Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
OtherLetters to the Editor

Intratumoral Spatial Distribution of Hypoxia and Angiogenesis Assessed by 18F-FAZA and 125I-Gluco-RGD Autoradiography

Esther G.C. Troost, Peter Laverman, Johannes H.A.M. Kaanders, Wim J.G. Oyen, Otto C. Boerman and Johan Bussink
Journal of Nuclear Medicine October 2008, 49 (10) 1732; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.108.053777
Esther G.C. Troost
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter Laverman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Johannes H.A.M. Kaanders
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wim J.G. Oyen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Otto C. Boerman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Johan Bussink
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

TO THE EDITOR: With great interest, we read the paper by Picchio et al. (1). The authors applied a double-tracer autoradiography technique for the identification of hypoxia and angiogenesis under ambient conditions and after carbogen breathing in EMT6 xenografts. For validation purposes, the endogenous hypoxia marker hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) was stained immunohistochemically and quantified.

In this comment, we will discuss 2 aspects of the experimental design chosen by Picchio et al.: first, the timing and duration of carbogen breathing, and second, the limitations of using a single xenograft line as a tumor model.

In recent studies using direct partial pressure of oxygen measurement with the OxyLite (Oxford Optronics) system on xenograft tumor models, we have shown that hypoxia decreased within 5 min after the start of carbogen breathing (2). Important in this respect is that Kaanders et al. previously showed that the effect of carbogen breathing on hypoxia decreased after 60 min of breathing time and that prolonged carbogen breathing resulted in a return of hypoxia to baseline levels (3). In subsequent experiments, we analyzed the effect of 60 min of carbogen breathing on tumor hypoxia using 18F-misonidazole (FMISO) autoradiography and immunohistochemical staining of the 2-nitroimidazole exogenous hypoxia marker pimonidazole. We found that the pimonidazole signal intensity decreased significantly after carbogen breathing (in 2 of 3 tumor lines) and that the 18F-FMISO signal intensity decreased slightly, albeit not significantly (4).

Our experimental design and findings differ substantially from those of Picchio et al. (1). In their study, the authors chose HIF-1α as an endogenous marker for tumor cell hypoxia. Also, the carbogen breathing time was, at 4 h, relatively long compared with 60 min in our studies and may have subsequently led to a rehypooxygenation (3). Furthermore, van der Sanden et al. demonstrated that the CO2 component of carbogen can lead to decreased blood perfusion in tumor vessels. This was explained by a steal effect of vessels surrounding the tumor tissue, which may affect tracer uptake and tracer washout (5). These phenomena might explain the discrepancy between the 18F-azomycin arabinoside (FAZA) and HIF-1α results by Picchio et al., as their experimental design included a 4-h period of carbogen breathing. Through vascular shutdown, the 18F-FAZA inflow and accumulation may have been hampered, whereas HIF-1α staining remained positive or returned to baseline levels in response to hypoxia as a consequence of the prolonged carbogen breathing time (4 h).

The use of a single tumor model may limit the generalizability, because recent studies from our laboratory show that the microregional distribution of 18F-FMISO is dependent on tumor model (6). We have identified 3 distinct patterns of hypoxia distribution: ribbonlike, patchy, and mixed (7). By using 18F-FMISO autoradiography and pimonidazole immunohistochemistry, we found that the correlation between the 2 imaging modalities was dependent on the tumor-model–specific microarchitecture. Of the 10 xenografted human head and neck cancer models studied, the 3 tumors with a ribbonlike distribution of hypoxia all showed a good correlation between 18F-FMISO autoradiography and pimonidazole immunohistochemistry. In tumors with a patchy distribution of hypoxia, 18F-FMISO accumulation was detected throughout the tumor section (6).

In conclusion, assessment of tumor hypoxia after carbogen breathing by means of PET depends on the timing and duration of carbogen breathing. Furthermore, the distinct microarchitecture of the tumor model studied affects the extent to which hypoxia can be reduced by carbogen breathing. Therefore, caution must be taken when using PET for hypoxia assessment and hypoxia monitoring during treatment.

Footnotes

  • COPYRIGHT © 2008 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine, Inc.

References

  1. 1.↵
    Picchio M, Beck R, Haubner R, et al. Intratumoral spatial distribution of hypoxia and angiogenesis assessed by 18F-FAZA and 125I-gluco-RGD autoradiography. J Nucl Med. 2008;49:597–605.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    Bussink J, Kaanders JH, Strik AM, van der Kogel AJ. Effects of nicotinamide and carbogen on oxygenation in human tumor xenografts measured with luminescense based fiber-optic probes. Radiother Oncol. 2000;57:21–30.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    Kaanders JH, Bussink J, van der Kogel AJ. ARCON: a novel biology-based approach in radiotherapy. Lancet Oncol. 2002;3:728–737.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    Troost EG, Laverman P, Kaanders JH, et al. Imaging hypoxia after oxygenation-modification: comparing [18F]FMISO autoradiography with pimonidazole immunohistochemistry in human xenograft tumors. Radiother Oncol. 2006;80:157–164.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    van der Sanden BP, Heerschap A, Hoofd L, et al. Effect of carbogen breathing on the physiological profile of human glioma xenografts. Magn Reson Med. 1999;42:490–499.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    Troost EG, Laverman P, Philippens M, et al. Correlation of [18F]FMISO autoradiography and pimonodazole immunohistochemistry in human head and neck carcinoma xenografts. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. April 18, 2008 [Epub ahead of print].
  7. 7.↵
    Ljungkvist AS, Bussink J, Rijken PF, Kaanders JH, van der Kogel AJ, Denekamp J. Vascular architecture, hypoxia, and proliferation in first-generation xenografts of human head-and-neck squamous cell carcinomas. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002;54:215–228.
    OpenUrlPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 49 (10)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 49, Issue 10
October 2008
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Intratumoral Spatial Distribution of Hypoxia and Angiogenesis Assessed by 18F-FAZA and 125I-Gluco-RGD Autoradiography
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Intratumoral Spatial Distribution of Hypoxia and Angiogenesis Assessed by 18F-FAZA and 125I-Gluco-RGD Autoradiography
Esther G.C. Troost, Peter Laverman, Johannes H.A.M. Kaanders, Wim J.G. Oyen, Otto C. Boerman, Johan Bussink
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Oct 2008, 49 (10) 1732; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.108.053777

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Intratumoral Spatial Distribution of Hypoxia and Angiogenesis Assessed by 18F-FAZA and 125I-Gluco-RGD Autoradiography
Esther G.C. Troost, Peter Laverman, Johannes H.A.M. Kaanders, Wim J.G. Oyen, Otto C. Boerman, Johan Bussink
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Oct 2008, 49 (10) 1732; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.108.053777
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Business Model Beats Science and Logic: Dosimetry and Paucity of Its Use
  • Determining PSMA-617 Mass and Molar Activity in Pluvicto Doses
  • The Value of Functional PET in Quantifying Neurotransmitter Dynamics
Show more Letters to the Editor

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire