Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
OtherInvited Commentary

Genetically Engineered Antibody Fragments and PET Imaging: A New Era of Radioimmunodiagnosis

Maneesh Jain and Surinder K. Batra
Journal of Nuclear Medicine December 2003, 44 (12) 1970-1972;
Maneesh Jain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Surinder K. Batra
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

The emerging interest in antibody-based pharmaceuticals and diagnostics is evident from the fact that currently 12 antibodies are available in the market as therapeutics (1) and another 5 are being exploited for clinical diagnosis of several malignancies. Because antibodies have high specificity toward their cognate antigens, tumor-antigen-specific antibodies are considered to be attractive vehicles for targeted delivery of imaging agents for the diagnosis of both primary and metastatic malignancies. The use of intact antibodies for imaging is hampered, however, by their large molecular size, which leads to prolonged serum half-life. Furthermore, because of the slow diffusion from vasculature into the tumor, intact antibodies take longer for maximal dose deposition in the target tissue (2,3). The combination of prolonged clearance kinetics and slow tumor uptake results in low radiolocalization indices and high systemic background (4). The simplest approach to circumvent these problems is to tailor the antibody molecules either by enzymatic digestion or genetic engineering to yield smaller-molecular-weight fragments with unaltered specificity and improved pharmacokinetics. Enzymatically produced antibody fragments F(ab)′2 and Fab′ exhibit more favorable pharmacokinetics and produce better images when radiolabeled with suitable radionuclide; however, they are tedious to prepare reproducibly.

Antibody engineering is an emerging field that has made it possible to tailor antigen-binding domains into a single polypeptide with a much smaller size than intact immunoglobulin. A single-chain Fv (scFv) recombinant protein for a given monoclonal antibody can be prepared by connecting genes encoding for heavy-chain and light-chain variable regions at the DNA level by an appropriate oligonucleotide linker. The resulting translation product forms a single polypeptide chain with a linker bridging the 2 variable domains. Compared with intact parental antibody (150 kDa), scFv (25 kDa) for a given immunoglobulin exhibits faster clearance kinetics and deeper tumor penetration; however, the absolute dose deposition of scFv is much lower for scFv (4). This is primarily due to its monovalent binding nature, which results in lower functional avidity. Divalent and multivalent scFvs have recently been described and result either from the spontaneous dimerization or covalent association of 2 or more monovalent scFvs (5). There is increasing evidence that recombinant antibody fragments with di- and multivalent binding with intermediate molecular weight (60–120 kDa) are an ideal compromise between slow-clearing high-localizing immunoglobulins and fast-clearing low-localizing monovalent scFvs (4,6, 7).

Diabodies result from noncovalent cross-pairing of scFv fragments, which is mediated by short linker peptides (8). With their bivalent binding, they exhibit better tumor deposition than do their scFv counterparts yet clear faster from circulation than do intact antibodies because of their smaller molecular size (55 kDa). Recently, the crystal structure of T84.66 diabody was described, and it appears that this design is suitable for enhanced flexibility and in vivo stability (9). The fusion proteins of scFv with the hinge region and CH3 domain of immunoglobulin molecule are called minibodies (10). The hinge region facilitates dimerization mediated by disulphide bond formation and imparts flexibility to the antigen-binding domain. With a molecular weight of 80 kDa, minibodies persist longer than diabodies in the serum, hence allowing higher dose deposition in the tumors (8,10, 11).

Advances in nuclear medicine have allowed the development of several imaging modalities that are being used for diagnosis, classification, characterization, preoperative evaluation of the extent of tumor, and postoperative monitoring of recurrence of the various malignancies. These techniques are based on differential uptake of radiolabeled tracers by tumor cells. The resulting signal is detected and computed to reconstruct a planar or tomographic image corresponding to the spatial distribution of tracer. Nuclear imaging has enabled not only morphologic but also metabolic (glucose uptake), antigenic (antibody-mediated), and physiologic (vascular imaging agents, hypoxia, etc.) characterization of tumors.

PET is a powerful imaging technique (12) that has been used in the staging and management of several malignancies, including lung cancer, colorectal cancer, melanoma, and lymphoma. Positrons emitted from tracer isotopes collide with the neighboring electrons, after which both particles are annihilated. This results in the release of energy in the form of 2 γ-rays of 511 keV, which are emitted in opposite directions and are recorded coincidently by a ring of external nuclear detectors. The signals are computed to reconstruct a tomographic image of the emitting source. The high sensitivity of PET, which is about 10-fold greater than that of conventional SPECT scanners, allows the detection of tracer isotopes at a much lower concentration (10−11–10−12 mol/L), and its higher resolution of (3–9)3 mm3 makes it possible to image tumors of very small dimensions (12). Although most of the clinical PET studies (∼95%) are based on 18F-FDG, recent interest has emerged to develop specific probes, such as antibodies and receptor ligands. 124I-labeled monoclonal antibodies have been evaluated for colon, breast, and ovarian cancer in animal models (13–15) and in humans for breast cancer (16). Recently, PET imaging using 124I-labeled anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) antibodies was performed to evaluate the utility of VEGF as a target in animal models (17) and in a patient group with various solid tumors (18). However, because of long serum persistence of intact immunoglobulin, optimal images are obtained 3–10 d after administration, which is a clinical disadvantage.

In the current issue of The Journal of Nuclear Medicine, Sundaresan et al. (19) describe antigen-specific PET imaging of tumor xenografts in the murine model using engineered antibodies. The authors have combined the high sensitivity and resolution of PET with the high specificity, selectivity, and improved pharmacokinetics of diabody and minibody forms of anti-CEA antibody T84.66 to obtain high-quality images of LS174T xenotransplants. Both minibody and diabody exhibited rapid blood clearance and specific retention in the tumor, which resulted in high ratios of tumor to normal tissue and tumor to background and enabled excellent visualization of the tumors at 18 h after administration. Despite lower absolute accumulation in the tumors, diabody yielded images with good contrast as early as 4 h after injection, primarily because of rapid clearing from the nontarget tissues. On the other hand, minibody exhibited nearly 5-fold-higher peak uptake and took longer to clear from the circulation, resulting in images with good contrast after 18 h after injection. It was possible to image tumors as small as 3 mm in diameter with minibody because of the high sensitivity. Comparing the PET images obtained by 18F-FDG in the same animals, Sundaresen et al. have also established the superiority of a more specific immunoPET over metabolic PET imaging. In a previous study, Wu et al. performed similar studies with minibody using 64Cu as the tracer positron emitter (20). Although the decay-half-life of 64Cu (12.7 h) is well suited for molecules exhibiting clearance kinetics similar to those of diabodies or minibodies, the major limitation of the use of copper is its nonspecific accumulation in nontarget tissues, particularly the liver and kidneys. This results in images with a nonspecific background in these tissues and makes copper, as a tracer, ineffectual for imaging hepatic lesions and metastases. PET using 18F-FDG, which images glucose use and accumulation, also suffers from a similar limitation because of the high metabolic activity in the liver, leading to a significant accumulation and causing nonspecific background. Additionally, labeling of antibodies with radiometals involves modification of the molecules by coupling them chemically to chelating agents. This often leads to alteration of the binding characteristics of the antibodies. These difficulties are not encountered when the proteins are labeled with the isotopes of iodine. The decay half-life of 124I (4.2 d) allows sufficient time for quality assessment of the radiolabeled proteins before their administration. Because of the longer physical half-life of 124I and the prolonged background persistence of intact immunoglobulins, 124I-labeled monoclonal antibodies directed against several tumor antigens have been exploited for PET imaging. As mentioned earlier, it usually takes anywhere from 3 to 10 d to image the tumors. In a recent study, bispecific anti-MUC1/anti-Ga chelate antibodies were used for PET imaging of breast cancer (21). Though the shorter interval for optimal imaging (∼20 h) using the pretargeting approach was comparable to that observed using minibodies (19), the former approach involved injections with antibody, blocking agent, and tracer (86Ga) chelate, in contrast to the single injection of the 124I-minibody.

The results of Sundaresan et al. (19) have provided evidence that engineered antibody fragments labeled with 124I can serve as excellent tools for rapid imaging of tumors with high specificity and resolution using positron emitters as tracers. Such antigen-specific novel imaging agents can be of immense importance for visualizing tumors that exhibit low metabolic activity and, thus, cannot be visualized by conventional 18F-FDG PET. At present, many tumor-specific antigens have been identified and are being explored as targets for therapy and diagnosis. The best examples include carcinoembryonic antigen, MUC1, TAG-72, VEGF, EGFRvIII, and HER2/neu. Also, many monoclonal antibodies directed against such tumor antigens have been engineered and are available in formats similar to diabody and minibody. With the lower cost and increasing availability of PET scanners in most of the clinical settings, it is time to explore and use these engineered antibodies for the antigen-specific imaging of several classes of tumors (and micrometastases) with high spatial resolution. The compatibility of recombinant antibodies with appropriate positron-emitting tracers has set the stage for the transition of PET from a relatively less specific metabolic imaging modality to a more specific, antigen-based imaging technique.

Acknowledgments

The authors of this editorial are being supported by grant DE-FG02-95ER62024 from the U.S. Department of Energy.

Footnotes

  • Received Aug. 15, 2003; revision accepted Aug. 28, 2003.

    For correspondence or reprints contact: Surinder K. Batra, PhD, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, UNMC Eppley Cancer Center, University of Nebraska Medical Center, 984525 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198-4525.

    E-mail: sbatra{at}unmc.edu

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    Glennie MJ, van de Winkel JG. Renaissance of cancer therapeutic antibodies. Drug Discov Today. 2003;8:503–510.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    Esteban JM, Colcher D, Sugarbaker P, et al. Quantitative and qualitative aspects of radiolocalization in colon cancer patients of intravenously administered MAb B72.3. Int J Cancer. 1987;39:50–59.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. ↵
    Reilly RM, Sandhu J, Alvarez-Diez TM, et al. Problems of delivery of monoclonal antibodies: pharmaceutical and pharmacokinetic solutions. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1995;28:126–142.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. ↵
    Batra SK, Jain M, Wittel UA, et al. Pharmacokinetics and biodistribution of genetically engineered antibodies. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2002;13:603–608.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    Todorovska A, Roovers RC, Dolezal O, et al. Design and application of diabodies, triabodies and tetrabodies for cancer targeting. J Immunol Methods. 2001;248:47–66.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    Goel A, Baranowska-Kortylewicz J, Hinrichs SH, et al. 99mTc-labeled divalent and tetravalent CC49 single-chain Fv’s: novel imaging agents for rapid in vivo localization of human colon carcinoma. J Nucl Med. 2001;42:1519–1527.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    Goel A, Colcher D, Baranowska-Kortylewicz J, et al. Genetically engineered tetravalent single-chain Fv of the pancarcinoma monoclonal antibody CC49: improved biodistribution and potential for therapeutic application. Cancer Res. 2000;60:6964–6971.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    Wu AM, Yazaki PJ. Designer genes: recombinant antibody fragments for biological imaging. Q J Nucl Med. 2000;44:268–283.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  9. ↵
    Carmichael JA, Power BE, Garrett TP, et al. The crystal structure of an anti-CEA scFv diabody assembled from T84.66 scFvs in V(L)-to-V(H) orientation: implications for diabody flexibility. J Mol Biol. 2003;326:341–351.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    Hu S, Shively L, Raubitschek A, et al. Minibody: a novel engineered anti-carcinoembryonic antigen antibody fragment (single-chain Fv-CH3) which exhibits rapid, high-level targeting of xenografts. Cancer Res. 1996;56:3055–3061.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    Yazaki PJ, Wu AM. Construction and characterization of minibodies for imaging and therapy of colorectal carcinomas. Methods Mol Biol. 2003;207:351–364.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  12. ↵
    Gambhir SS. Molecular imaging of cancer with positron emission tomography. Nat Rev Cancer. 2002;2:683–693.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    Bakir MA, Eccles S, Babich JW, et al. c-erbB2 protein overexpression in breast cancer as a target for PET using iodine-124-labeled monoclonal antibodies. J Nucl Med. 1992;33:2154–2160.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. Lee FT, Hall C, Rigopoulos A, et al. Immuno-PET of human colon xenograft-bearing BALB/c nude mice using 124I-CDR-grafted humanized A33 monoclonal antibody. J Nucl Med. 2001;42:764–769.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    Rubin SC, Kairemo KJ, Brownell AL, et al. High-resolution positron emission tomography of human ovarian cancer in nude rats using 124I-labeled monoclonal antibodies. Gynecol Oncol. 1993;48:61–67.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    Wilson CB, Snook DE, Dhokia B, et al. Quantitative measurement of monoclonal antibody distribution and blood flow using positron emission tomography and 124-iodine in patients with breast cancer. Int J Cancer. 1991;47:344–347.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  17. ↵
    Collingridge DR, Carroll VA, Glaser M, et al. The development of [(124)I]iodinated-VG76e: a novel tracer for imaging vascular endothelial growth factor in vivo using positron emission tomography. Cancer Res. 2002;62:5912–5919.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    Jayson GC, Zweit J, Jackson A, et al. Molecular imaging and biological evaluation of HuMV833 anti-VEGF antibody: implications for trial design of antiangiogenic antibodies. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002;94:1484–1493.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    Sundaresan G, Yazaki PJ, Shively JE, et al. 124I-Labeled engineered anti-CEA minibodies and diabodies allow high-contrast, antigen-specific small-animal PET imaging of xenografts in athymic mice. J Nucl Med. 2003;44:1962–1969.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    Wu AM, Yazaki PJ, Tsai S, et al. High-resolution microPET imaging of carcinoembryonic antigen-positive xenografts by using a copper-64-labeled engineered antibody fragment. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97:8495–8500.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    Schuhmacher J, Kaul S, Klivenyi G, et al. Immunoscintigraphy with positron emission tomography: gallium-68 chelate imaging of breast cancer pretargeted with bispecific anti-MUC1/anti-Ga chelate antibodies. Cancer Res. 2001;61:3712–3717.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 44, Issue 12
December 1, 2003
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Genetically Engineered Antibody Fragments and PET Imaging: A New Era of Radioimmunodiagnosis
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Genetically Engineered Antibody Fragments and PET Imaging: A New Era of Radioimmunodiagnosis
Maneesh Jain, Surinder K. Batra
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Dec 2003, 44 (12) 1970-1972;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Genetically Engineered Antibody Fragments and PET Imaging: A New Era of Radioimmunodiagnosis
Maneesh Jain, Surinder K. Batra
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Dec 2003, 44 (12) 1970-1972;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Immuno-PET: A Navigator in Monoclonal Antibody Development and Applications
  • Radiolabeled Small-Molecule Ligands for Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen: In vivo Imaging in Experimental Models of Prostate Cancer
  • Quantitative Immuno-Positron Emission Tomography Imaging of HER2-Positive Tumor Xenografts with an Iodine-124 Labeled Anti-HER2 Diabody
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Cellular Origin and Molecular Mechanisms of 18F-FDG Uptake: Is There a Contribution of the Endothelium?
  • Can Molecular Imaging Predict In-Stent Restenosis?
  • Transport of 99mTc-MAG3 via Rat Renal Organic Anion
Show more Invited Commentary

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire