Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleClinical Investigations

Diagnostic Accuracy of Virtual 18F-FDG PET/CT Bronchoscopy for the Detection of Lymph Node Metastases in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients

Michael Herbrik, Jon Treffert, Bernhard Geiger, Carolin Riegger, Verena Hartung, Sandra Julia Rosenbaum-Krumme, Michael Forsting, Gerald Antoch and Till A. Heusner
Journal of Nuclear Medicine October 2011, 52 (10) 1520-1525; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.111.092593
Michael Herbrik
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jon Treffert
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bernhard Geiger
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carolin Riegger
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Verena Hartung
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sandra Julia Rosenbaum-Krumme
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Forsting
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gerald Antoch
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Till A. Heusner
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT bronchoscopy for the detection of regional lymph node metastases in non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients; potential differences in the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), mean SUV (SUVmean), short-axis diameter, and distance to the airways when comparing true-positive (TP), false-positive (FP), true-negative (TN), and false-negative (FN) lymph nodes; the smallest bronchus diameter accessible by virtual bronchoscopy; and the duration from the start of the virtual 18F-FDG PET/CT bronchoscopy viewing tool until the images were displayed. Methods: Sixty-one consecutive NSCLC patients (mean age ± SD, 58 ± 10 y) underwent whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT. From these data, virtual 18F-FDG PET/CT bronchoscopies were reconstructed. The duration from the start of the tool until the display of virtual bronchoscopy images was determined. The diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT bronchoscopy for the detection of regional lymph node metastases was evaluated on a lesion basis. Axial 18F-FDG PET/CT scans served as the standard of reference. The SUVmax, SUVmean, short-axis diameter, and distance to the airways of regional lymph nodes were measured. Lymph nodes were classified as TP, FP, TN, and FN. The smallest bronchus diameter accessible by 18F-FDG PET/CT bronchoscopy was measured. Results: The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of virtual 18F-FDG PET/CT bronchoscopy for the detection of lymph node metastases were 76%, 87%, 85%, 79%, and 81%, respectively. The differences between the SUVmax, SUVmean, short-axis diameter, and distance to the airways of TP and FP as well as TN and FN lymph nodes were statistically significant (P < 0.05). The mean smallest diameter of accessible bronchi by 18F-FDG PET/CT bronchoscopy was 3 mm. The mean time duration from the start of the virtual 18F-FDG PET/CT bronchoscopy tool until the display of the images was 22 ± 7 s. Conclusion: Virtual fly-through 3-dimensional 18F-FDG PET/CT bronchoscopy yields a high diagnostic accuracy for the detection of regional lymph node metastases and has access to bronchi even in the periphery of the lung. High SUVmax, high SUVmean, large small-axis diameter, and short distance to the airways aid detection of lymph node metastases with 18F-FDG PET/CT bronchoscopy.

  • virtual bronchoscopy
  • 18F-FDG
  • PET/CT
  • bronchial carcinoma
  • lung cancer
  • non–small cell lung cancer

Lung and bronchus cancer represent the cancer types with the most cancer-related deaths in the United States, both in female and in male patients; with more than 220,000 newly diagnosed cases, it again was the most common newly diagnosed cancer type in the United States in 2010 (1,2). Non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for approximately 80% of all lung cancer disease. The choice of therapeutic options—surgery, radiation therapy, or chemotherapy alone or in combination with other treatment modalities—is based on the tumor stage (3). For a stage-adapted therapy, and thus an individual therapeutic concept, 18F-FDG PET/CT clearly outperforms other imaging modalities with its high diagnostic accuracy for the detection of the primary bronchial carcinoma and metastases (4,5). The accurate determination of the pretherapeutic lymph node status in NSCLC patients is crucial for adequate therapy planning and for the patient's prognosis. On the basis of accurate staging of mediastinal lymph nodes and the detection of unsuspected distant metastases using 18F-FDG PET/CT, compared with staging procedures based on other modalities, the rate of futile surgical procedures and the number of mediastinoscopies were significantly reduced (6,7).

Currently available PET/CT scanners contain a multislice, multidetector CT component and are capable of providing high-resolution CT and PET datasets that make it possible not only to generate and assess conventional PET/CT perspectives but also to generate virtual 18F-FDG PET/CT bronchoscopy views and fly through the trachea and the bronchus tree, with functional information provided in the same session. However, virtual 18F-FDG PET/CT bronchoscopy until now was described only in some pilot, mostly feasibility-proving projects, whereas its diagnostic accuracy remains unknown (8–11).

To further investigate the possibilities of combined, virtual 18F-FDG PET/CT bronchoscopy and to introduce this method into a more clinical context, the goal of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of virtual 18F-FDG PET/CT bronchoscopy for the detection of lymph node metastases in NSCLC patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients

For staging purposes, 61 consecutive patients (mean age at time of investigation, 58 y; range, 36–80 y; SD, 10 y; sex, 37 men and 24 women) with histopathologically proven NSCLC were referred to whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT between July 2009 and August 2010 after optical bronchoscopy. All investigations were performed in a university hospital setting as part of the clinically indicated tumor-staging algorithm. Table 1 provides a detailed overview of the Union for International Cancer Control stage according to the reference standard. All patients signed an informed consent document that detailed the use of intravenous 18F-FDG, CT contrast material, and rare potential side effects. No patient underwent anticancer treatment before or at the time of imaging. This retrospective study was performed in accordance with the regulations of the local ethics committee.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1.

Number of Patients and T Stage

Whole-Body 18F-FDG PET/CT

Whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT scans were obtained on a Biograph mCT hybrid PET/CT scanner (Siemens AG, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany). The system consisted of a full-ring dedicated PET scanner, equipped with lutetium oxyorthosilicate crystals with an axial field of view of 21.8 cm, and a 2 × 64 slice spiral CT scanner.

Patients fasted for at least 6 h before intravenous application of 18F-FDG (290 ± 50 MBq). Before the injection of the radioactive tracer, a blood sample was taken to ensure blood glucose levels were below 150 mg/dL. A water-based oral contrast agent (1,000 mL) was applied for bowel marking (12) within the 18F-FDG uptake time. 18F-FDG PET/CT started 60 min after the intravenous application of 18F-FDG, beginning with the CT scan. CT data were acquired in the caudocranial direction, covering a field of view from the skull base to the upper thighs. Images were acquired at 120 kV, with automatic mA/s adjustment (Care Dose 4D [Siemens Molecular Imaging]; Care Dose preset, 210 mAs). An iodinated contrast agent (100 mL) (Ultravist 300; Schering AG, Berlin, Germany) was administered with an automated dual-head injector (Medrad Stellant; Medizinische Systeme GmbH, Volkach, Germany), with a flow rate of 2 mL/s, followed by a flush of 2.5 mL of saline/s.

The start delay was set to 70 s. The images were acquired with 5-mm slice thickness, a 5-mm increment, and a pitch of 1. Images were reconstructed to 1.5-mm slice thickness. The rotation time of the CT tube was 0.5 s. CT data were acquired in slight expiration. After the acquisition of the CT data, PET images were obtained in 3-dimensional mode in the same position as the CT images.

The PET emission time was set to 2 min per bed position (overlap per bed position, 45%). PET images were reconstructed according to the ordered-subsets expectation maximization algorithm using 4 iterations and 8 subsets. A 3-dimensional gaussian filter of 4.0 mm in full width at half maximum was applied.

Virtual 18F-FDG PET/CT Bronchoscopy

An investigational software application has been developed that extends conventional (CT-only) virtual endoscopy (bronchoscopy or colonoscopy) by the simultaneous display of coregistered PET information. After the automated segmentation of the airway, the user is provided with fused multiplanar reconstruction views (sagittal, coronal, and transaxial) and a virtual endoscopic view of the data (Figs. 1 and 2). The user can optionally swap one of the multiplanar reconstruction views with a volume rendering of the segmented airway tree. A PET activity overlay is provided in the endoscopic view. A perspective raycaster is used to determine the endoluminal surface.

FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

Optical bronchoscopy (A) of 55-y-old man with histopathologically proven, metastasized NSCLC (TNM stage, T2N3M0) without suggestions of malignancy on optical bronchoscopy. Also on CT bronchoscopy (B), there is no (morphologic) sign of malignancy.

FIGURE 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2.

With addition of 18F-FDG PET information to 3-dimensional virtual 18F-FDG PET/CT bronchoscopy (A), lymph node metastasis (SUVmax, 17.1) becomes visible in position 2R (yellow dot on tracheal surface), as confirmed on axial (B) and coronal (C) 18F-FDG PET/CT.

PET-specific activity (normalized to standardized uptake value [SUV]) is determined at the surface. Local color components of the anatomic surface rendering are modified when the PET activity exceeds a user-adjustable threshold. The color modification is proportional to the PET activity; it is not a quantitative display but serves primarily to alert the user to the presence of surface PET activity exceeding the SUV threshold.

An intuitive fly-through interface provides navigation of the airways within the virtual endoscopic view. The endoscope path can be displayed on the planar views. When the user selects a point on the surface in endoscopic view, and during endoscopic navigation, the planar views are adjusted so that the current endoscope position is visible with a line graphic indicating the endoscope orientation. Navigation sessions can be saved directly to a video file.

Reference Standard

Because the goal of our study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of virtual 18F-FDG PET/CT bronchoscopy for the detection of thoracic lymph node metastases, compared with the axial FDG PET/CT, the findings of the axial 18F-FDG PET/CT scans were used as the reference standard for the evaluation.

Axial 18F-FDG PET/CT Evaluation

Two board-certified radiologists and 1 nuclear medicine physician (all with more than 5 y of PET/CT experience) evaluated the images. Decisions were made in consensus. On a first digital workstation, the axial 18F-FDG PET/CT scans were reviewed using a TrueD Workstation (Siemens Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany) connected to a PACS workstation.

Mediastinal, hilar, interlobar, and lobar lymph nodes were evaluated by reference to the classification by Mountain and Dresler (13). Images were analyzed as follows: all lymph nodes detectable on CT were included in the analysis. These lymph nodes were evaluated for any focally increased PET signal. PET foci in lymph nodes indicated metastases. A nonelevated PET signal or a signal considered compatible with physiologic lymphatic uptake was rated negative. Lymph node size did not directly affect PET/CT interpretation but was indirectly considered with respect to the intensity of the PET signal. In short, a given PET focus was rated positive in a small lymph node rather than in a large lymph node, accounting for partial-volume effects. The decision was an empiric one based on the long-term imaging experience of the 3 readers. Quantitative measurements such as SUVs on PET were done in a concomitant manner but were not used for final decision making (14). The following parameters were documented: for thoracic lymph nodes—localization according to Mountain and Dresler (13), short-axis diameter (measured orthogonally to the longest axial diameter) (mm), shortest distance to the airways (trachea, bronchi) (mm), maximum SUV (SUVmax), mean SUV (SUVmean), and dichotomous differentiation into metastases and physiologic nodes—and for bronchi—smallest diameter of accessible bronchi in the periphery of the lung (mm).

Virtual 18F-FDG PET/CT Bronchoscopy Evaluation

The investigational PET/CT virtual endoscopy application was installed on a Syngo Multimodality Workplace (Siemens Health Care). The first step of the evaluation was to level the PET window of the virtual bronchoscopy tool.

Investigators, in consideration of the simultaneously visible 18F-FDG PET/CT images in the 3 orthogonal planes, virtually flew through the airways while leveling the PET device (Fig. 2). A lesion-based analysis was done by dividing lesions into true-positives (TPs), true-negatives (TNs), false-positives (FPs), and false-negatives (FNs).

The line of vision from the tip of the virtual scope was controlled on cross-sectional images (Fig. 3).

FIGURE 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 3.

Axial (B) and coronal (C) 18F-FDG PET/CT and virtual 18F-FDG PET/CT bronchoscopy (A) of 73-y-old man with histopathologically proven NSCLC. Cross-sectional image shows virtual view direction by red or yellow line in axial and coronal views; tip of virtual scope is marked with purple dot. View is directed at bifurcation of right main bronchus. In virtual 18F-FDG PET/CT bronchoscopy view, primary NSCLC lesion is marked as green or yellow area.

Statistical Analysis

The duration from the start of the virtual 18F-FDG PET/CT bronchoscopy tool until display of all images was measured. The mean, minimum, maximum, and SD of the SUVmax, SUVmean, distances to the airways of the lymph nodes, and their short-axis diameters were calculated for TP, FP, TN, and FN lesions. The following parameters were determined on a lesion basis: sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of the virtual 18F-FDG PET/CT bronchoscopy tool for the detection of lymph node metastases. Differences between the measurements of TP and FP lymph nodes and TN and FN lymph nodes were tested for statistical significance using the Mann–Whitney Wilcoxon test, using a significance level of P = 0.05. The smallest bronchus diameter accessible by virtual 18F-FDG PET/CT bronchoscopy was measured.

RESULTS

Whole-Body 18F-FDG PET/CT

Patient Population and Tumor Characterization

In 28 patients, the primary NSCLC was localized centrally, and in 33 patients peripherally. The left upper lobe was affected 19 times, left lower lobe 5 times, right upper lobe 21 times, right lower lobe 10 times, and middle lobe 6 times. All diagnoses were verified histopathologically. The mean largest diameter was 44 mm (range, 11–118 mm; SD, 21.2 mm). The mean SUVmax was 13.2 (range, 1.3–35.6; SD, 7.0); the mean SUVmean was 5.8 (range, 1.1–18.9; SD, 3.0).

Lymph Nodes

Overall, 462 mediastinal, hilar, interlobar, and lobar lymph nodes with a minimum short-axis diameter of 3 mm were evaluated. The mean number of lymph nodes evaluated per patient was 8 (range, 2–19 lymph nodes; SD, 3.7). Table 2 provides a summary of lymph node localization.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2.

Localization of Investigated Lymph Nodes According to Classification of Mountain and Dresler (13)

The mean short-axis diameter of all nodes (n = 462) was 11 mm (range, 3–74 mm; SD, 6.9 mm), and the mean short-axis diameter of lymph node metastases (n = 222) was 14 mm (range, 5–74 mm; SD, 8.3 mm). The mean short-axis diameter of physiologic nodes (n = 240) was 8 mm (range, 3–25 mm; SD, 2.9 mm). The mean shortest distance to the tracheal or bronchial surface of all evaluated lymph nodes was 6 mm (range, 1–44 mm; SD, 9.1 mm), and the mean shortest distance of lymph node metastases to the tracheal or bronchial surface was 6 mm (range, 1–44 mm; SD, 8.3 mm). The mean shortest distance of physiologic lymph nodes to the tracheal or bronchial surface was 7 mm (range, 1–43 mm; SD, 9.8 mm).

The mean SUVmax of all evaluated lymph nodes was 4.5 (range, 0.6–23.1; SD, 3.8), and the mean SUVmax of lymph node metastases was 6.8 (range, 2.7–23.1; SD, 4.1). The mean SUVmax of physiologic lymph nodes was 2.1 (range, 0.6–5.5; SD, 0.7).

The mean SUVmean of all evaluated lymph nodes was 3.1 (range, 2.5–14.8; SD, 2.1), and the mean SUVmean of metastatic lymph nodes was 4.4 (range, 1.6–14.8; SD, 2.3). The mean SUVmean of physiologic lymph nodes was 1.7 (range, 0.3–4.5; SD, 0.6).

Virtual 18F-FDG PET/CT Bronchoscopy

Duration of 18F-FDG PET/CT Bronchoscopy Tool-Starting Process

The mean duration between the start of the virtual 18F-FDG PET/CT bronchoscopy software tool until display of the virtual 18F-FDG PET/CT bronchoscopy images was 22 s (range, 7–74 s; SD, 18 s).

Lymph Nodes

According to the whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT, standard virtual 18F-FDG PET/CT bronchoscopy was TP in 170 lymph nodes, TN in 207, FP in 32, and FN in 53 (Figs. 4 and 5). Therefore, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of virtual 18F-FDG PET/CT bronchoscopy for the detection of lymph node metastases were 76%, 87%, 85%, 79%, and 81%, respectively.

FIGURE 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 4.

18F-FDG PET–positive lymph node metastasis (SUVmax, 12.3) adjacent to surface of right wall of trachea that was TP on virtual 18F-FDG PET/CT bronchoscopy (A) in 76-y-old man patient with stage IIA disease. Axial (B) and coronal (C) 18F-FDG PET/CT confirm presence of metastasis.

FIGURE 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 5.

FP lesion with apparent focal PET uptake in positions 2R and 4R on virtual 18F-FDG PET/CT bronchoscopy (A). On axial (B) and coronal (C) 18F-FDG PET/CT, there was no corresponding lesion with elevated uptake was detectable.

The difference between the short-axis diameter of TP and FP lymph nodes and TN and FN lymph nodes was statistically significant (P < 0.001).

The difference between the shortest distance to the airways of TP and FP lymph nodes was not statistically significant (P = 0.41), whereas the difference between the shortest distance to the airways of TN and FN lymph nodes was statistically significant (P = 0.01).

The difference between the SUVmax of TP and FP lymph nodes, like the difference between the SUVmax of TN and FN lymph nodes, was statistically significant (P < 0.001).

The difference between the SUVmean of TP and FP lymph nodes was statistically significant (P < 0.001).

The difference between the SUVmean of TN lymph nodes (mean, 1.7; range, 0.5–4.5; SD, 0.6) and FN lymph nodes (mean, 3.2; range, 1.6–8; SD, 1.4) was also statistically significant (P < 0.001).

Table 3 provides a detailed overview of TP, FP, TN and FN lymph nodes.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 3.

Characteristics of Investigated Lymph Nodes

Bronchi

The mean smallest diameter of accessible bronchi in the periphery of the lung by virtual fly-through bronchoscopy was 3.2 mm (range, 2–6.1 mm; SD, 0.7 mm).

DISCUSSION

Virtual 3-dimensional 18F-FDG PET/CT visualizations such as virtual bronchoscopies, mediastinoscopies, or colonographies are technically feasible by image postprocessing using current high-resolution PET and CT data (8–11,15,16). The short durations (seconds) from the start of the tool to the display of the virtual 18F-FDG PET/CT bronchoscopy datasets are clearly operational in clinical routine. Virtual 18F-FDG PET/CT bronchoscopy enables noninvasive fly-through, even in relatively small airways in the periphery of the lung, and the detection of PET-positive lymph node metastases adjacent to airway structures, with a high diagnostic accuracy. Virtual 18F-FDG PET/CT bronchoscopy represents a technique that not only images surface morphologic features of central and peripheral airways but also displays functional information underneath the wall of the trachea and bronchi. With this complementary added information, compared with morphologic data alone, the paratracheal and parabronchial lymph node metastases become visible. Virtual 18F-FDG PET/CT may become an important preprocedural tool to better localize affected lymph nodes, especially before endobronchial ultrasound–guided biopsy of paratracheal or parabronchial lymph nodes.

For transbronchial, fiberoptic–bronchoscopically guided biopsies, especially in small tumors without morphologic signs such as bronchus invasion, compression, or bronchial irregularities, PET/CT bronchoscopy may be a valuable planning tool (8). Virtual 18F-FDG PET/CT bronchoscopy does not add any radiation exposure to the exposure caused by 18F-FDG PET/CT because bonchoscopy datasets can be reconstructed from the PET/CT images.

Further technical developments seem to be desirable to enhance the features of this tool: a software tool that offers variance in visualization of the transparency of the airway wall may not only help the visualization of functional data of tumor tissue adjacent to the airway surface but also help the direct visualization of the malignancy. A more or less transparent tracheal and bronchial wall could allow the assessment of the configuration of the lesion and distances between surface and malignant lesions, which may affect biopsy strategy. Because this option is not yet available, a side-by-side evaluation of PET/CT bronchoscopy with cross-sectional PET/CT images is required.

Another goal of future technical developments will be the implementation of a more sophisticated PET displaying algorithm. With the current software version in use, we found several FP lesions adjacent to the bronchus surface, most likely resulting from physiologic uptake by airway walls and a shine-through effect from adjacent physiologic mediastinal structures such as vessels (blood pool) or lymph nodes not affected by tumor. In addition, FN results occur in lymph nodes that are localized relatively far from the surface (∼12 mm). Adapting the software algorithm in use may reduce the number of FN lesions in the future. The next clinical study step will be to evaluate whether preinterventional virtual 18F-FDG PET/CT bronchoscopies ease fiberoptically guided biopsies and endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS)–guided biopsies.

This study has some limitations. Histopathology would have provided the better reference standard but was not available in all patients. Micrometastases cannot be detected with any imaging procedure, and FP findings occur with PET/CT when defining lymph node metastases. Thus, histopathology would have been desirable. However, because PET/CT has a relatively high accuracy for the detection of lymph node metastases in NSCLC, using PET/CT data as the standard of reference may be acceptable (6). Considering this gold standard, the calculated diagnostic accuracy of virtual 18F-FDG PET/CT bronchoscopy may have been overestimated (as compared with a gold standard histopathology). Thus, the true accuracy of virtual 18F-FDG PET/CT may prove to be lower than 81% when assessed prospectively with histopathology as a reference standard. Bearing this in mind, virtual 18F-FDG PET/CT bronchoscopy and EBUS may be of comparable diagnostic accuracy for the detection of lymph node metastases, with accuracies for EBUS reported to be 57%–93% in the literature (17–19). The true accuracy will have to be assessed in future prospective trials.

Another limitation is the manual PET thresholding in virtual 18F-FDG PET/CT bronchoscopy, which is based on correlation with axial 18F-FDG PET/CT data. Though this adjustment has to be done in the evaluation of normal axial 18F-FDG PET/CT scans also, in the virtual bronchoscopy view, there are no qualitative reference points for windowing/thresholding the PET image because no structure below the surface is visible. Thus, axial PET/CT data are required for correlation when thresholds are applied to the bronchoscopy datasets. It is noticeable that most FP lymph nodes are localized in positions 2 and 10 (13), possibly a result of several structures—such as the aorta and hilum—with physiologically elevated 18F-FDG uptake adjacent to these positions. In the future, this problem may be solved by adjusting the display algorithm to the expected surrounding physiologic PET activity.

CONCLUSION

Virtual 3-dimensional 18F-FDG PET/CT bronchoscopy yields a relatively high diagnostic accuracy for the detection of mediastinal lymph node metastases that is at least comparable to that of EBUS. In the future, virtual 18F-FDG PET/CT bronchoscopy may be used for endoscopically guided biopsy planning.

DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. Therefore, and solely to indicate this fact, this article is hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 USC section 1734.

Acknowledgments

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Footnotes

  • Published online Sep. 9, 2011.

  • © 2011 by Society of Nuclear Medicine

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Jemal A,
    2. Siegel R,
    3. Xu J,
    4. Ward E
    . Cancer statistics 2010. CA Cancer J Clin. 2010;60:277–300.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Jemal A,
    2. Siegel R,
    3. Ward E,
    4. Hao Y,
    5. Xu J,
    6. Thun MJ
    . Cancer statistics, 2009. CA Cancer J Clin. 2009;59:225–249.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Freudenberg LS,
    2. Rosenbaum SJ,
    3. Beyer T,
    4. Bockisch A,
    5. Antoch G
    . PET versus PET/CT dual-modality imaging in evaluation of lung cancer. Radiol Clin North Am. 2007;45:639–644.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Kligerman S,
    2. Digumarthy S
    . Staging of non-small cell lung cancer using integrated PET/CT. AJR. 2009;193:1203–1211.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Antoch G,
    2. Stattaus J,
    3. Nemat AT,
    4. et al
    . Non-small cell lung cancer: dual-modality PET/CT in preoperative staging. Radiology. 2003;229:526–533.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. van Tinteren H,
    2. Hoekstra OS,
    3. Smit EF,
    4. et al
    . Effectiveness of positron emission tomography in the preoperative assessment of patients with suspected non-small-cell lung cancer: the PLUS multicentre randomised trial. Lancet. 2002;359:1388–1393.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Herder GJ,
    2. Kramer H,
    3. Hoekstra OS,
    4. et al
    . Traditional versus up-front [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography staging of non-small-cell lung cancer: a Dutch cooperative randomized study. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:1800–1806.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Englmeier KH,
    2. Seemann MD
    . Multimodal virtual bronchoscopy using PET/CT images. Comput Aided Surg. 2008;13:106–113.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  9. 9.
    1. Quon A,
    2. Napel S,
    3. Beaulieu CF,
    4. Gambhir SS
    . “Flying through” and “flying around” a PET/CT scan: pilot study and development of 3D integrated 18F-FDG PET/CT for virtual bronchoscopy and colonoscopy. J Nucl Med. 2006;47:1081–1087.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.
    1. Seemann MD,
    2. Schaefer JF,
    3. Englmeier KH
    . Virtual positron emission tomography/computed tomography-bronchoscopy: possibilities, advantages and limitations of clinical application. Eur Radiol. 2007;17:709–715.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Yerushalmi D,
    2. Mullick R,
    3. Quon A,
    4. et al
    . Simulations of virtual PET/CT 3-D bronchoscopy imaging using a physical porcine lung-heart phantom. Mol Imaging Biol. 2009;11:275–282.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Antoch G,
    2. Kuehl H,
    3. Kanja J,
    4. et al
    . Dual-modality PET/CT scanning with negative oral contrast agent to avoid artifacts: introduction and evaluation. Radiology. 2004;230:879–885.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Mountain CF,
    2. Dresler CM
    . Regional lymph node classification for lung cancer staging. Chest. 1997;111:1718–1723.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Heusner TA,
    2. Kuemmel S,
    3. Hahn S,
    4. et al
    . Diagnostic value of full-dose FDG PET/CT for axillary lymph node staging in breast cancer patients. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2009;36:1543–1550.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Veit-Haibach P,
    2. Kuehle CA,
    3. Beyer T,
    4. et al
    . Diagnostic accuracy of colorectal cancer staging with whole-body PET/CT colonography. JAMA. 2006;296:2590–2600.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Itano H,
    2. Hirokawa Y,
    3. Takauchi K
    . Clinical utility of three-dimensional integrated 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography/computed tomography virtual mediastinoscopy. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2010;10:981–985.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Cerfolio RJ,
    2. Bryant AS,
    3. Eloubeidi MA,
    4. et al
    . The true false negative rates of esophageal and endobronchial ultrasound in the staging of mediastinal lymph nodes in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;90:427–434.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.
    1. Szlubowski A,
    2. Kuzdzał J,
    3. Kołodziej M,
    4. et al
    . Endobronchial ultrasound-guided needle aspiration in the non-small cell lung cancer staging. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009;35:332–335, discussion 335–336.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Rintoul RC,
    2. Skwarski KM,
    3. Murchison JT,
    4. Wallace WA,
    5. Walker WS,
    6. Penman ID
    . Endobronchial and endoscopic ultrasound-guided real-time fine-needle aspiration for mediastinal staging. Eur Respir J. 2005;25:416–421.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  • Received for publication May 16, 2011.
  • Accepted for publication July 29, 2011.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 52 (10)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 52, Issue 10
October 1, 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Diagnostic Accuracy of Virtual 18F-FDG PET/CT Bronchoscopy for the Detection of Lymph Node Metastases in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Diagnostic Accuracy of Virtual 18F-FDG PET/CT Bronchoscopy for the Detection of Lymph Node Metastases in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients
Michael Herbrik, Jon Treffert, Bernhard Geiger, Carolin Riegger, Verena Hartung, Sandra Julia Rosenbaum-Krumme, Michael Forsting, Gerald Antoch, Till A. Heusner
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Oct 2011, 52 (10) 1520-1525; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.111.092593

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Diagnostic Accuracy of Virtual 18F-FDG PET/CT Bronchoscopy for the Detection of Lymph Node Metastases in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients
Michael Herbrik, Jon Treffert, Bernhard Geiger, Carolin Riegger, Verena Hartung, Sandra Julia Rosenbaum-Krumme, Michael Forsting, Gerald Antoch, Till A. Heusner
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Oct 2011, 52 (10) 1520-1525; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.111.092593
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Cardiac Presynaptic Sympathetic Nervous Function Evaluated by Cardiac PET in Patients with Chronotropic Incompetence Without Heart Failure
  • Validation and Evaluation of a Vendor-Provided Head Motion Correction Algorithm on the uMI Panorama PET/CT System
  • Left Ventricular Strain from Myocardial Perfusion PET Imaging: Method Development and Comparison to 2-Dimensional Echocardiography
Show more Clinical Investigations

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire