| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
|
FIGURE 1. Two-dimensional (A) and 3D (B) images of 3 subjects show range of results. Left pair represents better-than-average agreement between 2D and 3D scans of 73-kg male with major defect. Note, however, that septal wall is decreased and apex is noisier in 3D study. Middle pair is from 60-kg female and represents best agreement between 2D and 3D scans. Right pair is from 125-kg male. Both images are noisy but apex is decreased in 3D study.
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY | THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE |
