Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
OtherLetters to the Editor

Optical Imaging: Skin Cancer Imaging

Nizar A. Mullani and Roger G. O'Neil
Journal of Nuclear Medicine June 2008, 49 (6) 1031; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.108.051185
Nizar A. Mullani
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Roger G. O'Neil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

TO THE EDITOR: The excellent review article by Luker and Luker (1) on the current and future directions is well done and presents most of the emerging optical imaging modalities—except skin cancer imaging.

Skin cancer is often the stepchild of cancer research and typically does not get the recognition it may deserve. Yet skin malignancies represent the highest number of new cancers reported every year, at over 1 million annually, based on estimations by the American Cancer Society (2). This number represents approximately 40% of all new cancers detected in the United States per year. However, most of these cancers are excluded from cancer statistics published by the American Cancer Society. Therefore, skin cancers, such as basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma, are often ignored or overlooked in discussions of cancer research.

Skin cancer detection is one of the best applications of optical imaging. With recent imaging advancements, optical imaging for skin cancer diagnosis has become an indispensible clinical tool that is used by 22% of dermatologists in the United States (3). Indeed, molecular optical imaging of skin cancer is routinely used clinically for imaging fluorescence from basal cell carcinomas using δ-5-aminolaevulinic acid as a fluorescent probe (4). More recently, molecular optical imaging studies with a fluorescent analog of deoxyglucose (2-(N-(7-nitrobenz-2-oxa-1,3-diazol-4-yl)amino)-2-deoxyglucose) have demonstrated that such probes hold the promise of providing an optical analog of FDG for metabolism mapping of superficial skin cancer (5).

Skin cancer is a powerful application of optical imaging in medicine. Because most skin cancers are located superficially, applying optical imaging methods is not as daunting a problem as imaging deeper cancers, such as breast cancer. Further, optical imaging equipment does not have to be expensive to be medically useful. Devices such as the dermatoscope (6) and DermLite (3Gen, LLC) (7) are inexpensive and, in the case of DermLite devices, can be adapted to provide multispectral and fluorescence imaging capabilities. So, when reviewing optical imaging methods in medicine, one must also consider the important clinical role they play in the diagnosis of skin cancer and treatment follow-up. Unlike most of the applications described by Luker and Luker (1), optical imaging of skin cancer is already being used clinically and could help pave the way for molecular optical imaging in medicine.

Footnotes

  • COPYRIGHT © 2008 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine, Inc.

References

  1. 1.↵
    Luker GD, Luker KE. Optical imaging: current applications and future directions. J Nucl Med. 2008;49:1–4.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Figures 2007. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society; 2007.
  3. 3.↵
    Federman DG, Kravetz JD, Kirsner RS. Skin cancer screening by dermatologists: prevalence and barriers. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2002;46:710–714.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    Szeimies RM, Landthaler M. Photodynamic therapy and fluorescence diagnosis of skin cancers. Recent Results Cancer Res. 2002;160:240–245.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    O'Neil RG, Wu L, Mullani N. Uptake of fluorescent analog (2-NBDG) in tumor cells. Mol Imaging Biol. 2005;7:388–392.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    Braun-Falco O, Stolz W, Bilek P, Merkle T, Landthaler M. The dermatoscope: a simplification of epiluminescent microscopy of pigmented skin changes [in German]. Hautarzt. 1990;41:131–136.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    Arrazola P, Mullani NA, Abramovits W. DermLite II: an innovative portable instrument for dermoscopy without the need for immersion fluids. Skinmed. 2005;4:78–83.
    OpenUrlPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 49 (6)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 49, Issue 6
June 2008
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Optical Imaging: Skin Cancer Imaging
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Optical Imaging: Skin Cancer Imaging
Nizar A. Mullani, Roger G. O'Neil
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jun 2008, 49 (6) 1031; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.108.051185

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Optical Imaging: Skin Cancer Imaging
Nizar A. Mullani, Roger G. O'Neil
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jun 2008, 49 (6) 1031; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.108.051185
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • 176Lu Radiation in Long–Axial-Field-of-View PET Scanners: A Nonissue for Patient Safety
  • Business Model Beats Science and Logic: Dosimetry and Paucity of Its Use
  • Reply to “Routine Dosimetry: Proceed with Caution”
Show more Letters to the Editor

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire