JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article
Click on image to view larger version.


Figure 4


FIGURE 4.  Composite ROC curves of the 3 observers. Az values for CT, 18F-FET PET, and 18F-FDG PET were 0.82, 0.93, and 0.95, respectively. Accuracy of observers did not significantly differ (P = 0.71) between 18F-FDG and 18F-FET PET but, in the distinction of carcinomas, was significantly (P < 0.05) greater with either technique than with CT.





Right arrow Return to article


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE