Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
OtherFOCUS ON MOLECULAR IMAGING

Nuclear Imaging of Cancer Cell Therapies

Vladimir Ponomarev
Journal of Nuclear Medicine July 2009, 50 (7) 1013-1016; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.109.064055
Vladimir Ponomarev
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

A promising role of cellular therapies in cancer treatment is reflected by the constantly growing number of clinical trials with adoptively transferred cells. Direct and indirect cell labeling for the nuclear imaging of transferred cells has been proven reliable for imaging adoptive cellular therapies. Both methods show their advantages and limitations. Direct labeling is a relatively easy, inexpensive, and well-established methodology. Indirect labeling using a reporter gene imaging paradigm allows for reliable, stable, and harmless visualization of cellular trafficking, persistence, proliferation, and function at the target site. It is expected that new human-derived reporter genes will be rapidly translated into clinical applications that require repetitive imaging for the effective monitoring of various genetic and cellular therapies.

  • molecular imaging
  • oncology
  • PET/CT
  • cell therapy
  • reporter gene

Recent developments in biotechnology have led to an increasing number of clinically available anticancer therapies that require the administration of cells of different origins. These cellular therapies are based on the ex vivo manipulation of various therapeutically useful cell types (e.g., stem cells, lineage progenitors, mesenchymal cells, lymphocytes, and dendritic cells), followed by local or systemic administration to cancer patients (1–4). A promising role of cellular therapies in cancer treatment, especially in minimal residual disease and micrometastases, is reflected by the constantly growing number of clinical trials with adoptively transferred cells (5). Until recently, immunostaining of whole-body slices of small animals was the most straightforward, reliable, and traditional approach used for assessing the localization and targeting of adoptively transferred cells (6). New methods for the noninvasive and repetitive evaluation of trafficking, homing, tumor targeting, differentiation, and persistence of adoptively transferred cells would significantly aid the development of progenitor or effector cell–based therapy approaches and facilitate their clinical implementation. For example, systemic administration of antigen-specific T lymphocytes is one of the most studied and clinically applicable methods of adoptive anticancer cell therapy. Long-term trafficking and localization of T lymphocytes is an important component of anticancer immune response and of elimination of abnormal cells and infectious agents from the body. Imaging could help monitor such processes as T cell migration, homing to the tumor target, and long-term T cell viability and their subsequent activation and cytolytic activity. These questions could potentially be answered by repetitive imaging using clinically applicable techniques, for example, nuclear imaging.

EX VIVO RADIOLABELING FOR NUCLEAR IMAGING

The first experiments on noninvasive imaging of lymphocyte trafficking were performed with extracorporal labeling. These methods were applied to different immune cells using various radioisotopes for labeling. 111In, in particular, found a wide clinical application in oncology as an imaging agent for monitoring immunotherapy with tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. In a study published by Fisher et al. (7), 6 patients with metastatic malignant melanoma who had multiple sites of subcutaneous, nodal, or visceral disease were treated with 111In-labeled tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) (mean dose, 8.4 × 109 labeled cells per patient), followed by serial whole-body γ-camera imaging and serial biopsies of tumor and normal tissue. 111In-labeled TILs localized to lung, liver, and spleen within 2 h after the infusion. This study showed that labeled TILs can localize preferentially to tumors, and it provided information about the possible mechanism of the therapeutic effects of TILs. In another study, autologous monocyte-derived dendritic cells loaded with a tumor antigen and labeled with 111In-oxine were injected intradermally in patients with varying cancer types (8). Only 1 of the 6 patients treated had nodular inguinal uptake on the intradermally injected side, suggesting that dendritic cells rapidly moved to a regional lymph node in which antigen presentation should occur. Imaging techniques that involve ex vivo labeling of lymphocytes or other adoptively transferred cells have several limitations (e.g., the relatively low attainable level of radioactivity per cell when cells are labeled with passively equilibrating radiotracers such as 111In-oxine). In the study described above by Fisher et al. (7), the mean concentration of radioactivity of 144.3 kBq/108 cells (3.9 μCi/108 cells) was achieved with a total of 10,471 kBq (283 μCi) of 111In activity injected. Significantly higher levels of radioactivity per cell could be obtained with tracers such as 18F-FDG that use facilitated transport and enzyme-amplified accumulation. However, 18F-FDG has been shown to gradually efflux out of the labeled cells (9) because of progressive loss of the radiolabel that occurs during cell division in vivo. Although more stable labeling of lymphocytes was achieved with 125I-5-iodo-2′-deoxyuridine, which is stably incorporated into the DNA of labeled cells (10), such an approach has never been tested. Another shortcoming of the ex vivo radiolabeling approach is the limited period of monitoring, which is due to radiolabel decay, cell division, and biologic clearance. In addition, the exposure of cells to higher doses of radioactivity during labeling may also be limited by radiotoxicity. In a study by Zanzonico et al. (11), T lymphocytes that were specific for the human anti–Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) were genetically engineered to express herpes simplex virus type 1 thymidine kinase (HSV1-tk) and radiolabeled ex vivo with 131I-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-5-iodo-1-d-arabinofuranosyluracil (131I-FIAU) for 2 h at concentrations between 1 and 1,850 kBq/mL (between 1 and 50 μCi/mL). At median nuclear absorbed doses up to 830 cGy, a 51Cr-release assay against B-lymphoblastoid cells showed no loss of immune cytotoxicity, thus demonstrating the functional integrity of tumor-reactive T cells labeled at this dose level for in vivo cell trafficking and tumor-targeting studies in the animals.

Genetic Labeling of Cells with Reporter Genes for Nuclear Imaging Using in Vivo Tracer Administration

Stable genetic labeling of adoptively transferred cells with various reporter genes has been used to circumvent the temporal limitations of ex vivo radiolabeling. The HSV1-tk reporter gene has been used in most seminal studies on imaging cell trafficking by nuclear techniques including imaging in humans (12–15). This paradigm involves the administration of a radiolabeled nucleoside analog probe that is selectively phosphorylated and trapped by interaction with the HSV1-tk enzyme in the transduced cell. In contrast to the above-mentioned (11) study, in which HSV1-tk–expressing T cells were prelabeled with 131I-FIAU ex vivo, Koehne et al. (16) demonstrated the feasibility of long-term (at least for several weeks) PET monitoring of targeting and migration of EBV-specific cytotoxic T cells (CTLs) that are transduced to constitutively express a radionuclide-based HSV1-tk reporter gene for in vivo 124I-FIAU labeling. PET images acquired at 28 h, 8 d, and 15 d after T cell infusion demonstrated high accumulations of T cells in the human leukocyte antigen–matched EBV-positive autologous and allogeneic tumors that resulted in the elimination of tumor xenografts. This paradigm provides the opportunity for repeated visualization of transferred T cells within the same animal over time using PET for continuous monitoring of T cell localization and persistence. Therapeutic antitumor immunity depends on a highly migratory CTL population capable of activation and trafficking between lymphoid and tumor-bearing microanatomic sites. Studies conducted by the UCLA group showed a specific targeting of the murine sarcoma virus antigen-positive tumor by mouse antigen-specific T cells that were transduced with the HSV1-sr39tk PET reporter gene (17). Specific localization of immune T cells to the antigen-positive tumor was detected over time by sequential imaging with 9-[4-18F-fluoro-3-(hydroxymethyl)butyl]guanine (18F-FHBG) of the same animals for 10 d. Interestingly, in this study tumor growth was assessed by 18F-FDG scans. By using two 18F-based radiotracers with rapid clearance and a radioisotope with a short half-life, repeated PET of tumor progression and T cell trafficking can be performed on a daily basis, thus providing accurate quantitative assessment of T cell dynamics and tumor response in vivo. PET can be used to kinetically measure the induction and therapeutic modulations of cell-mediated immune responses. Shu et al. showed the feasibility of PET to monitor the effect of immunosuppressive drugs on immune cell populations in the draining lymph nodes using hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells transduced with the HSV1-sr39tk, synthetic Renilla luciferase, and enhanced green fluorescent protein (GFP) trifusion reporter gene (18). It was shown that activation and expansion of immune cell populations in the draining lymph nodes could no longer be detected after mice were treated with dexamethasone. New genetic strategies aim to enhance cellular antitumor immunity in cancer patients by genetic reprogramming used to improve T cell survival, augment cell expansion, and offset T cell anergy and immune suppression. A recent study by Dobrenkov et al. (19) was the first to combine both genetic therapeutic (prostate cancer–specific chimeric antigen receptor [CAR]) and PET (HSV1-tk reporter gene and 18F-[2′-deoxy-2′-fluoro-β-d-arabinofuranosyl]-5-ethyluracil) components using genetic modifications of primary human T lymphocytes. This therapeutic or imaging strategy provides spatial and temporal information on CAR-positive T cell trafficking and persistence and can be used for antigen-specific CAR-transduced T cell treatment monitoring and prediction of tumor response and therapy outcome. Bone marrow transplantation (BMT) is one of the most radical and effective approaches in cancer treatment, not only in hematologic malignancies but also in solid tumors. This approach allows for the successful displacement of affected bone marrow (BM) of the recipient with donor hematopoietic cells. Nuclear imaging can identify the initial skeletal engraftment sites after BMT. Using a standard mouse model of BMT, Mayer-Kuckuk et al. (20) introduced a combined optical and PET reporter gene, triple-fusion encoding for HSV1-tk, GFP, and Firefly luciferase into mouse BM cells. PET was applied to acquire 3-dimensional images of the whole-body in vivo biodistribution of the transplanted cells, followed by CT. Coregistration of PET and CT mapped the sites of BM engraftment, and multiple, discrete BM cell engraftment sites were observed. With the noninvasive monitoring of BM engraftment using this multimodality approach, BMT can be tailored to the individual needs of patients, with minimal toxicity of conditioning regimens, sufficient numbers of transplanted cells, and adequate cytokine support. A similar approach has been used for the monitoring of mesenchymal stem cell targeting of microscopic tumors and tumor stroma development (21). As imaged by PET and 18F-FHBG, tracer human mesenchymal stem cells expressing HSV1-tk and GFP reporter genes could target microscopic tumors, subsequently proliferate and differentiate, and contribute to the formation of a significant portion of tumor stroma. Therefore, PET should facilitate clinical translation of stem cell–based anticancer gene therapeutic approaches by providing the means for in vivo noninvasive whole-body monitoring of trafficking, tumor targeting, and proliferation of reporter gene–expressing tracer human mesenchymal stem cells in tumor stroma. The major impediment to the translation of virus- and bacterium-derived reporter gene imaging approaches into clinical practice is the immunogenicity of these non–human-derived reporter proteins. This is especially important when the repetitive administration of a reporter gene or long-term monitoring of transgene expression is required, which could potentially be compromised by an immune reaction against this foreign protein. To circumvent this problem, several human-derived intrinsically nonimmunogenic reporter genes have been proposed for nuclear imaging, including the dopamine receptor type 2 (22), sodium iodide symporter (23), human mitochondrial thymidine kinase type 2 (24), and human norepinephrine transporter (hNET) (25). In the latter study, Doubrovin et al. (25) evaluated hNET, permitting the imaging of transduced cells in vivo with an approved clinical-grade radiolabeled probe (metaiodobenzylguanidine), and demonstrated the feasibility of nuclear imaging of 2 different cell populations using 2 independent reporter genes (Fig. 1).

FIGURE 1. 
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1. 

Dual-modality imaging using hNET and HSV1-tk reporter genes for monitoring different populations of antigen-specific CTLs. Severe combined immunodeficient mice bearing 2 subcutaneous xenografts—HLA-A0201+EBV-BLCL (T1) and HLA-DRB10701+EBV-BLCL (T2)—received intravenous infusion of mixture of EBV-specific CD4+CTL-hNET (15 × 106 cells per mouse), restricted by HLA-DRB10701 and CD8+CTL-HSV1-tk (9 × 106 cells per mouse), restricted by HLA-A0201 allele. To avoid 124I downscatter into 123I SPECT energy window, mice were first injected with 123I-MIBG and imaged 4 h thereafter with SPECT. This image showed selective accumulation of 123I-MIBG in T2 tumor targeted by CD4+CTL-hNET. No signal above background was detected in T1 tumor. After completion of SPECT, 124I-FIAU was given. Mice were then imaged by PET 2 h later. In these PET images, only T1 tumor was visualized. No signal was detected in T2 tumor. HLA = human leukocyte antigen; hNET = human norepinephrine transporter; MIBG = metaiodobenzylguanidine. (Reprinted with permission of (25).)

FUNCTIONAL IMAGING OF CELLS

Recently, several groups have demonstrated that the noninvasive reporter gene imaging of endogenous molecular genetic processes is feasible with PET. An essential component of the anticancer immune response is tumor-specific T cell activation. Ponomarev et al. (26) have monitored and assessed T cell activation in vivo using an activation-sensitive HSV1-tk–encoding genetic reporter system and PET with 124I-FIAU. The results of the study demonstrated that PET of T lymphocyte activation after T cell receptor engagement is feasible using the described reporter system. Furthermore, this activation could be arrested pharmacologically by the administration of clinically used calcineurin inhibitors such as cyclosporin A and FK506. This circumstance makes this imaging approach clinically valuable, because it can be used in patients receiving immunosuppressive drugs after BM and organ transplantation. Ultimately, the process of immune cell activation can be visualized using a direct radiotracer approach. In a recent study, Radu et al. (27) demonstrated that 1-(2′-deoxy-2′-18F-fluoroarabinofuranosyl) cytosine (18F-FAC) was specific for imaging activation-specific upregulation of the deoxyribonucleotide salvage pathway in lymphoid cells (Fig. 2). 18F-FAC enabled visualization of lymphoid organs and was sensitive to localized immune activation in a mouse model of antitumor immunity. PET detected early changes in lymphoid mass in systemic autoimmunity and allowed the evaluation of immunosuppressive therapy. Such an approach can be readily translated into clinical practice for the noninvasive PET monitoring of immune cell activation during the antitumor immunologic response.

FIGURE 2. 
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2. 

PET/CT of immune cell activation using 18F-FAC radiotracer. Increased 18F-FAC retention in spleen and lymph nodes at peak of primary antitumor immune response. 18F-FAC PET/CT of mice on day −1 (A) and day 15 (B) after oncoretrovirus injection. At peak of immune response (day 15), increased 18F-FAC retention is seen in lymph nodes and spleen. (C) Quantification of 18F-FAC retention in spleen and lymph nodes on day −1 and day 15 (n = 3). (D) 18F-FDG PET/CT of mice on day 13 after challenge. 18F-FDG retention is seen in lymph nodes, tumor, and spleen. %ID/g = percentage injected dose per gram; B = bone; BL = bladder; GI = gastrointestine; H = heart; LN = lymph node; SP = spleen; TU = tumor. (Reprinted with permission of (27).)

QUANTITATION OF ADOPTIVELY TRANSFERRED CELLS IN VIVO

The degree of PET signal in an anatomic region of interest (ROI) largely depends on the density of labeled cells in a volume of tissue. The potential of PET for quantifying cell signals in ROIs provides a unique opportunity to estimate the absolute number of injected labeled cells at the target site. However, little is known about the constraints and parameters for using PET signal detection to establish cell numbers in different ROIs. Su et al. (28) determined the correlation of PET signal to cell number and characterized the cellular limit of detection for PET. This study, using native mouse T cells transduced with the HSV1-tk reporter gene and PET with 18F-FHBG, revealed a cell number–dependent signal, with a limit of detection calculated as 106 cells in an ROI (0.1-mL volume). In another study (29), memory cells demonstrated early accumulation and apparent proliferation with large T cell numbers at the antigen-positive tumor as early as day 1 after T cell transfer. Both naive and memory cells eradicated the antigen-expressing tumor at a comparable density of intratumoral T cells (2–4 × 106/g). These methods and findings provide a strategy for quantitation of cellularity using PET that has implications for both experimental models and clinical diagnosis.

CONCLUSION AND FUTURE CONSIDERATIONS

Direct and indirect cell labeling for the nuclear imaging of transferred cells has been proven reliable for imaging adoptive cellular therapies. Both methods show their advantages and limitations. Direct labeling is a relatively easy, inexpensive, and well-established methodology. High-contrast cell-to-medium or -tissue ratios can be achieved easily. However, this approach is limited by a short period of monitoring (days), which is due to radiolabel decay, cell division, and biologic clearance. High levels of radiolabel concentration can impair the biologic functioning of the labeled cells. Indirect labeling using a reporter gene imaging paradigm allows for the reliable, stable, and harmless visualization of cellular trafficking, persistence, proliferation, and function at the target site. Genetically labeled cells can be repetitively imaged for a long period of observation (months). Picomolar concentrations of radiotracer administered in vivo are harmless for the labeled cells and for the surrounding organs and tissues. The genetic nature of this method (stable integration into the cell genome) permits in vivo labeling of the progeny of injected cells. The functional imaging of cell activation, cytokine signaling, and proapoptotic events is feasible and can be performed in preclinical experiments and in clinical settings using inducible genetic reporter systems and the direct tracer approach. It is expected that new human-derived reporter genes will be rapidly translated into clinical applications that require repetitive imaging for the effective monitoring of various genetic and cellular therapies.

Footnotes

  • COPYRIGHT © 2009 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine, Inc.

References

  1. 1.↵
    Erlandsson A, Morshead CM. Exploiting the properties of adult stem cells for the treatment of disease. Curr Opin Mol Ther. 2006;8:331–337.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. 2.
    Keating A. Mesenchymal stromal cells. Curr Opin Hematol. 2006;13:419–425.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.
    Rooney C, Smith CA, Ng CY, et al. Use of gene-modified virus-specific T lymphocytes to control Epstein-Barr-virus-related lymphoproliferation. Lancet. 1995;345:9–13.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    Buchsel PC, DeMeyer ES. Dendritic cells: emerging roles in tumor immunotherapy. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2006;10:629–640.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    Prados J, Melguizo C, Boulaiz H, Marchal JA, Aranega A. Cancer gene therapy: strategies and clinical trials. Cell Mol Biol. 2005;51:23–36.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    Reinhardt R, Jenkins MK. Whole-body analysis of T cell responses. Curr Opin Immunol. 2003;15:366–371.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    Fisher B, Packard BS, Read EJ, et al. Tumor localization of adoptively transferred indium-111 labeled tumor infiltrating lymphocytes in patients with metastatic melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 1989;7:250–261.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  8. 8.↵
    Blocklet D, Toungouz M, Kiss R, et al. 111In-oxine and 99mTc-HMPAO labelling of antigen-loaded dendritic cells: in vivo imaging and influence on motility and actin content. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2003;30:440–447.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    Adonai N, Nguyen KN, Walsh J, et al. Ex vivo cell labeling with 64Cu-pyruvaldehyde-bis(N4-methylthiosemicarbazone) for imaging cell trafficking in mice with positron-emission tomography. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99:3030–3035.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    Schelper RL, Adrian EK Jr. Monocytes become macrophages; they do not become microglia: a light and electron microscopic autoradiographic study using 125-iododeoxyuridine. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1986;45:1–19.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    Zanzonico P, Koehne G, Gallardo HF, et al. [131I]FIAU labeling of genetically transduced, tumor-reactive lymphocytes: cell-level dosimetry and dose-dependent toxicity. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2006;33:988–997.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    Gambhir SS, Herschman HR, Cherry SR, et al. Imaging transgene expression with radionuclide imaging technologies. Neoplasia. 2000;2:118–138.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.
    Jacobs A, Voges J, Reszka R, et al. Positron-emission tomography of vector-mediated gene expression in gene therapy for gliomas. Lancet. 2001;358:727–729.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.
    Penuelas I, Mazzolini G, Boan JF, et al. Positron emission tomography imaging of adenoviral-mediated transgene expression in liver cancer patients. Gastroenterology. 2005;128:1787–1795.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    Yaghoubi SS, Jensen MC, Satyamurthy N, et al. Noninvasive detection of therapeutic cytolytic T cells with 18F-FHBG PET in a patient with glioma. Nat Clin Pract Oncol. 2009;6:53–58.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    Koehne G, Doubrovin M, Doubrovina E, et al. Serial in vivo imaging of the targeted migration of human HSV-TK-transduced antigen-specific lymphocytes. Nat Biotechnol. 2003;21:405–413.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    Dubey P, Su H, Adonai N, et al. Quantitative imaging of the T cell antitumor response by positron-emission tomography. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:1232–1237.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    Shu C, Guo S, Kim YJ, et al. Visualization of a primary anti-tumor immune response by positron emission tomography. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:17412–17417.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    Dobrenkov K, Olszewska M, Likar Y, et al. Monitoring the efficacy of adoptively transferred prostate cancer-targeted human T lymphocytes with PET and bioluminescence imaging. J Nucl Med. 2008;49:1162–1170.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    Mayer-Kuckuk P, Doubrovin M, Bidaut L, et al. Molecular imaging reveals skeletal engraftment sites of transplanted bone marrow cells. Cell Transplant. 2006;15:75–82.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    Hung S, Deng WP, Yang WK, et al. Mesenchymal stem cell targeting of microscopic tumors and tumor stroma development monitored by noninvasive in vivo positron emission tomography imaging. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11:7749–7756.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    MacLaren D, Gambhir SS, Satyamurthy N, et al. Repetitive, non-invasive imaging of the dopamine D2 receptor as a reporter gene in living animals. Gene Ther. 1999;6:785–791.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    Groot-Wassink T, Aboagye EO, Glaser M, Lemoine NR, Vassaux G. Adenovirus biodistribution and noninvasive imaging of gene expression in vivo by positron emission tomography using human sodium/iodide symporter as reporter gene. Hum Gene Ther. 2002;13:1723–1735.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    Ponomarev V, Doubrovin M, Serganova I, et al. A novel non-immunogenic reporter gene for non-invasive imaging in humans: human thymidine kinase type 2 [abstract]. J Nucl Med. 2002;43(5 suppl):70P.
    OpenUrl
  25. 25.↵
    Doubrovin MM, Doubrovina ES, Zanzonico P, et al. In vivo imaging and quantitation of adoptively transferred human antigen-specific T cells transduced to express a human norepinephrine transporter gene. Cancer Res. 2007;67:11959–11969.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    Ponomarev V, Doubrovin M, Lyddane C, et al. Imaging TCR-dependent NFAT-mediated T-cell activation with positron emission tomography in vivo. Neoplasia. 2001;3:480–488.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    Radu CG, Shu CJ, Nair-Gill E, et al. Molecular imaging of lymphoid organs and immune activation by positron emission tomography with a new [18F]-labeled 2′-deoxycytidine analog. Nat Med. 2008;14:783–788.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    Su H, Forbes A, Gambhir SS, Braun J. Quantitation of cell number by a positron emission tomography reporter gene strategy. Mol Imaging Biol. 2004;6:139–148.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    Su H, Chang DS, Gambhir SS, Braun J. Monitoring the antitumor response of naive and memory CD8 T cells in RAG1−/− mice by positron-emission tomography. J Immunol. 2006;176:4459–4467.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  • Received for publication October 6, 2008.
  • Accepted for publication March 10, 2009.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 50 (7)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 50, Issue 7
July 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Nuclear Imaging of Cancer Cell Therapies
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Nuclear Imaging of Cancer Cell Therapies
Vladimir Ponomarev
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jul 2009, 50 (7) 1013-1016; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.109.064055

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Nuclear Imaging of Cancer Cell Therapies
Vladimir Ponomarev
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jul 2009, 50 (7) 1013-1016; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.109.064055
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • EX VIVO RADIOLABELING FOR NUCLEAR IMAGING
    • FUNCTIONAL IMAGING OF CELLS
    • QUANTITATION OF ADOPTIVELY TRANSFERRED CELLS IN VIVO
    • CONCLUSION AND FUTURE CONSIDERATIONS
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Genome Editing of Human Embryonic Stem Cells and Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells With Zinc Finger Nucleases for Cellular Imaging
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • From Genome to Phenome: Opportunities and Challenges of Molecular Imaging
  • Imaging the Activity of Efflux Transporters at the Blood–Brain Barrier in Neurologic Diseases: Radiotracer Selection Criteria
  • Molecular Imaging of Pulmonary Fibrosis
Show more Focus on Molecular Imaging

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire