JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article
Click on image to view larger version.


Figure 3


FIGURE 3.  Time course of 18F-FDG PET in a nonresponder patient (patient 1). (A) Intense 18F-FDG uptake in baseline study clearly depicts irregular tumor mass. (B) Tumor uptake is roughly unchanged in intermediate study (early SUV change, –15%). (C) In presurgical study, tumor volume is reduced but considerable tumor uptake is still present (late SUV change, –23%). This case was graded TRG4.





Right arrow Return to article


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE