|
|
||||||||
Clinical Investigations |
1 Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Munich, Munich, Germany
2 Department of Radiology, University of Munich, Munich, Germany
3 Department of Neurology, University of Munich, Munich, Germany
4 Department of Cardiology, University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
50% and luminal narrowing < 50% were visually assessed and characterized by 2 independent observers unaware of the results of MPI. Results: Ninety-nine coronary vessels were analyzed, and the quality of MDCT angiography images was assessed for 330 coronary segments. Coronary artery diameter was interpretable for 231 (70%) of 330 segments, whereas in 99 (30%) of 330 segments, vessel diameter could not be evaluated because of heavy calcifications, blurring, motion artifacts, or intracoronary stents. MDCT angiography detected stenoses
50% in 15 of 100 coronary arteries. Eight (53%) of 15 stenoses
50% showed reversible or fixed perfusion defects in the corresponding myocardial areas on MPI. Sensitivity, specificity, and negative and positive predictive values were 100%, 87%, 100%, and 29%, respectively, for the ability of MDCT angiography to detect reversible perfusion defects in the corresponding myocardial areas. Conclusion: MDCT angiography detected myocardial ischemia, as defined by reversible perfusion defects on MPI, with a positive predictive value of 29% in a nonselected study cohort. Compared with MPI alone, MDCT angiography added important morphologic information, but MPI remains mandatory for evaluating the functional relevance of coronary artery lesions.
Key Words: multidetector CT angiography myocardial SPECT coronary artery disease
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To date, no data have been published correlating MDCT angiography with MPI, both being methods with the potential to serve as noninvasive "gatekeepers" for the performance of conventional coronary angiography. This retrospective analysis compared the accuracies of MDCT angiography and MPI in the detection of perfusion defects referable to hemodynamically relevant coronary artery lesions. As such, this analysis may serve as a pilot study for the use of combined MDCT angiography and MPI for the noninvasive detection and classification of coronary artery lesions.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Myocardial Scintigraphy
A same-day stress/rest electrocardiography-gated MPI protocol was performed on all patients, using weight-adjusted doses of 4 MBq/kg (at least 300 MBq of 99mTc-methoxyisobutylisonitrile) at peak ergometric or pharmacologic stress and 10 MBq/kg (at least 700 MBq) at rest at least 3 h after the first injection.
The ergometric stress test was performed on an electronically braked bicycle ergometer and was terminated according to standard criteria: reaching age-predicted submaximal heart rate (heart rate
[220 age in years x 0.85]), severe chest pain, ST-segment depression > 0.2 mV, severe cardiac arrhythmia, hypertension (>240/120 mm Hg), or a fall of >40 mm Hg in systolic blood pressure. Pharmacologic stress was obtained by administration of 0.56 mg of dipyridamole per kilogram of body weight over 5 min. If systolic blood pressure was >120 mm Hg, 0.8 mg of nitroglycerin was administered sublingually to the patients before injection of the radiopharmaceutical for the rest image.
Gated images were acquired on a triple-head camera system (Prism 3000 XP; Philips) using a low-energy, high-resolution, parallel-hole collimator with a 360° rotation in continuous mode. An electrocardiogram R-wave detector provided a gate to acquire 12 frames per cardiac cycle during the poststress and postrest acquisitions. The summed image set was normalized conventionally for comparison of stress and rest images. For each study, short and long axes were reconstructed. A standardized filter (low-pass fourth-power; cutoff frequency, 0.26) was used.
Scintigraphic stress and rest images were evaluated visually by 2 experienced observers, who reached a consensus on the findings. The observers were unaware of the findings of MDCT angiography but aware of the size, weight, and sex of the patients. Raw data cines, gated SPECT wall motion, and wall thickening were analyzed, and quantitative analysis software (Hermes Perfit; Nuclear Diagnostics) was used for defect detection and quality control. Perfusion defects were allocated to coronary arteries according to the coronary perfusion type of the subject as described previously (27). Defects in the anterior wall and septal region were allocated to the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD); defects in the lateral wall, to the left circumflex coronary artery (LCX); and inferior defects, to the right coronary artery (RCA). Apical defects were considered to be in the LAD region, unless the defect extended to the lateral (LCX) or inferior (RCA) wall. In the watershed regions, the extension of a defect to the anterior, lateral, or inferior wall was decisive for the allocation of a coronary artery to the vascular bed. Furthermore, distinct defects affecting both the LAD region and the LCX region were rated as left main artery (LM) disease.
To ensure that reversible perfusion defects on MPI were true-positive findings, all patients underwent conventional coronary angiography and revascularization therapy in case of coronary artery stenosis.
Spiral MDCT Angiography
The MDCT angiography datasets were acquired using the 12 inner detectors of a 16-MDCT scanner (Sensation 16; Siemens Medical Solutions) and a previously described protocol (15).
In brief, a bolus of 120 mL of contrast agent (Solutrast 300, 300 mg/mL; Altana) was injected intravenously (5 mL/s). As soon as the signal density level in the ascending aorta reached a predefined threshold of 100 HU, the acquisition of the CT data and the electrocardiogram trace was started. Detector collimation was 12 x 0.75 mm; rotation time, 420 ms; and tube voltage, 120 kV at a current of 500 mAs during the diastolic phase of the cardiac cycle, and tube current was reduced by 80% during the remaining phase of the R-R interval, leading to an estimated mean effective radiation dose of approximately 4.3 mSv (28). Images were reconstructed with an acquisition time of 210 ms in diastole 350450 ms before the R wave using retrospective electrocardiogram gating. Motion artifacts can be avoided only in the presence of a heart rate of <65 beats per minute (29); therefore, all patients with heart rates of >65 beats per minute were pretreated with 50100 mg of oral metoprolol 1 h before the scan or intravenously with 1020 mg of metoprolol directly before the scan. The voxel size of the resulting CT images was 0.6 x 0.6 x 1 mm.
The CT datasets were analyzed by 2 independent, experienced readers using a Leonardo workstation (Siemens), who reached a consensus on the findings. In a first step, image quality was determined by the investigators on the basis of the presence of motion artifacts and vessel calcifications. Image quality was graded as excellent (no motion artifacts present), good (minor motion artifacts present), moderate (substantial motion artifacts present, but luminal assessment of significant stenosis still possible), heavily calcified (vessel lumen obscured by calcification), or blurred (only contrast visualization inside the vessel possible; no luminal assessment of significant stenosis possible). Results were documented separately for all coronary segments using a modified American Heart Association classification as described recently by Kuettner et al. (20). Each bypass graft was counted as an additional segment. Sections containing an intracoronary stent could not be evaluated, but the stent location was noted. The observer subjectively identified a prior myocardial infarction by considering blockage of contrast material and decreased CT attenuation. The latter was seen with the help of CT density values (HU), which were measured for areas of suspected infarction and representative noninfarcted areas in the same patient, with standard-sized (1 cm2), circular regions of interest placed over corresponding areas as described previously (30). Suspected areas of myocardial infarction were allocated to respective coronary vessels as described for myocardial scintigraphy.
The readers visually estimated whether stenoses were
50% or <50% and allocated them to the LM, LAD, LCX, or RCA. Bypass grafts were rated as belonging to their respective coronary arteries. Lesion structure was stated as calcified, not calcified, or mixed when appropriate (9).
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
MDCT angiography detected 47 stenoses in 44 of 99 coronary arteries. Stenoses were classified as
50% in 17 of 99 coronary arteries: 1 LM, 9 LAD, 3 LCX, and 4 RCA. Four patients showed myocardial areas with decreased CT attenuation suspected of representing prior myocardial infarction: 3 in the LAD and 1 in the territory supplying the RCA. In 1 of these 4 patients, additional blockage of contrast material was detected just posterior to a
50% stenosis in the middle segment of the RCA (Fig. 1). Stenoses were rated as <50% for 30 coronary arteries: 8 LM, 6 LAD, 5 LCX, and 11 RCA; 3 coronary arteries showed stenoses of both
50% and <50%. In 55 coronary arteries, no luminal narrowing could be detected, nor was luminal narrowing found in any of the 6 bypass grafts. Twenty of the 47 detected stenoses had plaque that was classified as calcified; 23, as mixed; and 4, as noncalcified.
|
Comparison of MDCT Angiography and MPI
Eight (47%) of 17 stenoses
50% as detected by MDCT angiography showed perfusion defects in the corresponding myocardial area on MPI. Five of these perfusion defects were reversible and 3 were fixed. Blockage of contrast material was detected posterior to 1 of these 8 stenoses, as was CT attenuation in the corresponding myocardial area. MPI showed a fixed perfusion defect with residual ischemia (Fig. 1). One patient with stenosis
50% and without blockage of contrast material showed decreased CT attenuation in the supplied myocardial region. In 2 patients with suspected myocardial infarction, no stenosis
50% was found in the supplying coronary artery, but 1 of the 2 patients had an intracoronary stent.
Nine (53%) of 17 stenoses
50% showed no perfusion defects on MPI (Fig. 2). None of the stenoses < 50% as detected by MDCT angiography in 30 coronary arteries was associated with a perfusion defect.
|
Sensitivity, specificity, and negative and positive predictive values for MDCT angiography to detect any perfusion defect in the target area on MPI were 73%, 90%, 96%, and 47%, respectively. Accuracy was 88% (Table 2).
|
50% or <50%, but the perfusion defects could be allocated to the appropriate lesions.
When we focused on the 15 patients without perfusion defects on MPI, MDCT angiography showed 5 stenoses
50% and 22 stenoses < 50% in 25 coronary arteries, and 15 calcified and 12 mixed plaques were registered. The locations of these stenoses and the consistency of the plaque are listed in Table 3. No relationship was found between plaque consistency and the appearance of perfusion defects.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Promising results have been published for MDCT angiography in the detection of coronary artery lesions in patients with suspected CAD. Nieman et al. first reported a high overall sensitivity and specificity of 95% and 86%, respectively, for detecting significantly stenosed branches (
50%) in 59 patients, including only side branches with a diameter
2.0 mm and excluding intraluminal coronary stents because of the known low interpretability (15). Ropers et al. investigated 77 patients and found a worse overall sensitivity of 73% for detecting >50% stenoses. When only evaluable arteries were used, sensitivity increased to 92% in that study, and specificity was 93% (14). Similar results were recently reported by Kuettner et al., who investigated 60 patients and found an overall sensitivity and specificity of 72% and 97%, respectively. When the investigators included only patients with an Agatston score equivalent of <1,000, sensitivity and specificity increased to 98% and 98%, respectively (20).
However, despite improved image quality with 16-MDCT angiography, severe calcifications and higher heart rates as well as intracoronary stents still limit the interpretability of contrast-enhanced visualization of coronary arteries. Consequently, a worse sensitivity of 37% but a high specificity of 99% were reported recently by Kuettner et al. for the ability of MDCT angiography to detect and classify coronary artery stenoses in patients with angiographically proven CAD, who frequently have a higher extent of coronary calcium than do patients investigated for exclusion of CAD (31). Only 57% of coronary artery segments could be judged in that study, a rate even lower than the 70% of interpretable segments in the present study.
All these studies compared the morphologic accuracy of MDCT angiography with that of conventional coronary angiography. To date, no experience has been published on MDCT angiography in the detection of functionally relevant coronary artery lesions, even though the identification of coronary stenoses as functionally relevant has been shown to be a major prerequisite for clinical decision making (32). Thus, the present study retrospectively compared the results of MDCT angiography with those of MPI, which was used as the gold standard for the detection of perfusion defects in cases of hemodynamically relevant coronary artery stenoses. To avoid false-positive MPI results, we determined the correlation between reversible perfusion defects and conventional coronary angiography and, in 5 of 5 patients, found significant stenoses, all of which were eliminated during interventional therapy.
Ninety-nine coronary vessels were investigated in 25 patients with suspected or known CAD, and MDCT angiography showed a high sensitivity of 100% for identifying coronary artery stenoses with a threshold value of 50% lumen narrowing leading to reversible perfusion defects on MPI. The sensitivity with 73% was weaker when MDCT angiography was compared with any perfusion defects detected by MPI, including fixed perfusion defects in cases of prior myocardial infarction. Less experience has been published on MDCT angiography in the detection of myocardial infarction, but it is supposed that both blockage of contrast material and the CT density values of myocardial areas can lead to the diagnosis of myocardial infarction, as was demonstrated by Nikolaou et al. (30). They reported an 85% sensitivity and 91% specificity for the ability of MDCT angiography to detect infarcted myocardial areas in 106 patients, 27 of whom had prior myocardial infarction. Applying these techniques for the identification of infarcted myocardial areas in the present study, we could detect the fixed perfusion defect of 4 of 6 patients on MPI. Two had stenoses
50% and 1 had blockage of contrast material, increasing both the specificity and the positive predictive value of MDCT angiography in the prediction of reversible perfusion defects on MPI and improving differentiation between ischemia and myocardial infarction.
Despite the low positive predictive value of MDCT angiography in the detection of hemodynamically relevant coronary artery lesions without preselection of patients, several arguments exist for performing MDCT angiography as a CAD diagnostic aid. Some investigators have suggested that future cardiac events may be predicted with the help of coronary calcium scores provided by MDCT angiography (1,2,33). Berman et al. recently demonstrated a potential role for applying coronary artery calcification screening after MPI among patients manifesting normal MPI results (34), a concept addressing the presence of subclinical atherosclerosis, which is hypothesized to affect the long-term risk of patients in different CAD risk groups. Pirich et al. recently reported that no significant correlation exists between calcium burden as measured by electron beam tomography and coronary flow reserve as quantified by 13N-ammonia PET (35), leading to the conclusion that such vessel alterations cannot be detected by any form of stress testing, including MPI. In the present study, the 15 patients without perfusion defects on MPI showed 22 stenoses < 50% on MDCT angiography, consisting of 15 calcified and 12 mixed plaques, and no relationship was found between plaque consistency and the appearance of perfusion defects.
Furthermore, subclinical atherosclerosis might affect individual risk stratification and therapy, even if noncalcified plaque components are present (49). Leber et al. recently demonstrated, in 37 patients, that in cases of diagnostic image quality, MDCT angiography permits accurate identification of coronary plaque composition (13). Consequently, MDCT angiography has the potential to identify noncalcified or mixed plaques that are at increased risk for rupture leading to fatal cardiac events, especially those high-risk plaques that are missed by MPI screening because they do not lead to any perfusion defects. Thus, myocardial scintigraphy has been established as highly effective for risk stratification, particularly in patients with an intermediate or high likelihood of CAD, who are represented in the present study. Patients with normal MPI findings have a low risk for cardiac events during short-term follow-up (36,37).
Future investigations will have to clarify how subclinical atherosclerosis will affect both risk stratification and therapy planning, especially in patients with suspected CAD and no perfusion defects on MPI.
Besides detecting noncalcified or mixed plaques without hemodynamic relevance, MDCT angiography could add valuable information to MPI by allocating perfusion defects to specific epicardial coronary vesselsa well-known problem in nuclear cardiology (38,39). Future generations of MDCT angiography scanners with even more detector rows and decreased rotation times will provide improved spatial and temporal resolution and therefore might overcome the current major limitations of MDCT angiographymotion artifacts and impaired visualization of coronary segments that are heavily calcified or contain intraluminal stents. However, when segments or luminal diameters are not interpretable on MDCT angiography, the hemodynamic relevance of lesions can be determined when MPI information is considered. Further studies have to evaluate whether the combination of MPI and MDCT angiography with 2- or 3-dimensional image fusion using separate modalities or hybrid scanners (SPECT/CT) has potential to improve conventional allocation processes. Such a potential has already been demonstrated for the combination of conventional coronary angiography and MPI (4042).
The present study had some limitations. It focused on the potential use of 16-MDCT angiography as a "gatekeeper" of invasive diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in patients with advanced coronary artery disease. Because, according to the current guidelines of the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association, the functional significance of coronary lesions as detected by myocardial scintigraphy or other noninvasive imaging modalities should be decisive for performing invasive diagnostic procedures or coronary interventions, conventional coronary angiography was deliberately not considered the gold standard. Because myocardial scintigraphy has shown high accuracy in the identification of hemodynamically significant coronary stenoses, and because MPI is most frequently used as the "gatekeeper" of invasive procedures for routine clinical diagnostics, 16-MDCT angiography was compared with MPI. The scintigraphic results in the case of reversible perfusion defects were strengthened by implementation of the results of conventional coronary angiography. In all 5 of these patients, conventional coronary angiography confirmed the scintigraphic detection of stenoses of >50%, and interventional therapy was performed. In any event, the preliminary results of this retrospective analysis have to be considered carefully, because it compared an anatomic imaging procedure with a functional imaging procedure. Furthermore, only a small number of patients could be included. Because the use of MDCT angiography is not routine for clinical diagnostics in CAD, we could consider only investigations that had been performed by chance.
| CONCLUSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
For correspondence or reprints contact: Marcus Hacker, MD, Klinik und Poliklinik für Nuklearmedizin der LMU, Ziemssenstrasse 1, 80336 München, Germany.
E-mail: marcus.hacker{at}med.uni-muenchen.de
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Related articles in JNM:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W. B. Meijboom, C. A.G. Van Mieghem, N. van Pelt, A. Weustink, F. Pugliese, N. R. Mollet, E. Boersma, E. Regar, R. J. van Geuns, P. J. de Jaegere, et al. Comprehensive Assessment of Coronary Artery Stenoses: Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography Versus Conventional Coronary Angiography and Correlation With Fractional Flow Reserve in Patients With Stable Angina J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 19, 2008; 52(8): 636 - 643. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Gaemperli, T. Schepis, I. Valenta, P. Koepfli, L. Husmann, H. Scheffel, S. Leschka, F. R. Eberli, T. F. Luscher, H. Alkadhi, et al. Functionally Relevant Coronary Artery Disease: Comparison of 64-Section CT Angiography with Myocardial Perfusion SPECT Radiology, August 1, 2008; 248(2): 414 - 423. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Sato, M. Hiroe, M. Tamura, H. Ohigashi, T. Nozato, H. Hikita, A. Takahashi, K. Aonuma, and M. Isobe Quantitative Measures of Coronary Stenosis Severity by 64-Slice CT Angiography and Relation to Physiologic Significance of Perfusion in Nonobese Patients: Comparison with Stress Myocardial Perfusion Imaging J. Nucl. Med., April 1, 2008; 49(4): 564 - 572. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Dewey, B. Hamm, H-P. Dubel, and W. Rutsch Multislice computed tomography coronary angiography for triaging patients with positive radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging QJM, January 1, 2008; 101(1): 65 - 67. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. J. Mahmarian Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography as an Anatomic Basis for Risk Stratification: Deja Vu or Something New? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 18, 2007; 50(12): 1171 - 1173. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Einstein, K. W. Moser, R. C. Thompson, M. D. Cerqueira, and M. J. Henzlova Radiation Dose to Patients From Cardiac Diagnostic Imaging Circulation, September 11, 2007; 116(11): 1290 - 1305. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. F. Di Carli, S. Dorbala, J. Meserve, G. El Fakhri, A. Sitek, and S. C. Moore Clinical Myocardial Perfusion PET/CT J. Nucl. Med., May 1, 2007; 48(5): 783 - 793. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. J. Bax, S. E. Inzucchi, R. O. Bonow, J. D. Schuijf, M. R. Freeman, E. J. Barrett, and on behalf of the Global Dialogue Group for the Eva Cardiac Imaging for Risk Stratification in Diabetes Diabetes Care, May 1, 2007; 30(5): 1295 - 1304. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. F. Di Carli and R. Hachamovitch New Technology for Noninvasive Evaluation of Coronary Artery Disease Circulation, March 20, 2007; 115(11): 1464 - 1480. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Rispler, Z. Keidar, E. Ghersin, A. Roguin, A. Soil, R. Dragu, D. Litmanovich, A. Frenkel, D. Aronson, A. Engel, et al. Integrated Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography and Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography for the Assessment of Hemodynamically Significant Coronary Artery Lesions J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 13, 2007; 49(10): 1059 - 1067. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Dorbala, R. Hachamovitch, and M. F. Di Carli Myocardial Perfusion Imaging and Multidetector Computed Tomographic Coronary Angiography: Appropriate for All Patients With Suspected Coronary Artery Disease? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 19, 2006; 48(12): 2515 - 2517. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Schuijf, W. Wijns, J. W. Jukema, D. E. Atsma, A. de Roos, H. J. Lamb, M. P.M. Stokkel, P. Dibbets-Schneider, I. Decramer, P. De Bondt, et al. Relationship Between Noninvasive Coronary Angiography With Multi-Slice Computed Tomography and Myocardial Perfusion Imaging J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 19, 2006; 48(12): 2508 - 2514. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Schuijf, W. Wijns, J. W. Jukema, I. DeCramer, D. E. Atsma, A. de Roos, M. P.M. Stokkel, P. Dibbets-Schneider, E. E. van der Wall, and J. J. Bax A Comparative Regional Analysis of Coronary Atherosclerosis and Calcium Score on Multislice CT Versus Myocardial Perfusion on SPECT J. Nucl. Med., November 1, 2006; 47(11): 1749 - 1755. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. F. Di Carli CT Coronary Angiography: Where Does It Fit? J. Nucl. Med., September 1, 2006; 47(9): 1397 - 1399. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. T. George, C. Silva, M. A.S. Cordeiro, A. DiPaula, D. R. Thompson, W. F. McCarthy, T. Ichihara, J. A.C. Lima, and A. C. Lardo Multidetector Computed Tomography Myocardial Perfusion Imaging During Adenosine Stress J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 4, 2006; 48(1): 153 - 160. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS |