use of screening serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) has resulted in downward stage migration and increased diagnosis of localized low-grade prostate cancers, leading to overdiagnosis and overtreatment (2). On the other hand, small high-grade tumors may be underdiagnosed and undertreated. There can be a high sampling error of about 40% with a standard transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy procedure that may then lead to repeated biopsies (including saturation and transperineal biopsy) at still high sampling errors of up to 70% (3). Although localized disease is treated with curative intent, up to 35% of patients (or higher in select high-risk groups) may experience biochemical recurrence within a decade of primary therapy (4). Stratification of men with biochemical recurrence is pivotal in clinical decision making for prescribing and sequencing appropriate treatments that may include salvage therapy for local recurrence and systemic therapy for metastatic disease. When men develop a castrate-resistant state, the prognosis is poor and treatment is directed toward attempts to enhance survival and comfort.

Imaging can provide clinically important information at every phase of this heterogeneous disease. All major imaging modalities, including ultrasound, CT, MR imaging (including multiparametric imaging and spectroscopy), and bone scintigraphy, have been used with documented strengths and limitations. PET is a quantitative imaging tool for interrogation of the underlying tumor biology. Several promising radiotracers are currently being investigated for PET imaging evaluation of prostate cancer including, but not limited to, 18F-FDG; 18F- and 11C-choline; 11C-acetate; 16α-18F-fluoro-5α -dihydrotestosterone, targeted to the androgen receptor; anti-1-amino-3-18F-fluorocyclobutane-1-carboxylic acid, a synthetic l-leucine analog; and PET radiotracers based on prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), prostate stem cell antigen, and gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPR).

GLUCOSE METABOLISM

A hallmark of cancer is the Warburg effect of elevated glucose metabolism in malignant tissue relative to normal tissue. This forms the basis for increased accumulation of 18F-FDG in cancer (5). However, 18F-FDG uptake in tissue is not specific for cancer and benign conditions may also display high tracer localization. 18F-FDG PET/CT is generally limited in the detection and initial staging of primary prostate cancer because many primary tumors are small, slow-growing, well-differentiated, and multiple with low-level tumor uptake that can overlap with that of normal tissue and coexisting benign prostatic hyperplasia. Poorly differentiated tumors and prostatitis both may demonstrate high uptake.

18F-FDG PET/CT may detect occult metastatic disease in a small number of men who present with biochemical recurrence. It has restricted utility for the detection of local recurrence in the treated prostate bed because of overlap of uptake between recurrent tumor and posttherapy tissue changes. Furthermore, high urine activity in the nearby bladder can obscure local tumor uptake (6). 18F-FDG PET/CT may be most useful in the evaluation of the extent and treatment response of castrate-resistant metastatic disease (7).

LIPOGENESIS

Malignancy-induced increased cellular membrane synthesis is the basis for imaging prostate cancer with 11C-acetate, 11C-choline, and 18F-fluorocholine PET radiotracers (8). Acetate is transported across the cellular membrane through monocarboxylate transporter and participates in the de novo synthesis of fatty acids from acetyl-CoA and malonyl-CoA through the action of fatty acid synthase, which is upregulated in prostate cancer (9). Choline enters the cell via choline transporters and is used for biosynthesis of phosphatidylcholine in the tumor cell membrane through malignancy-induced overexpression of choline kinase (9). Similar to 18F-FDG, uptake of radiolabeled acetate and choline derivatives by the primary prostate tumor may overlap with that of benign prostatic hyperplasia and normal prostate gland tissue.

11C-acetate may be useful for pelvic nodal staging and treatment planning in men with intermediate-risk (T2b–T2c or Gleason score 7 or PSA 10–20 ng/mL) to high-risk (T3a or Gleason score 8–10 or PSA > 20 ng/mL) prostate cancer (10). 11C-acetate may also be useful in the localization of tumor recurrence in men with biochemical failure, with a detection rate that tends to be positively associated with increasing serum PSA level (11).

Both 11C-choline and 18F-fluorocholine have received much attention over the past several years, particularly in Europe and Japan, for imaging of men with prostate cancer. Recently, 11C-choline was approved by the Food and Drug Administration for production and use to detect recurrent prostate cancer at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota (12). 11C-choline has the advantage of low excreted urine activity if scanning is performed sufficiently early after radiotracer injection, whereas 18F-fluorocholine has the advantage of longer half-life that facilitates regional tracer distribution without the need for on-site cyclotron and radiochemistry facilities.

A systematic review and metaanalysis by Umbehr et al. of 11C-choline and 18F-fluorocholine PET for the initial staging of prostate cancer reported a pooled sensitivity and specificity, on a per-patient basis (10 studies, n = 637 patients), of 84% (95% confidence interval [CI], 68%–93%) and 79% (95% CI, 53%–93%), respectively (13). In restaging patients with biochemical recurrence, the metaanalysis demonstrated, on a per-patient basis (12 studies, n = 1,055 patients), a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 85% (95% CI, 79%–89%) and 88% (95% CI, 73%–95%), respectively (13).

Evangelista et al. published a systematic review and metaanalysis (19 studies, including 12 studies for all sites of disease, 3 for lymph node metastases, and 4 for local recurrence, n = 1,555 patients) of the use of choline PET and PET/CT in biochemical relapse of prostate cancer (14). This metaanalysis reported a pooled sensitivity of 85.6% (95% CI, 82.9%–88.1%) and pooled specificity of 92.6% (95% CI, 90.1%–94.6%) for all sites of disease (prostatic fossa, lymph nodes, and bone), a pooled sensitivity of 75.4% (95% CI, 66.9%–82.6%) and pooled specificity of 82% (95% CI, 68.6%–91.4%) for prostatic fossa recurrence, and a pooled sensitivity of 100% (95% CI, 90.5%–100%) and pooled specificity of 81.8% (95% CI, 48.2%–97.7%) for lymph node metastases. In the latter case, the reported perfect pooled sensitivity for detection of lymph node metastases may have been overestimated given the small number of relevant publications included in the metaanalysis.

Overall, there is limited but promising evidence for the use of choline PET/CT to stage patients with untreated, high-risk prostate cancer. Relatively robust evidence suggests that choline PET/CT can be helpful for the evaluation of locoregional and distant metastatic disease in men with biochemical relapse of prostate cancer with a detection rate that is positively associated with increasing PSA level, increasing PSA velocity, and decreasing PSA doubling time. The current recommendation is for considering choline PET/CT as the first-line diagnostic procedure in patients with biochemical relapse showing PSA levels greater than 1 ng/mL, PSA velocity higher than 1 ng/mL/y, or PSA doubling time less than 6 mo (15).

AMINO ACID TRANSPORT

Anti-1-amino-3-18F-fluorocyclobutane-1-carboxylic acid (anti-18F-FACBC) is a synthetic nonmetabolized amino acid analog that accumulates in prostate cancer via overexpression of the ASC (alanine, serine, and cysteine) transport system and other amino acid transport systems (16). The early studies of anti-18F-FACBC in prostate cancer have been encouraging and demonstrate an advantage over 111In-capromab pendetide scintigraphy with relatively high tumor uptake and little urinary excretion of the tracer (Fig. 1) (17). A recent study suggested that anti-18F-FACBC may be advantageous over 11C-choline for localization of disease in biochemical failure (18). On the basis of the early encouraging results, additional studies will be needed in a larger cohort of patients to decipher the exact role of anti-18F-FACBC in the imaging evaluation of patients with prostate cancer.

FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

A 67-y-old man with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer. Axial PET (A) and axial fused PET/CT (B) images show intense localization of anti-18F-FACBC in metastatic left external iliac nodal basin (arrow). Axial SPECT (C) and axial fused PET/CT (D) demonstrate only low-grade activity on 111In-capromab pendetide scintigraphy. (Reprinted with permission of (26).).

ANDROGEN RECEPTOR

18F-fluoro-5α-dihydrotestosterone (18F-FDHT) is a labeled analog targeting the androgen receptor, which plays an important role in the development, growth, and maintenance of the prostate gland. Studies of comparisons to 18F-FDG have suggested that there may be diverse metabolic phenotypes of castrate-resistant cancers (androgen receptor–predominant, glycolysis-predominant, or androgen receptor/glycolysis-concordant) and that 18F-FDHT is probably suited as a pharmacodynamic response marker, rather than a treatment response marker, in the phase 1 clinical trials of new antiandrogenic drugs (19).

PSMA

PSMA is a type II cell surface transmembrane glycoprotein (also known as folate hydrolase I or glutamate carboxypeptidase II) that is upregulated in prostate cancer and provides a rational target for diagnostic imaging and directed therapy. PSMA does not have a known naturally occurring ligand, and despite what is implied from the label, it has a low degree of expression in the small intestine, proximal renal tubule, salivary glands, brain, and neovasculature of some nonprostate tumors (e.g., kidney, bladder, pancreas, lung). Investigators have developed and evaluated, in preclinical animal and pilot human studies, several radiolabeled ligands using various platforms that include antibodies or antibody fragments targeting the intracellular (binding to apoptotic or necrotic cells) or extracellular (binding to viable cells) motifs of the antigen. These PSMA-based radiotracers include 89Zr-desferrioxamine B (DFO)-7E11; 64Cu-labeled aptamers; and 11C-, 18F-, 68Ga-, 64Cu-, and 86Y-labeled low-molecular-weight inhibitors of PSMA including 18F-labeled N-[N-[(S)-1,3-dicarboxypropyl] carbamoyl]-4-[18F]fluorobenzyl-l-cysteine and 18F-labeled phosphoramidate peptidomimetic with some formulations that can also be labeled with radionuclides such as 177Lu or 90Y for targeted radioimmunotherapy (Fig. 2) (20).

FIGURE 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2.

Anterior PET maximum-intensity-projection image obtained at 2 h after intravenous injection of 18F-DCFBC (N-[N-[(S)-1,3-dicarboxypropyl]carbamoyl]-4-18F-fluorobenzyl-l-cysteine)demonstrate normal biodistribution of this low-molecular-weight, urea-based inhibitor of PSMA and high focal accumulation (arrows) in bone (A) or nodal metastases (B) from prostate cancer. (Reprinted with permission of (27).).

BONE MATRIX

The bone uptake of 18F-NaF is related to chemisorption with exchange of 18F− ion for OH− ion on the surface of the hydroxyapatite matrix of bone to form fluoroapatite and migration of 18F− ion into the crystalline matrix of bone. 18F-NaF PET/CT has been shown to provide higher sensitivity and specificity than 99mTc-based planar and single-photon CT bone scintigraphy for detection of osseous metastases in men with prostate cancer (21). The clinical use of 18F-NaF PET/CT is projected to grow on the basis of increasing availability of PET/CT scanners, commercial regional distribution of 18F-labeled radiotracers, lingering uncertainty on the supply of 99mTc-labeled compounds, and the recent decision by the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services for scan reimbursement through participation in the National Oncologic PET Registry.

OTHER PROMISING BIOMARKERS

Several other approaches are also in the preclinical stages of development and testing for molecular imaging of prostate cancer with PET. For example, 68Ga-DOTA-CHCO-Gly-4-aminobenzyl-Gln-Trp-Ala-Val-Gly-His-Leu-Met-NH is a radiolabeled ligand based on bombesin, which is an amino acid analog of the human gastrin-releasing peptide that binds to the GRPR. GRPR is overexpressed in prostate cancer.

Researchers have also developed radiolabeled ligands targeting free PSA (e.g., 89Zr-5A10 monoclonal antibody), prostate stem cell antigen (PSCA) (e.g., 124I-anti-PSCA antibody fragments), and thymidine kinase for assessing cellular proliferation and cellular stress (e.g., 1-(2′-deoxy-2′-fluoro-b-d-arabinofuranosyl)thymidine). There have also been reporter gene–reporter probe approaches for direct visualization and characterization of sentinel lymph nodes in prostate cancer using the reporter gene herpes simplex virus type 1 TK and reporter probe 9-(4-18F-fluoro-3-[hydroxymethyl]butyl)guanine (22).

POTENTIAL OPPORTUNITIES WITH PET/MR IMAGING

PET/MR imaging provides combined structural, metabolic, and functional imaging information that can potentially affect patient management and outcome. It may also enhance patient convenience by providing a 1-stop diagnostic imaging work-up, reducing patient anxiety, total scan time, and recalls for repeated scanning (23). Simultaneous acquisition of multiparametric MR and PET images with an appropriate radiotracer may be particularly valuable for identifying high-yield candidate biopsy sites that could reduce false-negative initial and repeated biopsies. Moreover, combined PET/MR imaging could facilitate the use of targeted focal therapy and the determination of its efficacy (Fig. 3) (24). Another interesting prospect is the potential utility of dual-modality imaging agents in this clinical setting (25).

FIGURE 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 3.

Fused multiparametric MR imaging and PET with 11C-choline in patient with true-positive high-grade (Gleason 4 + 3) left lobe (red arrows) and false-negative low-volume intermediate-grade (Gleason 3 + 3) right lobe (blue arrows) prostate cancer. (A) T2-weighted MR image. (B) Fused 11C-choline PET and T2-weighed MR image. (C) Apparent diffusion coefficient map obtained from diffusion-weighted image coregistered over T2-weighted MR image. (D) Hematoxylin and eosin histology slice. (E) Histology slice coregistered over T2-weighted MR image. (F) Parametric fusion PET/MR image using PCHOL/ADC ratio defined as quotient of standardized uptake value over apparent diffusion coefficient values. ADC = apparent diffusion coefficient; CHOL = choline; HE = hematoxylin and eosin. (Reprinted with permission of (28).).

CONCLUSION

PET with several radiotracers can assess the underlying altered biology of prostate cancer, including glucose metabolism, fatty acid metabolism, amino acid metabolism, DNA synthesis, and expression and activity levels of a variety of receptors, enzymes, and other cancer-specific and nonspecific biomarkers. The combination of PET with MR imaging, in view of the recent emergence of hybrid PET/MR imaging systems, may also provide additional opportunities for facilitating targeted biopsy, focal therapy, and 1-stop imaging localization of disease sites in patients with biochemical failure. Additional potential applications may include not only the assessment but also the deciphering of new insights into the biologic changes induced by various novel therapies. Molecular imaging with PET is therefore aligned seamlessly with the concept of precision and personalized medical care, which is applicable to all clinical phases of prostate cancer.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, grants R01-CA111613 and R21-142426. No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

  • © 2013 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Inc.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Schrecengost R,
    2. Knudsen KE
    . Molecular pathogenesis and progression of prostate cancer. Semin Oncol. 2013;40:244–258.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Moore AL,
    2. Dimitropoulou P,
    3. Lane A,
    4. et al
    . Population-based prostate-specific antigen in the UK leads to a stage migration of prostate cancer. BJU Int. 2009;104:1592–1598.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Presti J Jr.
    . Does the yield of prostate cancer biopsy and repeat biopsy justify the frequency of their use? Nat Clin Pract Urol. 2008;5:246–247.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Bruce JY,
    2. Lang JM,
    3. McNeel DG,
    4. et al
    . Current controversies in the management of biochemical failure in prostate cancer. Clin Adv Hematol Oncol. 2012;10:716–722.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Hanahan D,
    2. Weinberg RA
    . Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 2011;144:646–674.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Jadvar H,
    2. Desai B,
    3. Ji L,
    4. et al
    . Prospective evaluation of 18F-NaF and 18F-FDG PET/CT in detection of occult metastatic disease in biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer. Clin Nucl Med. 2012;37:637–643.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Jadvar H,
    2. Desai B,
    3. Ji L,
    4. et al
    . Baseline 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters as imaging biomarkers of overall survival in castrate-resistant metastatic prostate cancer. J Nucl Med. 2013;54:1195–1201.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Suburu J,
    2. Chen YQ
    . Lipids and prostate cancer. Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediat. 2012;98:1–10.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Apolo AB,
    2. Pandit-Taskar N,
    3. Morris MJ
    . Novel tracers and their development for the imaging of metastatic prostate cancer. J Nucl Med. 2008;49:2031–2041.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Haseebuddin M,
    2. Dehdashti F,
    3. Siegel BA,
    4. et al
    . 11C-acetate PET/CT before radical prostatectomy: nodal staging and treatment failure prediction. J Nucl Med. 2013;54:699–706.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Mohsen B,
    2. Giorgio T,
    3. Rasoul ZS,
    4. et al
    . Application of 11C-acetate positron emission tomography (PET) imaging in prostate cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. BJU Int. June 13, 2013 [Epub ahead of print].
  12. 12.↵
    1. Mitchell CR,
    2. Lowe VJ,
    3. Rangel LJ,
    4. et al
    . Operational characteristics of 11C-choline positron emission tomography/computerized tomography for prostate cancer with biochemical recurrence after initial treatment. J Urol. 2013;189:1308–1313.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Umbehr MH,
    2. Muntener M,
    3. Hany T,
    4. et al
    . The role of choline and 18F-fluorocholine positron emission tomography (PET) and PET/CT in prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2013;64:106–117.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Evangelista L,
    2. Zattoni F,
    3. Guittilla A,
    4. et al
    . Choline PET and PET/CT and biochemical relapse of prostate cancer. Clin Nucl Med. 2013;38:305–314.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Castellucci P,
    2. Picchio M
    . 11C-choline PET/CT and PSA kinetics. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013;40(suppl 1):S36–S40.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Okudaira H,
    2. Nakanishi T,
    3. Oka S,
    4. et al
    . Kinetic analyses of trans-1-amino-3-[18F]fluorocyclobutanecarboxylic acid transport in Xenopus laevis oocytes expressing human ASCT2 and SNAT2. Nucl Med Biol. 2013;40:670–675.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Schuster DM,
    2. Savir-Baruch B,
    3. Nieh PT,
    4. et al
    . Detection of recurrent prostate carcinoma with anti-1-amino-3-18F-fluorocyclobutane-1-carboxylic acid PET/CT and 111In-capromab pendetide SPECT/CT. Radiology. 2011;259:852–861.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Nanni C,
    2. Schiavina R,
    3. Boschi S,
    4. et al
    . Comparison of 18F-FACBC and 11C-choline PET/CT in patients with radically treated prostate cancer and biochemical relapse: preliminary results. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013;40(suppl 1):11–17.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  19. 19.↵
    1. Fox J,
    2. Blanc E,
    3. Schoder H,
    4. et al
    . Diversity of biology in castrate resistant prostate cancer [abstract]. J Nucl Med. 2009;50(suppl 2):136P.
    OpenUrl
  20. 20.↵
    1. Mease RC,
    2. Foss CA,
    3. Pomper MG
    . PET imaging in prostate cancer: focus on prostate-specific membrane antigen. Curr Top Med Chem. 2013;13:951–962.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Beheshti M,
    2. Langsteger W,
    3. Fogelman I
    . Prostate cancer: role of SPECT and PET in imaging bone metastases. Semin Nucl Med. 2009;39:396–407.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Jadvar H
    . Molecular imaging of prostate cancer: PET radiotracers. AJR. 2012;199:278–291.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Jadvar H,
    2. Colletti PM
    . Competitive advantage of PET/MRI. Eur J Radiol. June 18, 2013 [Epub ahead of print].
  24. 24.↵
    1. Wetter A,
    2. Lipponer C,
    3. Nensa F,
    4. et al
    . Simultaneous 18F choline positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate: initial results. Invest Radiol. 2013;48:256–262.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Glaus C,
    2. Rossin R,
    3. Welch MJ,
    4. et al
    . In vivo evaluation of 64Cu-labeled magnetic resonance nanoparticles as a dual-modality PET/MR imaging agent. Bioconjug Chem. 2010;21:715–722.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Schuster DM,
    2. Votaw JR,
    3. Nieh PT,
    4. et al
    . Initial experience with the radiotracer anti-1-amino-3-18F-fluorocyclobutane-1-carboxylic acid with PET/CT in prostate carcinoma. J Nucl Med. 2007;48:56–63.
  27. 27.↵
    1. Cho SY,
    2. Gauge KL,
    3. Mease RC,
    4. et al
    . Biodistribution, tumor detection, and radiation dosimetry of 18F-DCFBC, a low-molecular-weight inhibitor of prostate-specific membrane antigen, in patients with metastatic prostate cancer. J Nucl Med. 2012;53:1883–1891.
  28. 28.↵
    1. Park H,
    2. Wood D,
    3. Hussain H,
    4. et al
    . Introducing parametric fusion PET/MR imaging of primary cancer. J Nucl Med. 2012;53:546–551.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 54 (10)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 54, Issue 10
October 1, 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Molecular Imaging of Prostate Cancer with PET
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Molecular Imaging of Prostate Cancer with PET
Hossein Jadvar
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Oct 2013, 54 (10) 1685-1688; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.113.126094

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Molecular Imaging of Prostate Cancer with PET
Hossein Jadvar
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Oct 2013, 54 (10) 1685-1688; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.113.126094
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • GLUCOSE METABOLISM
    • LIPOGENESIS
    • AMINO ACID TRANSPORT
    • ANDROGEN RECEPTOR
    • PSMA
    • BONE MATRIX
    • OTHER PROMISING BIOMARKERS
    • POTENTIAL OPPORTUNITIES WITH PET/MR IMAGING
    • CONCLUSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Examining the Relationship and Prognostic Significance of Cell-Free DNA Levels and the PSMA-Positive Tumor Volume in Men with Prostate Cancer: A Retrospective-Prospective [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT Study
  • Clinical Evaluation of (4S)-4-(3-[18F]Fluoropropyl)-L-glutamate (18F-FSPG) for PET/CT Imaging in Patients with Newly Diagnosed and Recurrent Prostate Cancer
  • Precision Nanomedicine Using Dual PET and MR Temperature Imaging-Guided Photothermal Therapy
  • PSMA PET in Prostate Cancer
  • 18F-DCFBC PET/CT for PSMA-Based Detection and Characterization of Primary Prostate Cancer
  • Imaging Active Urokinase Plasminogen Activator in Prostate Cancer
  • Targeting Neuropeptide Receptors for Cancer Imaging and Therapy: Perspectives with Bombesin, Neurotensin, and Neuropeptide-Y Receptors
  • PET/MR in Oncology: Non-18F-FDG Tracers for Routine Applications
  • PET/CT with Sodium 18F-Fluoride for Management of Patients with Prostate Cancer
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • From Genome to Phenome: Opportunities and Challenges of Molecular Imaging
  • Imaging the Activity of Efflux Transporters at the Blood–Brain Barrier in Neurologic Diseases: Radiotracer Selection Criteria
  • Molecular Imaging of Pulmonary Fibrosis
Show more Focus on Molecular Imaging

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Correlative Imaging
  • Molecular imaging
  • oncology
  • PET
  • PET/CT
  • PET/MRI
  • radiopharmaceuticals
  • cancer
  • imaging
  • molecular
  • prostate
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire