JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article
Click on image to view larger version.


Figure 4


FIGURE 4.  (A and C) Linear regression analysis (A) showed good correlation between T1 and T2 poststress EFs (y = 0.968x + 1.428; r = 0.95; SEE = 0.03; P < 0.0001), whereas Bland–Altman method (C) showed good agreement between the 2 sets of measures. (B) Similarly, linear regression analysis showed good correlation between T1 and T2 resting EFs (y = 0.961x + 1.641; r = 0.94; SEE = 0.03; P < 0.0001). (D) Bland–Altman method showed shift in mean value of difference of +0.51 ± 4.13.





Right arrow Return to article


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE