|
|
||||||||
CLINICAL INVESTIGATIONS |
Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: thyroid cancer FDG PET treatment strategy
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
However, the value of FDG PET for patient management is still unclear for patients with negative 131I scans and elevated hTg levels. Therefore, the aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the impact of FDG PET on both follow-up and treatment of these patients. Initial results have been published briefly elsewhere (2125).
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2.0 µIU/mL) under thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) stimulation (TSH
30 µIU/mL), including 4 patients who had FDG PET later, when hTg levels were negative under TSH suppression (TSH
0.1 µIU/mL). In spite of a positive 131I scan, additional tumor lesions were suspected in 7 patients with elevated hTg levels. In the remaining 9 patients, thyroid cancer tissue was suspected because of findings on other imaging modalities (e.g., sonography, radiography of the chest, CT), although hTg levels were not elevated. Patients were followed-up at least until a decision was made concerning treatment strategy. Therefore, the follow-up interval amounted to 164 mo.
PET Scanning
Patients fasted for at least 12 h before PET scanning to minimize blood insulin levels and glucose use by normal tissue (26). Whole-body emission images were acquired without attenuation correction 60 min after intravenous injection of 370 MBq FDG using an ECAT EXACT 47 (921) PET scanner (Siemens/CTI, Knoxville, TN) with an axial field of view of 16.2 cm.
Patients were placed in the PET gantry in a supine position with both arms at the side of the body. Images were acquired for 8 min per bed position covering the neck down to the upper waist. The second set of images was acquired from the waist down to the upper legs. Before the second acquisition, patients were asked to empty the bladder (to decrease urine activity) and to raise their arms (to minimize photon attenuation in the abdomen). Emission data were reconstructed by filtered backprojection using a Hanning filter with a cutoff frequency of 0.4 unit of the Nyquist frequency. Transaxial spatial resolution was
12-mm full width at half maximum. PET images were printed on x-ray films and since 1998 have been printed on transparency film (Helios 810; Sterling Diagnostic Imaging, Bad Homburg, Germany) using a linear gray scale with highest activity displayed in black (27). Note that FDG PET was performed under varying TSH levels.
Evaluation
To evaluate the results of FDG PET, suspicious findings were correlated with histology, cytology, 131I uptake, CT, MRI, and hTg level. Because FDG PET was performed twice or multiple times on 20 patients, FDG PET was evaluated on a patient basis rather than on a study basis or a lesion basis. Thus, for each patient, the FDG PET study selected for evaluation was the one that influenced further treatment of the patient most. FDG PET was then classified as:
Moreover, results of FDG PET were correlated with the respective hTg level of the patient at the time of the study. Intervals of <10, 1020, 2050, 50100, and >100 µg/L were chosen for serum hTg levels. Then, true-positive FDG PET studies at a certain hTg level were divided by the total number of patients investigated at that hTg level. The data for stimulated and suppressed TSH were analyzed separately.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Validation of FDG PET findings and treatment strategy chosen is summarized in Table 1 and Table 2, respectively. FDG PET findings were true-positive in 34 of 41 patients. Treatment was directly changed in 19 of 34 patients with true-positive PET studies: 18 patients had further surgery (Fig. 1), and 4 patients were referred for external irradiation, 3 of them (57-y-old, 74-y-old, and 72-y-old women) after incomplete removal of local recurrences (Fig. 2). One of these patients (38-y-old woman) who presented with local recurrence underwent surgery in the same location 2 y later (data not included in Tables 1 and 2). Ten patients received 131I therapy when a follow-up 131I scan revealed a positive finding in the location of the FDG-positive lesions. 131I therapy was performed on 2 of these patients after incomplete resection of distant metastases (65-y-old and 64-y-old men). Note that the number of treatments summarized in line 1 in Table 2 (n = 39) exceeds the number of patients (n = 34) because of the 5 patients who had surgery and either external irradiation or 131I therapy. FDG PET showed widespread disease in 7 patients (e.g., in case of multiple pulmonary metastases); thus, palliative treatment, rather than curative therapy, was initiated.
|
|
|
|
Negative FDG PET
A physiologic pattern of FDG uptake was found in 20 of 64 patients; thus, FDG PET was classified as negative. Findings in 5 of these patients were proven to be true-negative by negative hTg levels during further follow-up (Table 1); consequently, these patients did not receive any specific therapy (Table 2). FDG PET of the remaining 15 patients turned out to be false-negative (Table 1), as proven by CT or MRI (n = 3), 131I uptake (n = 1), or persistently elevated or rising hTg levels (n = 11). The 3 patients who presented with positive CT or MRI findings were referred for surgery, and recurrent or metastatic disease of differentiated thyroid cancer was proven by histology in 2 of them thus far. One patient who had a positive 131I scan within the follow-up received 131I therapy. No specific treatment could be offered to the remaining 11 patients (Table 2) because CT, MRI, or 131I scanning did not reveal the origin of persistently elevated or rising hTg levels.
FDG PET and hTg Levels
The fraction of true-positive FDG PET was correlated positively with increasing hTg levels (Table 3). FDG PET findings were true-positive in 11%, 50%, and 93% of patients with hTg levels of <10, 1020, and >100µg/L, respectively. The fraction of true-positive FDG PET was independent of TSH level (i.e., whether hTg measurement was performed under TSH stimulation or suppression).
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Imaging modalities that can be offered to a patient in this clinical setting (i.e., differentiated thyroid cancer, elevated hTg levels, and negative 131I scan) include sonography of neck and abdomen, chest radiography, bone scanning, CT, and MRI. Apart from these procedures, PET with FDG has been used for several years in these patients. One of the first reports on FDG PET in three patients suffering from differentiated thyroid cancer was published by Joensuu and Ahonen (4) almost 13 y ago. Since that time, several studies have shown the ability of FDG PET for the detection of 131I-negative lesions in differentiated thyroid cancer (6,1618). This was confirmed by some studies with larger numbers of patients (5,911,14,15). In the meantime, FDG PET has been accepted as a valuable imaging method for patients with differentiated thyroid cancer who present with elevated hTg levels and negative 131I scans. Consequently, an interdisciplinary consensus conference held in Germany in 1996 and 1997 on the use of FDG PET in oncology classified this as a "1a-indication," meaning that FDG PET has been shown to have "proven clinical value" in this clinical setting (19,20).
Although the value of FDG PET in the detection of thyroid cancer tissue is undeniable, the consequences of FDG-positive lesions in terms of clinical outcome are still under discussion. In general, FDG uptake and the concomitant loss of 131I uptake are known as a functional sign of dedifferentiation (4,9,17). Lietzenmayer et al. (28) observed that the intensity of FDG uptake is correlated with progressive dedifferentiation. They quantified FDG uptake by standard uptake values and found that an intense FDG uptake with the concomitant loss of 131I uptake indicates progress. Patients with an initially high standard uptake value had an unfavorable clinical course, whereas decreasing FDG uptake together with a persistent 131I uptake was associated with a good prognosis. As the pathophysiologic basis for these observations, a correlation of the expression of the glucose transporter GLUT 1 and the grade of dedifferentiation of thyroid cancer was described by Schönberger et al. (29). However, one specific patient may exhibit either 131I-avid lesions or FDG-avid lesions and even lesions that take up both radiotracers (1618). Accordingly, in this study FDG uptake was also associated with a more aggressive behavior of metastatic lesions. Three patients with FDG-positive cervical tumor tissue underwent external irradiation after incomplete surgical resection (Fig. 2). In addition, FDG PET revealed extensive disease in seven patients, which changed the treatment regimen from a curative to a more palliative approach. On the other hand, it is important to note that four patients who underwent further surgery on the basis of locoregional findings had no signs for recurrence except for a slightly elevated hTg level later on (Table 3). Therefore, although FDG uptake can be considered as a sign of dedifferentiation, it does not automatically predict an unfavorable prognosis. Moreover, 131I-avid tumor tissue developed in some patients in the same location as earlier FDG-positive findings and the patients received 131I therapy later on. This observation is important because it indicates that further 131I scans may be promising even if a finding is only FDG positive. Hence, FDG-positive recurrences and metastases may indicate dedifferentiated and more aggressive tumor tissue but do not automatically predict a worse outcome.
These conclusions are supported by observations relating to hTg production. Although thyroid cancer tissue has lost the ability of taking up and storing iodine, it is primarily able to produce hTg, which indicates only partial differentiation. In our patients, FDG PET was more promising when the hTg level rose as described by others (13,15,30). Accordingly, Sophocleous et al. (31) reported in 1997 that false-negative hTg levels under TSH stimulation are rare (i.e., in the range of 3%4% of patients with recurrences). The most probable explanation for this finding is the tumor mass itself: hTg production rises with an increasing number of tumor cells, and at a certain size the lesion will be detected as FDG positive. Similar observations have been made relating to 131I-avid tumor tissue. Arning et al. (32) found only a few patients with 131I-avid metastases and low hTg levels. The well-known observation that maximum hTg levels decrease after 131I therapy although 131I scans are negative indicates 131I-avid micrometastases, which are too small to be visualized by scintigraphy. Therefore, the ability to produce hTg is obviously maintained longer in the process of dedifferentiation than is the ability to take up 131I. This can be explained by the fact that the mechanisms necessary for iodine storage (i.e., iodination, iodization, and synthesis of hTg) are much more complex than is the synthesis of hTg alone.
We found that the fraction of true-positive FDG PET was correlated positively with increasing hTg levels (Table 3). FDG PET findings were true-positive in 11%, 50%, and 93% of patients with hTg levels of <10, 1020, and >100µg/L, respectively. This observation is in accordance with Lubin et al. (2), who reported that a negative 131I scan was seen predominantly when the hTg level was <10 µg/L under TSH suppression. In addition, the cutoff level for determination of hTg as elevated is estimated to be between 1 and 10 µg/L (33,34). Thus, our data indicate that FDG PET is worthwhile, especially at hTg levels of >10 µg/L.
| CONCLUSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
For correspondence or reprints contact: Karl H. Bohuslavizki, MD, PhD, Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Related articles in JNM:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. A. Johnson and M. E. Tublin Postoperative Surveillance of Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma: Rationale, Techniques, and Controversies Radiology, November 1, 2008; 249(2): 429 - 444. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. T. Kloos Approach to the Patient with a Positive Serum Thyroglobulin and a Negative Radioiodine Scan after Initial Therapy for Differentiated Thyroid Cancer J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., May 1, 2008; 93(5): 1519 - 1525. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. E. Finkelstein, P. W. Grigsby, B. A. Siegel, F. Dehdashti, J. F. Moley, and B. L. Hall Combined [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography and Computed Tomography (FDG-PET/CT) for Detection of Recurrent, 131I-Negative Thyroid Cancer Ann. Surg. Oncol., January 1, 2008; 15(1): 286 - 292. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Ito, K. Kato, M. Ikeda, S. Iwano, N. Makino, M. Tadokoro, S. Abe, S. Nakano, M. Nishino, T. Ishigaki, et al. Comparison of 18F-FDG PET and Bone Scintigraphy in Detection of Bone Metastases of Thyroid Cancer J. Nucl. Med., June 1, 2007; 48(6): 889 - 895. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Shammas, B. Degirmenci, J. M. Mountz, B. M. McCook, B. Branstetter, B. B. Bencherif, J. M. Joyce, S. E. Carty, H. A. Kuffner, and N. Avril 18F-FDG PET/CT in Patients with Suspected Recurrent or Metastatic Well-Differentiated Thyroid Cancer J. Nucl. Med., February 1, 2007; 48(2): 221 - 226. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. E. Juweid and B. D. Cheson Positron-Emission Tomography and Assessment of Cancer Therapy N. Engl. J. Med., February 2, 2006; 354(5): 496 - 507. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P J Ell The contribution of PET/CT to improved patient management Br. J. Radiol., January 1, 2006; 79(937): 32 - 36. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Ma, A. Kuang, J. Xie, and T. Ma Possible Explanations for Patients with Discordant Findings of Serum Thyroglobulin and 131I Whole-Body Scanning J. Nucl. Med., September 1, 2005; 46(9): 1473 - 1480. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. L. Mazzaferri Empirically Treating High Serum Thyroglobulin Levels J. Nucl. Med., July 1, 2005; 46(7): 1079 - 1088. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. J. Kelloff, J. M. Hoffman, B. Johnson, H. I. Scher, B. A. Siegel, E. Y. Cheng, B. D. Cheson, J. O'Shaughnessy, K. Z. Guyton, D. A. Mankoff, et al. Progress and Promise of FDG-PET Imaging for Cancer Patient Management and Oncologic Drug Development Clin. Cancer Res., April 15, 2005; 11(8): 2785 - 2808. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Pacak, G. Eisenhofer, and D. S. Goldstein Functional Imaging of Endocrine Tumors: Role of Positron Emission Tomography Endocr. Rev., August 1, 2004; 25(4): 568 - 580. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N Khan, N Oriuchi, T Higuchi, H Zhang, and K Endo PET in the follow-up of differentiated thyroid cancer Br. J. Radiol., October 1, 2003; 76(910): 690 - 695. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Mruck, A. Pfahlberg, T. Papadopoulos, C. Stremmel, and T. Kuwert Uptake of 201Tl into Primary Cell Cultures from Human Thyroid Tissue Is Multiplied by TSH J. Nucl. Med., February 1, 2002; 43(2): 145 - 152. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. A. Macapinlac Clinical Usefulness of FDG PET in Differentiated Thyroid Cancer J. Nucl. Med., January 1, 2001; 42(1): 77 - 78. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY | THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE |