Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleFocus on Molecular Imaging

Recent Advances in the Molecular Imaging of Programmed Cell Death: Part I—Pathophysiology and Radiotracers

Francis G. Blankenberg and H. William Strauss
Journal of Nuclear Medicine November 2012, 53 (11) 1659-1662; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.112.108944
Francis G. Blankenberg
1Division of Pediatric Radiology, Department of Radiology, Lucile Salter Packard Children’s Hospital, Stanford, California; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
H. William Strauss
2Nuclear Medicine Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

In humans, apoptosis (programmed cell death) is the most common form of cell death after necrosis. Apoptosis is a series of genetically preprogrammed biochemical and morphologic energy-requiring events that, after a specific external or internal stimulus, results in the physiologic disappearance of a cell via its self-disintegration and packaging of its contents into membrane vesicles called apoptotic bodies. Apoptotic bodies can readily be ingested, with their nutrients and even organelles recycled by neighboring cells or phagocytes without local inflammation. In contrast, necrosis is characterized by the primary loss of plasma membrane integrity and the uncontrolled release of a cell’s contents, often causing local inflammation, tissue damage, and scarring. Alternate forms of cell death also exist, associated with specific molecular mechanisms involving enzymes, organelles, genes, external stimuli, or blockade of normal cell proliferation. In this review we will briefly outline the molecular mechanisms of apoptosis that can be imaged with radiotracers now under development.

  • molecular imaging
  • oncology
  • apoptosis
  • programmed cell death

Apoptosis is the primary mechanism by which unneeded or senescent cells are physiologically absorbed by healthy adjacent cells and tissues (1). The term apoptosis (in Greek, a dropping or falling off of an organ or part) describes a complex series of morphologic events including cytoplasmic shrinkage, nuclear condensation, membrane blebbing, and budding off of intracellular contents, which are then packaged into small membrane-bound packets called apoptotic bodies. Apoptotic bodies are subsequently ingested by adjacent cells and phagocytes without provoking an inflammatory response or tissue damage. Apoptosis is the polar opposite of necrotic cell death, a chaotic event characterized by the uncontrolled primary failure of the cell membrane that frequently results in inflammation, tissue destruction, and scarring.

Although there is still no fully validated marker of apoptosis in vivo, there are several stereotypical pathophysiologic changes in the cell membrane, cytoplasm, and nucleus that can potentially be detected by a variety of new radiotracers (1). We will outline the most studied of these tracers after reviewing the pathophysiology of apoptosis.

PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF APOPTOSIS

Apoptosis is a mechanism of orderly cell death (2,3), as opposed to necrosis. Necrosis is characterized by the primary loss of outer membrane function and integrity, with uncontrolled swelling of a cell, its nucleus, and organelles coupled to the chaotic release of cellular contents into surrounding tissues. Other forms of cell death such as anoikis (cell death triggered by detachment of cells from the extracellular matrix), necroptosis (regulated necrosis requiring catalytic activity of a receptor interacting with protein kinase 1), mitotic catastrophe, and autoschizis have been described (4). Most of these other cell death mechanisms use some of the biochemical machinery required for apoptosis.

Caspase-Dependent Apoptosis (Classic Pathways)

The morphologic changes of apoptosis are preceded by an initiation phase triggered by a wide array of signals, including a lack of needed growth factors, antihormonal therapy, DNA damage, immune reactions, ischemic injury, ionizing radiation, and chemotherapy (5,6). The lag time between exposure to the trigger and the time of observable morphologic signs of apoptosis is highly variable, depending heavily on cell type, type of trigger, its intensity and duration, and the local environmental conditions of the cell.

Most apoptotic pathways, however, converge on a family of cysteine aspartate–specific proteases known as the caspases (Fig. 1) (7). The terminal effector caspase, caspase-3, once activated by death receptors on the cell surface (extrinsic pathway) or via the release of cytochrome c from the mitochondria (intrinsic pathway), travels to the nucleus and facilitates the cleavage of nuclear DNA. Caspase-3 also cleaves poly-ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP-1), a DNA repair enzyme—an event that prevents any chance of cell survival.

FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

Molecularly targeted radiotracers.

After caspase-3 activation, there is a rapid redistribution and exposure of the anionic membrane-bound phospholipid phosphatidylserine (PS) on the cell surface (Fig. 1) (8,9). PS is normally restricted to the inner leaflet of the lipid bilayer by an adenosine triphosphate–dependent enzyme called flippase (translocase). Flippase in concert with a second adenosine triphosphate–dependent enzyme, floppase, that pumps cationic phospholipids such as phosphatidylcholine (PC) and sphingomyelin to the cell surface, maintains an asymmetric distribution of different phospholipids between the inner and outer leaflets of the plasma membrane (10). The rapid redistribution across the cell membrane (measured in minutes) is facilitated by a calcium-dependent deactivation of flippase and the activation of a third enzyme called scramblase.

Other Signaling Pathways That Can Induce Cell Death

The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) can also trigger apoptosis (i.e., ER stress-induced cell death) (11). Normally, the ER is the site of protein synthesis, conformational maturation, and quality control for correctly folded proteins. Proteins failing to adopt a stable conformation are dislocated into the cytosol, where they are targeted for ubiquitylation (a tag to identify a protein for elimination) and proteosomal degradation. Certain conditions or drugs can lead to the abnormal accumulation of unfolded proteins resulting in ER stress. During ER stress, cells can reachieve homeostasis by initiating a series of orchestrated events known as the unfolded protein response. If unsuccessful, ER stress can directly initiate a specific ubiquitin E3 ligase that tags antiapoptotic proteins (e.g., Bcl-2) with ubiquitin. Subsequently, the proteosome degrades these antiapoptotic molecules, thereby tipping the balance between pro- and antiapoptotic factors toward the intrinsic pathway of apoptosis.

Other forms of cell death can also externalize PS, including necrosis/oncosis, mitotic catastrophe, cell senescence, pyroptosis, PARP-1–mediated cell death, and autophagy (12). Autophagy (“self-eating”) has considerable overlap with apoptosis (13). As opposed to apoptosis, however, autophagy normally serves a housekeeping function by recycling senescent or damaged cytoplasmic contents or organelles (as opposed to the cell itself). The hallmark of autophagy is the formation of isolation membranes that engulf targeted cytoplasmic material (or organelles), resulting in double-membraned vesicles called autophagosomes (autophagic vacuoles) (14). Autophagosomes then undergo maturation by fusion with lysosomes to create autolysosomes. It is within the autolysosome that autodigestion occurs. Autophagy permits a cell to survive periods of cellular famine through the autodigestion and reuse of intracellular DNA/RNA, proteins, and lipids into free nucleotides, amino acids, and fatty acids, respectively. Autophagy, however, can be an alternative to apoptosis if the classic apoptotic mechanisms are damaged or are inhibited.

RADIOTRACERS FOR APOPTOSIS

PARP-1–Mediated Cell Death/Oncosis

PARP-1 normally functions as a DNA damage sensor, and its activation serves to repair low levels of DNA damage (15). With high levels of DNA damage, however, there is massive activation of PARP-1 that consumes all available stores of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (in the oxidized state) (NAD+), its primary substrate. As NAD+ can be regenerated only by cleavage of adenosine triphosphate, the cell literally runs out of energy and dies via necrosis. Olaparib, an experimental chemotherapeutic benzimidazole-based inhibitor (and its indole analogs) of PARP-1, can also be derivatized and labeled with 18F for PET of PARP-1–mediated cell death (16). These agents are now under development and are superior to the previous 11C-labeled phenanthridone PARP-1 binding derivative known as PJ34 (17).

The PS Binding Agent Radiolabeled Annexin V

PS selectively exposed on the cell surface during apoptosis can be imaged with a variety of agents. One such radiotracer uses annexin V, an intracellular human protein (molecular weight, ∼36,000) with a nanomolar affinity for membrane-bound PS (18–20). Although the bifunctional 99mTc chelating agent hydrazinonicotinamide has been used for most animal and clinical radiolabeled annexin V studies to date, there are alternative methods including self-chelating annexin V mutants with a cysteine-containing N-terminal 6 amino acid tag that can bind 99mTc (21–23). These mutants have major advantages over hydrazinonicotinamide–annexin V, including a 50%–75% decreased renal uptake of tracer and a markedly improved (2- to 3-fold) specific localization to sites of apoptosis in animal models (24,25). Annexin V has also been labeled with 18F (26). using N-succinimidyl 4-fluorobenzoate or site-specific derivatization with 18F-maleimide–labeled mutant annexin V-128 (27).

Other PS Binding Agents

Other peptides and proteins have been found that can recognize membrane-bound PS (28). These include the C2A domain of synaptotagmin I. C2A binds to negatively charged phospholipids in membranes, including PS. C2A and its mutants have been labeled with 99mTc (29) iron particles (24,30) and Gd3+ (25). C2A complexes have yet to be tested on humans (31).

Other approaches to detect the membrane changes of apoptosis include the small-molecule zinc–dipicolylamine coordination complex (32) and cationic liposomes (33). CLSYYPSYC, a PS-binding peptide, has been described; however, its mechanism of PS binding has yet to be elucidated (34–36). The same group of investigators also identified ApoPep-1, a 6-amino-acid CQRPPR peptide that recognizes histone 1H exposed on the surface of apoptotic cells (37). Preliminary imaging experiments with 124I-ApoPep-1 in treated murine tumors are also encouraging.

Imaging of Caspase-3 Activity

The backbone of caspase-seeking tracers is based on the 5-pyrrolidinylsulfonyl isatin class of nonpeptidyl caspase inhibitors (38,39). The dicarbonyl function of isatins covalently binds to the cysteine residue of the active site of a given caspase. There is a need, however, to generate isatin sulfonamides that have higher metabolic stability and more moderate lipophilicity while retaining selectivity and affinity for caspase-3 and -7, including a 2′-fluoroethyl-1,2,3-triazole with subnanomolar affinity for caspase-3 that has been identified (40,41). Other isatin analogs may have improved localization to sites of apoptosis in vivo (42,43).

18F-FDG PET of Apoptosis

Tumor models have demonstrated an enhanced apoptotic reaction that correlated with suppressed tumor glucose utilization 48 h after the start of cytotoxic chemotherapy (44–46), as have patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor treated with the tyrosine kinase inhibitor imatinib mesylate (STI571; Gleevec) (47) and epidermal growth factor receptor kinase inhibition of non–small cell lung cancer with gefitinib (28). However, because apoptosis must use energy, at least initially, glucose demand may increase temporarily in some unique clinical situations (48,49).

Uncategorized Radiotracers for the Imaging of Apoptosis

Aposense molecules are another family of radiotracers (50–52). These small molecules have an amphipathic structure, with both specific hydrophobic and charged moieties. The published doses are 100- to 1,000-fold higher on a molar basis for these agents than for other classes of agents with very low specific uptakes. The most recent of these tracers, known as ML-10, has been applied to the study of apoptotic tumor cells in vitro and in vivo (53). Despite an improvement in uptake, the absolute uptake values remain low (<1.5% injected dose/g) even for tumors treated with high-dose chemotherapy (i.e., at the 50% lethal dose) (54–57)—doses high enough to induce necrosis and raising the question of the mechanism of tracer localization.

SUMMARY

Although remarkable progress has been made in the development of PET and SPECT radiotracers and apoptosis-specific radiotracers, much work still needs to be done to bring any of these agents into routine use in the clinic. Most preclinical and clinical trial work has been done with different forms of radiolabeled annexin V. In the short term, the Canadian company Atreus Pharmaceuticals, Inc., in conjunction with its European partner, Advanced Accelerator Applications, SA, is developing a kit for the preparation of 99mTc rh-annexin V-128, which is expected to be in human studies shortly and is expected to be made available for investigator-sponsored preclinical and clinical studies. Long-term caspase- or PARP-1–binding or 1H-recognizing radiotracers may be useful complements to the imaging of PS expression.

Acknowledgments

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Footnotes

  • Published online Oct. 2, 2012.

  • © 2012 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Inc.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Blankenberg FG,
    2. Norfray JF
    . Multimodality molecular imaging of apoptosis in oncology. AJR. 2011;197:308–317.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Ameisen JC
    . On the origin, evolution, and nature of programmed cell death: a timeline of four billion years. Cell Death Differ. 2002;9:367–393.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Fink SL,
    2. Cookson BT
    . Apoptosis, pyroptosis, and necrosis: mechanistic description of dead and dying eukaryotic cells. Infect Immun. 2005;73:1907–1916.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Galluzzi L,
    2. Vitale I,
    3. Abrams JM,
    4. et al
    . Molecular definitions of cell death subroutines: recommendations of the Nomenclature Committee on Cell Death. Cell Death Differ. 2012;19:107–120.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Chan A,
    2. Reiter R,
    3. Wiese S,
    4. Fertig G,
    5. Gold R
    . Plasma membrane phospholipid asymmetry precedes DNA fragmentation in different apoptotic cell models. Histochem Cell Biol. 1998;110:553–558.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Martin SJ,
    2. Reutelingsperger CPM,
    3. McGahon AJ
    . Early redistribution of plasma membrane phosphatidylserine is a general feature of apoptosis regardless of the initiating stimulus: inhibition by overexpression of Bcl-2 and Abl. J Exp Med. 1995;182:1545–1556.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Huerta S,
    2. Goulet EJ,
    3. Huerta-Yepez S,
    4. Livingston EH
    . Screening and detection of apoptosis. J Surg Res. 2007;139:143–156.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Zwaal RFA,
    2. Schroit AJ
    . Pathophysiologic implications of membrane phospholipid asymmetry in blood cells. Blood. 1997;89:1121–1132.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Zwaal RFA,
    2. Comfurius P,
    3. Bevers EM
    . Surface exposure of phosphatidylserine in pathological cells. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2005;62:971–988.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Wood BL,
    2. Gibson DF,
    3. Tait JF
    . Increased phosphatidylserine exposure in sickle cell disease: flow cytometric measurement and clinical associations. Blood. 1996;88:1873–1880.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Egger L,
    2. Madden DT,
    3. Rheme C,
    4. Rao RV,
    5. Bredesen DE
    . Endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced cell death mediated by the proteasome. Cell Death Differ. 2007;14:1172–1180.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Verheij M
    . Clinical biomarkers and imaging for radiotherapy-induced cell death. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2008;27:471–480.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Levine B,
    2. Kroemer G
    . Autophagy in the pathogenesis of disease. Cell. 2008;132:27–42.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Maiuri MC,
    2. Zalckvar E,
    3. Kimchi A,
    4. Kroemer G
    . Self-eating and self-killing: crosstalk between autophagy and apoptosis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2007;8:741–752.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Aguilar-Quesada R,
    2. et al
    . Modulation of transcription by PARP-1: consequences in carcinogenesis and inflammation. Curr Med Chem. 2007;14:1179–1187.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Keliher EJ,
    2. Reiner T,
    3. Turetsky A,
    4. Hilderbrand SA,
    5. Weissleder R
    . High-yielding, two-step 18F labeling strategy for 18F-PARP1 inhibitors. ChemMedChem. 2011;6:424–427.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Tu Z,
    2. Chu W,
    3. Zhang J,
    4. Dence CS,
    5. Welch MJ,
    6. Mach RH
    . Synthesis and in vivo evaluation of [11C]PJ34, a potential radiotracer for imaging the role of PARP-1 in necrosis. Nucl Med Biol. 2005;32:437–443.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Boersma HH,
    2. Kietselaer BL,
    3. Stolk LM,
    4. et al
    . Past, present, and future of annexin A5: from protein discovery to clinical applications. J Nucl Med. 2005;46:2035–2050.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.
    1. Lahorte CMM,
    2. Vanderheyden J-L,
    3. Steinmetz N,
    4. Van de Wiele C,
    5. Dierckx RA,
    6. Slegers G
    . Apoptosis-detecting radioligands: current state of the art and future perspectives. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2004;31:887–919.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Munoz LE,
    2. Frey B,
    3. Pausch F,
    4. et al
    . The role of annexin A5 in the modulation of the immune response against dying and dead cells. Curr Med Chem. 2007:14:271–277.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Tait JF,
    2. Brown DS,
    3. Gibson DF,
    4. Blankenberg FG,
    5. Strauss HW
    . Development and characterization of annexin V mutants with endogenous chelation sites for 99mTc. Bioconjug Chem. 2000;11:918–925.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.
    1. Jin M,
    2. Smith C,
    3. Hsieh HY,
    4. Gibson DF,
    5. Tait JF
    . Essential role of B-helix calcium binding sites in annexin V-membrane binding. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:40351–40357.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    1. Tait JF,
    2. Smith C,
    3. Blankenberg FG
    . Structural requirements for in vivo detection of cell death with 99mTc-annexin V. J Nucl Med. 2005;46:807–815.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    1. Zhao M,
    2. Beauregard DA,
    3. Loizou L,
    4. Davletov B,
    5. Brindle KM
    . Non-invasive detection of apoptosis using magnetic resonance imaging and a targeted contrast agent. Nat Med. 2001;7:1241–1244.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Krishnan AS,
    2. Neves AA,
    3. de Backer MM,
    4. et al
    . Detection of cell death in tumors by using MR imaging and a gadolinium-based targeted contrast agent. Radiology. 2008;246:854–862.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Murakami Y,
    2. Takamatsu H,
    3. Taki J,
    4. et al
    . 18F-labelled annexin V: a PET tracer for apoptosis imaging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2004;31:469–474.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Li X,
    2. Link JM,
    3. Stekhova S,
    4. et al
    . Site-specific labeling of annexin V with F-18 for apoptosis imaging. Bioconjug Chem. 2008;19:1684–1688.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Su H,
    2. Bodenstein C,
    3. Dumont RA,
    4. et al
    . Monitoring tumor glucose utilization by positron emission tomography for the prediction of treatment response to epidermal growth factor receptor kinase inhibitors. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12:5659–5667.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    1. Zhao M,
    2. Zhu X,
    3. Ji S,
    4. et al
    . 99mTc-labeled C2A domain of synaptotagmin I as a target specific molecular probe for noninvasive imaging of acute myocardial infarction. J Nucl Med. 2006;47:1367–1374.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    1. Jung HI,
    2. Kettunen MI,
    3. Davletov B,
    4. Brindle KM
    . Detection of apoptosis using the C2A domain of synaptotagmin I. Bioconjug Chem. 2004;15:983–987.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Alam IS,
    2. Neves AA,
    3. Witney TH,
    4. Boren J,
    5. Brindle KM
    . Comparison of the C2A domain of synaptotagmin-I and annexin-V as probes for detecting cell death. Bioconjug Chem. 2010;21:884–891.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Hanshaw RG,
    2. Lakshmi C,
    3. Lambert TN,
    4. Johnson JR,
    5. Smith BD
    . Fluorescent detection of apoptotic cells by using zinc coordination complexes with a selective affinity for membrane surfaces enriched with phosphatidylserine. ChemBioChem. 2005;6:2214–2220.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    1. Bose S,
    2. Tuunainen I,
    3. Parry M,
    4. Medina OP,
    5. Mancini G,
    6. Kinnunen PK
    . Binding of cationic liposomes to apoptotic cells. Anal Biochem. 2004;331:385–394.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Shao R,
    2. Xiong C,
    3. Wen X,
    4. Gelovani JG,
    5. Li C
    . Targeting phosphatidylserine on apoptotic cells with phages and peptides selected from a bacteriophage display library. Mol Imaging. 2007;6:417–426.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  35. 35.
    1. Thapa N,
    2. et al
    . Discovery of a phosphatidylserine-recognizing peptide and its utility in molecular imaging of tumour apoptosis. J Cell Mol Med. 2008;12:1649–1660.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    1. Schellenberger EA,
    2. Sosnovik D,
    3. Weissleder R,
    4. Josephson L
    . Magneto/optical annexin V, a multimodal protein. Bioconjug Chem. 2004;15:1062–1067.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    1. Wang K,
    2. et al
    . In vivo imaging of tumor apoptosis using histone H1-targeting peptide. J Control Release. 2010;148:283–291.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. 38.↵
    1. Zhou D,
    2. Chu W,
    3. Rothfuss J,
    4. et al
    . Synthesis, radiolabeling, and in vivo evaluation of an 18F-labeled isatin analog for imaging caspase-3 activation in apoptosis. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2006;16:5041–5046.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. 39.↵
    1. Faust A,
    2. Wagner S,
    3. Law MP,
    4. et al
    . The nonpeptidyl caspase binding radioligand (S)-1-(4-(2-[18F]fluoroethoxy)-benzyl)-5-[1-(2-methoxymethylpyrrolidinyl)sulfonyl]isatin ([18F]CbR) as potential positron emission tomography-compatible apoptosis imaging agent. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2007;51:67–73.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  40. 40.↵
    1. Smith G,
    2. Glaser M,
    3. Perumal M,
    4. et al
    . Design, synthesis, and biological characterization of a caspase 3/7 selective isatin labeled with 2-[18F]fluoroethylazide. J Med Chem. 2008;51:8057–8067.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. 41.↵
    1. Nguyen Q-D,
    2. Smith G,
    3. Glaser M,
    4. Perumal M,
    5. Årstadb E,
    6. Aboagye EO
    . Positron emission tomography imaging of drug-induced tumor apoptosis with a caspase-3/7 specific [18F]-labeled isatin sulfonamide. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:16375–16380.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. 42.↵
    1. Chen DL,
    2. et al
    . Comparison of radiolabeled isatin analogs for imaging apoptosis with positron emission tomography. Nucl Med Biol. 2009;36:651–658.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. 43.↵
    1. Zhou D,
    2. Zhou D,
    3. Chu W,
    4. et al
    . [18F]- and [11C]-labeled N-benzyl-isatin sulfonamide analogues as PET tracers for apoptosis: synthesis, radiolabeling mechanism, and in vivo imaging study of apoptosis in Fas-treated mice using [11C]WC-98. Org Biomol Chem. 2009;7:1337–1348.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. 44.↵
    1. Takei T,
    2. Kuge Y,
    3. Zhao S,
    4. et al
    . Enhanced apoptotic reaction correlates with suppressed tumor glucose utilization after cytotoxic chemotherapy: use of 99mTc-annexin V, 18F-FDG, and histologic evaluation. J Nucl Med. 2005;46:794–799.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. 45.
    1. Li D,
    2. Yao Q,
    3. Li L,
    4. Wang L,
    5. Chen J
    . Correlation between hybrid 18F-FDG PET/CT and apoptosis induced by neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. Cancer Biol Ther. 2007;6:1442–1448.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  46. 46.↵
    1. Suttie SA,
    2. Park KGM,
    3. Smith TAD
    . [18F]-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose incorporation by AGS gastric adenocarcinoma cells in vitro during response to epirubicin, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil. Br J Cancer. 2007;97:902–909.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  47. 47.↵
    1. Trent JC,
    2. et al
    . Early effects of imatinib mesylate on the expression of insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 and positron emission tomography in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Cancer. 2006;107:1898–1908.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. 48.↵
    1. Haberkorn U,
    2. Bellemann ME,
    3. Brix G,
    4. et al
    . Apoptosis and changes in glucose transport early after treatment of Morris hepatoma with gemcitabine. Eur J Nucl Med. 2001;28:418–425.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. 49.↵
    1. Mortimer JE,
    2. Dehdashti F,
    3. Siegel BA,
    4. et al
    . Metabolic flare: indicator of hormone responsiveness in advanced breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:2797–2803.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  50. 50.↵
    1. Reshef A,
    2. Shirvan A,
    3. Grimberg H,
    4. et al
    . Novel molecular imaging of cell death in experimental cerebral stroke. Brain Res. 2007;1144:156–164.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. 51.
    1. Damianovich M,
    2. Ziv I,
    3. Heyman SN,
    4. et al
    . ApoSense: a novel technology for functional molecular imaging of cell death in models of acute renal tubular necrosis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2006;33:281–291.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  52. 52.↵
    1. Aloya R,
    2. Shirvan A,
    3. Grimberg H,
    4. et al
    . Molecular imaging of cell death in vivo by a novel small molecule probe. Apoptosis. 2006;11:2089–2101.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  53. 53.↵
    1. Grimberg H,
    2. Levin G,
    3. Shirvan A,
    4. et al
    . Monitoring of tumor response to chemotherapy in vivo by a novel small-molecule detector of apoptosis. Apoptosis. 2009;14:257–267.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  54. 54.↵
    1. Cheng C,
    2. Xue W,
    3. Diao H,
    4. et al
    . Antitumor activity and toxicological properties of doxorubicin conjugated to α,β-poly[(2-hydroxyethyl)-L-aspartamide] administered intraperitoneally in mice. Anticancer Drugs. 2010;21:362–371.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  55. 55.
    1. Meer L,
    2. Schold SC,
    3. Kleihues P
    . Inhibition of the hepatic O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase in vivo by pretreatment with antineoplastic agents. Biochem Pharmacol. 1989;38:929–934.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  56. 56.
    1. Steen RG,
    2. Tamargo RJ,
    3. Brem H,
    4. Glickson JD,
    5. Wehrle JP
    . In vivo 31P nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy of rat 9L gliosarcoma treated with BCNU: dose response of spectral changes. Magn Reson Med. 1989;11:258–266.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  57. 57.↵
    1. Weinberg MJ,
    2. Rauth AM
    . 5-Fluorouracil infusions and fractionated doses of radiation: studies with a murine squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1987;13:1691–1699.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  • Received for publication May 16, 2012.
  • Accepted for publication September 17, 2012.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 53 (11)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 53, Issue 11
November 1, 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Recent Advances in the Molecular Imaging of Programmed Cell Death: Part I—Pathophysiology and Radiotracers
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Recent Advances in the Molecular Imaging of Programmed Cell Death: Part I—Pathophysiology and Radiotracers
Francis G. Blankenberg, H. William Strauss
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Nov 2012, 53 (11) 1659-1662; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.112.108944

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Recent Advances in the Molecular Imaging of Programmed Cell Death: Part I—Pathophysiology and Radiotracers
Francis G. Blankenberg, H. William Strauss
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Nov 2012, 53 (11) 1659-1662; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.112.108944
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF APOPTOSIS
    • RADIOTRACERS FOR APOPTOSIS
    • SUMMARY
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Cardioprotective Effects of HSP72 Administration on Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury
  • Recent Advances in the Molecular Imaging of Programmed Cell Death: Part II--Non-Probe-Based MRI, Ultrasound, and Optical Clinical Imaging Techniques
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • From Genome to Phenome: Opportunities and Challenges of Molecular Imaging
  • Imaging the Activity of Efflux Transporters at the Blood–Brain Barrier in Neurologic Diseases: Radiotracer Selection Criteria
  • Molecular Imaging of Pulmonary Fibrosis
Show more Focus on Molecular Imaging

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • molecular imaging
  • oncology
  • Apoptosis
  • programmed cell death
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire