Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
OtherLetters to the Editor

An Alternative to Kinevac

Martin P. Jacobs and Charles D. Peterson
Journal of Nuclear Medicine December 2002, 43 (12) 1727;
Martin P. Jacobs
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Charles D. Peterson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

TO THE EDITOR:

Our referring physicians have found hepatobiliary scanning with gallbladder stimulation by Kinevac (sincalide for injection; Bracco Diagnostics Inc., Princeton, NJ) to be useful in the management of their patients. With Kinevac no longer available (1), we sought to develop an alternative procedure to provide similar information.

On the basis of our review of fatty-meal gallbladder stimulation studies using ultrasonography (2,3) and cholescintigraphy (4,5), we developed a protocol using a standardized oral fatty meal to serve as the stimulus for gallbladder contraction. At 60 min after the intravenous administration of 185 MBq (5 mCi) of 99mTc-mebrofenin, and assuming normal visualization of the gallbladder, we give the patient 90 mL (3 oz) of heavy whipping cream sweetened with a teaspoon of sugar. This quantity contains 30 g of fat. Imaging is performed immediately after ingestion of the meal and at 15, 60, and 75 min after ingestion. The ejection fraction is calculated using the peak (baseline or, rarely, 15 min) and trough (75 or, rarely, 60 min) counts. On the basis of our previous experience and for simplicity’s sake, background and decay correction are not performed.

We analyzed the data for the first 82 consecutive patients on whom the protocol could be successfully accomplished. The whipping cream was usually not given to patients with nasogastric tubes, and only 2 other patients could not tolerate the meal. When an ejection fraction of <40% was considered abnormal and 40%–49% was considered borderline, 11 (13%) of 82 patients had an abnormal ejection fraction and 21% had an abnormal or borderline ejection fraction. When the same parameters were used on our last 32 consecutive Kinevac-stimulated scans, 3 (9%) of 32 patients had abnormal ejection fractions and 5 (16%) of 32 had abnormal or borderline ejection fractions. For fatty-meal and Kinevac stimulation, the average ejection fractions of all patients were 70% and 71%, respectively.

We conclude that fatty-meal-stimulated cholescintigraphy is well tolerated and easy to perform and results in ejection fraction values similar to those obtained with Kinevac-stimulated cholescintigraphy. We are in the process of evaluating the clinical significance of the ejection fractions obtained with the fatty meal.

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    Unexpected shortfalls of two nuclear medicine pharmaceuticals. J Nucl Med. 2001;42(10):16N–19N.
    OpenUrl
  2. ↵
    Donald JJ, Fache JS, Buckley AR, Burhenne HJ. Gallbladder contractility: variation in normal subjects. AJR. 1991;157:753–756.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. ↵
    Kaplan GR, Charlesworth CH, Banarsee R. A Mars bar is not an adequate fatty meal: a comparison with Calogen. Clin Radiol. 1995;50:180–181.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. ↵
    Shafer RB, Marlette JM, Morley JE. The effects of Lipomul, CCK and TRH on gallbladder emptying. Clin Nucl Med. 1983;8:66–69.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. ↵
    Bobba VR, Krishnamurthy GT, Kingston E, Turner FE, Brown PH, Langrell K. Gallbladder dynamics induced by a fatty meal in normal subjects and patients with gallstones: concise communication. J Nucl Med. 1984;25:21–24.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 43, Issue 12
December 1, 2002
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
An Alternative to Kinevac
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
An Alternative to Kinevac
Martin P. Jacobs, Charles D. Peterson
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Dec 2002, 43 (12) 1727;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
An Alternative to Kinevac
Martin P. Jacobs, Charles D. Peterson
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Dec 2002, 43 (12) 1727;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • REFERENCES
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Business Model Beats Science and Logic: Dosimetry and Paucity of Its Use
  • Reply to “The Randomized, Phase 2 LuCAP Study”
  • Patient-Specific Dosimetry-Driven PRRT: Time to Move Forward!
Show more Letters to the Editor

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire