JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Siroos, M.
Right arrow Articles by Horst, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Siroos, M.
Right arrow Articles by Horst, K.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 47 No. 10 1732b-1733
© 2006 by Society of Nuclear Medicine

CT Attenuation Correction Is Clinically Superior to Supine–Prone MPS

Mirzaei Siroos, Knoll Peter and Koehn Horst

Wilhelminenspital, Vienna, Austria

TO THE EDITOR: We read with great interest the paper by Nishina et al. (1). The authors concluded from their study that, compared with supine MPS alone, combined supine–prone quantification significantly improves the specificity of myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) in the identification of obstructive coronary artery disease. Supine acquisition is known to result in diaphragmatic attenuation of inferior wall counts. In our limited experience using the combined supine–prone imaging method, we achieved results similar to those of Nishina et al. indicating that the specificity of MPS for perfusion abnormalities in the posterior wall of the myocardium can be improved. However, we emphasize that in many patients with "true" perfusion abnormalities, cardiac symptoms develop during the stress procedure and—not only in these patients but also in obese patients—the additional prone positioning may be quite inconvenient. Therefore, with the growing number of new devices enabling attenuation correction by means of CT, we suggest that combined SPECT/CT be preferred to the combined supine–prone protocol to improve the specificity of MPS in routine clinical workups (24).

References

  1. Nishina H, Slomka PJ, Abidov A, et al. Combined supine and prone quantitative myocardial perfusion SPECT: method development and clinical validation in patients with no known coronary artery disease. J Nucl Med. 2006;47:51–58.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Dondi M, Fagioli G, Salgarello M, Zoboli S, Nanni C, Cidda C. Myocardial SPECT: what do we gain from attenuation correction (and when)? Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2004;48:181–187.[Medline]
  3. Fricke E, Fricke H, Weise R, et al. Attenuation correction of myocardial SPECT perfusion images with low-dose CT: evaluation of the method by comparison with perfusion PET. J Nucl Med. 2005;46:736–744.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Grossman GB, Garcia EV, Bateman TM, et al. Quantitative Tc-99m sestamibi attenuation-corrected SPECT: development and multicenter trial validation of myocardial perfusion stress gender-independent normal database in an obese population. J Nucl Cardiol. 2004;11:263–272.[Medline]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Siroos, M.
Right arrow Articles by Horst, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Siroos, M.
Right arrow Articles by Horst, K.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE