|
|
|||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Basic Science Investigation |
1 Department of Nuclear Medicine, Tumor Immunity Medical Research Center, Laboratory of Molecular Imaging and Therapy of Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; 2 Institute of Radiation Medicine, Medical Research Center, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea; 3 Laboratory of Nuclear Medicine, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Science, Seoul, Korea; and 4 Kyungpook National University College of Nature Sciences, Daegu, Korea
Correspondence: For correspondence or reprints contact: June-Key Chung, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 28 Yongon-dong, Chongno-gu, Seoul, 110-744, Korea. E-mail: jkchung{at}plaza.snu.ac.kr
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: hypoxia hypoxia-inducible factor-1 molecular imaging sodium iodide symporter luciferase
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
, whose expression is dependent on cellular oxygen level, and a constitutively expressed HIF-1β (aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator) (1–3).
HIF-1
reacts quite differently at different cellular oxygen levels. Under normoxic conditions, the von Hippel-Lindau protein recognizes posttranslational modifications caused by iron or the oxygen-dependent hydroxylation of HIF-1
and induces the ubiquitin proteasomal degradation pathway; thus, it blocks the transcription of target genes. On the other hand, under hypoxic conditions, HIF-1
is activated through a multistep process involving its stabilization, nuclear translocation, and heterodimerization with the HIF-1β subunit. In addition, HIF-1
β binds to a cis-acting hypoxia response element (HRE) of the consensus sequence in the upstream site of more than 60 genes, which are also involved in cell proliferation and survival, tumor therapy resistance, glucose metabolism (e.g., glucose transporter 1), angiogenesis (e.g., vascular endothelial growth factor [VEGF]), metastasis, and apoptosis (2,4–7).
HIF-1
can also be upregulated via other mechanisms. For example, the inactivation of the von Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor gene increases HIF-1
stabilization (8), and HIF-1
protein synthesis can be induced in an oxygen-independent manner, such as by the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways, which are stimulated by growth factors, cytokines, and other signaling molecules (4). Cobalt chloride or iron chelators such as desferrioxamine (DFO) also stabilize HIF-1
by blocking HIF-1
posttranslational modification by prolyl hydroxylase (9,10).
Several methods have been developed to measure hypoxia or HIF-1 activation in solid tumors. Commonly used invasive methods include microelectrode oxygen concentration measurements (11), immunohistochemical stainings for pimonidazole (an exogenous hypoxic marker) (12,13), carbonic anhydrase IX (14), and HIF-1
(15). In noninvasive methods, molecular imaging based on nuclear medicine and optical imaging systems offers another approach. Some investigators have tried to visualize tumor hypoxia by imaging 18F-fluoroerythronitroimidazole or 18F-fluoromisonidazole (FMISO) using PET techniques (16). Recently, a cis-promoter reporter gene imaging system was used to visualize hypoxia. 124I-2'-fluoro-2'-deoxy-1β-D-arabinofuranosyl-5-iodouracil accumulates in hypoxic cells that express exogenously the HIF-1
–driven herpes simplex virus type 1 thymidine kinase gene (16). In addition, luciferase (13) and green fluorescence protein (17) have been used for optical imaging.
The sodium iodide symporter (NIS) gene is an imaging reporter gene used in nuclear medicine. NIS is an integral membrane protein and cotransports 2 sodium ions and 1 iodide ion into cells in normal thyroid tissue and in some nonthyroid tissues, such as salivary glands, stomach, thymus, and breast. As compared with conventional PET reporter genes, NIS has several advantages because it has a wide availability of substrates, such as the radioiodine 99mTc-pertechnetate. Moreover, these substrates are unlikely to influence the underlying cell biochemistry and accordingly are not metabolized in most tissues (18). Our groups and others have described the usefulness of NIS in the visualization of molecular–genomic phenomena, including gene expression, nuclear receptor activation, and target cell trafficking (19,20).
The purpose of the present study was to develop an NIS gene system to noninvasively image HIF-1 transcriptional activation in C6 rat glioma. Firefly luciferase (Luc) and human sodium iodide symporter (hNIS) reporter genes were used for bioluminescence and scintigraphic imaging, and HIF-1–specific reporter systems were engineered using the hNIS and Luc genes. These systems were used to compare patterns of reporter gene expression with those of conventional hypoxic markers.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Cell Culture and Hypoxia
C6 rat glioma cells (CCL-107; American Type Culture Collection) were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (Gibco) containing 1% antibiotic-antimycotic solution (10,000 IU of penicillin, 10,000 µg of streptomycin per milliliter, 25 µg of amphotericin B per milliliter [Cellgro], and 10% [v/v] fetal bovine serum [Invitrogen]). Cells were cultured under normoxic conditions (5% CO2, 20% O2, and 75% N2) in a humidified chamber at 37°C or under hypoxic conditions (<1% O2) in a hypoxic chamber, or they were treated with various concentrations (0–400 µM) of DFO for 4–24 h. To evaluate cell viability, normoxic and hypoxic cells were washed with 1x phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), trypsinized and mixed with the same volume of trypan blue solution (0.4%, w/v, in PBS), and immediately examined to determine whether they excluded the dye under light microscopical observation. The number of dead stained cells was counted, and percentage of cell viability was obtained.
Establishment of Stable Cell Lines
C6 glioma cells were transfected with p5HRE-NIS (or p5HRE-Luc) using LipofectAMINE Plus reagent (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Cells were cultured in medium supplemented with 400–850 µg of geneticin per milliliter (Invitrogen) to select stable transfectants for 2 wk. Established clonal lines were screened using 125I uptake assay and bioluminescence assays, and after hypoxia had been induced in a hypoxic chamber (<1% O2) for 24 h the C6-5HRE-NIS or C6-5HRE-Luc clone with the highest iodide uptake and bioluminescent activity was isolated.
In Vitro 125I Uptake Assay
To assess hypoxia-inducible hNIS activity, 125I uptake levels were determined using a modification of the method described by Weiss et al. (22). C6-5HRE-NIS reporter cells were seeded at 1 x 105 cells per well in 24-well plates in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum. After 24 h, cells were treated with DFO at 100, 200, or 400 µM (Sigma Chemical Co.) or exposed to hypoxia (<1% O2) for various times (4, 8, 12, or 24 h) to activate HIF-1
. The cells were then treated with 0.5 mL of Hanks' balanced salt solution containing 0.5% bovine serum albumin, 10 mM 2-[4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperzinyl]ethanesulfonic acid-NaOH (pH 7.3), 10 µM sodium iodide, and carrier-free Na125I (at a specific activity of 3.7 kBq [0.1 µCi]) at 37°C for 30 min. The cells were then washed twice rapidly with 2 mL of ice-cold iodide-free Hanks' balanced salt solution buffer and detached with 0.2% sodium dodecyl sulfate, and radioactivities were measured using a
-counter. Uptake values were normalized versus the percentage of viable cells present as determined by trypan blue exclusion assays.
In Vitro Bioluminescence Assays
Bioluminescence assays were performed using a luciferase assay kit (Tropix). Cells were plated and treated with DFO or incubated in a hypoxic chamber, as described previously. After induction of hypoxic conditions, cells were washed twice with 1 mL of 1x PBS, and lysis solution was then added to each well. Cell lysates were transferred to a microplate, and bioluminescences were measured using a Wallac 1420 VICTOR3 V (PerkinElmer Life and Analytic Sciences). Bioluminescent signals were normalized versus the percentage of viable cells present as determined by trypan blue exclusion assays.
Reverse-Transcription PCR (RT-PCR) Analysis of Transcripts from hNIS, Luc, and VEGF Genes Specifically Targeted by HIF-1
C6 parental cells and C6-CMV-NIS (the expression of the hNIS gene is controlled by CMV independently of hypoxia) or C6-CMV-Luc (the expression of the Luc gene is controlled by CMV independently of hypoxia) cells and C6-5HRE-NIS or C6-5HRE-Luc reporter cells were incubated under normoxic or hypoxic (<1% O2) conditions for 24 h, harvested, and lysed with Trizol reagent (Invitrogen). Total RNA was extracted according to the manufacturer's instructions. cDNAs were synthesized in a final volume of 20 µL using 1 µg of total RNA, 1 µL of random primer p(dN), 4 µL of 5x first strand buffer, 2 µL of 0.1 M dithiothreitol, 1 µL of 10 mM deoxynucleotide triphosphate mix, 1 µL of RNase inhibitor, and 1 µL of SuperScript II reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen). To quantify VEGF and hNIS (or luciferase) messenger RNA (mRNA) expressions (both of which are downstream genes of 5HRE under normoxic or hypoxic conditions), the prepared cDNAs were subjected to PCR by using primers for hNIS (or Luc), VEGF, and β-actin as an internal control. The primer sequences used were as follows:
Western Blotting
C6 and C6-CMV-NIS (or C6-CMV-Luc) and C6-5HRE-NIS (or C6-5HRE-Luc) reporter cells were incubated in a normoxic or hypoxic chamber (<1% O2) for 24 h, washed with PBS, harvested by scraping, and centrifuged at 15,000 rpm, 4°C, for 3 min. Nuclear protein (for HIF-1
) and cytoplasmic proteins (for
-tubulin and hNIS or Luc) were extracted using a NE-PER Nuclear and Cytoplasmic Extraction Reagents Kit (Pierce Biotech) according to a modification of manufacturer's instructions. Protein concentrations were measured using a BCA Protein Assay Kit (Pierce). Proteins (20 µg) were mixed with a sodium dodecyl sulfate sample buffer, boiled at 70°C for 10 min, and separated by gradient (4%–12%) polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (Invitrogen).
After the proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (Schleicher & Schuell) by electroblotting, membranes were blocked with 5% skim milk in Tris-buffered saline (20 mM Tris, 137 mM sodium chloride, and 0.1% polysorbate 20) at room temperature for 1 h. The membranes were then incubated with monoclonal mouse antihuman/mouse/rat HIF-1
antibodies (1:1,000 dilution, Clone 241809; R&D Systems) and monoclonal mouse antihuman NIS (1:2,000 dilution, Clone FP5A; LAB VISION) (23) or monoclonal mouse anti-luciferase (1:1,000 dilution, Clone LUC-1; Sigma) (24) and
-tubulin as an internal loading control (1:2,500 dilution, Clone B-5-1-2; Sigma) for 1 h. After the membranes were washed 3 times with Tris-buffered saline, they were incubated with secondary antimouse horseradish peroxidase–conjugated antibody (1:2,000 dilution) for 1.5 h. Immunoreactive bands were visualized using enhanced chemiluminescence reagents (Roche) and LAS-3000 (Fuji Film).
Generation of Tumor Xenografts in Nude Mice
All procedures involving animals were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Seoul National University and were consistent with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (25).
Three groups of adult male BALB/c nu/nu mice weighing 20 g on average were used to develop in vivo models of tumor tissue hypoxia. The first group (n = 5) was used to visualize DFO-induced HIF-1 transcriptional activity in tumor xenografts using a scintigraphic imaging system (NIS group 1). The second group (n = 4) was used to visualize HIF-1 transcriptional activity in natural hypoxic region by growing tumors using a scintigraphic imaging system (NIS group 2). In NIS group 3, different cell lines were implanted as follows: 1 x 106 C6 cells in the right shoulder, 1 x 106 C6-CMV-NIS cells in the left thigh, and 1 x 106 C6-5HRE-NIS cells in the right thigh (NIS group). Other animals (n = 5) were used to visualize HIF-1 transcriptional activity using a bioluminescence imaging system; 3 different cell lines were injected subcutaneously as follows: 1 x 106 C6 cells in the right shoulder, 1 x 106 C6-CMV-Luc cells in the left thigh, and 1 x 106 C6-5HRE-Luc cells in the right thigh (Luc group).
Tumor xenografts (<1 cm in diameter) had developed 2 wk later, when the mice were imaged to determine prehypoxia (baseline) hNIS and Luc expression levels. The mice were anesthetized by an intraperitoneal injection of ketamine (53 mg/kg) and xylazine (12 mg/kg).
In Vivo Scintigraphic and Bioluminescent Imaging
In the NIS group, 30 min after an introperitoneal injection of 11.1 MBq (300 µCi) of 99mTc-pertechnetate per mouse, the mice were placed in a spread-prone position and scanned with a
-camera (ON 410; Ohio Nuclear) equipped with a 6-mm-sized pinhole collimator.
In the Luc group, mice were injected intraperitoneally with an aqueous solution of the Luc substrate luciferin (5 mg/mouse; Molecular Probes) 10 min before bioluminescence imaging. Mice were anesthetized with isoflurane and transferred into a light-tight chamber equipped with a charge-coupled device camera (IVIS200; Xenogen Corp.) running Live Image software (Xenogen Corp.) to obtain bioluminescent images.
In NIS group 1 and the Luc group, to enhance the transcriptional activation of HIF-1 transiently, hypoxia-mimicking DFO was injected intraperitoneally at 300 mg/kg (26,27). Mice were imaged using a
-camera (or a charge-coupled device camera) 4, 24, and 48 h after DFO administration. In NIS group 2, xenografts were grown up to 2 cm in diameter (for 3 wk) to develop a natural hypoxic region. Scintigraphic images were acquired sequentially during tumor growth.
Biodistribution, Autoradiography, and Immunohistochemistry (IHC)
IHC and autoradiography were performed after tumors had been grown for 3 wk to compare reporter protein expression with hypoxic regions.
In NIS group 2 (n = 4), biodistribution studies, phosphor plate digital autoradiography, and IHC study were performed to compare the intratumoral distributions of 99mTc-pertechnetate and pimonidazole (a chemical adduct that detects tissue hypoxia). Ninety minutes before sacrifice, each mouse in NIS group 2 was administered a 0.1-mL injection (60 mg/kg of body weight intraperitoneally) of pimonidazole hydrochloride (Hypoxyprobe-1 Plus Kit; Chemicon International), according to the manufacturer's instructions (12). Thirty minutes before sacrifice, 99mTc-pertechnetate (about 37 MBq in 0.1 mL) was injected intraperitoneally into each mouse. After sacrifice, the entire tumors were removed, weighed, and measured for radioactivity, and percentages of injected dose per gram (%ID/g) of tumor were calculated. Tumors were then snap-frozen, sectioned into 20-µm (for autoradiography) or 4-µm (for hematoxylin and eosin and IHC) slices, and immunostained with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)–conjugated primary antibody against pimonidazole (1:50) and horseradish peroxidase–labeled secondary anti-FITC monoclonal antibody (1:50) supplied with the kit used (Hypoxyprobe-1 Plus Kit), according to a modification of the manufacturer's instructions as described previously (12).
In the Luc group, mice were sacrificed 90 min after being injected with pimonidazole hydrochloride. Serial sections of C6-5HRE-Luc tumor paraffin blocks were cut at 4 µm, freed of paraffin in HistoClear (National Diagnostics), and rehydrated through decreasing concentrations of ethanol (100% and 95%). After autoclave treatment (3 min at 121°C), endogenous peroxidase activity was quenched with 3% H2O2 in methanol for 5 min at room temperature. This was followed by rinsing in Tris-buffered saline for 2 min at room temperature. To obtain pimonidazole staining, sections were first incubated with an FITC-conjugated primary antibody against pimonidazole (1:50 dilution; Hypoxyprobe-1 Plus Kit) for 1 h at room temperature, then with a horseradish peroxidase–labeled secondary anti-FITC monoclonal antibody (1:50 dilution; Hypoxyprobe-1 Plus Kit) for 30 min at room temperature, as described previously (12). To obtain luciferase staining, sections were first incubated with a goat antifirefly luciferase polyclonal antibody (1:50 dilution; Abcam Ltd.) for 1 h at room temperature, then with a biotin-coupled antigoat secondary antibody (1:500 dilution; DAKO) for 30 min at room temperature. Finally, sections were incubated with streptavidin conjugated with horseradish peroxidase (1:400 dilution; DAKO). To reveal the peroxidase activity, 3,3'-diaminobenzidine was used as chromogenes. Then samples were slightly counterstained with hematoxylin.
Data Analysis
Quantitation of in vivo scintigraphic and bioluminescent images was performed by using an image-analysis program (Multi Gauge, version 2.02; Fuji Film). Regions of interest (ROIs) were drawn on each scintigraphic and bioluminescent image to quantify radionuclide uptake or the optical flux (photons/s) of the target signal. The same size of ROI was selected for comparison. Statistical significances of all in vitro and biodistribution results were determined using a 2-sided Student t test with equal variances. The ROI results for NIS group 2 and the Luc group in vivo imaging were determined using a paired t test. A value of P less than 0.05 was considered significant. All statistical analysis was performed using Excel 2003 (Microsoft).
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
5-fold) increases were observed in C6-5HRE-Luc cells after 12 h of incubation in a hypoxic chamber (Fig. 2C) or after 24 h of treatment with 100 µM DFO (Fig. 2D), compared with that in C6-5HRE-Luc cells after 12 h of normoxic chamber incubation or after 24 h of treatment with 0 µM DFO (P < 0.001 and P < 0.0001 for * and **, respectively, in Fig. 2). Results were normalized versus viable cell numbers. Despite normalization to living cells, the other cells were somewhat damaged by a high concentration of DFO (200 and 400 µM). These damaged cells responded less to hypoxic conditions. Similar patterns of radioactivity (or bioluminescence signal) induction were observed in human hepatoma SK-Hep 1 cells transfected with p5HRE-NIS (or p5HRE-Luc) (data not shown).
|
|
proteins, translocated to the nucleus, increased strongly in reporter cells incubated for 24 h in a hypoxic chamber versus reporter cells under normoxic conditions. In addition, hNIS or Luc expression increased in reporter cells after 24 h of hypoxic chamber incubation, but no change was observed in the expression of
-tubulin, which was used as an internal control. We also observed hNIS (or Luc) mRNA and protein level even under normoxic conditions, suggesting 5HRE promoter leakiness for both reporter gene systems.
Reporter Gene Imaging That Visualized Transcription-Activated HIF-1
In the Luc group, the bioluminescent signal of C6-5HRE-Luc tumors, versus DFO-pretreated images, time-dependently increased. The bioluminescent signal was not significantly elevated in C6 or C6-CMV-Luc tumors (Fig. 4A).
|
|
Biodistribution and Comparison Between Autoradiography and IHC
In the biodistribution of 99mTc-pertechnetate in mice (n = 4) of NIS group 2, C6-5HRE-NIS tumors accumulated more radioactivity (24.82 ± 3.98 %ID/g) than did C6 (2.85 ± 0.59 %ID/g) or C6-CMV-NIS (12.3 ± 3.08 %ID/g) tumors (Fig. 5D) (P < 0.005). Autoradiography of 99mTc-pertechnetate (Fig. 6F) and IHC staining of pimonidazole (Fig. 6D) in C6-5HRE-NIS tumors demonstrated localization of accumulating radioactivity similar to that observed for pimonidazole. In C6-5HRE-Luc tumor sections, patterns of IHC staining were similar for pimonidazole (Fig. 6E) and luciferase (Fig. 6G). However, 99mTc-pertechnetate uptake was low in control C6 gliomas (Fig. 6A) stained negatively for Luc. The results of autoradiography and IHC implied that hNIS or Luc reporter genes were specifically expressed in hypoxic regions.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The establishment of an HIF-1–specific reporter system was confirmed by in vitro experiments. Western blot analysis using HIF-1
nuclear protein verified that posttranslationally modified HIF-1
protein was translocated to the nucleus under hypoxic conditions. RT-PCR demonstrated the increased expression of HIF-1–induced nuclear or bioluminescent imaging reporter genes (hNIS or Luc) and of hypoxia response genes, such as VEGF. The increased activity of functional translated reporter proteins was monitored under hypoxia by measuring radioactivity and bioluminescent intensity. Although many experiments have found no detectable increase in HIF-1
mRNA under hypoxic conditions, the mRNA levels of many hypoxia-responsive target genes were found to be significantly elevated (28,29); thus, there was no need to confirm the transcriptional regulation of the HIF-1
gene under hypoxic conditions in the present study.
In vivo scintigraphy and bioluminescence images showed elevated HIF-1 transcriptional activity after DFO treatment. In addition, in line with natural tumor growth, scintigraphy showed increased C6-5HRE-NIS, compared with C6-CMV-NIS, tumor radioactivity. These results hold true in in vitro as well as in vivo studies (data not shown).
However, our reporter systems still have some limitations. At first, our reporter system showed a leaky reporter gene expression even under normoxic conditions. Harada et al. constructed a Luc gene fused with the oxygen-dependent degradation (ODD) domain, which is controlled under the 5HRE promoter (5HREp-ODD-Luc), to improve this problem of the promoter leakiness of a 5HRE promoter (30). Second, the CMV promoter, compared with the 5HRE construct, had a weak signal in vitro and in vivo. The reason might be that it takes a long time to establish C6-CMV-Luc or C6-CMV-NIS stable cells, which undergo more passages than C6-5HRE-Luc or C6-5HRE-NIS cells. We already reported that gene silencing based on methylation of CpG sites and histone deacetylation in CMV constructs might result in the decrease of transgene hNIS gene expression after several passages and could be reversed by DNA demethylation and histone deacetylation inhibition (31). Third, the low sensitivity of NIS reporter genes explains the lack of a significant increase in DFO-induced scintigraphic images versus DFO-induced bioluminescent images (19,32). And the higher accumulations of 99mTc-pertechnetate observed in naturally occurring hypoxic tumors, compared with DFO-induced tumors in the NIS group, is probably explained by the different effects of long-term hypoxia for 1 wk and transient DFO treatment. There appeared to be a yet undefined threshold of HIF-1 activation below which p5HRE-NIS expression was not detected, and we did not confirm that the degree of HIF-1 activation is correlated with the degree of promoter activation.
Two different imaging systems, which have their own advantages and disadvantages, were used with the hNIS and Luc reporter genes. Although bioluminescence imaging is technically simple and highly sensitive with minimal background interference (19,32), it is of limited use in large-animal studies, especially in human applications, because of light absorption by tissue (33). On the other hand, the nuclear medicine imaging reporter gene NIS is applicable in large animals and humans. Moreover, although NIS has low sensitivity, compared with the luciferase system, it has advantages such as ready availability and no requirement for complicated radiochemistry of its substrates, such as radioiodine or 99mTc-pertechnetate, which can be used in place of iodide. In addition, the metabolic clearances of these substrates are well understood, and these substrates are known not to induce an immune response (18).
In this study, ex vivo immunohistochemical staining and autoradiography suggested that increased imaging signals, that is, radioactivities and bioluminescent intensities, in tumors were induced by increased imaging reporter gene expressions, which were stimulated under hypoxic conditions. Autoradiography and IHC of C6-5HRE-NIS tumors demonstrated that the localization of accumulated radioactivity was similar to that of pimonidazole (the hypoxic region), which implies that the hNIS reporter system controlled by 5HRE specifically undergoes transcriptional regulation via HIF-1 activation. The immunostaining study of C6-5HRE-Luc tumors showed concordance between luciferase and pimonidazole staining findings and thus demonstrated Luc gene expression in hypoxic tumor regions.
Visualization of hypoxic tumors is quite important in the management of cancer with chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Hypoxic tumors are usually resistant to chemotherapy or radiotherapy. In the visualization of tumor hypoxia, these reporter imaging systems differ in several aspects from conventional hypoxic PET images obtained using 18F-fluoromisonidazole, 60Cu-diacetyl-bis(N4-methythiosemicarbazone), or others, which concern binding to macromolecules in hypoxic cells. In our system, exogenous gene transfection is needed, which presents difficulties in practice. However, hypoxic PET images can visualize hypoxic areas only and tissue hypoxia is only 1 stimulator of HIF-1 activation. Several other tumor factors, such as growth factors, cytokines, and reactive oxygen species induced by ionizing radiation (34,35), also stimulate HIF-1
activation. These factors control the transcriptions of several genes involved in cancer biology, for example, in angiogenesis, cell survival, glucose metabolism, and invasion (4). In addition, it has been suggested that not only hypoxia but also sensitivity of tumor vasculature to radiation is a major determinant of response to radiotherapy. Successful radiotherapy is dependent on the destruction of the tumor-feeding vasculature, as the survival of tumors is highly reliant on vessels. Activation of HIF-1 itself leads to radioresistance by inducing the expression of VEGF, erythropoietin, transforming growth factor-β3, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, and transferrin genes, which are highly active in angiogenesis. Moreover, radiotherapy upregulates HIF-1 levels and activity of tumor cells because of reactive oxygen species by radiation-induced tumor reoxygenation (34). Therefore, the visualization and tumor therapy targeting for HIF-1 activation is more important than that for hypoxia itself when assessing cancer behavior. Reporter gene imaging might offer a novel means of investigating molecular–genomic events in cancer.
| CONCLUSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
is a negative factor for tumor therapy. Oncogene. 2003;22:3213–3220.[CrossRef][Medline]
targeted for VHL-mediated destruction by proline hydroxylation: implications for O2 sensing. Science. 2001;292:464–468.
in response to early myocardial ischemia. J Forensic Sci. 2006;51:120–124.[CrossRef][Medline]
: posttranscriptional regulation and conformational change by recruitment of the Arnt transcription factor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94:5667–5672.Related articles in JNM:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C.-H. Hsieh, J.-W. Kuo, Y.-J. Lee, C.-W. Chang, J. G. Gelovani, and R.-S. Liu Construction of Mutant TKGFP for Real-Time Imaging of Temporal Dynamics of HIF-1 Signal Transduction Activity Mediated by Hypoxia and Reoxygenation in Tumors in Living Mice J. Nucl. Med., December 1, 2009; 50(12): 2049 - 2057. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. S. Dothager and D. Piwnica-Worms Molecular Imaging of Pulmonary Disease In Vivo Proceedings of the ATS, August 15, 2009; 6(5): 403 - 410. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | RSS | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY | THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE |