Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
OtherLetters to the Editor

White Blood Cell Labeling with 99mTc-HMPAO

Claire de Labriolle Vaylet, Nichol Colas-Linhart, Anne Petiet and Bernard Bok
Journal of Nuclear Medicine April 2003, 44 (4) 657-658;
Claire de Labriolle Vaylet
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nichol Colas-Linhart
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anne Petiet
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bernard Bok
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

TO THE EDITOR:

We were interested to read the contribution of Dr. Ak and collaborators dealing with the chromosomal consequences induced by white blood cell labeling with 99mTc-hexamethylpropyleneamine oxime (HMPAO) (1). The authors considered that their experimental conditions mimicked routine conditions. However, the final radioactive concentration they obtained was 325.6 MBq for 4.2–7 million mononuclear cells, that is, about 150-fold higher than the radioactive concentration on mononuclear cells we have under routine conditions (325 kBq per million mononuclear cells (2)). The authors said that they use “mixed leukocyte labeling,” whereas they have, in fact, labeled isolated mononuclear cells without reducing radioactive concentration in order to correct for the absence of granulocytes in their preparation. Mononuclear cells are only a fraction of white blood cells, less abundant than granulocytes, and their affinity for HMPAO is lower than granulocyte affinity (3).

In our opinion, it is therefore not surprising that the authors, having worked under such conditions, noted a high frequency of unstable chromosomal aberrations that led them to conclude that all the aberrant cells would be unable to clone after in vivo injection and would be eliminated.

In contrast to the observation made by Ak et al., we have previously shown that some lymphocytes, after being labeled under conditions mimicking routine nuclear medicine practice, had chromosomal aberrations and that a fraction of labeled cells was still able to clone in vitro.

We think that it is safer and therefore advisable to exclude lymphocytes before labeling in order to avoid the injection of damaged lymphocytes.

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    Ak İ, Vardereli E, Durak B, et al. Labeling of mixed leukocytes with 99mTc-HMPAO causes severe chromosomal aberrations in lymphocytes. J Nucl Med. 2002;43:203–206.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    de Labriolle-Vaylet C, Colas-Linhart N, Sala-Trepat M, Petiet A, Voisin P, Bok B. Biological consequences of the heterogeneous irradiation of lymphocytes during technetium-99m hexamethylpropylene amine oxime white blood cell labelling. Eur J Nucl Med. 1998;25:1423–1428.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. ↵
    Peters AM, Osman S, Henderson BL, et al. Clinical experience with 99mTc-hexamethylpropylene amineoxime for labeling leucocytes and imaging inflammation. Lancet. 1986;2(8513):946–949.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed

REPLY:

As indicated in our publication (1), all cultured, labeled lymphocytes carried heavy chromosomal damage. However, judging from the letter to the editor of de Labriolle Vaylet et al., in their study (2) only some lymphocytes had chromosomal aberrations and some were even able to form clones in vitro. It thus seems that the lymphocytes in their study contained much less radioactivity, so that we assume their labeling procedure must have been different from ours. With our methodology, we feel confident that reinjection of heavily damaged lymphocytes in the patient will not have adverse clinical consequences.

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    Ak İ, Vardareli E, Durak B, et al. Labeling of mixed leukocytes with 99mTc-HMPAO causes severe chromosomal aberrations in lymphocytes. J Nucl Med. 2002;43:203–206.
  2. ↵
    de Labriolle-Vaylet C, Colas-Linhart N, Sala-Trepat M, Petiet A, Voisin P, Bok B. Biological consequences of the heterogeneous irradiation of lymphocytes during technetium-99m hexamethylpropylene amine oxime white blood cell labelling. Eur J Nucl Med. 1998;25:1423–1428.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 44, Issue 4
April 1, 2003
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
White Blood Cell Labeling with 99mTc-HMPAO
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
White Blood Cell Labeling with 99mTc-HMPAO
Claire de Labriolle Vaylet, Nichol Colas-Linhart, Anne Petiet, Bernard Bok
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Apr 2003, 44 (4) 657-658;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
White Blood Cell Labeling with 99mTc-HMPAO
Claire de Labriolle Vaylet, Nichol Colas-Linhart, Anne Petiet, Bernard Bok
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Apr 2003, 44 (4) 657-658;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • REFERENCES
    • REFERENCES
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Business Model Beats Science and Logic: Dosimetry and Paucity of Its Use
  • Determining PSMA-617 Mass and Molar Activity in Pluvicto Doses
  • The Value of Functional PET in Quantifying Neurotransmitter Dynamics
Show more Authors of the Letter and the Reply

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire