JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nettleton, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Morris, I. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nettleton, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Morris, I. D.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 45 No. 1 138-146
© 2004 by Society of Nuclear Medicine

Basic Science Investigations

Uptake, Localization, and Dosimetry of 111In and 201Tl in Human Testes

Jo S. Nettleton, PhD1, Richard S. Lawson, PhD1, Mary C. Prescott, MD1 and Ian D. Morris, DSc2

1 Department of Nuclear Medicine, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, United Kingdom
2 School of Biological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom


   ABSTRACT
TOP
 ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSION
 REFERENCES
 
This study concerns the testicular uptake and dosimetry of Auger electron-emitting radionuclides that are used during routine diagnostic nuclear medicine procedures. To consider the possible effects of these radionuclides on spermatogenic cells, a study has been undertaken to obtain in vivo data for quantification of 111In chloride and 201Tl chloride uptake into the human testis after intravenous administration. Values have been determined for uptake into the testis as a whole and to the seminiferous tubules where the germ cells are located. Methods: Data were obtained from patients with prostate cancer who opted for orchidectomy to effect hormone suppression. Patients were administered intravenously 1.5 MBq of either 111In chloride or 201Tl chloride at 24 or 48 h before orchidectomy. Upon removal, the testes were analyzed to assess uptake of radionuclide. Conventional dosimetry has been used to estimate testicular radiation doses using our values of percentage uptake. Results: Uptake of both 111In chloride and 201Tl chloride into the testes was seen at a level above that explained by simple homogeneous distribution of the radionuclide throughout the body; the testes as a whole demonstrated increased uptake by factors of 3.56 and 4.01 compared with nonspecific uptake for 111In and 201Tl, respectively, at 24 h after administration. Both radionuclides gained access to the seminiferous tubules. Conclusion: The results obtained indicate that the values of testicular radiation doses quoted by the International Commission on Radiological Protection for 111In might be too low by a factor of 4, whereas those for 201Tl might be too high by a factor of 4. No data were obtained for uptake by individual germ cells within the testis and, therefore, no consideration of dosimetry at the cellular level was possible. However, it has been demonstrated that uptake of diagnostic Auger electron-emitting radionuclides by male germ cells within the testis is possible after intravenous administration.

Key Words: radiation dosimetry • nuclear medicine • testes


   INTRODUCTION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSION
 REFERENCES
 
Both 111In chloride and 201Tl chloride are used in diagnostic nuclear medicine for imaging a range of diseases and medical conditions. Nuclear medicine scans have demonstrated localization of 111In and 201Tl in the genitalia, and possibly testes, of male patients after intravenous administration for diagnostic purposes (1–5). However, the resolution of {gamma}-camera images is inadequate to determine the exact location of the radionuclides within this area, whether it is associated with germ cells within the testes or reproductive tract, or within the blood in local vessels. In addition, 111In-labeled leukocytes have been used to image the epididymis (6) and localization in the epididymal region has been reported after intravenous administration of labeled cells, although once again imaging techniques cannot determine whether the 111In is actually localized within the epididymis.

Animal studies have demonstrated uptake of 111In (7–10), 114mIn (11–13), and 201Tl (14–16) into the testes and onto developing germ cells in rodents. It is therefore possible that there is similar localization onto germ cells within the human testis. Currently, very little in vivo human data are available to accurately determine localization and quantity of 111In and 201Tl within the testes. The information used by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) (17) to calculate dose equivalents assumes no selective testicular uptake of 111In chloride and 0.8% of injected activity (%IA) uptake into the testis for 201Tl chloride, after intravenous administration. The value of 0.8 %IA for 201Tl is based on nuclear medicine images of the testicular or scrotal region (15,18). However, data from postmortems on 2 patients who died soon after intravenous administration of 201Tl chloride (19) indicated uptake of around 0.11 %IA.

Within the testis, stem cells (type A spermatogonia) and developing germ cells (intermediate and type B spermatogonia, spermatocytes, and spermatids), as well as spermatozoa, are located within the seminiferous tubules. Access of blood-borne radionuclides to these cells is restricted by the so-called blood-testis barrier made up by the tight junctions between the Sertoli’s cells within which the germ cells are embedded during development. Only the spermatogonia that are located close to the basal membrane of the seminiferous tubules are not excluded from contact with the extracellular environment. Any uptake of either 111In or 201Tl by germ cells within the testis (with the exception of spermatogonia) must therefore be via the Sertoli’s cells. Ionic indium acts as an iron analog and several studies have demonstrated that uptake of 114mIn into rat testes is via transferrin-mediated endocytosis (13,20). In contrast, thallium acts as a potassium analog, using the Na+/K+ pump to gain access to the seminiferous tubules (14,21,22). Hoyes et al. (20) demonstrated passage of 137Cs, another potassium analog that utilizes the same uptake mechanism, across the Sertoli’s cell junction. Similar behavior of 201Tl is likely and uptake of this radionuclide into the testis is possible.

The most radiosensitive cells in the seminiferous tubules are the type B and intermediate spermatogonia with a median lethal dose (LD50) of the order of 0.2 Gy (in the mouse) (23). Stem cell spermatogonia show that the dose required to reduce survival to 37% is 0.97 Gy (in humans) (24). Spermatocytes are less radiosensitive (LD50 between 1.99 Gy and 8.1 Gy in the mouse), and further studies in mice have determined that spermatids and spermatozoa are less radiosensitive still and genetic damage is only shown after fertilization (23). Hoyes (13) has demonstrated mutagenic damage in the offspring of rats after paternal exposure to systemic 114mIn chloride, providing evidence for passage of indium through the blood-testis barrier. In addition, studies have shown damage to germ cells in animals after injection of both indium and thallium radionuclides directly into the testis (25–27).

A study has been undertaken to quantify the in vivo uptake of 111In and 201Tl into adult human testes after intravenous administration of radionuclide as the chloride. Values of uptake per gram of tissue have been determined as a percentage of the injected radionuclide for both gross testicular tissue as well as for the seminiferous tubules alone. The information obtained will enable more accurate calculation of absorbed dose to the testes using the MIRD system of dosimetry. In addition, the data will provide a first step to identifying cellular uptake of these Auger electron-emitting radionuclides by developing germ cells within the human testis, which would have significant implications for the form of dosimetry model required.


   MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSION
 REFERENCES
 
Design of Experiment
An experiment was designed in which radionuclide, either 111In or 201Tl, was administered to patients who were to undergo orchidectomy (subcapsular or total) as a means of hormone suppression for the treatment of prostate cancer. The radionuclide was administered intravenously at either 24 or 48 h before the operation. Upon removal, the testes were used to assess the uptake and localization of radionuclide within testicular tissue as a whole and within the seminiferous tubules. In addition, a 2 mL blood sample was taken from the patient at the time of the operation to compare the amount of radionuclide in the blood with that in the testes.

The radioactivity administered to each patient was approximately 1.5 MBq (the value being based on the sensitivity of the radiation detection instrument and the requirement to be able to detect uptake into the testis down to the level that is considered nonspecific—that is, based on even distribution of radionuclide throughout total body weight (28)).

Twelve volunteers were recruited into the study, 6 being administered with each radionuclide. All were male patients with prostate cancer who had elected to undergo orchidectomy to achieve suppression of testicular hormones. None of the patients had undergone chemical hormone suppression treatment before recruitment. All volunteers were >64 y old and considered able to give informed consent. Patients who were unwilling or unable to give informed consent or were confused as to the nature of the study (or orchidectomy procedure) were excluded from the study. All information obtained from the study is reported in a strictly anonymous form.

The radionuclide (111In or 201Tl) was administered via intravenous injection.

Measurement of Testicular Uptake
Radiopharmaceuticals were obtained from Nycomed Amersham at typical specific radioactivities (Amersham Nuclear Medicine radiopharmaceutical catalog: Nycomed Amersham), approximately 1,850 MBq/mg for both 111In and 201Tl. Both 111In and 201Tl were injected as chloride.

The radioactivities of the administered radionuclide doses (and standards) were determined using an ionization chamber (CRC 15R; Capintec) dose calibrator that is calibrated annually against a traceable national standard.

Two syringes of radionuclide (both containing either 111In chloride or 201Tl chloride) were prepared for each volunteer. The radionuclide in 1 syringe was used to make a standard solution in 1 L of water containing enough stable metal (indium or thallium) to ensure that the ratio of stable to radioactive atoms was of the order of at least 106:1. This was to prevent any adhesion of the radioactive element to the container walls, which would produce inaccuracy when aliquots of the standard were assayed. Four 1 mL aliquots were placed into counting tubes and these were sealed as standards.

The second syringe contained the radionuclide to be administered to the volunteer by intravenous injection. A small amount (approximately 1 mL) of blood was drawn into the syringe immediately before injection and mixed with the radionuclide. The blood plus radionuclide was then injected back into the patient. The mixing of blood with the radionuclide is significant in the case of 111In chloride as it allows labeling of serum transferrin before reinjection. The syringe was flushed several times with blood. The injection time and date were noted. The radioactivity remaining in the syringe was remeasured and, thus, the injected activity was calculated.

At the time of surgery, a blood sample was taken into a heparinized tube and, after removal, the testes were placed on ice until processed. The testes were weighed and if the operation was not a subcapsular orchidectomy, the capsule and epididymis were dissected free before weighing. Three 1 g samples were taken from each testis or paired epididymides (if available) and were minced and weighed into tubes for the determination of radioactivity.

A section of tissue (up to 5 g) was then taken from each testis for isolation of the seminiferous tubules. Eagle’s Minimum Essential Medium (MEM) was used as the basis of a testis dispersion fluid (which removed the interstitial tissue from a sample, leaving only the seminiferous tubules intact). Bovine serum albumin was added to the MEM at 0.1%. Immediately before use, collagenase dispase (0.3 mg/mL) and deoxyribonuclease (20 µg/mL) were also added to the medium. The tissue was incubated at 34°C for 20 min with continuous agitation in dispersion fluid. The seminiferous tubules remained intact at the end of incubation and were washed twice in MEM. From this, three 1 g samples were taken for each testis and processed for radioactivity determination as described above. Tissue samples processed for histology were preserved in Bouin’s fluid. All of the above chemicals were obtained from Sigma Chemical Co.

The radioactive content of the tissue samples, blood (1 mL), and standards, as well as a set of 4 tissue blanks (tubes containing 1 mL of unlabeled testicular tissue preserved in Bouin’s fluid from a previous donor) were assayed using a Minaxi {gamma}-Counter (5500 series Autogamma; Packard Instruments). Energy windows of 210–270 keV and 60–80 keV were set for 111In and 201Tl, respectively. A 2 min counting period was used and resulted in Poisson counting errors of <5% per sample tube. All values of counts per minute (cpm) were background corrected and decay corrected to the same time. Values of cpm were corrected to cpm/g or cpm/mL and the mean ± SE for each tissue type was found (gross testicular tissue, seminiferous tubules, epididymides, blood, and standards).

The percentage of injected radioactivity present per gram of tissue sample (or per mL blood) As was calculated using Equation 1:

(Eq. 1)
where Istd is the radioactivity of the 1 L radionuclide standard (MBq), Iinj is the radioactivity of the injected radionuclide (MBq), Cs is the cpm/g (or per mL) recorded for the sample tissue, Cstd is the cpm recorded for the 1 mL of standard, and D is the standard dilution factor (1,000).

Four volunteers were administered 111In and 4 were administered 201Tl at 24 h before orchidectomy (8 samples in total). A further 2 in each group were given the radionuclide at 48 h before surgery (4 in total). Mean values (±SEs when the number of samples >=3) of percentage uptake per gram of tissue (gross testicular tissue, seminiferous tubules, epididymis) or per milliliter of blood were determined for all volunteers at each administration time and radionuclide. Where only 1 sample of a tissue or blood was obtained from a subject, a single result was recorded.

Mean values of nonspecific uptake per gram of tissue were calculated based on the weight of the volunteer, by considering homogeneous distribution of radionuclide throughout the body with no specific uptake mechanisms resulting in concentration within any organ or system. A factor for the amount of uptake above the nonspecific value was thus determined for the gross testicular tissue as uptake per gram of testicular tissue divided by uptake per gram throughout the body.

Dose Calculation
The MIRD system of organ dosimetry (29) was used to calculate the absorbed dose to the testes per MBq injected, using 3 different models for residence time in the testes as described:

  1. We used the mean measured testicular uptake per gram in our 4 subjects at 24 h after injection, multiplied by a standard mass for 2 normal testes of 35 g (28), to obtain our own estimate of normal testicular uptake. This approach was used to minimize the effect of low testicular weight in some of our subjects. This uptake figure was then combined with the standard clearance times used by the ICRP (17) to give the testicular residence time. The SD of the uptake measurements was used as an estimate of the uncertainty on the residence time.
  2. This model used the same testicular uptake as model I, but the pessimistic assumption of no biologic clearance from the testes was used instead of the ICRP clearance.
  3. The 6 measured values of percentage uptake per gram at both 24 and 48 h were fitted to a falling exponential, taking into account the errors of each individual measurement. The area under the fitted exponential, combined with a standard testicular mass of 35 g, gave the estimate of testicular residence time. The uncertainty in the fit was used to estimate the uncertainty in the residence time.

For all 3 models, S factors for the testes (MIRDOSE3.1, Radiation Internal Dose Information Center, Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Oak Ridge, TN, 1995) were used to calculate the self-absorbed dose to the testes from activity within the testes. We assumed that the dose to testes from other nearby organs would be the same as that calculated by the ICRP. The total testicular dose calculated by the ICRP for 111In (17) and for 201Tl (30) was used, from which the testicular self-dose calculated using the ICRP uptake figures (17) was subtracted and our own calculated values of testicular self-dose were added. We then used the modified values of testicular dose, together with (unchanged) ICRP data on doses to other organs for 111In (17,31) and for 201Tl (30; David Taylor, Secretary of ICRP Committee 2, written communication, 2001), multiplied by relevant tissue weighting factors, to calculate effective doses. No attempt was made to account for Auger electron emissions not included in S factors in MIRDOSE3.1.


   RESULTS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSION
 REFERENCES
 
The mean age and weight of volunteers were 70.5 y and 78 kg for 111In and 77.8 y and 70.8 kg for 201Tl. None of the volunteers was significantly anemic. Figures 1 and 2 are typical histology sections for the volunteers (Figs. 1A and 1B represent subjects In2 and In4, respectively, and Figs. 2A and 2B represent subjects Tl1 and Tl2, respectively). It can be seen that the testes from subject Tl2, in particular, contains few germ cells within the testes. This might have been expected from the low testicular weight (total for both testes, 15.0 g). The sections from subjects In2 and Tl1 indicate higher numbers of germ cells present (total testicular weights, 39.0 and 41.0 g, respectively). In general, all testes demonstrated spermatogenesis, although the level appeared to be associated with testis weight. As the individuals recruited into the study were all >64 y old and most were >70 y old, this was expected.



View larger version (131K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 1. Typical testicular sections from subject In2 (A) and subject In4 (B), administered intravenously with 111In chloride.

 


View larger version (147K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 2. Typical testicular sections from subject Tl1 (A) and subject Tl2 (B), administered intravenously with 201Tl chloride.

 
Tables 1 and 2 show individual results for 111In and 201Tl administered 24 and 48 h before orchidectomy. Results are shown as the percentage of injected radionuclide activity per gram of tissue (%IA/g) for gross testicular tissue, seminiferous tubules, and epididymis and per milliliter (%IA/mL) for blood. Percentage uptake representing nonspecific uptake (based simply on the weight of the individual) is also shown. Tables 3 and 4 are a summary of these results for all individuals undergoing the same administration protocol (for 111In and 201Tl, respectively). The mean percentage activity in the testes is also shown (based on a standard mass of 35 g (28) and our values of uptake per gram of gross testicular tissue).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 1 Uptake of 111In Chloride: Results for Individual Subjects

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 2 Uptake of 201Tl Chloride: Results for Individual Subjects

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 3 Summary Results for 111ln Chloride: Concentration Above Levels Expected for Nonspecific Uptake as Proportion of Body Mass

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 4 Summary Results for 201TI Chloride: Concentration Above Levels Expected for Nonspecific Uptake as Proportion of Body Mass

 
The values of absorbed dose to the testes per MBq injected for each of the different models of clearance used and the resulting values of effective dose are given in Tables 5 and 6 for 111In chloride and 201Tl chloride, respectively. The quoted errors only take account of the uncertainty in our measurements of testicular uptake. There are many other sources of error in biologic data and S factors, but these are common to our results and those quoted by the ICRP.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 5 Values of Absorbed Dose to Testes and Effective Dose for 111ln Chloride Using Different Models of Biologic Clearance from Testis

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 6 Values of Absorbed Dose to Testes and Effective Dose for 201Tl Chloride Using Different Models of Biologic Clearance from Testis

 

   DISCUSSION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION
 REFERENCES
 
As shown by Tables 1–4, uptake of both 111In and 201Tl into the testes was greater than that accounted for by simple homogeneous distribution of the intravenously injected radionuclide throughout the body according to organ weight (nonspecific uptake). The errors associated with the measurements are relatively large due to the limited number of subjects. This is especially significant for the 48-h measurements when only 2 subjects participated for each radionuclide and the data must be considered as preliminary.

Percentage uptake per gram into gross testicular tissue is 3.56 ± 0.55 x nonspecific uptake for 111In at 24 h and 3.64 (4.40, 2.88) x at 48 h (where the values in parentheses [or brackets] are the individual results when only 2 samples were obtained). Though this is of a similar magnitude to the amount of 111In in the blood at the same times (3.49 ± 0.85 x and 3.41 [4.20, 2.62] x at 24 and 48 h, respectively), it is unlikely that the radioactivity associated with the testes is simply due to the blood within the tissue, because the content of blood in the testis is relatively small. The ICRP (28) reports the total blood content of both testes (combined total weight, 35 g) as being 5.8 g. Uptake of 201Tl into gross testicular tissue is of a similar order (4.01 ± 0.09 x and 3.32 [3.70, 2.94] x nonspecific uptake at 24 and 48 h, respectively). However, the amount of 201Tl localized in the blood is very much smaller than for 111In (0.11 ± 0.02 x and 0.09 [0.07, 0.11] x nonspecific uptake values at 24 and 48 h, respectively). This result would be expected because 201Tl is a potassium analog and would be expected to be removed from the blood into the urine, as well as being taken up by tissues such as muscle (22,32), whereas 111In will be present in blood bound to serum transferrin and will have a much longer clearance time from the blood as it is taken up and retained by cells with a large iron requirement (33–35).

Both 111In and 201Tl gained access to the seminiferous tubules (uptake of both radionuclides being approximately twice that due to homogeneous distribution according to weight). This indicates that both radionuclides can pass across the blood-testis barrier formed by the Sertoli’s cells and thus might be available for uptake by developing germ cells within the seminiferous epithelium. The result for 111In is consistent with the work by other authors (11,12,20), who have demonstrated transferrin-mediated passage of the radionuclide (or 114mIn) through the Sertoli’s cell layer in animals. Thallium is thought to use the Na+/K+ pump to gain access to the seminiferous tubules (21,22), and the possibility of leaching out of tissue samples during the washing process means that these results for 201Tl must be viewed as a lower level of uptake only. Uptake of Auger electron-emitting radionuclides by developing germ cells (and stem cells) might have biologic consequences necessitating dosimetric reevaluation (9,10,26,27,36–38).

Values for uptake into the epididymis are only available for 111In, because all orchidectomies performed after administration of 201Tl were subcapsular. There appears to be uptake into the epididymis, being of the order of twice the value obtained for nonspecific uptake only. The age of the patients and their medical condition mean that the number of sperm within the epididymi were likely to be lower than for a healthy young male. It is not known to what extent the number of spermatozoa present in the lumen affects the amount of radionuclide within.

The small number of samples for the 48-h measurement (n = 2) prevents any statistical analysis of these results. However, the SEs in Tables 1 and 2 give an indication of measurement error. The biologic variation between patients would be expected to be of the same order as for the 24-h data and, thus, associated errors would be estimated to be of a similar magnitude. Based on 48-h concentration factors, it does not appear that there has been significant clearance of either radionuclide from the testis between the 2 time points. This may indicate that an equilibrium has been reached by 24 h after administration and that both radionuclides are retained by the testes. The uncertainties in clearance rates have been addressed by using 3 alternative models to calculate absorbed and effective doses, as described in the Dose Calculation section and shown in Tables 5 and 6. Values of concentration factor for seminiferous tubules also appear to demonstrate retention of both radionuclides (2.14 ± 0.40 and 2.57 ± 0.49 at 24 h and 1.73 [2.21, 1.26] and 1.9 [2.28, 1.52] at 48 h for 111In and 201Tl, respectively), although once again small sample sizes prevent statistical analysis.

It is worth noting that the value for nonspecific uptake into the testis does not take into account the fact that the radionuclide is likely to be excluded from regions containing little fluid, such as cortical bone. This consideration can be included by assuming nonspecific distribution to be through the compartment of the body that consists of water. Of total body weight, 60% is considered to be water, whereas, in the testis alone, the value is 81% (28). Thus, the value of nonspecific uptake into the testis would be corrected by a factor of 0.81/0.6 (1.35), which is smaller than our measured concentrations factor for either 111In or 201Tl.

Hoyes et al. (20) reported a value of 0.2 %IA uptake into the testes of rats at 24 h after systemic administration of 114mIn. The typical body weight of the rats used by Hoyes et al. was 200 g, with a testicular weight of approximately 1.8 g (12). Localization as a proportion of body mass would result in 0.9 %IA uptake into the testes. Their result of 0.2 %IA therefore demonstrates uptake at values lower than nonspecific (concentration factor, 0.22). Our study has demonstrated a concentration factor of 3.56 for 111In at 24 h (testicular uptake, 0.2 %IA), which is significantly larger than that of Hoyes et al. Studies have shown (23,39) that the human testis has an increased ratio of parenchymal tissue to spermatogonia compared with the rat testis and contains twice as many transferrin-synthesizing Sertoli’s cells. Therefore, transferrin-mediated uptake of indium into the human testis might be expected to be relatively larger than that in the rat, as demonstrated by this study. Values of uptake observed by other researchers (as above) are shown in Table 7, alongside the results from our work.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 7 Comparison of Results for Uptake of 111ln and 201Tl From Our Research with Those Reported in Other Studies

 
The values of 201Tl uptake determined here are significantly less than most of those previously determined using nuclear medicine images; values of 0.46 %IA, 0.15 %IA, 0.8 %IA, and 1.0 %IA total testicular uptake at 24 h have been reported by Rao et al. (5), Atkins et al. (14), Hosain and Hosain (15), and Gupta et al. (18), respectively (Table 7). As discussed earlier, the resolution of such images does not enable accurate location of the radionuclide within the scrotal sack. However, Atkins et al. (14) reported 0.7% uptake of injected radionuclide into the 33-g testis of a 12-kg dog at 24 h after administration. This relates to a concentration factor above nonspecific uptake (based on the above testis and body weights) of 2.55. Our value of the concentration factor for 201Tl at 24 h after administration was 4.01 (testicular uptake of 0.19 %IA for both testes), which is a similar order of magnitude. In addition, the postmortem values of testicular uptake determined by Samson et al. (19) were around 0.1 %IA. It should be noted that ICRP Publication 53 (17,30,31; David Taylor, Secretary of ICRP Committee 2, written communication, 2001) uses a value of 0.8 %IA (0.4 %IA per testis) based on the nuclear medicine imaging work of Hosain and Hosain (15) as a worst-case value.

The weight of testes used in this study (12–42 g for both testes) was often lower than the average value for young healthy males (35 g total for both) (28), and it can be seen from Figures 1 and 2 that they contained fewer than the normal numbers of germ cells. This might be expected due to the age of the patients (all >64 y). In addition, the function of the Sertoli’s cells in these individuals is likely to be lower than average due to age (40). Uptake into the testes is related to germ cell numbers and Sertoli’s cell function (12). Testicular uptake for the subjects in the study is thus likely to have been lower than average. Values of uptake obtained from this study should therefore be viewed as lower limits only. However, we have attempted to allow for this effect as much as possible by using uptake values corrected to standard 35-g testes.

Using the MIRD system of dosimetry, the absorbed dose to the testes has been estimated using the uptake values determined in this study and 3 alternative clearance models described earlier in this article: model I, ICRP clearance rates (17); model II, no biologic clearance; and model III, an exponential fit to our own measurements. Use of these different models allowed us to address the uncertainty associated with the results at 48 h. In the case of 111In, testicular absorbed doses of 0.17 ± 0.013, 0.21 ± 0.017, and 0.14 ± 0.014 mGy/MBq were obtained for models I, II, and III, respectively (Table 5). These are all significantly higher than the ICRP value of 0.053 mGy/MBq (17,30,31), which assumed no specific testicular uptake. Our estimates of testicular absorbed dose for 201Tl are 0.11 ± 0.006, 0.14 ± 0.007, and 0.12 ± 0.016 mGy/MBq for models I, II, and III, respectively (Table 6). These are all significantly lower than the ICRP value of 0.45 mGy/MBq (30), which assumed a value of 0.8 %IA testicular uptake (17).

It can be seen that our results show significant differences from the published data. The differences all arise from our figures for testicular uptake. The differences between our 3 clearance models are small when compared with the difference between our results and those quoted by the ICRP. Our estimates of the testicular dose from 111In are a factor of between 2.6 and 4.0 larger than the ICRP values, and our estimates for 201Tl are a factor of between 3.2 and 4.1 smaller than the ICRP values.

After intravenous administration of 80 MBq 111In chloride for joint imaging (41) or 80 MBq 201Tl chloride for myocardial studies (14), the calculated radiation dose to the testes, using the figures as determined in this work (from model III), would be 11 and 10 mGy, respectively. However, depending on the subcellular localization of both 111In and 201Tl, studies have demonstrated an increased radiobiologic effectiveness (RBE) of up to 4.2 for 111In oxine (compared with x-rays) and 3.3 for 201Tl chloride (compared with the ß-analog 204Tl) when injected into the testis of mice (38). Although the subcellular distribution of 111In chloride will differ from that of 111In oxine, the increased RBE for 201Tl chloride would increase the equivalent dose to the testes to 32 mSv. These doses are considerably below the levels (at least 80 mGy, x-ray) that have been shown to produce measurable oligospermia (20); however, the possibility of genetic damage cannot be excluded (27,42).

The choice of clearance model has no effect on the value of effective dose (Tables 5 and 6). For 111In, the effective dose calculated using any of our models is 0.22 mSv/MBq, which is similar to the ICRP value of 0.21 mSv/MBq (30). For 201Tl, our calculated effective dose is 0.14 mSv/MBq, which represents a 36% decrease in the published ICRP value of 0.22 mSv/MBq (30). However, the ICRP has now recognized that the effective dose from 201Tl published in ICRP Publication 80 (30) contained an error in transcription of the dose to the ovary. This has subsequently been corrected and the effective dose is now recalculated as 0.17 mSv/MBq (David Taylor, Secretary of ICRP Committee 2, written communication, 2001), although this corrected figure is still not widely known. Relative to this, our value of 0.14 mSv/MBq represents a decrease of 18%.

The number of samples (especially for the 48-h data) is rather limited. The reason for this was a change of preferred treatment protocol for prostate cancer within the department, which resulted in very few orchidectomies being performed. However, the study does provide a significant addition to the available data for in vivo testicular uptake of 111In and 201Tl, from the chloride form.

It should be noted that all data obtained in this study were from patients with prostate cancer who opted for orchidectomy to effect hormone suppression. None of the patients had previously undergone hormone treatment. The age of the patients (>64 y old) means that Sertoli’s cell function is likely to have been lower than average and, thus, translation of the results obtained to the general male population should be viewed with caution. However, because in vivo data could not be obtained from healthy young men, we believe that the results obtained provide a valuable extension to the data regarding uptake and localization of these commonly used diagnostic radiopharmaceuticals.


   CONCLUSION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSION
REFERENCES
 
The results of this in vivo study indicate that there is uptake of both 111In and 201Tl into the human testis after systemic administration in the chloride form, though it is likely that the uptake mechanisms are different for the 2 radionuclides. Values of the percentage uptake into the testis as a whole are consistent with previous data obtained from animal studies, the uptake of 111In being larger than that used by the ICRP in dose calculations and that of 201Tl being smaller. In addition, both radionuclides appear to traverse the blood-testis barrier and, thus, can gain access to the developing germ cells within the seminiferous epithelium. Further work should be undertaken to localize the radionuclide within the seminiferous tubules and to quantify uptake onto the intratubular germ cells.


   ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
The Central Manchester Healthcare National Health Service Trust provided financial support for this project.


   FOOTNOTES
 
Received Aug. 28, 2002; revision accepted Sep. 30, 2003.

For correspondence or reprints contact: Jo S. Nettleton, PhD, NSD2B, St. Peter’s House, Bootle L20 3LZ, United Kingdom.

E-mail: joanne.nettleton{at}hse.gsi.gov.uk


   REFERENCES
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Van-Reenen OR, Lotter MG, Minaar PC, du-Heyns A, Badenhorst PN, Pieters H. Radiation dose from human platelets labelled with indium-111. Br J Radiol. 1980;53:790–795.[Abstract]
  2. Beatty B, Paxton R, Sheibani K, et al. Testis imaging with 111In-labeled anticarcinoembryonic antigen monoclonal antibody: identification of carcinoembryonic antigen in normal germ cells. Cancer Res. 1986;46:6503–6508.[Medline]
  3. Murray JL, Rosenblum MG, Lamki L, et al. Clinical parameters related to optimal tumour localization of indium-111-labeled mouse antimelanoma monoclonal antibody ZME-018. J Nucl Med. 1987;28:25–33.
  4. Feller PA, Sodd VJ. Dosimetry of four heart-imaging radionuclides: 43K, 81Rb, 129Cs and 201Tl. J Nucl Med. 1976;16:1070–1075.
  5. Rao DV, Shepstone BJ, Wilkins HB, Howell RW. Kinetics and dosimetry of thallium-201 in human testes. J Nucl Med. 1995;36:607–609.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Debatin JF, Beytas EM. Indium 111 white blood cell imaging of epididymitis. Eur J Nucl Med. 1990;17:286–289.[Medline]
  7. Jonsson B-A. Biokinetics and Localization of Some Indium-111 Radiopharmaceuticals in Rats at the Macroscopic and Microscopic Level [PhD dissertation]. Lund, Sweden: Lund University; 1991.
  8. Jonsson B-A, Strand S-E, Andersson L. Radiation dosimetry for indium-111-labeled anti-CEA-F(ab')2 fragments evaluated from tissue distribution in rats. J Nucl Med. 1992;33:1654–1660.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Jonsson BA, Strand SE, Larsson BS. A quantitative autoradiographic study of the heterogeneous activity distribution of different indium-111-labeled radiopharmaceuticals in rat tissues. J Nucl Med. 1992;33:1825–1833.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Jonsson BA, Strand SE, Emanuelsson H, Larsson B. Tissue, cellular and subcellular distribution of indium radionuclides in the rat. In: Howell RW, Narra VR, Sastry KSR, Rao DV, eds. Biophysical Aspects of Auger Processes. Woodbury, NY: American Institute of Physics; 1992:249–272.
  11. Jackson C, Jackson H, Bock M, Morris ID, Sharma HL. Metal radionuclides and the testis. Int J Radiat Biol. 1991;60:851–858.[Medline]
  12. Hoyes KP, Sharma HL, Jackson H, Hendry JH, Morris ID. Spermatogenic and mutagenic damage after paternal exposure to systemic indium-114m. Radiat Res. 1994;139:185–193.[Medline]
  13. Hoyes KP, Johnson C, Johnston RE, et al. Testicular toxicity of the transferrin binding radionuclide indium-114m in adult and neonatal rats. Reprod Toxicol. 1995;9:297–305.[Medline]
  14. Atkins H, Budinger T, Lebowitz E, et al. Thallium-201 for medical use. Part 3. Human distribution and physical imaging properties. J Nucl Med. 1977;18:133–140.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Hosain P, Hosain F. Revision of gonadal radiation dose to man from thallium-201. In: Proceedings of the Third International Radiopharmaceutical Dosimetry Symposium. Oak Ridge, TN; 1981:333–345.
  16. Som P, Matsui K, Atkins HL, et al. Microautoradiographic studies on the cellular localization of radiothallium. Nucl Med. 1978;17:266–269.
  17. ICRP Publication 53: Radiation dose to patients from radiopharmaceuticals. Ann ICRP. 1987;18:1–373.[Medline]
  18. Gupta SM, Herrera N, Spencer RP, Hosain F, Cricitti TW. Testicular-scrotal content of 201Tl and 67Ga after intravenous administration. Int J Nucl Med Biol. 1981;8:211–212.[Medline]
  19. Samson G, Wackers F, Becker A, Schole EB. Distribution of 201Tl in man. In: Oeff K, Schmidt H, eds. Nuklearmedizin und Biokybernetic [Nuclear Medicine and Biokinetics]. Vol 1. Berlin, Germany: Informationsdienste; 1978:385–389.
  20. Hoyes KP, Morris ID, Hendry JH, Sharma HL. Transferrin mediated uptake of radionuclide by the testis. J Nucl Med. 1996;37:336–340.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Kuffler SW, Nicholls JG. From Neuron to Brain: A Cellular Approach to the Functions of the Nervous System. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer; 1977.
  22. Kawana M, Krizek H, Porter J, Lathrop KA, Charleston D, Harper PV. Use of 199Tl as a potassium analog in scanning [abstract]. J Nucl Med. 1970;11:333.
  23. Bianchi M. Cytotoxic insult to germinal tissue. Part 1. Testis; Part 2. Ovary. In: Potten CS, Hendry JH, eds. Cytotoxic Insult to Tissue: Effects on Cell Lineages. London, U.K.: Churchill Livingstone; 1983:258–328.
  24. Oakberg EF. Mammalian gametogenesis and species comparisons in radiation responses of the gonads: effects of radiation on meiotic systems. International Atomic Energy Agency meeting; Vienna, Austria; 8–11 May, 1968.
  25. Rao DV, Govelitz GF, Sastry KSR. Radiotoxicity of thallium-201 in mouse testes: inadequacy of conventional dosimetry. J Nucl Med. 1983;24:145–153.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Rao DV, Sastry KSR, Grimmond HE, et al. Cytotoxicity of some indium radiopharmaceuticals in mouse testes. J Nucl Med. 1988;29:375–384.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Rao DV, Narra VR, Howell RW, Lanka VK, Sastry KSR. Induction of spermhead abnormalities by incorporated radionuclides: dependence on subcellular distribution, type of radiation dose rate and presence of radioprotectors. Radiat Res. 1991;125:89–97.[Medline]
  28. ICRP Publication 23: Report of the Task Group on Reference Man. Oxford, U.K.: Pergamon Press; 1975:182.
  29. Loevinger R, Budinger TF, Watson EE. Primer For Absorbed Dose Calculations. New York, NY: Society of Nuclear Medicine; 1988.
  30. ICRP Publication 80: Radiation doses to patients from radiopharmaceuticals: addendum 2 to ICRP Publication 53. Ann ICRP. 1998;28:1–126.
  31. Addendum 1 to ICRP 53. Radiation doses to patients from radiopharmaceuticals. Ann ICRP. 1991;22:1–28.
  32. Cox PH, Belfer AJ, van der Pompe WB. Thallium 201 chloride uptake in tumours, a possible complication in heart scintigraphy. Br J Radiol. 1976;49:767–768.[Abstract]
  33. Beamish M, Brown E. The metabolism of transferrin bound indium-111 and iron-59 in the rat. Blood. 1974;43:693–701.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Beamish M, Brown E. A comparison of the behaviour of indium-111 and iron-59 labelled transferrin on incubation with human and rat reticulocytes. Blood. 1974;43:703–711.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Raijmakers PGHM, Groeneveld ABJ, Hollander WD, Teule GJJ. Transport of 67Ga and 111In across a membrane: role of plasma binding and concentration gradients. Nucl Med Commun. 1992;13:349–356.[Medline]
  36. Hoyes KP, Morris ID. Environmental radiation and male reproduction. Int J Androl. 1996;19:199–204.[Medline]
  37. Humm JL, Howell RW, Rao DV. Dosimetry of Auger electron emitting radionuclides: Report No. 3 of the AAPM Nuclear Medicine Task Group No. 6. Med Phys. 1994;21:1901–1915.[Medline]
  38. Rao DV, Mylavarapu VB, Sastry KSR, Howell RW. Internal Auger emitters: effects on spermatogenesis and oogenesis in mice. In: Baverstock KF, Charlton DE, eds. DNA Damage by Auger Emitters. London, U.K.: Taylor and Francis 1988:15–26.
  39. Johnson L, Petty CS, Neaves WB. A comparative study of the daily sperm production and testicular components in humans and rats. Biol Reprod. 1980;22:1233–1243.[Abstract]
  40. Nistal M, Mora JCD, Paniagua R. Classification of several types of maturational arrest of spermatogonia according to Sertoli cell morphology: an approach to aetiology. Int J Androl. 1998;21:317–326.[Medline]
  41. Sayle BA, Fawcett HD, Wilkey DJ, Cierney G. Indium-111 chloride imaging in the detection of infected prostheses. J Nucl Med. 1985;26:718–721.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Sailer B, Jost L, Erikson K, Tajiran M, Evenson D. Effects of x-irradiation on mouse testicular cells and sperm chromatin structure. Environ Molec Mutagen. 1995;25:23–30.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
G. Grafstrom, B.-A. Jonsson, A. M. El Hassan, J. Tennvall, and S.-E. Strand
Rat testis as a radiobiological in vivo model for radionuclides
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, April 1, 2006; 118(1): 32 - 42.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JNMHome page
S. R. Thomas, M. G. Stabin, and F. P. Castronovo
Radiation-Absorbed Dose from 201Tl-Thallous Chloride
J. Nucl. Med., March 1, 2005; 46(3): 502 - 508.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nettleton, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Morris, I. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nettleton, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Morris, I. D.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE