Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
OtherLetters to the Editor

Brain SPECT by 99mTc-Tetrofosmin for the Differentiation of Tumor Recurrence from Radiation Injury

George A. Alexiou, Spyridon Tsiouris, Athanasios P. Kyritsis, Konstantinos S. Polyzoidis and Andreas D. Fotopoulos
Journal of Nuclear Medicine October 2008, 49 (10) 1733-1734; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.108.054494
George A. Alexiou
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Spyridon Tsiouris
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Athanasios P. Kyritsis
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Konstantinos S. Polyzoidis
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andreas D. Fotopoulos
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

TO THE EDITOR: We read with great interest the article by Terakawa et al. (1) concerning the discrimination between tumor recurrence and radiation necrosis by PET with l-methyl-11C-methionine (11C-MET). The authors studied 77 brain tumor patients after surgical excision and radiotherapy; all cases presented with an indication of recurrent tumor (metastasis or glioma) or radiation necrosis on MRI follow-up. The results showed that the mean lesion-to-normal ratio was the most valuable index for differentiating recurrence from radiation necrosis. A mean lesion-to-normal ratio greater than 1.41 provided the best sensitivity and specificity for metastatic brain tumor, and a mean ratio greater than 1.58 provided the best sensitivity and specificity for glioma (1).

Radiation necrosis is a potential long-term complication of radiotherapy or radiosurgery and is usually indistinguishable from true tumor recurrence by means of CT and MRI. Several advanced MRI techniques such as diffusion- and perfusion-weighted imaging and MR spectroscopy have been suggested to have increased sensitivity and accuracy, compared with conventional imaging (2); however, these techniques have certain limitations in cases of mixed necrosis and recurrence, and overlap between tumor recurrence and radiation necrosis groups has also been noted (3).

Functional metabolic imaging by PET and SPECT has been also evaluated. Nonetheless, PET studies are often cost-prohibitive and not widely available. Therefore, there has been much interest in using SPECT as a feasible alternative imaging technique. The major tumor-seeking radiotracers that have been extensively evaluated are 201Tl and 99mTc-sestamibi. Furthermore, several in vitro studies on glioma cell lines have substantiated a potential superiority of 99mTc-tetrofosmin (99mTc-TF) over 99mTc-sestamibi for brain tumor imaging, since 99mTc-TF accumulation is independent of the multidrug-resistance phenotype of the cell (4,5). On the basis of these reports, we investigated the in vivo imaging properties of 99mTc-TF in tumors of the central nervous system. 99mTc-TF is a tumor-seeking diphosphine that does not cross the intact blood–brain barrier, and uptake of 99mTc-TF depends on regional blood flow and cell membrane integrity, thus reflecting cellular metabolic status and viability. We fount that 99mTc-TF could successfully differentiate tumor recurrence from radiation injury (6). We also evaluated the relationship between glioma and meningioma proliferation (as assessed by the immunohistologic index Ki-67 and flow cytometry) and 99mTc-TF uptake. In both tumor types, we verified a strong positive linear correlation between tracer uptake and tumor proliferative potential and aggressiveness (7–9). Furthermore, we reported that 99mTc-TF SPECT could hold a role in differentiating neoplastic from nonneoplastic intracerebral hemorrhage (10). Thus, we propose that metabolic brain imaging by 99mTc-TF SPECT can contribute considerably to the management of patients who undergo radiotherapy and develop new lesions or symptoms. Comparative studies with other metabolic imaging techniques such as 11C-MET would be valuable to evaluate this critical issue.

Footnotes

  • COPYRIGHT © 2008 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine, Inc.

References

  1. 1.↵
    Terakawa Y, Tsuyuguchi N, Iwai Y, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 11C-methionine PET for differentiation of recurrent brain tumors from radiation necrosis after radiotherapy. J Nucl Med. 2008;49:694–699.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    Hollingworth W, Medina LS, Lenkinski RE, et al. A systematic literature review of magnetic resonance spectroscopy for the characterization of brain tumors. AJNR. 2006;27:1404–1411.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    Rock JP, Scarpace L, Hearshen D, et al. Associations among magnetic resonance spectroscopy, apparent diffusion coefficients, and image-guided histopathology with special attention to radiation necrosis. Neurosurgery. 2004;54:1111–1117.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    Le Jeune N, Perek N, Denoyer D, Dubois F. Study of monoglutathionyl conjugates TC-99M-sestamibi and TC-99M-tetrofosmin transport mediated by the multidrug resistance-associated protein isoform 1 in glioma cells. Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 2005;20:249–259.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    Le Jeune N, Perek N, Denoyer D, Dubois F. Influence of glutathione depletion on plasma membrane cholesterol esterification and on Tc-99m-sestamibi and Tc-99m-tetrofosmin uptakes: a comparative study in sensitive U-87-MG and multidrug-resistant MRP1 human glioma cells. Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 2004;19:411–421.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    Alexiou GA, Fotopoulos AD, Papadopoulos A, Kyritsis AP, Polyzoidis KS, Tsiouris S. Evaluation of brain tumor recurrence by 99mTc-tetrofosmin SPECT: a prospective pilot study. Ann Nucl Med. 2007;21:293–298.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    Alexiou GA, Tsiouris S, Goussia A, et al. Evaluation of glioma proliferation by 99mTc-tetrofosmin. Neuro Oncol. 2008;10:104–105.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  8. 8.
    Alexiou GA, Vartholomatos G, Tsiouris S, et al. Evaluation of meningioma aggressiveness by 99mTc-tetrofosmin SPECT. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. May 7, 2008 [Epub ahead of print].
  9. 9.↵
    Fotopoulos AD, Alexiou GA, Goussia A, et al. 99mTc-tetrofosmin brain SPECT in the assessment of meningiomas: correlation with histological grade and proliferation index. J Neurooncol. May 6, 2008 [Epub ahead of print].
  10. 10.↵
    Alexiou GA, Bokharhii JA, Kyritsis AP, Polyzoidis KS, Fotopoulos AD. Tc-99m tetrofosmin SPECT for the differentiation of a cerebellar hemorrhage mimicking a brain metastasis from a renal cell carcinoma. J Neurooncol. 2006;78:207–208.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 49 (10)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 49, Issue 10
October 2008
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Brain SPECT by 99mTc-Tetrofosmin for the Differentiation of Tumor Recurrence from Radiation Injury
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Brain SPECT by 99mTc-Tetrofosmin for the Differentiation of Tumor Recurrence from Radiation Injury
George A. Alexiou, Spyridon Tsiouris, Athanasios P. Kyritsis, Konstantinos S. Polyzoidis, Andreas D. Fotopoulos
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Oct 2008, 49 (10) 1733-1734; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.108.054494

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Brain SPECT by 99mTc-Tetrofosmin for the Differentiation of Tumor Recurrence from Radiation Injury
George A. Alexiou, Spyridon Tsiouris, Athanasios P. Kyritsis, Konstantinos S. Polyzoidis, Andreas D. Fotopoulos
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Oct 2008, 49 (10) 1733-1734; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.108.054494
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Business Model Beats Science and Logic: Dosimetry and Paucity of Its Use
  • Determining PSMA-617 Mass and Molar Activity in Pluvicto Doses
  • The Value of Functional PET in Quantifying Neurotransmitter Dynamics
Show more Letters to the Editor

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire