JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ballinger, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ballinger, J. R.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 46 No. 12 2121
© 2005 by Society of Nuclear Medicine

Nomenclature of 99mTc-Technetium-Labeled Radiopharmaceuticals

James R. Ballinger, PhD

Guy’s and St. Thomas’ Hospital
London, United Kingdom

TO THE EDITOR:

Dr. Tewson is quite right when he points out in his letter that technetium chemists are somewhat lax in the description of their agents (1). In his example, 99mTc-ciprofloxacin is internally contradictory in that it implies that ciprofloxacin contains the atom technetium, which of course it does not.

The pharmacopoeias do use the correct names: for example, technetium 99mTc medronate. Apart from sestamibi and one or two others, in general the chemical names of radiopharmaceuticals do not include technetium so "technetium 99mTc" must be added in each instance, which really is unworkable for routine use. It’s too late to close the barn door.

He also makes the point that an exact chemical structure is required for reproducible results to be obtained. The aforementioned technetium 99mTc medronate is a constantly changing mixture of several complexes, all of which are taken up by bone and have been used, apparently reproducibly, for 30 y in the most popular nuclear medicine procedure in the world.

However, I would like to make this proposal: I will lobby the SPECT community to tighten up its nomenclature if he can persuade his colleagues in the PET world to discard the incorrect term 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) when they really mean 18F-2-deoxy-2-fluoro-D-glucose!

REFERENCE

  1. Tewson TJ. Re: Synthesis and comparison of 99mTc-enrofloxacin and 99mTc-ciprofloxacin [letter]. J Nucl Med. 2005;46:1077.[Free Full Text]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ballinger, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ballinger, J. R.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE