Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
OtherLetters to the Editor

Reply: Feasibility of Automated Partial-Volume Correction of SUVs in Current PET/CT Scanners: Can Manufacturers Provide Integrated, Ready-to-Use Software?

Irène Buvat, Stephen L. Bacharach and Marine Soret
Journal of Nuclear Medicine June 2008, 49 (6) 1032-1033; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.108.051334
Irène Buvat
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stephen L. Bacharach
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marine Soret
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

REPLY: We appreciate our colleagues' observations about corrections for the partial-volume effect (PVE) in PET. They have brought up an important and timely issue—whether PET/CT manufacturers could offer PVE corrections as part of their clinical software. We agree that even if no perfectly accurate PVE correction has been designed so far, many possibilities do exist to reduce the bias introduced by PVE without substantially increasing variability (1). As mentioned in our review paper, by showing the anatomic support of functional abnormalities, fused PET/CT images (and soon PET/MR images) make it possible to implement simple PVE corrections, such as those based on recovery coefficients (2,3). Simpler corrections that do not even require any assumption regarding the contours of the functional abnormalities (4) are also available. Even if such corrections remain approximate, having them available could provide the user with an extremely valuable tool to assess the reliability of the SUV estimates, permitting computation of the SUV both with and without PVE correction, similar to showing both attenuation-corrected and non–attenuation-corrected images.

Having both the corrected and uncorrected SUV indices available to the physicians would seem to be a great step forward toward a sounder quantitative interpretation of the images. This is true even if the corrections might be only approximate. As mentioned in the letter of Drs. Basu and Alavi, this is especially true in the context of patient monitoring, an area in which changes in SUV estimates have to be interpreted as either real physiologic changes or simply the result of a change in the PVE (e.g., due to changes in tumor size). The crucial role that PET/CT is likely to play in patient monitoring should provide strong motivation to address the challenging issue of providing PVE-corrected indices (or still better, PVE-corrected images) and, ultimately, even to provide corrections for motion-induced PVEs.

Footnotes

  • COPYRIGHT © 2008 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine, Inc.

References

  1. 1.↵
    Soret M, Bacharach SL, Buvat I. Partial-volume effect in PET tumor imaging. J Nucl Med. 2007;48:932–945.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    Geworski L, Knopp BO, Levi de Cabrejas M, Knapp WH, Munz DL. Recovery correction for quantitation in emission tomography: a feasibility study. Eur J Nucl Med. 2000;27:161–169.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    Hickeson M, Yun M, Matthies A, et al. Use of a corrected standardized uptake value based on the lesion size on CT permits accurate characterization of lung nodules on FDG-PET. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2002;29:1639–1647.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    Teo B-K, Seo Y, Bacharach SL, et al. Partial-volume correction in PET: validation of an iterative postreconstruction method with phantom and patient data. J Nucl Med. 2007;48:802–810.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 49 (6)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 49, Issue 6
June 2008
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Reply: Feasibility of Automated Partial-Volume Correction of SUVs in Current PET/CT Scanners: Can Manufacturers Provide Integrated, Ready-to-Use Software?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Reply: Feasibility of Automated Partial-Volume Correction of SUVs in Current PET/CT Scanners: Can Manufacturers Provide Integrated, Ready-to-Use Software?
Irène Buvat, Stephen L. Bacharach, Marine Soret
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jun 2008, 49 (6) 1032-1033; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.108.051334

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Reply: Feasibility of Automated Partial-Volume Correction of SUVs in Current PET/CT Scanners: Can Manufacturers Provide Integrated, Ready-to-Use Software?
Irène Buvat, Stephen L. Bacharach, Marine Soret
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jun 2008, 49 (6) 1032-1033; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.108.051334
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Business Model Beats Science and Logic: Dosimetry and Paucity of Its Use
  • Determining PSMA-617 Mass and Molar Activity in Pluvicto Doses
  • The Value of Functional PET in Quantifying Neurotransmitter Dynamics
Show more Letters to the Editor

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire