JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH RSS TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


First published online June 13, 2008, 10.2967/jnumed.107.040915
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Data
Right arrow An erratum has been published
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JNM
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Steele, P. P.
Right arrow Articles by Koss, J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Steele, P. P.
Right arrow Articles by Koss, J. E.

Comparison of Simultaneous Dual-Isotope Multipinhole SPECT with Rotational SPECT in a Group of Patients with Coronary Artery Disease

Peter P. Steele, Dennis L. Kirch and John E. Koss

Western Cardiology Associates, Westminster, Colorado


Figure 1
View larger version (124K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 1.  (A) Picker Prism 3000XP is shown as modified for multipinhole cardiac SPECT perfusion imaging. System is shown set up for patient to be positioned feet-in so that 3 detectors will surround left anterior oblique position of heart. Detector 3 has been remounted between detectors 1 and 2, and all 3 detectors were remounted 90° from the original mounting configuration. (B) Close-up of all 3 detectors with pinhole collimators in place.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (90K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 2.  Short-axis reconstructions for multipinhole (A) and rotational (B) SPECT acquisitions performed on the same patient showing inferior-lateral defect. Resting images are shown above stress images. Arrows point to artifact caused by patient motion, which occurred during acquisition of resting rotational SPECT images. This type of motion artifact is eliminated by simultaneous multipinhole SPECT technique.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (87K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 3.  Short-axis reconstructions for multipinhole (A) and rotational (B) SPECT acquisitions performed on patient with anterior flow difference. Resting images are shown above stress images. Images from 2 modalities are visually and quantatively similar. (See curves in Fig. 4.) Same areas of anterior flow difference are identified in both sets of images, but images in A show larger stress defect than rotational SPECT results in B.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 4.  CPC of short-axis images shown in Figure 3 for multipinhole (A) and rotational (B) SPECT reconstructions. Same anterior regions of flow difference are identified in both sets of curves, but multipinhole analysis shows greater flow differentiation (open arrows) than rotational analysis (closed arrows). SUP = superior; ANT = anterior; INF = inferior; POS = posterior.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 5.  CPC of short-axis slices from multipinhole (A) and rotational (B) SPECT acquisitions on patient with anterior infarct. Low-level flow differences as seen in region of infarct in multipinhole study (open arrows) are also demonstrated, but to lesser extent, in rotational study (closed arrows). SUP = superior; ANT = anterior; INF = inferior; POS = posterior.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 6.  CPC of short-axis slices from multipinhole (A) and rotational (B) SPECT acquisitions on patient with inferior defect. Curves for both A and B analyses show inferior flow differences (open arrows), which are consistent with patient's history. Rotational study also shows flow differences in superior apical region (solid arrows), which are inconsistent with location of any known obstructions. SUP = superior; ANT = anterior; INF = inferior; POS = posterior.

 

Figure 7
View larger version (108K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 7.  Short-axis reconstructions from multipinhole SPECT MPI demonstrating DPAC. (A) Resting images using 99mTc tetrofosmin. (B) Simultaneously acquired 201Tl stress reconstructions combining both peaks of 201Tl. (C and D) Separate reconstructions for lower peak (C) and upper peak (D) of 201Tl. Attenuation-compensated stress images in B visually compare better to resting images in A than stress images from either of 2 individual thallium peaks shown in C and D.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH RSS TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2008 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.