|
|
||||||||
Clinical Investigations |
1 Turku PET Centre, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
2 Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Turku University Central Hospital, Turku, Finland
3 Department of Internal Medicine, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
4 Department of Internal Medicine, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
5 Department of Internal Medicine, Turku University Central Hospital, Turku, Finland
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: adrenal gland PET radionuclide imaging metomidate 18F-FDG
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Adrenal tumors are found incidentally in up to 5% of patients, illustrating the need for an effective strategy to determine whether a patient should be treated surgically, pharmacologically, or not at all (1,2). Besides clinical history and hormonal profile, mass size and imaging characteristics play an important role in the diagnostic algorithm, which by no means has matured to a universally approved form (6). In some patients, the size, morphologic appearance, attenuation on CT, and growth pattern of the adrenal mass do not disclose its nature. A positive intracellular lipid signal on MRI suggests a benign adenoma, but in the absence of characteristic features on MRI or CT, functional imaging with radionuclides should be considered for differential diagnosis (7,8).
Recently, PET using 11C-labeled metomidate was introduced for the identification of indeterminate adrenal masses (9,10). Metomidate is an inhibitor of 11ß-hydroxylase, a key enzyme in the biosynthesis of cortisol and aldosterone by the adrenal cortex. Our goal was to evaluate 11C-metomidate PET in the diagnosis of incidentalomas and to study whether uptake of tracer is associated with adrenal cortex function.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Synthesis of Radiopharmaceuticals
11C-Metomidate was prepared by a modification of the published procedure (9). 11C-Methyl triflate, prepared by a standard procedure (11), was trapped at 0°C in 100 mL of acetone containing 0.51.0 mg of O-desmethyl precursor (R028141; Janssen Research Foundation) and 2.04.0 mL of freshly prepared tetrabutylammonium hydroxide (1 mol/L, aqueous). When trapping was completed, the reaction mixture was purified on a µBondapak C-18 column (125Å, 10 µm, 7.8 x 300 mm in internal diameter; Waters) using an eluent of methanol:water, 60:40, and a flow of 4 mL/min. The purified product was collected in a vessel containing 0.8 mL of sterile propylene glycol:ethanol, 7:3, evaporated, redissolved in sterile phosphate buffer (0.1 mol/L, pH 7.4), and filtered through a Gelman Acrodisc sterile filter (PN 4192, 0.2 mm; Pall Corp.). The final radiochemical yield of 11C-metomidate from 11C-methyl triflate was 40%80%, with a specific radioactivity of 60 ± 20 GBq/µmol. The radiochemical purity was higher than 98% and stable for at least 2 h. Omission of propylene glycol and ethanol during evaporation decreased radiochemical purity (80%90%), showing that the radiochemical impurities were formed by radiolysis.
The synthesis of 18F-FDG followed a previously described nucleophilic substitution procedure (12). The radiochemical purity of 18F-FDG was at least 95%, and the specific radioactivity at the end of synthesis was more than 75 GBq/µmol.
Patient Preparation
11C-Metomidate and 18F-FDG PET studies were performed either on the same day or within 1 wk of each other. For both PET studies, the subjects fasted at least 6 h or overnight. Drinking of water was allowed ad libitum. Before 11C-metomidate PET a 2-wk break was required from drugs that could affect uptake of tracer (ketoconazole, metyrapone). For the 11C-metomidate study, 2 catheters were inserted in contralateral forearm veins to inject tracer and to draw blood samples during imaging. The blood-sampling arm was wrapped in an electric blanket to heat the arm for arterialization of blood samples. The subject was placed supine in the PET scanner with the arms held upright, and correct positioning to image the adrenals was secured with anatomic landmarks and CT images. For repositioning during the second PET study, laser lines were marked on the skin with a felt-tip pen. At least 3 h separated injection of the 2 radiopharmaceuticals, with 11C-metomidate always preceding 18F-FDG. Two patients (patients 10 and 12) did not undergo 18F-FDG imaging for logistic reasons.
Image Acquisition and Processing
An 18-ring 2-dimensional whole-body PET scanner (Advance; General Electric Medical Systems) operated in 2-dimensional mode was used. The camera has bismuth germanate detectors, which image 35 planes at 4.25-mm intervals in a single session. The diameter of the field of view is 55 cm, and the axial length is 15.2 cm. Both PET studies were corrected for photon attenuation with 10- to 12-min preinjection transmission scans using robotically operated rods containing 68Ge/68Ga. For cases in which 18F-FDG imaging was performed in whole-body mode, 2-min postemission transmission scans were obtained.
Dynamic imaging was started by bolus intravenous injection of a median dose of 432 MBq (range, 211444 MBq) of 11C-metomidate, and a 45-min emission scan was subsequently acquired (frame rate of 5 x 60 s, 5 x 180 s, 3 x 300 s, and 1 x 600 s). Arterialized venous blood was frequently sampled for measurement of radioactivity throughout imaging and determination of metabolites of 11C-metomidate. Samples for the latter were obtained at 2, 6, 10, 20, 30, and 40 min after injection of tracer. 18F-FDG imaging (n = 11) was performed in steady state starting 45 min after intravenous injection and consisted of two 10-min frames. Alternatively, whole-body scans (n = 8) were obtained in the craniocaudal direction with 67 bed positions, each lasting 5 min. No blood samples were taken during 18F-FDG imaging except for plasma glucose before tracer injection. The median dose of 18F-FDG was 369 MBq (range, 251378 MBq). All image acquisition data were corrected for dead time, decay, and photon attenuation and reconstructed with an ordered-subsets expectation maximization algorithm using 4 iterations. The final in-plane spatial resolution in reconstructed images was 5 mm, and the axial resolution was 6 mm.
Blood Metabolite Analysis
Venous blood samples were collected into heparinized tubes at 2, 6, 10, 20, 30, and 40 min after injection to measure the amount of unchanged 11C-metomidate and radioactive metabolites in plasma. Plasma proteins were precipitated with acetonitrile, and the supernatant obtained after centrifugation was analyzed with high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) using a µBondapak C-18 reversed-phase column (125Å, 10 µm, 7.8 x 300 mm in internal diameter; Waters) at a flow rate of 6.0 mL/min and a gradient of 100% acetonitrile (B) in 50 mmol of phosphoric acid per liter (A) as follows: 0 min of 75% A and 25% B, 5.5 min of 40% A and 60% B, 7.5 min of 40% A and 60% B, and 8.59 min of 75% A and 25% B. A LaChrom HPLC system (Hitachi/Merck) and a Radiomatic 150TR radioactivity detector (Packard) were used.
Measurement of 11C-Metomidate and 18F-FDG Uptake
The adrenals were invariably seen as hot spots in the final 11C-metomidate PET frame, which was used for defining regions of interest (ROI). Trace ROI function was used to outline ROIs encompassing the whole hot spot area in normal and enlarged adrenal glands, and mean (not maximum) radioactivity in the 3 consecutive axial planes with the highest radioactivity was used for further calculations. Similarly, a standard-sized circular ROI approximately 3 cm in diameter was drawn in 3 consecutive planes in the right lobe of the liver, also an organ with high uptake of 11C-metomidate (10). In the kinetic analysis, the input function for uptake of 11C-metomidate was corrected for 2 major labeled metabolites that constituted a variable but highly significant fraction of total plasma radioactivity. The corrected plasma and tissue timeactivity curves derived from ROIs as explained above were used to calculate kinetic influx constant (Ki) values by applying the graphical analysis first described by Patlak (13). Standardized uptake values (SUVs) were also defined from the last frame, between 35 and 45 min, correcting tissue radioactivity for patient weight and injected dose (14).
Because normal adrenals have faint uptake of 18F-FDG, definition of ROIs was much more difficult on 18F-FDG PET images than on 11C-metomidate PET images. Accordingly, we outlined ROIs onto 18F-FDG planes by reading 18F-FDG and 11C-metomidate axial images together and by relating findings to those on corresponding CT scans. This was facilitated by the normal 18F-FDG uptake seen in liver, spleen, kidneys, and, variably, in stomach and bowel. The second of the 2 time frames (5565 min) was used for calculation of SUV in adrenals and liver, again using the mean value over 3 consecutive planes. For whole-body 18F-FDG studies, only one 5-min frame was available for SUV calculation.
Statistical Analysis
Commercially obtained software (SPSS, release 11.0.1, standard version; SPSS Inc.) for Windows (Microsoft) was used for statistical evaluation. Results are expressed mostly as median and range. Normality of quantitative data was assessed with the KolmogorovSmirnov test. For normally distributed data, ANOVA and the independent-samples t test was used; for other data, nonparametric methods (the KruskalWallis test and MannWhitney U test) were applied. The association between Ki and SUV was evaluated with the Pearson correlation coefficient. All P values are 2 tailed.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Quantification of 11C-Metomidate Uptake
Identification of adrenocortical adenomas and normal adrenal glands was easy with 11C-metomidate PET because of the invariably high uptake of tracer in target organs with functional steroid hormone synthesis. In accordance with Bergström et al. (10), liver and, more variably, stomach and duodenum also showed moderate to high 11C-metomidate uptake, which did not interfere with radioactivity seen in adrenal tissues in late images. PET images of 4 patients with different types of adrenal incidentalomas are shown in Figure 1.
|
|
|
|
Comparison of 11C-Metomidate and 18F-FDG
18F-FDG was not helpful in distinguishing adrenal tumors, with the exception of 2 of the 3 noncortical malignancies, which had characteristically high glycolytic activity coupled with low uptake of 11C-metomidate (Figs. 1G and 1H). Of interest was the relatively low uptake of 18F-FDG in adrenocortical carcinoma (average SUV = 2.9 and maximum SUV = 3.8; Fig. 1F) and in bilateral adrenal metastases from renal cell cancer, which had low maximum SUVs of 2.4 and 2.3. The primary tumor in the right kidney had been previously embolized and was difficult to see in the vicinity of high 18F-FDG activity excreted in the pelvis. Although 18F-FDG was believed to generally be less informative than 11C-metomidate, active adenomas (median SUV = 2.3; range, 1.83.9; n = 7) and the 2 pheochromocytomas (average SUVs = 3.0 and 2.9) showed higher uptake of 18F-FDG than did the 3 inactive adenomas, with SUVs of 1.6, 1.7, and 1.7 (Figs. 1B and 1D). Again, no association between tracer uptake and mass size could be found.
To assess the relationship between adenoma metabolism and hormonal activity, ratios of tumor to normal adrenal were defined for 11C-metomidate and ratios of tumor to liver, for 18F-FDG. The 11C-metomidate ratio could distinguish both active and inactive adrenocortical adenomas from other tumors (active vs. others, P = 0.003; inactive vs. others, P = 0.019) but was not different between hormonally active and inactive adenomas (Fig. 5). The 18F-FDG ratio in noncortical tumors (n = 7) was not different from that in any other adrenal masses, including active and inactive adenomas (n = 12). This lack of significance depended strongly on the low number of malignant lesions and unexpectedly low uptake of 18F-FDG in 2 of these 4 neoplasias.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-imaging of the adrenal cortex, whereas 123I- or 131I-labeled metaiodobenzylguanidine, a norepinephrine analog, is a common tracer for depicting tumors arising from the adrenal medulla (8). Because PET is now increasingly available in the clinical setting, pheochromocytomas may be diagnosed with 18F-FDG (16) and 18F-fluorodopa (17), and inhibitors of steroid biosynthesis, such as 11C-metomidate, may become counterparts of 18F-FDG and 18F-fluorodopa for PET imaging of the adrenal cortex (9,10). The current study was performed under European COST action B12, aiming to develop a noninvasive test for evaluation of adrenal incidentalomas with PET. We looked specifically at the uptake kinetics of 11C-metomidate in tumors and normal adrenal glands and in liver and venous plasma and compared the findings with those on 18F-FDG images obtained in steady state. In line with the preclinical validation study (9) and the first clinical study (10), we could demonstrate high uptake of 11C-metomidate in adrenocortical tumors and normal adrenal glands as a sign of sustained 11ß-hydroxylase activity. Decreased tracer uptake, in comparison with physiologic uptake, was seen in pheochromocytomas, cysts, and noncortical malignancies such as lymphoma and metastatic carcinomas, whereas adrenocortical carcinoma had the highest uptake of 11C-metomidate among all lesions. 18F-FDG was clearly inferior to 11C-metomidate for depicting adrenal lesions if they were adenomas and, somewhat surprisingly, also in the solitary case of adrenocortical carcinoma. The low uptake of 18F-FDG in adrenal metastases from renal cell cancer was less surprising because 18F-FDG is known to have only a limited role in the diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma (18).
The uptake kinetics of 11C-metomidate in adrenal tissue are favorable for PET imaging because irreversible binding of the tracer occurs over the first 45 min (Fig. 3). Because 2 large fractions of 11C-metomidate metabolites occur in plasma, it is necessary to correct the plasma input function for these yet unidentified radiochemical species before applying graphical analysis to assess binding of 11C-metomidate. This correction was successfully performed for 12 patients to calculate graphical influx constant Ki (Fig. 3), and in further analysis we showed that the obtained Kis could be replaced by the robust SUV approach commonly used in clinical oncology (4,14). Ki and SUV were not associated with mass size, and pheochromocytomas were seen to have the highest uptake in the outer rather than the inner zone of tumora finding compatible with the steroid-synthesizing propertys being the major determinant of uptake of 11C-metomidate in adrenal tissue (9). This does not translate, however, to a direct measure of rate of adrenocortical hormone synthesis, since the SUVs in active and inactive adenomas overlapped widely, in keeping with the findings of Bergström et al. (10). Furthermore, uptake ratios for adenoma to contralateral adrenal gland were not significantly different between active and nonsecretory adenomas (Fig. 5).
Although 11C-metomidate PET does not immediately replace 131I-labeled cholesterol derivatives in the functional evaluation of adrenal cortex, a search for new tracers applicable to positron imaging is in order with the widespread expansion of dedicated PET scanners. The major advantages of PET are rapid completion of the imaging, within 1 h, and a resolution and sensitivity better than those of adrenal scintigraphy. Clearly, the value of quantitative 11C-metomidate PET will remain obscure until the results from the larger European multicenter study are at hand. In our trial, most patients were seen by a clinical endocrinologist; we hope that on that basis the multicenter trial included more patients with metastatic tumors and thus avoided the slight referral bias of the current study. Unfortunately, it seems difficult to distinguish adrenocortical adenoma from carcinoma with the current technique, but for a patient with known carcinoma, 11C-metomidate should be a specific tracer for metastatic disease (10). For patients presenting with adrenal masses and a history or strong suggestion of neoplastic disease, 18F-FDG PET may still be the study of choice because whole-body imaging may conceal other deposits of cancer in addition to adrenal metastasis (15).
| CONCLUSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
For correspondence or reprints contact: Heikki Minn, MD, Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Turku University Central Hospital, P.O. Box 52, FIN-20521 Turku, Finland.
E-mail: heikki.minn{at}utu.fi
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Hahner, A. Stuermer, M. Kreissl, C. Reiners, M. Fassnacht, H. Haenscheid, F. Beuschlein, M. Zink, K. Lang, B. Allolio, et al. [123I]Iodometomidate for Molecular Imaging of Adrenocortical Cytochrome P450 Family 11B Enzymes J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2008; 93(6): 2358 - 2365. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. F. Hahn, M. A. Blake, and G. W. L. Boland Adrenal Lesions: Attenuation Measurement Differences between CT Scanners Radiology, August 1, 2006; 240(2): 458 - 463. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Allolio and M. Fassnacht Adrenocortical Carcinoma: Clinical Update J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2006; 91(6): 2027 - 2037. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Hennings, O. Lindhe, M. Bergstrom, B. Langstrom, A. Sundin, and P. Hellman [11C]Metomidate Positron Emission Tomography of Adrenocortical Tumors in Correlation with Histopathological Findings J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., April 1, 2006; 91(4): 1410 - 1414. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Leboulleux, C. Dromain, G. Bonniaud, A. Auperin, B. Caillou, J. Lumbroso, R. Sigal, E. Baudin, and M. Schlumberger Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of 18-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography in Adrenocortical Carcinoma: A Prospective Comparison with Computed Tomography J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., March 1, 2006; 91(3): 920 - 925. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Blake, J. M. A. Slattery, M. K. Kalra, E. F. Halpern, A. J. Fischman, P. R. Mueller, and G. W. Boland Adrenal Lesions: Characterization with Fused PET/CT Image in Patients with Proved or Suspected Malignancy--Initial Experience Radiology, March 1, 2006; 238(3): 970 - 977. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY | THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE |