The "Results" section of the article "Dual-Time-Point 18F-FDGPET for the Evaluation of Gallbladder Carcinoma" by Nishiyamaet al. (J Nucl Med. 2006;47:633638) contained 3 errors.The fifth sentence of the second paragraph should read "Overall,for visual analysis of gallbladder carcinoma, delayed PET improvedthe diagnosis in 2 patients (6%)." The second sentence of thethird paragraph should read "The sensitivity of diagnosis ofgallbladder carcinoma using semiquantitative analysis of PETimages was improved for delayed imaging and combined early anddelayed imagingin 3 patients (13%) and 4 patients (17%),respectively." The second sentence of the fourth paragraph shouldread "CRP levels were measured in all patients except two."