|
|
||||||||
Clinical Investigations |
1 Department of Internal Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
2 Section of Immunobiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
3 Positron Medical Center, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology, Tokyo, Japan
4 Department of Neurosurgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2.7) in the vasculature of 2 of the 11 cases in the active stage of Takayasu arteritis. The other 9 patients in the active stage revealed weak 18F-FDG accumulation (2.3
SUV
1.2). No significant 18F-FDG accumulation was observed in the patients with inactive disease (SUV
1.2) and 6 control healthy subjects (SUV < 1.3). Given the cutoff SUV is 1.3, the sensitivity of 18F-FDG PET analysis of Takayasu arteritis is 90.9% and the specificity is 88.8%. 18F-FDG PET coregistered with enhanced CT localized 18F-FDG accumulation in the aortic wall in the patients with Takayasu arteritis who had weak 18F-FDG accumulation that could not otherwise be identified anatomically. Finally, 18F-FDG accumulation resolved with therapy in 2 active cases. The disappearance of 18F-FDG accumulation did not coincide with the level of general inflammatory markers. Conclusion: The 18F-FDG PET images coregistered with enhanced CT images showed the distribution and inflammatory activity in the aorta, its branches, and the pulmonary artery in patients with active Takayasu arteritis, even those who had weak 18F-FDG accumulation. The intensity of accumulation decreased in response to therapy.
Key Words: aortitis Takayasu arteritis PET 18F-FDG CT
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The diagnosis of Takayasu arteritis is made from the identification of a vascular lesion by a conventional aortogram, enhanced CT, MRI, augmented general inflammatory markers, or clinical symptoms due to ischemia. The disease activity of Takayasu arteritis is estimated from the levels of general inflammatory markers such as C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate during treatment with medication. However, general inflammatory markers usually are not good surrogate markers for evaluating the disease activity of Takayasu arteritis (3).
Gadolinium-enhanced MRI has been recently reported to provide imaging adequate to delineate large vessel anatomy and identify stenotic lesions (4). In gadolinium-enhanced MRI, the enhanced uptake of contrast agent by the inflamed large vessels are presumably due to enhanced permeability. However, the specificity for active inflammation or edema in the vessel wall is imperfect. Histopathology remains the gold standard for active vascular inflammation and it cannot be done in the diagnosis of Takayasu arteritis (5).
18F-FDG PET has been recently reported to be useful in the diagnosis of vascular diseases such as atherosclerosis and large vessel aortitis (612). However, we found that most of the patients with active Takayasu arteritis revealed weak 18F-FDG accumulation in the vascular wall of the large vessels by PET analysis and therefore we could not diagnose Takayasu arteritis by 18F-FDG PET alone. And few cases were studied to determine whether 18F-FDG accumulation might disappear in response to the medication.
The aim of our study was to evaluate whether 18F-FDG PET coregistered with enhanced CT can identify the distribution of the inflammation in the vasculature, facilitate the diagnosis anatomically, and evaluate the disease activity of Takayasu arteritis. We also evaluated whether there are differences between the disease activity estimated by general inflammatory markers and that estimated by 18F-FDG PET. We prospectively studied 11 patients with active Takayasu arteritis, 3 patients with inactive Takayasu arteritis, according to the diagnostic criteria (13) and 6 healthy control subjects. The coregistration of PET with enhanced CT may facilitate the diagnosis of Takayasu arteritis and could validate the usefulness of 18F-FDG PET for evaluating the disease activity of Takayasu arteritis
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
18F-FDG PET
PET was performed with a whole-body PET scanner, model SET 2400W (Shimadzu Co.), with an axial field of view of 20.0 cm and 63 transverse slices with a slice thickness of 3.125 mm. 18F-FDG was produced using a commercial kit (FDG MicroLab; GE Healthcare) in the Positron Medical Center, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology. All patients were asked to fast for >12 h before the study to minimize glucose utilization in normal tissues and to ensure standardized glucose metabolism. A total of 23 rounds of 18F-FDG PET scans were performed in 14 patients with Takayasu arteritis; each of 6 healthy subjects underwent 18F-FDG PET once. The image acquisition on 2-dimensional mode started 45 min after the intravenous administration of 300370 MBq (approximately 6 MBq 18F-FDG per kilogram of body weight) using simultaneous emission and transmission measurement methods (14). A 7-min emission/transmission scan with a 68Ga/68Ge rotating rod source was performed for 4 overlapping bed positions; this resulted in an axial field of view of 75 cm and a total acquisition time of 28 min. Emission and transmission sinograms were separated by the sinogram windowing technique. The transmission scan for the attenuation correction was filtered using nonlinear gaussian filters to reduce noise (15) and reconstructed using ordered-subsets expectation maximization with 6 iterations and 16 subsets and postsmoothed using a 3 x 3 x 3 cubic filter. The image pixel counts were calibrated to activity concentration (Bq/mL) and were corrected for decay using the time of tracer injection as the reference. The resulting in-plane image resolution of the transaxial image was approximately 8-mm full width at half maximum.
Initial Data Processing
Further data processing and analysis were performed on an SGI workstation (Silicon Graphics) using Dr.View software (Asahi Kasei Joho System). Before image registration, the PET data were resampled to a 256 x 256 matrix and the volume extents and pixel sizes were adjusted automatically by our registration software to equalize the extents of PET and CT field of view. The coregistration of PET and enhanced CT was obtained by the semiautomated process of rigid-body transformation with additional fine adjustment of the interactive process of viewing the superimposed images in 3-dimensional slices using the Dr.View program so that the outline of the mediastinum and the upper edge of the lung were matched. With this approach, satisfactory registration was achieved at the particular region of the thoracic aorta and its branching portions regardless of the arm position.
Visual Analysis
PET data were analyzed by visual interpretation of coronal, sagittal, and transverse slices and cross-referenced with coregistered enhanced CT images and rotating 3-dimensional images when necessary. All 3 image modalities (CT, PET, and coregistered images) were assessed separately by 2 experienced radiologists using standardized questionnaires independently. The aorta was considered positive for aortitis when heterogeneously increased 18F-FDG uptake was present in areas presumed to correspond to the aorta in the enhanced CT images. In contrast, the aorta was considered negative when no 18F-FDG uptake was observed.
Analysis of Regions of Interest (ROIs)
Each ROI was identified on the wall of the aorta with its center on the local maximum of 18F-FDG accumulation by the same nuclear medicine physician during the entire study. 18F-FDG uptake was quantified at the ROI using the standardized uptake value (SUV) normalized for lean body mass. In the control case, 18F-FDG uptake was quantified at the aortic arch because Takayasu arteritis affects the aortic arch most often. The SUV is defined as a tissue activity concentration divided by the total activity injected per body weight.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2.7), which was easily identified in the aortic region, was observed and the other patients with active disease revealed weak 18F-FDG accumulation (2.3
SUV
1.2), from which identification of the location of 18F-FDG accumulation was difficult by 18F-FDG PET alone. Furthermore, 18F-FDG accumulation in this study did not always coincide with established aortic lesions observed in CT or MR angiography. In contrast, 3 patients with inactive disease (SUV = 1.2) and the control subjects had no specific 18F-FDG accumulation in the vasculature and revealed low SUVs (SUV < 1.3) in the aortic arch region. Therefore, we judged that the cutoff point of SUV could be 1.3 for the diagnosis of vascular inflammation in our analysis. Given the SUV cutoff point is 1.3, the sensitivity of our analyses should be 90.9% and the specificity should be 88.8%.
18F-FDG PET Coregistered with Enhanced CT Facilitates Identification of 18F-FDG Accumulation of Takayasu Arteritis Anatomically
As shown in Table 1, most of the patients with active disease did not have strong 18F-FDG accumulation that was easily identified in the aortic region. Therefore, to identify the lesion of 18F-FDG accumulation anatomically, we coregistered the 18F-FDG PET images with the enhanced CT images.
In the case shown in Figure 1, enhanced CT showed a dilated aortic arch causing severe aortic regurgitation and constriction of the abdominal aorta due to Takayasu arteritis. Similar findings were confirmed in the angiogram and MR images (data not shown). The 18F-FDG accumulation was observed in the mediastinum region (Figs. 1A and 1D), but we could not adequately identify whether these 18F-FDG accumulations were located in the vascular wall on the basis of the PET image alone. However, as shown in Figures 1B and 1E, the 18F-FDG PET images coregistered with enhanced CT images revealed that these 18F-FDG accumulations were localized in the vascular wall of the ascending arteries and also in the pulmonary arteries. These 18F-FDG accumulations did not always coincide with a vascular wall thickening lesion. These may represent areas of inflammation that have not yet progressed to develop vascular thickening.
|
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The diagnosis of Takayasu arteritis is made from image analysis and clinical symptoms (13). The key finding for the diagnosis of Takayasu arteritis is the image analysis of angiograms, enhanced CT, and MRI showing the stenosis, occlusion, or aneurysm formation in large- and medium-sized vessels. The diagnosis of Takayasu arteritis often takes time because the discernable appearance of vascular lesions often takes time. We may hesitate to diagnose Takayasu arteritis in its early stage in suspected cases that do not have any vascular deformity. Therefore, direct identification of the inflammation in the vasculature facilitates the diagnosis of Takayasu arteritis in the early stage.
Several reports show the value of 18F-FDG PET in the diagnosis of large vessel arteritis (612) and show strong 18F-FDG signals in the vascular lesions that could be detected in several patients with aortitis. However, we found that 18F-FDG PET analyses did not always give the strong signals that could be easily identified with a location anatomically in patients with active Takayasu arteritis. Coregistration of 18F-FDG PET images with enhanced CT images has been described as a tool that provides good anatomic localization of functional data (16,17). Visual side-by-side analysis of nuclear medicine and CT studies is of value in characterizing large, single lesions (18,19). Therefore, we coregistered 18F-FDG PET images with enhanced CT images to identify 18F-FDG accumulation located in the vascular wall, to diagnose Takayasu arteritis, and also to exclude the cases of suspected Takayasu arteritis in which 18F-FDG accumulation was not located on the vascular wall. Takayasu arteritis sometimes involves only pulmonary arteries (20,21), and it is difficult to diagnose because of few clinical symptoms. Our study shows that the coregistration of 18F-FDG PET and enhanced CT may facilitate the diagnosis of isolated pulmonary arteritis due to Takayasu arteritis.
During the treatment of Takayasu arteritis with medication, general inflammatory markers such as C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate are used for the estimation of inflammatory activities. However, these inflammatory markers are reported to be unreliable surrogate markers for estimating the inflammatory activity of Takayasu arteritis during treatment with medication (1). Our study showed that C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate did not correlate with the existence of the inflammation in the vasculature. These findings suggest that 18F-FDG PET may be a potential tool for estimating the disease activity of Takayasu arteritis. However, more cases must be studied to confirm these findings.
Pathologic analyses of Takayasu arteritis showed that the inflammatory process of Takayasu arteritis starts at the vasa vasorum in the adventitia (2,22,23). These inflammatory cells in the affected lesion may be involved in 18F-FDG accumulation in Takayasu arteritis. Recently, 18F-FDG PET was also used for the diagnosis of atherosclerosis (2426). 18F-FDG is believed to accumulate in atherosclerotic vascular lesions. Takayasu arteritis generally affects young females (27). They usually have a low number of risk factors for atherosclerosis and marked atherosclerosis formation is usually not expected in these young females. To differentiate 18F-FDG accumulation due to Takayasu arteritis from atherosclerosis, the disappearance of 18F-FDG accumulations during the treatment with medication may be a critical point. 18F-FDG accumulation in PET in the diagnosis of Takayasu arteritis should be carefully interpreted along with other clinical findings.
| CONCLUSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
For correspondence or reprints contact: Kenji Ishii, MD, Positron Medical Center, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology, 35-2 Sakaecho, Itabashi, Tokyo 173-0015 Japan.
E-mail: ishii{at}pet.tmig.or.jp
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H Kuehl, H Eggebrecht, T Boes, G Antoch, S Rosenbaum, S Ladd, A Bockisch, J Barkhausen, and R Erbel Detection of inflammation in patients with acute aortic syndrome: comparison of FDG-PET/CT imaging and serological markers of inflammation Heart, November 1, 2008; 94(11): 1472 - 1477. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. L. Gornik and M. A. Creager Aortitis Circulation, June 10, 2008; 117(23): 3039 - 3051. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Tahara, H. Kai, H. Nakaura, M. Mizoguchi, M. Ishibashi, H. Kaida, K. Baba, N. Hayabuchi, and T. Imaizumi The prevalence of inflammation in carotid atherosclerosis: analysis with fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography Eur. Heart J., September 2, 2007; 28(18): 2243 - 2248. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Wittram and J. A. Scott 18F-FDG PET of Pulmonary Embolism Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2007; 189(1): 171 - 176. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Meller, C.-O. Sahlmann, and A. K. Scheel 18F-FDG PET and PET/CT in Fever of Unknown Origin J. Nucl. Med., January 1, 2007; 48(1): 35 - 45. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Andrews and J. C. Mason Takayasu's arteritis--recent advances in imaging offer promise Rheumatology, January 1, 2007; 46(1): 6 - 15. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Tahara, H. Kai, M. Ishibashi, H. Nakaura, H. Kaida, K. Baba, N. Hayabuchi, and T. Imaizumi Simvastatin Attenuates Plaque Inflammation: Evaluation by Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 7, 2006; 48(9): 1825 - 1831. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY | THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE |