JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article
Click on image to view larger version.


Figure 3


FIGURE 3.  18F-FDG PET MRglc data for age-, sex-, and education-matched control and FAD subjects. Regional MRglc is averaged across hemispheres. Compared with respective control subjects, all FAD subjects show reduced MRglc values. Two FAD subjects with MMSE scores of 27 of 30 (FAD-5) and 25 of 30 (FAD-6) are marked with a white circle and a white diamond, respectively, and 1 FAD subject with questionable impairment (FAD-3) is marked with a white triangle. Note that these subjects were not driving statistical effects. HIP = hippocampus.





Right arrow Return to article


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE