HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Abstract Figures Only Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Related articles in JNM Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bagheri, B. Articles by Adler, L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bagheri, B. Articles by Adler, L.

Characterization of the Normal Adrenal Gland with ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT

¹ Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
² Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

	ABSTRACT

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION CONCLUSION REFERENCES

 
Prior studies have documented increased ¹⁸F-FDG adrenal activity in both benign and malignant pathologic conditions. When whole-body PET imaging is performed without CT anatomic coregistration, however, the normal adrenal gland is difficult to recognize. The purpose of this study was to investigate the normal adrenal appearance and standardized uptake value (SUV) using ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT imaging. Methods: Twenty patients with lymphoma with normal-appearing adrenal glands on prior CT examination (less than a 5% pretest likelihood of adrenal involvement) were studied. PET/CT imaging was performed 2 h after intravenous administration of ¹⁸F-FDG. Unenhanced CT scans were acquired for attenuation correction and anatomic coregistration. PET images were reconstructed using an ordered-subsets expectation maximization algorithm and were corrected for body weight, dose, and radioactive decay. Ability to confirm visualization of the adrenal glands was determined for ¹⁸F-FDG PET alone and for ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT by a consensus of 2 readers, and uptake of ¹⁸F-FDG in the adrenal gland was compared with liver activity and scored visually (0 = no visualization, 1 = activity less than in liver, 2 = activity equal to liver activity, and 3 = activity greater than in liver). Results: The 2 readers agreed on visualization of the adrenal glands with PET alone for 2 of 40 (5%) glands. With PET/CT, the readers agreed on visualization of 27 of 40 (68%) adrenal glands. Visual scores for normal adrenal activity ranged from 0 to 3, and maximum SUVs ranged from 0.95 to 2.46. Visual scoring of adrenal activity correlated well with both mean and maximal SUV (mean SUV vs. visual score: slope = 0.96, r = 0.88; maximum SUV vs. visual score: slope = 0.99, r = 0.87). Conclusion: PET/CT permits more reliable visualization of normal adrenal glands than does PET alone. Visual assessment of adrenal uptake correlates well with SUV measurement, and readers of PET/CT need to be aware of the wide range of normal adrenal uptake.

Key Words: ¹⁸F-FDG • adrenal gland • PET/CT • standardized uptake value

	INTRODUCTION

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION CONCLUSION REFERENCES

 
Prior studies have characterized the abnormal appearance of adrenal masses on ¹⁸F-FDG PET studies. In general, malignant lesions show ¹⁸F-FDG activity equal to or greater than liver activity (1–4), although benign adenomas may also show increased ¹⁸F-FDG uptake. Because of low ¹⁸F-FDG activity in the normal adrenal, visualization of the gland is difficult with stand-alone PET. The range of ¹⁸F-FDG activity of the normal adrenal gland could not, therefore, be characterized before anatomic coregistered PET and CT (PET/CT) became available.

The purpose of this study was to establish the appearance and range of ¹⁸F-FDG activity of the normal adrenal gland using ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT.

	MATERIALS AND METHODS

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION CONCLUSION REFERENCES

 
This was a retrospective study of 20 sequential ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT studies performed on patients with pathologically proven lymphoma (11 with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and 9 with Hodgkin’s disease) referred for staging. Patients with lymphoma were chosen because of the very low pretest likelihood of adrenal involvement (less than 5%) (5–9). All patients underwent CT imaging before their ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT study to confirm that none had CT evidence of an abnormal adrenal mass. All patients were studied before initiation of chemotherapy or radiation to avoid any potential effect on adrenal ¹⁸F-FDG uptake. The Institutional Review Board of Fox Chase Cancer Center approved the study.

Patients fasted for at least 4 h before the intravenous injection of ¹⁸F-FDG (8.1 MBq/kg of body weight) but were allowed to drink water and to take medications. PET/CT was performed on a Discovery LS scanner (General Electric Medical Systems). CT studies for attenuation correction and anatomic coregistration were performed without intravenous contrast material, with no breath-hold, and with the following imaging parameters: 140 kVp, 90 mA, 0.8 s per CT rotation, and a 5-mm slice thickness. PET emission data were obtained 2 h after ¹⁸F-FDG injection, for 6 min at each bed position, using a 2-dimensional high-sensitivity mode with an axial field of view of 14.5 cm. There was a 1-slice overlap between the bed positions. The PET images were reconstructed on a 128 x 128 matrix using an ordered-subsets expectation maximization algorithm for 28 subsets and 2 iterations, with a 10-mm postreconstruction filter. The PET system has an in-plane resolution of 5 mm (10). CT data were used for attenuation correction of all PET images for both visual and quantitative analysis. All images were corrected for body weight, dose, and radioactive decay and were displayed on an eNTEGRA workstation (General Electric Medical Systems) using a standardized uptake value (SUV) gray scale of 0 (white) to 5 (black). All images were reviewed to make certain there had been no significant patient movement between the CT and PET acquisitions, to ensure adequate coregistration for placement of the adrenal region of interest (ROI).

Each adrenal gland was measured in millimeters, using the longest dimension on the axial CT slice on which the adrenal gland was largest. To measure the adrenal SUV, a manual ROI was drawn in the shape of the adrenal gland on the same slice. This ROI was then applied to the adrenal gland in the coregistered ¹⁸F-FDG PET image. The adrenal glands ranged from 15 to 28 mm in maximum width, and the total number of pixels in the ROIs ranged from 50 to 75. Mean and maximum SUVs were recorded using the vendor-supplied SUV software.

The ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT studies were first independently reviewed by 2 observers to determine how often they could confirm visualization of either adrenal gland based on PET images alone. The readers reviewed both the 3-dimensional volume-rendered maximum-intensity-projection images and the simultaneously displayed ¹⁸F-FDG PET transaxial, coronal, and sagittal views. A linked cursor program permitted simultaneous, dynamic cursor placement in the maximum-intensity-projection images and in all 3 imaging planes to help the readers confirm or exclude adrenal visualization. The adrenal was said to be visualized if the readers saw any focus of ¹⁸F-FDG uptake greater than adjacent background levels in the expected anatomic location of either the right or the left adrenal gland. If adrenal uptake was detected, each reader was asked to score it visually, compared with liver activity (0 = no visualization [Fig. 1A], 1 = activity less than in liver [Fig. 1B], 2 = activity equal to liver activity [Fig. 1C], and 3 = activity greater than in liver [Fig. 1D]).

View larger version (75K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIGURE 1. Visual scoring of 18F-FDG PET/CT paired transaxial images. Arrows show the location of the adrenal glands coregistered on the CT image (left) and linked to the corresponding anatomic location on the PET image (right). These examples demonstrate no uptake (visual score = 0) (A), activity greater in adrenal gland than in background but less in adrenal gland than in liver (visual score = 1) (B), adrenal activity equal to liver activity (visual score = 2) (C), and adrenal activity greater than liver activity (visual score = 3) (D).

The 2 readers’ independent scores from the PET/CT reading were averaged for each adrenal gland. Cases of no agreement on whether adrenal uptake was seen were resolved by a separate consensus reading by the 2 observers.

The SUV was calculated as decay-corrected activity (kBq) per milliliter of tissue volume per injected ¹⁸F-FDG activity (kBq) per body mass (g).

Statistical Analysis
Group comparisons were tested for significance using the Student t test. Data were expressed as the mean ± SD. P < 0.05 was considered significant. For each adrenal gland, the mean visual scores were compared with the measured SUVs from the PET/CT study by linear regression.

	RESULTS

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION CONCLUSION REFERENCES

 
When evaluating ¹⁸F-FDG PET images alone, the readers agreed on visualization of an adrenal gland for 2 of 40 (5%) glands. This was in only 1 patient, who showed prominent bilateral adrenal uptake (Fig. 2). When evaluating the coregistered PET/CT images, the readers agreed that 68% of adrenal glands (27/40) could be visualized and that the remaining 32% (13/40) could not.

View larger version (104K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIGURE 2. This maximum-intensity-projection image is the only case in which the readers agreed that the adrenal gland could be seen on the PET-alone image review. In this case, adrenal activity was prominent bilaterally (arrows).

View larger version (18K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIGURE 3. Plot showing the linear regression for visual scores (Vis Score) versus the mean and maximum (Max) SUVs.

	DISCUSSION

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION CONCLUSION REFERENCES

The right adrenal gland is superior to the upper pole of the right kidney and posterior to the inferior vena cava and is between the right lobe of the liver and the right crus of the diaphragm. If there is a paucity of retroperitoneal fat, the right adrenal gland can be difficult to visualize on CT. The left adrenal gland often lies lateral to the aorta and left diaphragmatic crus, superior to the left renal vein, and anteromedial to the upper pole of the left kidney (5).

CT is the primary diagnostic imaging method for evaluation of adrenal glands. On an optimal CT scan, normal and pathologic adrenal glands can be well visualized.

Intravenous contrast material may be useful for characterizing the enhancement pattern of masses to improve the ability to make specific diagnoses. With T1-weighted MRI, the adrenal glands have a medium signal intensity similar to that of liver, somewhat greater than the diaphragmatic crus but less than the surrounding fat. In standard T2-weighted images, the adrenal glands are hypointense to fat and isointense to liver but hyperintense to the crus. Significant chemical shift artifacts may obscure details of the normal adrenal gland. On fat-suppressed T2-weighted MR images, however, the normal adrenal gland appears brighter than the suppressed fat. Thus, normal adrenal glands and small masses are best seen on T1-weighted or fat-suppressed T2-weighted images. The normal adrenal gland does not enhance markedly after intravenous administration of gadolinium (5).

Unlike CT and MRI, ¹⁸F-FDG PET is based on increased glucose metabolism. In a retrospective analysis of 50 adrenal lesions in 41 patients, most (13/18) malignant adrenal lesions showed significantly higher ¹⁸F-FDG uptake than in the liver and most (27/32) benign lesions had activity less than in the liver (1). In a group of 26 patients studied with ¹⁸F-FDG PET, 6 had adenomas, 7 had nonadenoma benign lesions (1 neurinoma, 1 ganglioneuroma, 1 cyst, 1 myelolipoma, and 3 pseudotumors), and 13 had malignant tumors (6 carcinomas, 1 sarcoma, and 6 metastases). No significant ¹⁸F-FDG uptake was observed in any benign adrenal lesion. Conversely, increased ¹⁸F-FDG uptake (greater than background levels) was observed in all patients with malignant adrenal tumors (11). In a study of Shulkin et al., calculated SUVs ranged from 2.6 to 13.4 for 12 patients with benign pheochromocytoma and from 1.6 to 13.3 for 17 patients with malignant pheochromocytoma. All malignant tumors had activity greater than in the liver (12). Erasmus et al. performed a study to differentiate benign from metastatic adrenal masses in patients with bronchogenic carcinoma (3). Twenty-five adrenal masses had increased ¹⁸F-FDG uptake (greater than background levels), but only 23 had metastatic disease confirmed on biopsy. Eight adrenal masses had no increased ¹⁸F-FDG uptake, and these were all proven benign on biopsy.

Interpretation of adrenal uptake as benign or malignant on the basis of visual assessment may be problematic. In a study by Yun et al., 13 of 18 malignant lesions had uptake significantly greater than in the liver; however, 5 malignant lesions had uptake equal to or only slightly greater than liver uptake (1). Because normal adrenal glands may also show activity equal to or slightly greater than liver uptake, one must be cautious in the interpretation of a benign versus a malignant lesion when such uptake is present. Interpretation based on coregistered ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT may help. An adrenal gland that appears to be of normal size on CT, with only minimally increased ¹⁸F-FDG uptake (equal to or slightly greater than liver uptake), should be considered most likely benign. Most malignant adrenal lesions will show on CT a marked increase in ¹⁸F-FDG uptake (greater than in liver) with or without an increase in the size of the adrenal gland. Studies on larger numbers of patients will be needed to confirm this approach.

In this study, we showed that identification of the normal adrenal gland was difficult with ¹⁸F-FDG PET images alone and that coregistered ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT permitted visualization of ¹⁸F-FDG uptake (greater than background levels) in 68% of normal adrenal glands. Thus, even with anatomically coregistered ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT, 32% of normal adrenal glands did not show uptake greater than background levels. We also found that there is a wide range of normal adrenal uptake, with visual scores ranging from 0 to 3 and maximum SUVs ranging from 0.95 to 2.46. Thus, normal adrenal glands may show uptake greater than background levels and equal to or slightly greater than liver activity.

We found that mean maximum SUV was higher for the left normal adrenal gland than for the right. Although adrenal glands vary significantly in size and shape, there is both anatomic and radiologic evidence that the left adrenal gland tends to be slightly larger than the right (13). In a CT study, Karstaedt et al. found that when only one adrenal gland was visualized, it was most often the left (14% [left] vs. 1.5% [right]). In addition, although most often visualized in transaxial CT images as a thin inverted Y or arrowhead configuration (60%), the left adrenal gland had a thick triangular mass appearance more often than did the right (40% [left] vs. 3% [right]) and was thicker than the right (6.7 mm [left] vs. 5.1 mm [right]) (14). We believe this size difference likely resulted in the slightly higher SUVs because of less partial-volume averaging.

A potential limitation of this study is that a biopsy was not performed on the adrenal glands to exclude lymphoma involvement; they were screened only with CT to exclude enlargement or a focal tumor mass. However, prior studies have shown that lymphoma involvement in the adrenal is rare, occurring in only 1%–4% of patients (5–9). Also, no hormonal measurements were made to look for the possibility of stress-induced adrenal activation.

Readers of ¹⁸F-FDG PET studies need to be cautioned that the SUVs reported in this study are based on images acquired 2 h after injection and that SUVs are dependent on the time from injection to imaging (15,16). Therefore, the values reported in this study apply only to a 2-h imaging time and cannot be compared with other reported SUVs, which may have been calculated at different times after ¹⁸F-FDG injection.

In the single case of significant bilateral adrenal uptake, the CT scan was again reviewed and confirmed that the adrenal glands were of normal size. A review of the patient’s medical chart also showed no clinical findings to suggest adrenal hyperplasia or Cushing’s disease.

	CONCLUSION

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION CONCLUSION REFERENCES

 
In patients with a low pretest likelihood of adrenal pathology, ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT provided more reliable visualization of the normal adrenal gland than did PET alone. Readers of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT need to be aware of the wide range of normal adrenal uptake.

	FOOTNOTES

 
Received Nov. 20, 2003; revision accepted Jan. 29, 2004.

For correspondence or reprints contact: Alan H. Maurer, MD, Temple University Hospital, Broad and Ontario Streets, Philadelphia, PA 19140.

E-mail: amaurer{at}temple.edu

	REFERENCES

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION CONCLUSION REFERENCES

 

1. Yun M, Kim W, Alnafisi N, Lacorte L, Jang S, Alavi A. ¹⁸F-FDG PET in characterizing adrenal lesions detected on CT or MRI. J Nucl Med. 2001;42:1795–1799.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2. Boland G, Goldberg M, Lee M, et al. Indeterminate adrenal mass in patients with cancer: evaluation at PET with 2-(F-18)-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose. Radiology. 1995;194:131–134.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3. Erasmus J, Patz E, McAdams H, et al. Evaluation of adrenal masses in patients with bronchogenic carcinoma using ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. AJR. 1997;168:1361–1362.[Free Full Text]
4. Maurea S, Mainolfi C, Wang H, et al. Positron emission tomography (PET) with fludoeoxyglucose F 18 in the study of adrenal masses: comparison of benign and malignant lesions. Radiol Med (Torino). 1996;92:782–787.
5. Kenney P, Lee J. The adrenals. In: Heiken J, ed. Computed Body Tomography with MRI Correlation. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven; 1999:1171–1208.
6. Glazer H, Lee J, Balfe D, Mauro M, Griffeth R, Sagel S. Non-Hodgkin lymphoma: computed tomographic demonstration of unusual extranodal involvement. Radiology. 1983;149:211–217.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. Jafri S, Francis I, Glazer G, Bree R, Amendola M. CT detection of adrenal lymphoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1983;7:254–256.[Medline]
8. Paling M, Williamson B. Adrenal involvement in non-Hodgkin lymphoma. AJR. 1983;141:303–305.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9. Reznek R, Husband J. Lymphoma. In: Husband JES, Razneck RH, eds. Imaging in Oncology. Vol 2. London, U.K.: Martin Dunitz; 1998:583–624.
10. Grado TR, Turkington TG, Williams JJ, Stearns CW, Hoffman JM, Coleman RE. Performance characteristics of a whole body PET scanner. J Nucl Med. 1994;35:1398–1406.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Maurea S, Klain M, Mainolfi C, Ziviello M, Salvatore M. The diagnostic role of radionuclide imaging in evaluation of patients with nonhypersecreting adrenal masses. J Nucl Med. 2001;42:884–892.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12. Shulkin BL, Thompson NW, Shapiro B, Francis IR, Sisson JC. Pheochromocytomas: imaging with 2-(fluorine-18)fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose PET. Radiology. 1999;212:35–41.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. Netter F. Anatomy and blood supply of the suprarenal (adrenal) glands. The Ciba Collection of Medical Illustrations. Vol 4. New York, NY: Ciba Pharmaceutical Company; 1981:41–42.
14. Karstaedt N, Sagel S, Stanley R, Melson G, Levitt R. Computed tomography of the adrenal gland. Radiology. 1978;129:723–730.[Abstract]
15. Hamburg LM, Hunter GT, Albert NM, et al. The dose uptake ratio as an index of glucose metabolism: useful parameter or oversimplification? J Nucl Med. 1994;35:1308–1312.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16. Keyes JW. SUV: standard uptake or silly useless value? J Nucl Med. 1995;40:1784–1791.

Related articles in JNM:

THIS MONTH IN JNM

JNM 2004 45: 8A-9A. [Full Text]  

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. B. Elaini, S. K. Shetty, V. M. Chapman, D. V. Sahani, G. W. Boland, A. T. Sweeney, M. M. Maher, J. T. Slattery, P. R. Mueller, and M. A. Blake Improved Detection and Characterization of Adrenal Disease with PET-CT RadioGraphics, May 1, 2007; 27(3): 755 - 767. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S-C Chan, T-C Yen, and K-K Ng Upper pole of a duplex kidney mimicking adrenal incidentaloma in 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography: a pitfall in diagnosis Br. J. Radiol., August 1, 2006; 79(944): e50 - e52. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. C. Mackie, B. L. Shulkin, R. C. Ribeiro, F. P. Worden, P. G. Gauger, R. J. Mody, L. P. Connolly, G. Kunter, C. Rodriguez-Galindo, J. W. Wallis, et al. Use of [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography in Evaluating Locally Recurrent and Metastatic Adrenocortical Carcinoma J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2006; 91(7): 2665 - 2671. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. B. Costa, J. A. Parker, and S. T. Schumer Modern Treatment of Lung Cancer: CASE 3. Non-Metastatic Bilateral F-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose Avid Adrenal Glands in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., October 20, 2005; 23(30): 7740 - 7742. [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Markou, P. Manning, B. Kaya, S. N Datta, J. B Bomanji, and G. S Conway [18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose ([18F]FDG) positron emission tomography imaging of thymic carcinoid tumor presenting with recurrent Cushing's syndrome Eur. J. Endocrinol., April 1, 2005; 152(4): 521 - 525. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Figures Only Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Related articles in JNM Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bagheri, B. Articles by Adler, L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bagheri, B. Articles by Adler, L.