Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
OtherBASIC SCIENCE INVESTIGATIONS

Nuclear Uptake and Dosimetry of 64Cu-Labeled Chelator–Somatostatin Conjugates in an SSTr2-Transfected Human Tumor Cell Line

Martin Eiblmaier, Rebecca Andrews, Richard Laforest, Buck E. Rogers and Carolyn J. Anderson
Journal of Nuclear Medicine August 2007, 48 (8) 1390-1396; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.107.039990
Martin Eiblmaier
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rebecca Andrews
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard Laforest
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Buck E. Rogers
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carolyn J. Anderson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

64Cu radiopharmaceuticals have shown tumor growth inhibition in tumor-bearing animal models with a relatively low radiation dose that may be related to nuclear localization of the 64Cu in tumor cells. Here we address whether the nuclear localization of 64Cu from a 64Cu-labeled chelator–somatostatin conjugate is related to the dissociation of the radio-copper from its chelator. The 64Cu complex of 1,4,8,11-tetraazacyclotetradecane-1,4,8,11-tetraacetic acid (TETA) has demonstrated instability in vivo, whereas 64Cu-CB-TE2A (CB-TE2A is 4,11-bis(carboxymethyl)-1,4,8,11-tetraazabicyclo[6.6.2]hexadecane) was highly stable. Methods: Receptor binding, nuclear uptake, internalization, and efflux assays were performed to characterize the interaction with the somatostatin receptor and the intracellular fate of 64Cu-labeled chelator–peptide conjugates in A427-7 cells. From these data, the absorbed dose to cells was calculated. Results: 64Cu-TETA-Y3-TATE (64Cu-[1]) and 64Cu-CB-TE2A-Y3-TATE (64Cu-[2]) had high affinity for somatostatin receptor subtype 2 (SSTr2) in A427-7 cells. After 3 h, 64Cu-[2] showed greater internalization (>30%) compared with 64Cu-[1] (∼15%). There was uptake of 64Cu-[1] in nuclei of 427–7 cells (9.4% ± 1.7% at 24 h), whereas 64Cu-[2] showed minimal nuclear accumulation out to 24 h (1.3% ± 0.1%). A427-7 cells were exposed to 0.40 Gy from 64Cu-[1] and exposed to 1.06 Gy from 64Cu-[2]. External beam irradiation of A427-7 cells showed <20% cell killing at 1 Gy. Conclusion: These results are consistent with our hypothesis that dissociation of 64Cu from TETA leads to nuclear localization. Dosimetry calculations indicated that the nuclear localization of 64Cu-[1] was not significant enough to increase the absorbed dose to the nuclei of A427-7 cells. These studies show that 64Cu localization to cell nuclei from internalizing, receptor-targeted radiopharmaceuticals is related to chelate stability.

  • 64Cu
  • targeted radiotherapy
  • somatostatin receptor
  • somatostatin analog
  • dosimetry

Radiolabeled somatostatin analogs have become important agents for molecular imaging and targeted radiotherapy of somatostatin-receptor (SSTr)–positive tumors. Gamma scintigraphy with 111In-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid-octreotide (111In-DTPA-octreotide; OctreoScan, Mallinckrodt) has become the standard method to image neuroendocrine tumors (1,2) and is clinically approved in Europe and the United States. Somatostatin analogs labeled with 111In, 90Y, 177Lu, and 64Cu have been evaluated for targeted radiotherapy of cancer in animal models (3–7), and clinical trials have been performed with 90Y-1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid tyrosine3-octreotide (90Y-DOTATOC) and 177Lu-DOTA-tyrosine3-octreotate (177Lu-DOTATATE) in patients with neuroendocrine tumors with promising results (8–11).

64Cu (half-life = 12.7 h; β+ [17.4%]; β− [41%]) emits both β+ and β− radiation, allowing for the use of this radionuclide in both PET and targeted radiotherapy of cancer. Thus, 64Cu-labeled somatostatin analogs have the potential as dual-use agents for imaging and radionuclide therapy, reinforcing the arsenal of radiopharmaceuticals (12) available to treat SSTr–positive tumors. We previously observed that 64Cu-labeled tumor-targeting agents showed enhanced therapeutic efficacy of an internalizing 64Cu-labeled anticolorectal carcinoma monoclonal antibody (mAb), 64Cu-labeled 1A3, in a tumor-bearing rodent model compared with 90Y- or 131I-labeled mAbs in the same animal model (13,14). We also evaluated the 64Cu-labeled somatostatin analogs octreotide and tyrosine3-octreotate (Y3-TATE) as therapeutic agents. Although we did not observe complete tumor remissions, we did see tumor growth inhibition at relatively low radiation doses to the tumors (465–600 cGy) (6,7).

We previously demonstrated that 64Cu from 64Cu-1,4,8,11-tetraazacyclotetradecane-1,4,8,11-tetraacetic acid-octreotide (64Cu-TETA-octreotide) was significantly localized in the nuclei of AR42J rat pancreatic tumor cells in cell culture, whereas 111In from 111In-DTPA-octreotide was found in the tumor cell nuclei in only very small amounts (15). These data suggested that delivery of 64Cu to the cell nuclei may enhance the therapeutic effect of β-emitting, tumor-targeting copper radiopharmaceuticals. In this study, the effect of the Cu(II) chelator on the delivery of 64Cu to tumor cell nuclei was evaluated to study the intracellular fate of the radiometal in somatostatin analogs, and the potential consequences on cell survival. 64Cu-1,4,8,11-tetraazacyclotetradecane-1,4,8,11-tetraacetic acid tyrosine3-octreotate (64Cu-TETA-Y3-TATE) and 64Cu-4,11-bis(carboxymethyl)-1,4,8,11-tetraazabicyclo[6.6.2]hexadecane-tyrosine3-octreotate (64Cu-CB-TE2A-Y3-TATE) were evaluated in the highly expressing, somatostatin receptor subtype 2 (SSTr2) transfected A427-7 human non–small cell lung cancer cell line (16). We hypothesized that 64Cu from 64Cu-TETA-Y3-TATE, but not from 64Cu-CB-TE2A-Y3-TATE, would dissociate from the complex after internalization by the SSTr2 and localize to the cell nucleus. Here we compared the nuclear localization of 64Cu from 64Cu-TETA-Y3-TATE with that of the more stable 64Cu-CB-TE2A-Y3-TATE and determined the absorbed radiation dose to A427-7 cells grown in cell culture.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Materials

1,4,8,11-Tetraazacyclotetradecane-1,4,8,11-tetraacetic acid (TETA) was obtained from Macrocyclics, and 4,11-bis(carboxymethyl)-1,4,8,11-tetraazabicyclo[6.6.2]hexadecane (CB-TE2A) was provided by Gary Weisman from the University of New Hampshire (17). Y3-TATE was synthesized and conjugated to TETA and CB-TE2A by CSBio using previously published methods (17). All reagents for receptor-binding assays were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich.

The stable transfection of A427 non–small lung cancer cells with SSTr2 has been described elsewhere (16). A427-7 cell medium (minimum essential Eagle medium in Earle's balanced salt solution) was obtained from Gibco and supplemented with 1 mM nonessential amino acids (Sigma-Aldrich), 10 mM sodium pyruvate (Sigma-Aldrich), and 10% fetal bovine serum (Gibco).

Radiochemistry

TETA-Y3-TATE [1] (1 μg) was labeled with 19–74 MBq (0.5–2 mCi) of [64Cu]cupric acetate by incubation in 100–150 μL of 0.1 M ammonium acetate (pH 5.5) for 1 h at room temperature (RT) as previously described to yield 64Cu-TETA-Y3-TATE (64Cu-[1]) (7). 64Cu-CB-TE2A-Y3-TATE (64Cu-[2]) was produced by incubating 1 μg of CB-TE2A-Y3-TATE [2] with 9–37 MBq (0.25–1 mCi) of [64Cu]cupric acetate in 100–150 μL of 0.1 M ammonium acetate (pH 8.0) for 1.5 h at 95°C as previously described (17). Radiochemical purity was confirmed by radio-thin layer chromatography (radio-TLC) (C18 plate; mobile phase, 10% ammonium acetate:methanol = 3:7). natCuCl2 was used to synthesize natCu-[1] and natCu-[2] from [1] and [2] under identical conditions.

Receptor-Binding Assays

A427-7 cell membrane preparations for binding assays were prepared as previously described (16). Assays were performed on a 96-well Multiscreen Durapore filtration plate (Millipore) using methods previously described with some modifications (17). Membranes were diluted in binding buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 5 mM MgCl2·6 H2O, 0.1% bovine serum albumin [BSA], 0.5 μg/mL aprotinin, 200 μg/mL bacitracin, 10 μg/mL leupeptin, and 10 μg/mL pepstatin A), and 5–30 μg of membrane protein were used per well. In competitive binding assays, 64Cu-[1] or 64Cu-[2] were displaced with increasing concentrations (0.01 nM–1 μM) of natCu-[1] or natCu-[2], respectively. In saturation binding assays, increasing concentrations (0.05–15 nM) of 64Cu-[1] or 64Cu-[2] were added to membranes to measure total binding, and nonspecific binding was determined by conducting the assay in the presence of an excess (200 nM) of [1] or [2]. After incubation at RT for 2 h, the medium was removed with a vacuum manifold, and the membranes were washed twice with 200 μL binding buffer. OptiPhase Super-Mix (Perkin Elmer) (25 μL) was added to each well, and bound activity was measured with a 1450 Microbeta liquid scintillation and luminescence counter (Perkin Elmer). In competitive binding assays, 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) values were estimated from nonlinear curve fitting of bound peptide versus the sum of the concentrations of 64Cu- and natCu-labeled peptide using Prism (GraphPad) software. In saturation binding assays, specific binding was obtained by subtraction of nonspecific binding from total binding. Maximum binding capacities (Bmax) were estimated from nonlinear curve fitting of specific binding versus the concentration of 64Cu-labeled peptide using Prism.

Nuclear Localization

64Cu-[1] or 64Cu-[2] was added to A427-7 cells in T-175 culture flasks (∼107 cells/flask, ligand:receptor = 1:10 based on the respective Bmax). Cells were incubated at 37°C for various time periods, after which the medium was removed, cells were washed carefully with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and were removed from the flask with a cell scraper tool. A427-7 nuclei were isolated as described previously (15). 64Cu activity in the nuclear fraction, the lysate supernatant, and the medium was measured with a Beckman 8000 automated well-type gamma counter. The percentage in the nucleus was determined by the gamma counts in the pure nuclei divided by the gamma counts associated with whole cells. Aliquots of nuclei were assayed qualitatively for purity by fluorescence microscopy after staining with fluorescein isothiocyanate ([FITC] 3 μg/mL) and propidium iodide (7 μg/mL) as described previously (15).

Internalization and Efflux Profiles

64Cu-[1] or 64Cu-[2] (5–50 pmol) was added to A427-7 cells cultured at 37°C in 6-well plates (∼5 · 105 cells/well). Internalization during a pulse of 4 h and efflux of the radioactivity during the 20 h after the pulse were monitored. At various time points, the medium was aspirated and the cells were washed twice with 1 mL Hanks' buffered salt solution (HBSS) and incubated for 10 min at 37°C in 1 mL HBSS supplemented with 20 mM sodium acetate (pH 4.0) to remove peptide bound to the cell surface. The cells were lysed by incubation with 0.5% sodium dodecyl sulfate in PBS (80°C, 30 min). 64Cu activities in the medium, the cell-surface wash, and the cell lysate were measured with a gamma counter.

External Beam Irradiation

A427-7 cells were plated in T25 flasks and 24 h later were irradiated at 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 Gy using a PANTAK pmc1000 x-ray machine at a dose rate of ∼0.9 cGy/min. The cells were immediately trypsinized and counted, and different cell numbers were seeded on p60 plates in triplicate. The cells were grown for 12 d to allow for colony formation and then fixed with ethanol and stained with crystal violet. Colonies (>50 cells) were counted and the data were normalized to the cells that were not irradiated.

Dosimetry

Internalization/efflux data were replotted in disintegrations per second per cell (dps/cell), and disintegrations per cell over the course of the experiment were calculated from the area-under-curve function of GraphPad Prism. To the total number of disintegrations was added the number of disintegrations past the last time point (24 h) assuming only physical decay (no biologic washout from the cell surface or nucleus). The absorbed dose to whole cells and to the nuclei was calculated from the total number of decays by a linear combination of S values and disintegration numbers (using cellular S values for 64Cu, and a cell radius of 10 μm and a nuclear radius of 9 μm) (18). MIRD methodology for cellular dosimetry considers either the whole cell as the source organ or the cell surface, the cytoplasm, and the nucleus. In this experiment, the cytoplasm activity was provided by the difference between the measured internalized activity and the activity assigned to the nucleus. The total absorbed dose to the cell nucleus is provided by:Mathand the absorbed radiation dose to the whole cell is:Mathwhere ACy, AC, ACS, and AN are the total number of disintegrations in the cytoplasm, in the whole cell, at the cell surface, and in the nucleus. The S(target organ ← source organ) are the cellular S values in Gy/Bq·s. These calculations were made with the assumption that the absorbed dose from decay occurring in a neighboring cell does not contribute to the total dose of a given cell. This assumption is justified here as the experiment was performed in a single-layer cell culture and the distance is relatively large.

RESULTS

Radiochemistry

Radiolabeling of TETA-Y3-TATE [1] and CB-TE2A-Y3-TATE [2] with 64Cu produced 64Cu-TETA-Y3-TATE (64Cu-[1]) and 64Cu-CB-TE2A-Y3-TATE (64Cu-[2]) with ≥95% radiochemical purity as determined by radio-TLC. The Rf values for these compounds were significantly different (0.79 ± 0.01, n = 6, for 64Cu-[1]; 0.63 ± 0.01, n = 7, for 64Cu-[2]; P < 0.0001).

Receptor Binding

Competitive and saturation receptor-binding assays were performed to examine the interaction of both somatostatin analogs with SSTr2 on transfected A427-7 cells. Assays were conducted using isolated A427-7 cell membranes with a defined amount of membrane protein (5–30 μg/well). In competitive receptor-binding experiments, 64Cu-[1] (0.070 nM) and 64Cu-[2] (0.057 nM) were displaced from A427-7 membranes by increasing concentrations of natCu-[1] and natCu-[2], respectively. The IC50 values for both compounds were not significantly different: 4.87 ± 1.11 nM for 64Cu-[1] and 3.71 ± 1.09 nM for 64Cu-[2].

The binding constants (Kd) were not significantly different (0.22 ± 0.02 nM, n = 3, for 64Cu-[1]; 0.61 ± 0.24 nM, n = 3, for 64Cu-[2]; P = 0.18) and were found to be in the expected range for somatostatin analogs (17). Even though the maximum binding capacities (Bmax) were not statistically significantly different (5,440 ± 1,110 fmol/mg, n = 3, for 64Cu-[1]; 11,400 ± 1,960 fmol/mg, n = 3, for 64Cu-[2]; P = 0.06), there was a clear tendency to higher values for 64Cu-[2]. This phenomenon has been observed previously with AR42J cells for these 2 compounds (17). Plots of the competitive and representative saturation binding experiments are shown in Figure 1, and Table 1 summarizes the receptor-binding parameters for both compounds.

FIGURE 1. 
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1. 

Receptor binding of 64Cu-TETA-Y3-TATE (▪: IC50 = 4.87 ± 1.11 nM, Kd = 0.22 ± 0.02 nM, Bmax = 5,440 ± 1,110 fmol/mg) and 64Cu-CB-TE2A-Y3-TATE (▴: IC50 = 3.71 ± 1.09 nM, Kd = 0.61 ± 0.24 nM, Bmax = 11,400 ± 1,960 fmol/mg) to A427-7 cell membranes. (A) and (B) Competitive receptor binding. (C) and (D) Representative saturation binding experiments. Insets: Scatchard plots.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

Receptor-Binding Parameters for 2 Somatostatin Analogs and SSTr2 of A427-7 Human Non–Small Cell Lung Carcinoma Cells

Nuclear Localization of 64Cu from [1] and [2] in A427-7 Nuclei

A427-7 cells were continuously incubated with 64Cu-[1] or 64Cu-[2]. 64Cu activity in the media, whole cells, cell lysates, and cell nuclei was measured at various time points. Figure 2 depicts the localization of 64Cu from 64Cu-[1] and 64Cu-[2] in A427-7 nuclei. The rate of internalization differed substantially for the 2 compounds (data not shown) (17), with 64Cu-[2] entering the cells faster than 64Cu-[1]. To correct for this increased uptake of 64Cu-[2], the data are plotted as the percentage of cell-associated activity (% CAA) rather than the percentage initial dose (%ID). Whereas incubation with 64Cu-[2] did not lead to accumulation of 64Cu in the nuclear fraction (1.3% ± 0.1% CAA at 24 h), there was considerable uptake of 64Cu-[1] in the nuclei of A427-7 cells (9.4% ± 1.7% CAA at 24 h). This nuclear uptake was low initially and increased substantially after the first 12 h of the experiment. These results are consistent with our hypothesis of dissociation of 64Cu from the TETA chelator in 64Cu-[1], but not from CB-TE2A in 64Cu-[2], before 64Cu trafficking to the cell nucleus.

FIGURE 2. 
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2. 

Nuclear uptake of 64Cu-TETA-Y3-TATE (▪) and 64Cu-CB-TE2A-Y3-TATE (▴) shown as percentage of cell-associated activity (% CAA) located in A427-7 nuclei (n = 2–4 for 1-, 2-, 4-, 6-, and 12-h time points; n = 5 for 18-h time point; n = 6 for 24-h time point).

Samples of isolated nuclei were treated with FITC, which stains protein, and propidium iodide, which stains nucleic acids, to confirm purity. As previously demonstrated (15), no visible cellular debris was detected in the nuclear fractions (data not shown).

Internalization and Efflux Profiles

A427-7 cells were incubated with 50 pmol (5.44 kBq/pmol [0.147 μCi/pmol]) of 64Cu-[1] or 64Cu-[2]. After 4 h, the radiopharmaceutical-containing medium was replaced with fresh medium, and cells were incubated for an additional 20 h. Profiles for the activity internalized into cells and bound to the cell surface are shown in Figure 3A. The amount of 64Cu-[2] bound to the surface of A427-7 cells exceeds the amount of surface-bound 64Cu-[1] at all time points. This finding is consistent with the higher Bmax measured for 64Cu-[2]. As in the nuclear uptake experiments, substantially more 64Cu-[2] than 64Cu-[1] is internalized into A427-7 cells. For both compounds, the amount of internalized activity peaks at 3 h, when the cells' capacity for uptake ends. The decrease in activity after the change to fresh medium is primarily due to the radioactive decay of 64Cu, and not to efflux of either 64Cu-[1] or 64Cu-[2], which can be seen by replotting the data as %ID over time (Fig. 3B).

FIGURE 3. 
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 3. 

Internalization and efflux profiles of 64Cu-TETA-Y3-TATE (▪, internalized; □, surface-bound) and 64Cu-CB-TE2A-Y3-TATE (▴, internalized; ▵, surface-bound) in A427-7 cells shown in kilobecquerels (A) and in %ID (B). 64Cu activity in becquerels derived from 64Cu-TETA-Y3-TATE (▪) and 64Cu-CB-TE2A-Y3-TATE (▴) localized to nuclei of A427-7 cells is shown in C. Vertical line at 4 h in A–C delineates change to fresh medium.

Dosimetry

Internalization/efflux data were replotted in dps/cell to calculate the disintegrations per cell over the course of the experiment, by using the area-under-curve function of GraphPad Prism. Cell numbers were calculated from protein mass as determined by a bicinchoninic acid (BCA) protein assay (Pierce). Several control experiments confirmed that there are ∼1.9 · 106 cells/mg protein for A427-7 cells (data not shown). Nuclear uptake data were used to estimate the percentage of internalized activity that translocated to A427-7 nuclei. Figure 3C displays 64Cu activities in A427-7 nuclei from 64Cu-[1] and 64Cu-[2]. Despite 64Cu-[2] being more efficiently internalized, the amount of 64Cu from 64Cu-[1] entering the cell nucleus is similar to that of 64Cu-[2] at early time points and higher at later time points. Disintegrations per cell were used to calculate the absorbed dose to the whole cell and to the cell nucleus: A427-7 cells were exposed to 0.40 Gy in the case of 64Cu-[1], 0.15 Gy of which can be partitioned to A427-7 cell nuclei. With 64Cu-[2], the respective values were 1.06 Gy and 0.38 Gy (Fig. 4A). The nuclear dose from 64Cu-[2] is higher than that from 64Cu-[1], even though more 64Cu-[1] is transported to A427-7 cell nuclei. This stems from the substantial contribution of cytosolic activity to the nuclear dose (more 64Cu-[2] is internalized; Fig. 3) and from the fact that 64Cu from 64Cu-[1] appears in the nucleus only later in the time course.

FIGURE 4. 
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 4. 

Dosimetry and cell killing by ionizing radiation. (A) Absorbed dose to A-427-7 cells from 64Cu-[1] and 64Cu-[2] during internalization/efflux period; dose to nucleus is indicated in black. (B) A-427-7 cells were exposed to ionizing radiation in an external beam experiment. Absorbed doses higher than 1 Gy are necessary for substantial cell killing.

External Beam Irradiation

The A427-7 cells had a plating efficiency of ∼22%. After exposure to various doses of x-rays, a colony-forming assay was performed and the data were fit using the linear-quadratic model for cell survival (Fig. 4B). These data show that the α/β ratio (the dose at which the linear and quadratic components of radiation damage are equal) for A427-7 cells was 2.5 and the D10 (the dose required to kill 90% of the cells) was 5.6 Gy. The low α/β ratio and the high D10 indicate that this cell line is relatively radioresistant.

DISCUSSION

When designing a radiopharmaceutical for peptide receptor radiotherapy, one of the goals is to maximize damage to the tumor cells. Irradiating the DNA is an effective way to injure and eventually kill cells; thus, a radionuclide that localizes to the cell nucleus of a tumor cell potentially enhances the efficacy of the radiopharmaceutical. This may be especially true for radionuclides whose ranges in tissues are short. 64Cu decays through β+ emission (0.655 MeV, 17.4%), β− emission (0.573 MeV, 41%), and electron capture (0.33 MeV, 0.6%, and 1.68 MeV, 40.5%). There are 2 Auger electrons emitted per decay (840 eV and 6.8 keV), and because of the very restricted range of these low-energy electrons in biologic tissues, nuclear localization of 64Cu could increase the probability of cell killing from DNA damage. Thus far, chelators have been optimized for high stability to increase uptake in target organs and avoid accumulation of the radiometal in nontarget tissues. However, for targeted radiotherapy with 64/67Cu-labeled tumor-targeting peptides or mAbs, the use of a chelator that complexes 64Cu less stably after uptake into the cell could indeed prove to be more efficacious than using a chelator that complexes the copper radionuclide more stably.

We previously demonstrated that 64Cu from 64Cu-TETA-octreotide localizes to the nucleus of AR42J rat pancreatic tumor cells and hypothesized that dissociation of the radiometal from the chelator is the first step in this process. Here, we compare two 64Cu radiopharmaceuticals, 64Cu-TETA-Y3-TATE (64Cu-[1]) and 64Cu-CB-TE2A-Y3-TATE (64Cu-[2]). Y3-TATE–based radiopharmaceuticals are highly specific for SSTr2, have a higher affinity (typically, IC50 < 2 nM (19)), and are more rapidly internalized into cells expressing this receptor than octreotide-based analogs (6,20). 64Cu-[1] demonstrated higher uptake into tumor and other somatostatin–receptor-rich tissues than 64Cu-TETA-octreotide in CA20948 tumor-bearing rats and AR42J tumor-bearing severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) mice (21). We subsequently demonstrated that 64Cu-[2] showed lower nonspecific uptake in blood and liver and greater tumor uptake compared with 64Cu-[1] (17).

We investigated the binding characteristics of 64Cu-[1] and 64Cu-[2] to somatostatin receptors on A427 non–small cell lung carcinoma cells. Several clones of this human tumor cell line are available, stably transfected with and expressing various levels of SSTr2 on the cell surface, without expression of any other somatostatin receptor subtype (16). The IC50 values compare well with those of related somatostatin analogs (19). Here we show an approximately 2-fold increase in SSTr2 density on A427-7 cells (Bmax) for 64Cu-[2] compared with that of 64Cu-[1], whereas we observed a 10-fold higher Bmax value for 64Cu-[2] compared with that of 64Cu-[1] in AR42J cells (17). As AR42J cells express SSTr1, SSTr2, SSTr3, and SSTr5, differences in binding affinities to somatostatin receptor subtypes other than SSTr2 were hypothesized to explain the observed maximum receptor densities, as the assay cannot distinguish between binding to the various subtypes. A427-7 cells only express SSTr2, so here the confounding influence of other receptor subtypes cannot account for the higher Bmax observed for 64Cu-[2], although the difference is not as pronounced in the AR42J cells. The Cu-CB-TE2A moiety of 64Cu-[2] has a charge of +1, whereas the Cu-TETA moiety of 64Cu-[1] is negatively charged due to the presence of 2 extra carboxylic acid groups. This change from a positive to a negative charge on the chelator could have an effect on the binding of the Y3-TATE peptide moiety to the somatostatin receptor, although the Kd was not significantly affected.

64Cu-[1] and 64Cu-[2] differ substantially with respect to the in vivo stability of the 64Cu-chelate, and this has important consequences for the translocation of copper from these compounds to the cell nucleus. The half-life of Cu(II)-CB-TE2A in 5N HCl at 90°C is 154 h, whereas Cu(II)-TETA has a half-life of <5 min (22). In rat liver metabolism studies in vivo, 64Cu from 64Cu-TETA was found to dissociate and to bind to proteins (e.g., superoxide dismutase) at much higher levels than from 64Cu-CB-TE2A (23). Our experimental results with A427-7 cells confirm this stability pattern. In A427-7 cells incubated with 64Cu-[2], there was only minimal 64Cu localization in the nuclear fraction over a 24-h time course, whereas incubation with 64Cu-[1] led to a 6-fold increase over the same time period. We hypothesized that dissociation of 64Cu from the chelator must occur before localizing to the nucleus. Our hypothesis does not take into account the fate of the peptide portion of the radiopharmaceutical within cells, which may be subject to degradation during the internalization pathway—for example, by lysosomal processes. Other researchers have proposed the transport of intact somatostatin radiopharmaceuticals to the nucleus (24), although we demonstrated that the amount of 111In-DTPA-octreotide delivered to AR42J cell nuclei is very small (∼5% of CAA) (15).

The percentages of 64Cu from 64Cu-TETA-Y3-TATE that localized to the A427-7 nuclei at 4 and 24 h (1.3% ± 0.1% and 9.4% ± 1.7%, respectively) were substantially lower than those observed for 64Cu-TETA-octreotide in AR42J cells at the same time points (10% and 20%, respectively) (15). This is not likely due to the use of octreotide versus Y3-TATE, as all nuclear uptake values were normalized to the percentage of agent that was cell-associated. Additionally, the same chelator (TETA) was used for both sets of experiments.

Dosimetry estimates were obtained from the uptake and efflux data (Fig. 3) for 64Cu-[1] and 64Cu-[2] in A427-7 cells. The results (Fig. 4A) show that even with high specific activities of 64Cu-[1] and 64Cu-[2], we were not able to deliver more than 1 Gy to A427-7 cells. Treatment of the cells with external beam irradiation (Fig. 4B) at 1 Gy of radiation dose killed <20% of the cells. A study that used another somatostatin analog (DOTATOC), labeled with the β-emitter 177Lu, achieved approximately 65% cell killing of Capan-2 cells at a dose of 1.53 Gy (25). However, this effect can be attributed only partially to somatostatin receptor-mediated internalization of 177Lu-DOTATOC, because the radiolabeled chelator 177Lu-DOTA itself also caused 53% cell killing of Capan-2 cells at a dose of 1.25 Gy (25). Our experiments with internalized 64Cu-labeled somatostatin analogs show that a low dose was delivered to A427-7 cells, in part because of their large size (diameter = 19 μm). Additionally, the transport to the A427-7 nuclei of 64Cu from TETA-Y3-TATE did not contribute significantly to the dose to the tumor cell nuclei, most likely because the nuclear localization did not increase substantially until the 24-h time point, unlike in AR42J cells, where transport to the nucleus occurred as early as 4 h (15). For these reasons, we chose not to pursue cell-killing experiments in A427-7 cells.

CONCLUSION

The data presented here support our hypothesis that the mechanism of 64Cu delivery to the nuclei of tumor cells by 64Cu-labeled somatostatin analogs after internalization involves dissociation from the chelator followed by translocation to the nucleus. A highly stable 64Cu-CB-TE2A-Y3-TATE (64Cu-[2]) showed very low amounts of nuclear localization compared with the less-stable 64Cu-TETA-Y3-TATE (64Cu-[1]). High levels of internalization were obtained with both compounds; however, only <1 Gy of radiation dose was delivered by either 64Cu-labeled somatostatin analog.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge Susan Adams for technical support and Jesse Parry for technical assistance and helpful discussions. Funding was provided by National Cancer Institute grants 5 R01 CA064475 and R24 CA86307 (production of 64Cu at Washington University School of Medicine), and National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering grant R01 EB 004533.

Footnotes

  • COPYRIGHT © 2007 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine, Inc.

References

  1. 1.↵
    Krenning EP, Kwekkeboom DJ, Bakker WH, et al. Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy with [111In-DTPA-D-Phe1]- and [123I-Tyr3]-octreotide: the Rotterdam experience with more than 1000 patients. Eur J Nucl Med. 1993;20:716–731.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    Krenning EP, Kooij PPM, Pauwels S, et al. Somatostatin receptor: scintigraphy and radionuclide therapy. Digestion. 1996;57(suppl. 1):57–61.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    de Jong M, Breeman WAP, Bakker WH, et al. Comparison of 111In-labeled somatostatin analogues for tumor scintigraphy and radionuclide therapy. Cancer Res. 1998;58:437–441.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.
    Stolz B, Weckbecker G, Smith-Jones PM, Albert R, Raulf F, Bruns C. The somatostatin receptor-targeted radiotherapeutic [90Y-DOTA-DPhe1,Tyr3]octreotide (90Y-SMT 487) eradicates experimental rat pancreatic CA 20948 tumours. Eur J Nucl Med. 1998;25:668–674.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.
    de Jong M, Breeman WAP, Bernard BF, et al. [177Lu-DOTA0-Tyr3]octreotate for somatostatin receptor-targeted radionuclide therapy. Int J Cancer. 2001;92:628–633.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    Anderson CJ, Jones LA, Bass LA, et al. Radiotherapy, toxicity and dosimetry of copper-64-TETA-octreotide in tumor-bearing rats. J Nucl Med. 1998;39:1944–1951.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    Lewis JS, Lewis MR, Cutler PD, et al. Radiotherapy and dosimetry of 64Cu-TETA-Tyr3-octreotate in a somatostatin receptor-positive tumor-bearing rat model. Clin Cancer Res. 1999;5:3608–3616.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    Bushnell D, Menda Y, Madsen M, et al. Assessment of hepatic toxicity from treatment with 90Y-SMT 487 (OctreoTher™) in patients with diffuse somatostatin receptor positive liver metastases. Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 2003;18:581–588.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.
    de Jong M, Breeman WA, Valkema R, Bernard BF, Krenning EP. Combination radionuclide therapy using 177Lu- and 90Y-labeled somatostatin analogs. J Nucl Med. 2005;46(suppl 1):13S–17S.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.
    Pless M, Waldherr C, Maecke H, Buitrago C, Herrmann R, Mueller-Brand J. Targeted radiotherapy for small cell lung cancer using 90yttrium-DOTATOC, an yttrium-labelled somatostatin analogue: a pilot trial. Lung Cancer. 2004;45:365–371.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    Kwekkeboom DJ, Bakker WH, Kam BL, et al. Treatment of patients with gastro-entero-pancreatic (GEP) tumours with the novel radiolabelled somatostatin analogue [177Lu-DOTA(0),Tyr3]octreotate. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2003;30:417–422.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    Froidevaux S, Eberle AN. Somatostatin analogs and radiopeptides in cancer therapy. Biopolymers. 2002;66:161–183.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    Connett JM, Anderson CJ, Guo LW, et al. Radioimmunotherapy with a Cu-64-labeled monoclonal antibody: a comparision with Cu-67. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996;93:6814–6818.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    Connett JM, Buettner TL, Anderson CJ. Maximum tolerated dose and large tumor radioimmunotherapy studies of 64Cu-labeled MAb 1A3 in a colon cancer model. Clin Cancer Res. 1999;5:3207s–3212s.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    Wang M, Caruano AL, Lewis MR, Meyer LA, VanderWaal RP, Anderson CJ. Subcellular localization of radiolabeled somatostatin analogues: implications for targeted radiotherapy of cancer. Cancer Res. 2003;63:6864–6869.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    Parry JJ, Eiblmaier M, Andrews R, et al. Characterization of somatostatin receptor subtype 2 expression in stably transfected A-427 human cancer cells. Mol Imaging. 2007;6:56–67.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    Sprague JE, Peng Y, Sun X, et al. Preparation and biological evaluation of copper-64-Tyr3-octreotate using a cross-bridged macrocyclic chelator. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10:8674–8682.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    Goddu SM, Howell RW, Bouchet LG, Bolch WE, Rao DV. MIRD Cellular S Values: Self-Absorbed Dose per Unit Cumulated Activity for Selected Radionuclides and Monoenergetic Electron and Alpha Particle Emitters Incorporated into Different Cell Compartments. New York, NY: Society of Nuclear Medicine; 1997.
  19. 19.↵
    Reubi JC, Schar J-C, Waser B, et al. Affinity profiles for human somatostatin receptor subtypes SST1-SST5 of somatostatin radiotracers selected for scintigraphic and radiotherapeutic use. Eur J Nucl Med. 2000;27:273–282.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    Lewis JS, Lewis MR, Srinivasan A, Schmidt MA, Wang J, Anderson CJ. Comparison of four 64Cu-labeled somatostatin analogs in vitro and in a tumor-bearing rat model: evaluation of new derivatives for PET imaging and targeted radiotherapy. J Med Chem. 1999;42:1341–1347.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    Lewis JS, Srinivasan A, Schmidt MA, Anderson CJ. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of 64Cu-TETA-Tyr3-octreotate: a new somatostatin analog with improved target tissue uptake. Nucl Med Biol. 1999;26:267–273.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    Woodin KS, Heroux KJ, Boswell CA, et al. Kinetic inertness and electrochemical behavior of Cu(II) tetraazamacrocyclic complexes: possible implications for in vivo stability. Eur J Inorg Chem. 2005;4829–4833.
  23. 23.↵
    Boswell CA, Sun X, Niu W, et al. Comparative in vivo stability of copper-64-labeled cross-bridged and conventional tetraazamacrocyclic complexes. J Med Chem. 2004;47:1465–1474.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    Hornick CA, Anthony CT, Hughey S, Gebhardt BM, Espenan GD, Woltering EA. Progressive nuclear translocation of somatostatin analogs. J Nucl Med. 2000;41:1256–1263.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    Nayak T, Norenberg J, Anderson T, Atcher R. A comparison of high- versus low-linear energy transfer somatostatin receptor targeted radionuclide therapy in vitro. Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 2005;20:52–57.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  • Received for publication January 19, 2007.
  • Accepted for publication May 15, 2007.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 48 (8)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 48, Issue 8
August 2007
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Nuclear Uptake and Dosimetry of 64Cu-Labeled Chelator–Somatostatin Conjugates in an SSTr2-Transfected Human Tumor Cell Line
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Nuclear Uptake and Dosimetry of 64Cu-Labeled Chelator–Somatostatin Conjugates in an SSTr2-Transfected Human Tumor Cell Line
Martin Eiblmaier, Rebecca Andrews, Richard Laforest, Buck E. Rogers, Carolyn J. Anderson
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Aug 2007, 48 (8) 1390-1396; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.107.039990

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Nuclear Uptake and Dosimetry of 64Cu-Labeled Chelator–Somatostatin Conjugates in an SSTr2-Transfected Human Tumor Cell Line
Martin Eiblmaier, Rebecca Andrews, Richard Laforest, Buck E. Rogers, Carolyn J. Anderson
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Aug 2007, 48 (8) 1390-1396; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.107.039990
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Monte Carlo N-Particle (MCNP) Modeling of the Cellular Dosimetry of 64Cu: Comparison with MIRDcell S Values and Implications for Studies of Its Cytotoxic Effects
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • How Sensitive Is the Upper Gastrointestinal Tract to 90Y Radioembolization? A Histologic and Dosimetric Analysis in a Porcine Model
  • 11C-Methionine PET of Myocardial Inflammation in a Rat Model of Experimental Autoimmune Myocarditis
  • Counting Rate Characteristics and Image Distortion in Preclinical PET Imaging During Radiopharmaceutical Therapy
Show more Basic Science Investigations

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire