JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mirzaei, S.
Right arrow Articles by Kuhn, P. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mirzaei, S.
Right arrow Articles by Kuhn, P. J.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 46 No. 3 550-551
© 2005 by Society of Nuclear Medicine

Scintimammography with a Pinhole Collimator

Siroos Mirzaei, MD

Centre Hospitalier Luxembourg
Luxembourg, Luxembourg
Wilhelminenspital
Wien, Austria

Peter Knoll, PhD

Wilhelminenspital
Wien, Austria

TO THE EDITOR:

We read with great interest the paper by Coover et al. (1) regarding scintimammography using a dedicated breast camera. The results seem to be fascinating. In line with the authors, we agree that efforts to improve the imaging technique may lead to a higher sensitivity for scintimammography, particularly in the selected patient group of women with dense breast tissue. Preliminary experience obtained in other studies (2,3) has shown that use of a pinhole collimator might also improve visualization of breast lesions examined by scintimammography. Just for localization of the tumor, we would prefer the use of a {gamma}-probe (4) for patient convenience instead of the scintimammographic needle localization described by the authors (1).

REFERENCES

  1. Coover LR, Caravaglia G, Kuhn P. Scintimammography with dedicated breast camera detects and localizes occult carcinoma. J Nucl Med. 2004;45:553–558.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Koukouraki S, Damilakis J, Giatromanolaki A, Androulakis E, Karkavitsas N, Koukourakis M. Functional imaging of tumors with 99Tcm-sestamibi pinhole scintigraphy. Nucl Med Commun. 1996;17:943–951.[Medline]
  3. Tornai MP, Bowsher JE, Jaszczak RJ, et al. Mammotomography with pinhole incomplete circular orbit SPECT. J Nucl Med. 2003;44:583–593.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Barbera L, Illanes L, Terrier F, Dopta G. Occult breast cancer: detection and radioguided surgery with 99mTc-MIBI. Rev Esp Med Nucl.2003;22:6–12.[Medline]

 
Leonard R. Coover

Hamot Medical Center
Erie, Pennsylvania

Phyllis J. Kuhn

Lake Erie Research Institute
Girard, Pennsylvania

REPLY:

Koukouraki et al. (2) described 25 patients with known malignancies who underwent 99mTc-sestamibi (Cardiolite; Dupont) scintimammography using parallel and pinhole collimation in assessing response to radiation therapy. The investigators concluded that tumor avidity for sestamibi could successfully be assessed with pinhole scintimammography.

Tornai et al. (3) used pinhole apertures with small but very high stopping power to evaluate dedicated mammotomography with pinhole incomplete circular orbit (PICO) SPECT of 1 breast that was uncompressed and pendant. This 1 breast had 2 lesions. They compared this method to planar pinhole scintimammography. They concluded that both lesions of the 1 breast were better visualized with PICO SPECT than with planar pinhole imaging.

Barbera et al. (4) performed planar scintimammography and SPECT with 99mTc-sestamibi on patients presenting with axillary lymphadenopathy. Positive findings led to use of a {gamma}-detecting probe to locate the lesion and guide its surgical removal. Five cases were described.

In reference to our study, comparison and comment are not possible because of the different detection techniques and different patient selection criteria. Our study population was quite different from the populations of each of these 3 studies. Our technique was used for screening a population of women with mammographically dense breasts, category 1 or 2 mammography findings, unremarkable clinical examinations, and a strong family history of breast cancer.

The lesions detected in our screening population were small, and only 1 of the 3 was detected using planar imaging with the standard camera. Considering the relatively low target-to-background ratio of the 3 lesions detected in our study, further studies evaluating {gamma}-probe detection of these types of lesions may be warranted.

REFERENCES

  1. Koukouraki S, Damilakis J, Giatromanolaki A, Androulakis E, Karkavitsas N, Koukourakis M. Functional imaging of tumors with 99Tcm-sestamibi pinhole scintigraphy. Nucl Med Commun. 1996;17:943–951.
  2. Tornai MP, Bowsher JE, Jaszczak RJ, et al. Mammotomography with pinhole incomplete circular orbit SPECT. J Nucl Med. 2003;44:583–593.
  3. Barbera L, Illanes L, Terrier F, Dopta G. Occult breast cancer: detection and radioguided surgery with 99mTc-MIBI. Rev Esp Med Nucl. 2003;22:6–12.




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mirzaei, S.
Right arrow Articles by Kuhn, P. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mirzaei, S.
Right arrow Articles by Kuhn, P. J.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE