Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
OtherLetters to the Editor

The Twilight Saga of Insulin Administration in Hyperglycemic Patients Undergoing 18F-FDG PET

Yuh-Feng Lin, Fu-Chiu Yu and Jainn-Shiun Chiu
Journal of Nuclear Medicine March 2010, 51 (3) 497; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.109.070185
Yuh-Feng Lin
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fu-Chiu Yu
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jainn-Shiun Chiu
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

TO THE EDITOR: Roy et al. recently published a study adopting a standardized protocol of intravenous insulin administration to reduce glycemia in diabetic cancer patients undergoing 18F-FDG PET (1). The authors claimed that the pretest intravenous insulin injection in diabetic patients is a realistic approach. However, several issues deserve further exploration before this standardized insulin protocol can be incorporated into daily PET practice.

In clinical tumor imaging, hyperglycemia has a recognized adverse effect on the quality of 18F-FDG PET images because of competitive inhibition of 18F-FDG uptake by glucose. Although insulin can be used as a glycemia-reducing agent, arbitrary prescription of insulin before 18F-FDG injection may exacerbate muscular 18F-FDG uptake and compromise tumor uptake, thus curtailing image interpretability (2). According to the study results of Roy et al., 18F-FDG PET image quality was barely adequate in 75% of patients receiving insulin. This means every 1 of 4 scans must be repeated. Repeating a study is not a cost-benefit if the PET center does not have its own on-site cyclotron. Rescheduling is inconvenient to the patients and bothersome to the center staff. The set point to prescribe insulin in the study protocol of Roy et al. might account for their poor image quality. The Society of Nuclear Medicine recommends rescheduling the examination if the patient's blood glucose level is greater than 8.3–11.1 mmol/L (150–200 mg/dL) (3). The European Association of Nuclear Medicine also advises that an 18F-FDG PET study should not be performed when the blood glucose level exceeds 11.1 mmol/L (4). If cancelling an examination or rescheduling an appointment is not feasible, we suggest the use of intravenous insulin at a blood glucose level of more than 11.1 mmol/L, instead of the 10.0 mmol/L stated by Roy et al. Additionally, we encourage hyperglycemic patients to have a temperate walk after insulin injection to reduce muscular uptake. In this way, the proportion of images of adequate quality would improve.

In their study, less favorable image quality was found with more glycemic reduction after insulin administration, and no significant correlation was observed between muscular uptake and parameters such as initial glycemia, total insulin dose, and number of insulin doses. Hence, the extent of glycemic reduction is not predictable and the chance of study failure is unavoidable. The implication is that we cannot select which hyperglycemic patient is suitable for insulin use. We also cannot apply the correct insulin dose to manage glycemic reduction before imaging. These phenomena can be explained by nonuniform insulin sensitivity among hyperglycemic patients. Therefore, Roy's standardized insulin protocol, an illogical practice such as sliding-scale insulin (5), is a problematic recipe for glycemic control in hyperglycemic patients undergoing 18F-FDG PET studies. Sliding-scale insulin is also associated with poorer glycemic control, a harmful roller-coaster effect between hyperglycemic and hypoglycemic episodes, and increased risks of hypoglycemia, as occurred in 6 patients (9.5%) in the study of Roy et al. Thus, their standardized insulin protocol might be a risky strategy.

To obtain a useful diagnostic image of 18F-FDG PET, one should ensure that the patient has fasted overnight and has a blood glucose level of less than 8.3 mmol/L in the early morning on the day of the PET scan. A good method is to do a “practice run” by checking the patient's blood glucose levels for at least 3 d before the 18F-FDG PET appointment (6). If the morning blood glucose level is persistently higher than 8.3 mmol/L, the scheduler needs to recognize this problem well before the scan appointment and request that the diabetologist manage the glycemic status by basal and nutritional insulin therapy with a supplemental insulin regimen (7). To avert the possibility of irreversibly unreadable images, hypoglycemia, and transcellular-shift hypokalemia, before establishing specific guidelines for using insulin in hyperglycemic patients undergoing 18F-FDG PET we should have the patients fast and we should not administer additional insulin.

Footnotes

  • COPYRIGHT © 2010 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine, Inc.

References

  1. 1.↵
    Roy F-N, Beaulieu S, Boucher L, Bourdeau I, Cohade C. Impact of intravenous insulin on 18F-FDG PET in diabetic cancer patients. J Nucl Med. 2009;50:178–183.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    Coleman RE. Clinical PET in oncology. Clin Positron Imaging. 1998;1:15–30.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    Delbeke D, Coleman RE, Guiberteau MJ, et al. Procedure guideline for tumor imaging with 18F-FDG PET/CT 1.0. J Nucl Med. 2006;47:885–895.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    Bombardieri E, Aktolun C, Baum RP, et al. FDG-PET: procedure guidelines for tumour imaging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2003;30:BP115–BP124.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    Umpierrez GE, Palacio A, Smiley D. Sliding scale insulin use: myth or insanity? Am J Med. 2007;120:563–567.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    Hamblen SM, Lowe VJ. Clinical 18F-FDG oncology patient preparation techniques. J Nucl Med Technol. 2003;31:3–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    Clement S. Better glycemic control in the hospital: beneficial and feasible. Cleve Clin J Med. 2007;74:111–112, 114–120.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 51 (3)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 51, Issue 3
March 2010
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Twilight Saga of Insulin Administration in Hyperglycemic Patients Undergoing 18F-FDG PET
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
The Twilight Saga of Insulin Administration in Hyperglycemic Patients Undergoing 18F-FDG PET
Yuh-Feng Lin, Fu-Chiu Yu, Jainn-Shiun Chiu
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Mar 2010, 51 (3) 497; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.109.070185

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
The Twilight Saga of Insulin Administration in Hyperglycemic Patients Undergoing 18F-FDG PET
Yuh-Feng Lin, Fu-Chiu Yu, Jainn-Shiun Chiu
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Mar 2010, 51 (3) 497; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.109.070185
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Business Model Beats Science and Logic: Dosimetry and Paucity of Its Use
  • Determining PSMA-617 Mass and Molar Activity in Pluvicto Doses
  • The Value of Functional PET in Quantifying Neurotransmitter Dynamics
Show more Letters to the Editor

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire